
When Val Kilmer Was Batman and the '90s Were Their Most '90s
In June 1995 a pop confection hit thousands of movie screens. It seemed to embody what both boosters and critics have identified as that decade's end-of-history nonchalance. It was, of all things, a Batman movie. And holding it together, the sturdy straight man surrounded by abject goofiness, was Val Kilmer, the actor who died at the age of 65 on Tuesday.
'Batman Forever' was the third movie in a franchise kicked off in 1989 by the director Tim Burton's brooding 'Batman.' Starring Michael Keaton in the title role and Jack Nicholson as the Joker, 'Batman' was, by the standards of the time, dark for a comic-book flick.
Burton's and Keaton's follow-up, 'Batman Returns' (1992), failed to repeat the original's box-office success. So a new director, Joel Schumacher, was brought in expressly to make what one journalist termed a 'Batman Lite.' Schumacher was a fan of Kilmer's portrayal of Doc Holliday in the 1993 western 'Tombstone' and tapped him as his leading man.
This was not Burton's Batman. 'There's not much to contemplate here,' the critic Janet Maslin wrote in The New York Times, 'beyond the spectacle of gimmicky props and the kitsch of good actors (all of whom have lately done better work elsewhere) dressed for a red-hot Halloween.'
Schumacher favored showy camera angles and a garish color scheme. The villains — Jim Carrey played the Riddler, Tommy Lee Jones was Two-Face — were freely permitted to chew the scenery. Batman's suit had nipples. The movie was weird.
It was also a box-office smash. It broke an opening-weekend record and eventually brought in more than $336 million worldwide, besting its predecessor by tens of millions of dollars.
In his highest-profile role ever, Kilmer played Batman and Bruce Wayne as stolid. He romances Kidman's psychologist with aw-shucks respectability ('Chicks love the car'). He combats his antagonists' ridiculousness with a straight face. His Wayne is tortured and guilt-wracked, and also middle-aged. No longer just a son seeking vengeance, he becomes a father figure to an orphaned young man (who turns out to become Robin, played by Chris O'Donnell).
The outlandishness of 'Batman Forever' was recognized almost immediately as emblematic of its era. The next year, the French director Olivier Assayas made 'Irma Vep,' a satire of modern blockbuster moviemaking. While the sleek black suit that the star of the film-within-the-film must wear is most obviously a reference to Michelle Pfeiffer's Catwoman of 'Batman Returns,' the gaudy aesthetic is all 'Batman Forever.'
There have since been efforts to reclaim Kilmer's film as something of an unsung masterpiece. Vera Drew, the director of last year's art house independent movie 'The People's Joker,' credited 'Batman Forever' as its primary influence.
But Kilmer was one-and-done as the Caped Crusader. He did not return for Schumacher's follow-up, 'Batman & Robin' (1997), and decades later told The Times that the role felt like too much of a cipher. 'It's not about Batman,' he said. 'There is no Batman.' He was replaced by George Clooney.
'Batman & Robin' was a relative flop best remembered today for the execrable puns uttered by Arnold Schwarzenegger's Mr. Freeze ('All right everyone — chill'). That iteration of the franchise ended there.
The kind of comic-book movie that 'Batman Forever' typified faded away, to be replaced the following decade by the grittiness of Christopher Nolan's 'Dark Knight' trilogy and the real-world irony of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Not counting his brief appearance three years ago in 'Top Gun: Maverick,' Kilmer was never again in so big a movie.
But 'Batman Forever' is an immaculate artifact of its time, in much the same manner as 'Top Gun' (1986), another of Kilmer's most memorable films. It was not the best '90s movie, but it may have been the most '90s movie. When historians wish to learn what it was like to live in the United States during the height of its unipolar moment atop the world, they could do worse than to dust off Kilmer's Batman suit, nipples and all.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘Harry Potter' Star, 66, Turns Heads in Optical Illusion Suit
'Harry Potter' Star, 66, Turns Heads in Optical Illusion Suit originally appeared on Parade. Fiona Shaw turned heads at the European premiere of Echo Valley at BFI Southbank in London. The Harry Potter actress, 66, arrived on the red carpet on Tuesday, June 10, wearing a navy three-piece suit with a dizzying pattern. Shaw completed the look with a pair of platform sandals. Echo Valley is an Apple TV+ psychological thriller starring Julianne Moore and Sydney Sweeney. The film, written by Brad Ingelsby and directed by Michael Pearce features a supporting cast that includes Shaw, alongside Domhnall Gleeson and Kyle MacLachlan. Echo Valley debuted in select North American theaters on June 6, and will be available for streaming on Apple TV+ starting on June 13. While many may recognize Shaw from playing the stern Aunt Petunia Dursley in the Harry Potter film series, her career spans decades. Some of her other notable roles include Medea and Richard II on stage, Marnie Stonebrook in True Blood, Carolyn Martens in Killing Eve, and Grace Williams in Bad a 1989 interview with The New York Times, Shaw, who was 31 years old at the time, admitted she was fearful about the future of her career. 'All I know is that I awake every morning thinking the hourglass is running out,' she said. 'It's not that I feel old, but that I think there is something I must say, something I must do before I die.' Looking back on that interview in a 2024 conversation with Vanity Fair, Shaw said, 'Aren't you glad you're not meeting that woman now? Maybe at that time, the careers for men were so much better that I was so pleased to have one ... so I suspect the intensity came from that. That and: 'When you're being interviewed, you want to say very important things. I've stopped trying to do that.'" 'Harry Potter' Star, 66, Turns Heads in Optical Illusion Suit first appeared on Parade on Jun 10, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jun 10, 2025, where it first appeared.


USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Wang Cong wanted more 'Joker' at UFC 316, but still chasing Valentina Shevchenko rematch
Wang Cong wanted more 'Joker' at UFC 316, but still chasing Valentina Shevchenko rematch Show Caption Hide Caption UFC 316: Wang Cong post-fight interview UFC 316 winner Wang Cong spoke to MMA Junkie and reporters post-fight after her unanimous decision victory over Ariane da Silva. NEWARK, N.J. – Wang Cong met the media Saturday after her win over Ariane da Silva at UFC 316. Cong (8-1 MMA, 3-1 UFC) outworked da Silva (17-11 MMA, 6-8 UFC) for a unanimous decision on the preliminary card at Prudential Center. The fight was marred by a huge weight miss from da Silva – 7 pounds – and subsequent 25 percent penalty paid to Cong. But she said she should have finished da Silva and should have been 'crazy like 'The Joker.'' A decade ago, Cong beat current UFC women's flyweight champion Valentina Shevchenko in a kickboxing match, and now has her sights set on her in MMA. 'I feel like this fight showed where I am, and I'm ready to go back and train crazy,' Cong said through her translator after the win. Check out Cong's post-fight news conference in the video above.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Justin Baldoni continuing legal fight against Blake Lively after dismissal
(NewsNation) — Justin Baldoni's team says it isn't finished after a judge dismissed its case against Blake Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds. In a statement, Baldoni's attorney, Bryan Freedman, said that Lively and her team's 'predictable declaration of victory is false.' Freedman also said the court is allowing Baldoni and his team to amend four of the seven claims it made against his former 'It Ends With Us' co-star. Judge Lewis J. Liman also dropped Baldoni's $250 million lawsuit against The New York Times. The deadline for Baldoni's team to make those amendments is June 23. What is Simone Biles' net worth? Baldoni's attorney's full statement reads: 'Ms. Liveley and her team's predictable declaration of victory is false, so let us be clear about the latest ruling. While the Court dismissed the defamation related claims, the Court has invited us to amend four out of the seven claims against Ms. Lively, which will showcase additional evidence and refined allegations.' 'This case is about false accusations of sexual harassment and retaliation and a nonexistent smear campaign, which Ms. Lively's team conveniently describes as 'untraceable' because they cannot prove what never happened. Most importantly, Ms. Lively's own claims are no truer today than they were yesterday, and with the facts on our side, we march forward with the same confidence that we had when Ms. Lively and her cohorts initiated this battle and look forward to her forthcoming deposition, which I will be taking.' 'We are grateful for the organic show of support from the public and for the dedication of the internet sleuth community who continue to cover the case with discernment and integrity.' After the judge dismissed Baldoni's suits, Lively's legal team said it was 'a total victory and a complete vindication.' Lively's lawyers, Mike Gottlieb and Esra Hudson, told Us Weekly: 'As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it. We look forward to the next round, which is seeking attorneys' fees, treble damages and punitive damages against Baldoni, Sarowitz, Nathan and the other Wayfarer Parties who perpetrated this abusive litigation.' Lively also made a statement, saying that she would continue to defend women's rights. In an Instagram story, she said, 'Like so many others, I've felt the pain of a retaliatory lawsuit, including the manufactured shame that tries to break us.' She also said the suit against her 'was defeated,' and there are some 'incredible organizations' that can help women in a situation similar to hers. 'With love and gratitude for the many who stood by me, many of you I know. Many of you I don't. But I will never stop appreciating or advocating for you,' she ended the post. Lively originally brought a lawsuit against Baldoni for alleged sexual harassment. One insider told NewsNation's Paula Froelich in February that Lively and Reynolds 'have no idea what's coming down the pike.' Lively claimed in her lawsuit that sales of her haircare brand, Blake Brown, plummeted by nearly 78% after what she calls a 'social manipulation campaign.' Billie Eilish's brother Finneas says he was tear-gassed during LA ICE protest A person close to Target, which sells Lively's haircare brand, told Puck that the brand is set to do 'less than $15 million' in sales in 2025. The source claimed that Blake Brown was previously a $100 million brand. Another source told Froelich that no one has wanted to work with Lively since the lawsuits. A trial for Lively's suit against Baldoni has been scheduled for March 2026. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.