Ludhiana MC commissioner served contempt notice by NGT over green belt encroachment
The tribunal warned that if the commissioner fails to justify the non-compliance, he may face prosecution under Section 26 of the NGT Act, 2010. The bench also said that arrest and detention in civil prison and imposition of environmental compensation on the MC could be considered for the damage caused due to encroachments and delay in remediation.
PAC members Kapil Arora and Vikas Arora said they had initially filed a case highlighting illegal construction by the MC on the green belt of Leisure Valley in Sarabha Nagar, including a Zone-D extension office and a scrap yard. They also raised the issue of encroachments in Model Town Extension. In July, the Tribunal had directed the commissioner to restore the green belt areas and submit a compliance report.
However, the residents' body alleged that only partial demolition took place and the report submitted was incomplete, leading the bench to reopen the case. On January 13 this year, the tribunal had already warned that failure to implement its orders was punishable under the law and could lead to coercive action.
PAC also informed that another contempt petition is pending before the tribunal against the construction of a library on park land at Dholewal Chowk, and orders in that case are awaited.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
NGT issues notices on alleged plastic waste violations by tobacco brands
The National Green Tribunal ( NGT ) issued notice on a plea from The Citizens Foundation, which alleges widespread non-compliance with the Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016, by manufacturers of gutkha, pan masala, and tobacco products. The petition claims that banned plastic packaging materials are still being used and calls for strict enforcement of existing regulations. This includes the closure of units violating the rules and the recovery of environmental compensation. A judicial bench led by Justice Prakash Shrivastava and Expert Member Dr. A. Senthil Vel has issued notices to relevant authorities, including the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC), seeking their responses. Counsel for the petitioner pointed out that, despite the CPCB's earlier directives, issued on October 22, 2021, under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, to 25 manufacturers to halt operations unless they adopted eco-friendly packaging, these directives remain unimplemented. The CPCB had instructed the defaulting companies to submit a timeline for switching to sustainable materials and to pay Environmental Compensation (EC) with interest for any delays. The plea highlights violations of Rules 4(f) and 4(i) of the 2016 Rules, which prohibit the use of plastic sachets and specific polymers in packaging gutkha and related products. CPCB's previous reports suggested that such non-compliance could result in stern penalties, including seizure of goods, shutting down of factories, and levies of Rs 5,000 per ton of plastic used. Repeat offences could attract additional fines of up to Rs 20,000 per ton. The applicant also cited a CPCB report from January 2021, which outlines enforcement under the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regime. According to this, delayed EC payments could be penalised with annual interest ranging from 12 per cent to 24 per cent. Delays exceeding three months could lead to factory closures and criminal prosecution under Section 15(1) of the Environment Protection Act. Recognising the gravity of the environmental concerns raised, the NGT has scheduled the next hearing for September 26, 2025. The applicant must serve notices on the remaining respondents and file an affidavit of service one week prior to the scheduled date, as stated by the Tribunal.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
a day ago
- Business Standard
NGT issues notices on alleged plastic waste violations by tobacco brands
The National Green Tribunal (NGT) issued notice on a plea from The Citizens Foundation, which alleges widespread non-compliance with the Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016, by manufacturers of gutkha, pan masala, and tobacco products. The petition claims that banned plastic packaging materials are still being used and calls for strict enforcement of existing regulations. This includes the closure of units violating the rules and the recovery of environmental compensation. A judicial bench led by Justice Prakash Shrivastava and Expert Member Dr. A. Senthil Vel has issued notices to relevant authorities, including the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC), seeking their responses. Counsel for the petitioner pointed out that, despite the CPCB's earlier directives, issued on October 22, 2021, under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, to 25 manufacturers to halt operations unless they adopted eco-friendly packaging, these directives remain unimplemented. The CPCB had instructed the defaulting companies to submit a timeline for switching to sustainable materials and to pay Environmental Compensation (EC) with interest for any delays. The plea highlights violations of Rules 4(f) and 4(i) of the 2016 Rules, which prohibit the use of plastic sachets and specific polymers in packaging gutkha and related products. CPCB's previous reports suggested that such non-compliance could result in stern penalties, including seizure of goods, shutting down of factories, and levies of Rs 5,000 per ton of plastic used. Repeat offences could attract additional fines of up to Rs 20,000 per ton. The applicant also cited a CPCB report from January 2021, which outlines enforcement under the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regime. According to this, delayed EC payments could be penalised with annual interest ranging from 12 per cent to 24 per cent. Delays exceeding three months could lead to factory closures and criminal prosecution under Section 15(1) of the Environment Protection Act. Recognising the gravity of the environmental concerns raised, the NGT has scheduled the next hearing for September 26, 2025. The applicant must serve notices on the remaining respondents and file an affidavit of service one week prior to the scheduled date, as stated by the Tribunal.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
MC submits ATR in parking scam
Chandigarh: The Chandigarh municipal corporation (MCC) has submitted a detailed action taken report (ATR) to the UT administration in a high-stakes financial default case involving the city's paid parking contractor. The report, which will be forwarded to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), outlines a series of criminal and departmental actions — including four arrests — following a staggering Rs 7.26 crore default in license fees and Rs 16 lakh in unpaid stamp duty. The MC has also informed that lapses were found on the part of the then additional municipal commissioner, an HCS officer. The CBI has asked for permission from the competent authority under the Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA). The MC said for the recovery of the licence fee, the case is ongoing in the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The CAG also flagged this financial loss in its audit para. The MC stated, "This office issued prosecution sanction in respect of Monil Chauhan, superintendent Gr II, MC, Chandigarh, as requested by the CBI. It is also stated that the Department of Personnel, Chandigarh Administration, forwarded the copy of a letter received from the Department of Personnel Chief Secretary's Office, Govt of Haryana, to supply the detailed para-wise comments along with specific recommendations on the letter issued by the Central Bureau of Investigation, Govt of India, Anti-Corruption Branch, Sector 30-A, Chandigarh. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like You will never turn off your computer again. Undo It has been intimated that a case was registered in CBI, ACB, Chandigarh, under section 120/B read with 420 IPC against (i) Ram Sunder Prasad Singh, sole proprietor of M/s Ram Sunder Prasad Singh, (ii) M/s Pashchatya Entertainment (P) Ltd, (iii) Sanjay Sharma, Director of M/s Pashchatya Entertainment (P) Limited, (iv) Vikas Pandey, authorised signatory of M/s Pashchatya Entertainment (P) Limited, and unknown public servant on the basis of a complaint submitted by Sachin Singh, Sub Inspector, CBI, ACB, who conducted the Preliminary Enquiry in the matter." The reply further reads, "It is further mentioned in the said letter that in the said case, investigation conducted so far revealed certain issues/lapses with regard to the execution of the lease deed by the two private contractors on the part of SK Jain, the then Additional Commissioner, MC, Chandigarh. The CBI authorities requested that permission under section 17-A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as amended in 2018), in respect of the said officer be obtained from the competent authority and conveyed to their office for conducting an investigation with regard to the role of these officers/officials. "
