
The Resistance Front
Security agencies in Kashmir see the TRF as an offshoot of the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). The nomenclature, many security experts in Kashmir believe, was aimed at presenting itself as a 'new-age ideological force' and distancing itself from other Islamist groups such as al-Qaeda and Jaish-e-Muhammad.
The TRF emerged on the militancy landscape of Jammu and Kashmir after the Centre abrogated the provisions of Article 370 in 2019. Kashmir has seen around two dozen militant outfits active since the militancy started in the 1990s. Many smaller groups have eventually vanished from the scene. The TRF came into the crosshairs of the security agencies in April 2020 when a group of terrorists engaged security forces in a firefight for four days close to the Line of Control (LoC) in Kupwara's Keran Sector in snow-filled mountain passes. The killing of five elite commandos of the Army in extreme weather conditions in Keran signalled the changing tack and tactics of terrorists in Kashmir.
One senior police official said the major shift the TRF brought was a higher level of training, online propaganda and high-end weaponry and body cameras to film the attacks live and stream them online. The outfit operates on social media platforms 'to promote their cause and lure unemployed youth to carry out terror activities', according to the National Investigation Agency's (NIA) probe.
Urban militancy
Around 200 TRF cadres have been killed since 2019 in Kashmir. At present, the TRF, which was mandated by its handlers across the border to revive militancy in urban pockets in Kashmir, remains a faceless outfit. The killing of Muhammad Abbas Sheikh, a resident of Kulgam, in 2021 and Basit Dar, also from Kulgam, in May 2024 left the outfit faceless. According to the police records, Sheikh, who was active since 1996, was the brain behind the TRF's actions and revival of militancy in Srinagar. Dar, who joined the TRF in 2021, was involved in 18 FIRs before being killed in Kulgam in a chance encounter, officials said.
Departing from attacking security forces' patrols and installations, the TRF in 2021 started a series of targeted killings of the members of minorities, including a well-known chemist, Makhan Lal Pandita, and a school principal, Supinder Kaur. Several non-local labourers were targeted by the group. These killings resulted in mass migration of Kashmiri Pandits from the Kashmir Valley that year.
So far, the NIA has zeroed in on a Pakistani national Habibullah Malik alias Sajid Jutt, from Kasur district in Pakistan's Punjab as the TRF's main handler. Malik is seen as the brain behind the expansion of the TRF operations from the Kashmir Valley into the Pir Panjal Valley in the Jammu region. He is accused of 'motivating vulnerable Kashmiri youth to join the TRF for carrying out terrorist activities in J&K'.
The TRF first attributed the attack on tourists in Pahalgam to the increasing number of domicile certificates issued to outsiders in J&K. With pressure mounting globally over the massacre, the TRF in an online statement distanced itself from the attack, saying the outfit 'unequivocally denies any involvement in the Pahalgam incident'. 'Any attribution of this act to the TRF is false, hasty, and part of an orchestrated campaign to malign the Kashmiri resistance'. It termed the release of the earlier statement online as 'a result of a coordinated cyber intrusion'.
As security agencies claim the TRF support structure stands dismantled in the Kashmir Valley, the latest attack only shows how delicate peace remains in Kashmir with challenges being posed by such organisations as the TRF with new tactics and targets.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
19 minutes ago
- Hans India
'Kaan Kholke Sun Le...' No third-party role in Pak ceasefire: EAM in RS
New Delhi: External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Wednesday clarified that there was no phone call between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump between April 22, the day the Pahalgam terror attack took place, and June 16. "I want to tell them (Opposition), woh kaan kholke sun le... (listen carefully) From April 22 to June 16, where wasn't one phone call between President Trump and PM Modi," Jaishankar said in the Rajya Sabha. The minister's remarks came amid Opposition's questions to the government on Donald Trump claiming credit for the ceasefire in the India-Pakistan military conflict. Jaishankar also reiterated that there was no third-party intervention in the India-Pak ceasefire, and that all issues with Pakistan will be dealt with bilaterally. The government has time and again rejected Trump's assertion that a mediation from the United States led to the cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan back in May. "...When Operation Sindoor commenced, a number of countries were in touch with us to see how serious the situation was and how long it would go... We gave the same message to all the countries... that we were not open to any mediation," Jaishankar said. He clarified that all countries which got in touch with India were informed that a fight with Pakistan would continue until a request through the channel of the DGMO in Pakistan. "If that fighting was to stop, Pakistan must make a request. And that request could only come through the channel of the DGMO...," Jaishankar added. Repeating what PM Modi said on Tuesday, Jaishankar said US Vice President JD Vance called on May 9, warning that Pakistan was planning a huge attack on India. To this, PM Modi replied that India's response would be appropriate, he said. ''Hum goli ka jawab gole se denge (We will respond to bullets with missiles)',' the Prime Minister had said earlier. Speaking about the Pahalgam attack that killed 26 civilians, Jaishankar noted that that incident was "absolutely unacceptable" and crossed India's "red line". "When the Pahalgam attack happened on April 22, it was a shocking attack for a variety of manner in which people were killed in front of their families, the fact that their faith was asked before killing them, the intent of destroying the economy of Jammu and Kashmir, which had returned to normalcy and prosperity after the end of Article 370. All of this angered the country," he said.


Mint
19 minutes ago
- Mint
Malegaon Blast verdict today after 17 years of legal proceedings; ex-MP Pragya Thakur among accused
Nearly 17 years after a deadly blast claimed six lives and left more than 100 injured in Maharashtra's communally sensitive Malegaon town, a special NIA court is expected to pronounce its verdict in the case on Thursday, July 31. The trial, which started in 2018, got over on April 19, 2025, however. the case was reserved for judgement. BJP leader and former MP Pragya Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit were among the seven accused who faced trial in the case for offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Indian Penal Code. The other acuused include - Major (retired) Ramesh Upadhyay, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhakar Dwivedi, Sudhakar Chaturvedi and Sameer Kulkarni. The National Investigation Agency (NIA), which conducted the probe into the case, has sought "commensurate punishment" for the accused. During its final arguments, the NIA told the court that the Malegaon blast — which occurred in a town with a significant Muslim population — was orchestrated by the conspirators to terrorise a section of Muslim community, disrupt essential services, create communal tensions. The NIA based its finding on "relevant, admissible, cogent, trustworthy, wholly reliable and proved evidence" and "conclusively and cogently" established the crucial circumstances to form a complete chain of events. The blast took place during the holy month of Ramzan, just before the Navratri festival, the NIA pointed out, claiming the intention of the accused was to strike terror in a section of the Muslim community. The charges comprised UAPA sections 16 (committing terrorist act) and 18 (conspiring to commit terrorist act) and various IPC sections, including 120 (b) (criminal conspiracy), 302 (murder), 307 (attempt to murder), 324 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 153 (a) (promoting enmity between two religious groups). During the trial, the prosecution presented 323 witnesses, of whom 37 turned hostile. Thakur, in her final statement, submitted that her implication in the case is "totally illegal, bad in law and contrary to the law of the land and with malafide intention and ulterior motive". Purohit has submitted that "there is no material evidence" linking him to the alleged offence."The prosecution's case rests on fabricated and contradictory witness statements that are devoid of any independent corroboration and fail to meet the evidentiary threshold required in law," his final arguments claimed. Six persons were killed and more than 100 injured when an explosive device strapped to a motorcycle went off near a mosque in the town, located about 200 km from Mumbai, on September 29, 2008. The case was initially probed by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) before being transferred to the NIA in 2011. (With inputs from agencies)


India Today
19 minutes ago
- India Today
2008 Malegaon blast case verdict today, court to decide fate of Pragya Thakur
A special court in Mumbai will deliver its much-awaited verdict on Thursday in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, marking the culmination of nearly 17 years of investigation, legal twists, and prolonged Judge AK Lahoti, who has extensively heard arguments from both the prosecution and defence, will pronounce the judgment in the case in which former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit are among the case pertains to the September 29, 2008 blast at Bhiku Chowk in Malegaon, a town with a sizeable Muslim population, which claimed six lives and left 101 injured. The explosion, caused by an IED strapped to a two-wheeler, was initially investigated by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) before being handed over to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in from Sadhvi Pragya and Purohit, five other accused faced trial - Major (retired) Ramesh Upadhyay, Sudhakar Chaturvedi, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhakar Dhar Dwivedi alias Shankaracharya, and Sameer Pragya was arrested in October 2008 and is now out on bail. The motorcycle used in the blast was registered in her Public Prosecutor Avinash Rasal, appearing for the NIA, relied on a range of evidence, including call data records, intercepted phone calls, and material allegedly recovered from the to the prosecution's argument was the claim that RDX was found at Chaturvedi's residence in Deolali, where the bomb was allegedly assembled under the direction of Lt Colonel submitted that the prosecution had presented "relevant, admissible, cogent, trustworthy, wholly reliable and proven evidence" to establish a complete chain of events pointing to the involvement of the defence strongly contested the prosecution's Pragya's counsel, JP Mishra, questioned the identification of the motorcycle used in the blast. He argued that the chassis was too damaged to confirm Col Purohit's lawyer, Viral Babar, submitted that his client was falsely implicated, allegedly kidnapped and tortured, and that other military witnesses had been coerced. Babar also highlighted the lack of a Section 65B certificate for electronic call data records, rendering them inadmissible under the Indian Evidence defence for Chaturvedi and Dwivedi alleged planting of evidence and procedural Rahirkar, accused of funding the alleged conspiracy under the banner of Abhinav Bharat, claimed he was falsely trial formally began in December 2018. Of the 323 witnesses examined, 39 turned hostile and 26 died before testifying. The NIA dropped MCOCA charges but continued the trial under UAPA, IPC, and the Explosive Substances Act. The judgment was reserved on April 19.- Ends