MEPs clash with the EU Commission over anti-money laundering blacklist
The EU's 'blacklist' hasn't aligned with that of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF)—the global watchdog on money laundering and terrorist financing—for over a year and a half. According to EU Commissioner for Financial Services, Maria Luis Albuquerque, this misalignment has created 'significant irritants with international partners'.
'If we are perceived as not respecting the outcomes of the process, this risks undermining our ability in the future to influence technical assessments and secure the commitments we would like to see from other jurisdictions,' argued Albuquerque during a committee meeting in the European Parliament on Monday.
Earlier this month, the Commission updated its list, adding countries such as Algeria, Angola, Kenya, Monaco, and Venezuela. Meanwhile, several jurisdictions—including Barbados, Gibraltar, Panama, and the United Arab Emirates—were removed.
However, this list cannot enter into force without the scrutiny and assent of both the European Parliament and the Council – and the Commission has not yet convinced MEPs to support it.
In a resolution adopted in April 2024, MEPs opposed the Commission's decision to delist Gibraltar, United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Panama, citing compelling evidence that these jurisdictions have failed to take sufficient steps to address—or even actively facilitate—the circumvention of sanctions against Russia. These sanctions include targeted financial measures imposed in response to Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine.
Parliament has concerns delisted countries may circumvent Russia sanctions
'Those countries may act as platforms for circumvention of sanctions for Union entities, directly or indirectly, thus undermining the Union's efforts in stopping the Russian war machine,' the resolution stated.
Speaking to a half-empty room at the EU Parliament in Brussels, from which political groups such as Renew Europe, the European Sovereign Nations (ESN) and The Left were absent, Albuquerque argued that their concerns had been addressed and that these jurisdictions had made "tangible progress".
Those present publicly aired their frustration with the process.
'It doesn't seem to me that the possibility to engage in dialogue with the European Parliament was utilized to the extent that corresponds to very strong involvement of the Parliament in this matter,' MEP Luděk Niedermayer (European People's Party/Czechia) said.
The Commissioner herself expressed her concerns about the current impasse. 'The fact that countries listed by the FATF are still not listed by the EU exposes the EU's financial system to vulnerabilities and can create loopholes that need to be addressed,' she said.
The Portuguese Commissioner also pointed out that the absence of an updated European list causes confusion and legal uncertainty for entities that must apply anti-money laundering rules.
'EU operators have to comply with divergent lists which increase their compliance burden, adds additional costs and impacts their global competitiveness,' Albuquerque added.
Yet neither the diplomatic argument over negotiations with the UAE nor the concerns over reputational and economic risks shielded the Commissioner from a combative exchange with MEPs. Among the most vocal critics was German Socialist Birgit Sippel, who accused the Commission of merely replicating FATF assessments.
'I have the impression that more or less the Commission is simply copy-pasting the reports and decisions from the FATF, and to be honest, simply mentioning visits and strategic dialogues are not that much convincing,' Sippel said.
The Commissioner countered that the blacklist was the product of over a year of 'intense work', based not only on FATF findings but also on bilateral dialogues and on-site visits to the third countries concerned.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
5 hours ago
- Euronews
Greece and Poland demand reparations from Germany for World War II
The opening of the photographic exhibition "Legacy of War—The losses of Poland and Greece: A March Towards Memory and Justice" opened on Tuesday at the European Parliament in Brussels. The event was hosted by Greek MEP Emmanouil Fragkos and Polish MEP Arkadiusz Murlancik, both members of the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) political group. The exhibition, with photographs depicting the invasion, occupation and the resistance, aims to recall the extent of the devastation suffered by Poland and Greece at the hands of Nazi Germany during World War II, pointing out the evidence that the two states must use in their legal fight for reparations. A debate on "War Crimes and Reparation - Safeguarding the Rule of Law by Addressing Past Injustice" was held with the participation of experts from Greece, Poland, and Italy and members of the European Parliament. In his statement, Fragkos spoke about Greece's long-standing identification with just demands, noting the importance of justice in order to close the wounds of World War II. He referred to the crimes committed by the Nazis against the Greeks and the country's infrastructure, which condemned Greece to poverty, noting that the claim for reparations is a legally active demand. His Polish counterpart spoke about transitional justice, the rule of law and the importance of international responsibility in addressing historical crimes and ensuring accountability. Unfortunately, German MEPs did not attend the event, despite being invited. Only the first step in renewed efforts to achieve compensation On the Polish side, the organiser was ECR MEP Arkadiusz Mularczyk. Previously, as deputy foreign minister and Polish MP, he supervised the preparation of a special report on war reparations: "We spent long months on the work, trying to estimate something that is almost impossible to value. How to value the long and short-term losses caused by the destruction of Poland, of its infrastructure, its monuments, its economy, its potential? Losses in people, those murdered, but also those maimed physically and psychologically, the destruction of the Polish elite?" So far, the topic is ignored by Germany, which even claims that it is a closed issue. However, there are countries where compensation processes are still going on even now, although it is done in an unusual way. In Italy, for example, where Italian lawyers file lawsuits on behalf of victims, victims' families and win compensation, the Italian state pays. MEPs reiterate that the conference and exhibition are only the first step on a long road. The next ones will be the establishment of a special intergroup on war reparations from Germany and, within this framework, cooperation between the affected countries and legislative acts - such as resolutions of the European Parliament, for example.
Local France
6 hours ago
- Local France
France and Spain lead efforts to tax private jets
The two European nations – along with Kenya, Benin, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Barbados plus Antigua and Barbuda – launched a coalition at a UN conference on development financing in Seville to tighten up taxation of the aviation sector, including the prospect of taxes on private jets and passengers travelling in business or first class. Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said the coalition would 'work toward a greater contribution from the aviation sector' to improve 'climate resilience'. In a statement, France's Élysée palace confirmed this initiative, specifying that it aims to 'improve the mobilisation of national revenues in developing countries and support international solidarity,' with particular emphasis on adapting to climate change. Advertisement The coalition's goal is 'to increase the number of countries applying taxes on airline tickets, including for luxury travel, and to tax private jets based on best practices,' the Élysée's statement continued, while ensuring 'further progress in countries that already have such levies.' The announcement was welcomed by Greenpeace, which urged 'all countries to join and implement the commitments' made by this 'new solidarity coalition' in time for COP30, which will be held in November in Belem, Brazil. 'Flying is the most elitist and polluting form of travel, so this is an important step toward ensuring heavy users of this undertaxed sector pay their fair share,' insisted Rebecca Newsom, head of Greenpeace's 'Stop Drilling, Start Paying' campaign. At COP28 in 2023, Barbados, France, and Kenya launched a working group, with the support of the European Commission, to consider so-called 'global solidarity' levies on polluting sectors such as fossil fuels and aviation. This group, which has since worked on the introduction of specific taxes on private jets and airline tickets, estimated in a report published on June 19th that these measures could 'generate substantial revenues' of up to €187 billion. France already levies an 'eco tax' on airline tickets , which is charged on a sliding scale with higher rates for first class tickets and private jets.
Fashion Network
7 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Green claims: confusion surrounds the EU's anti-greenwashing directive
The EU's 'Green Claim' directive is designed to regulate the sustainability claims made by brands and combat greenwashing. But as the parliamentary debate under way since January was about to end, the European Commission has withdrawn its support for the text. Before specifying its position. After U-turns on the duty of vigilance directive and later on the need to display the environmental score on apparel products, the EU's tendency to back down on its green deal has once again been confirmed. This time, it all started on June 18, with a request from the European People's Party (EPP) to drop the so-called 'Green Claim' directive. The directive originally targeted vague marketing expressions such as 'green product', 'biodegradable', 'climate-neutral' and '100% natural', aiming to force brands to demonstrate the veracity of their sustainability claims. The European Council stated its position on it a year ago, and its approval was eagerly awaited by brands, NGOs and industry associations, including European textile industry association Euratex. On Friday June 20, it came as a surprise when a European Commission representative confirmed, following the EPP's request, its 'intention to withdraw its proposals' for defining the terms associated with sustainability. It was enough to stop short the debate on the directive, which had begun in 2023, despite the fact that a final meeting was scheduled for June 23 between the Commission, the Council and the European Parliament. A few hours later, the EU Commission clarified its position, saying it is still willing to push forward the directive, but not if it incorporates provisions for micro-companies, as was the case in the text's last draft. There are 30 million such companies active in Europe. This back and forth is consistent with the simplification drive the European Commission has been pushing since January. A politically motivated drive that notably led to a first package of comprehensive measures being presented in March. Measures which included a watering down of the duty of vigilance directive, and which have enraged NGOs while also not convincing companies and retailers.
