logo
Group opposing Mayor Brandon Johnson and allies raises $10 million, progressives decry ‘sucker politics'

Group opposing Mayor Brandon Johnson and allies raises $10 million, progressives decry ‘sucker politics'

Chicago Tribune02-05-2025
The first well-funded shots against Mayor Brandon Johnson and progressive allies of his are already being fired, two years before they face reelection.
A series of mailers sent earlier this year by the dark money Common Ground Collective argue 'Chicago is in chaos' in a bid to beat up the mayor and four City Council members. The group behind the mailers is tight-lipped on where its cash comes from and what it plans to do next, but has a staggering amount of money to keep throwing punches.
The Common Ground Collective has raised $10 million, according to its executive director, Chuck Swirsky. It's a sum that's sure to grow but that is already similar to the combined amount Johnson received in his 2023 campaign from his top funders, the Chicago Teachers Union, Service Employees International Union and related unions.
The group, a nonprofit, is not required to publicly disclose its donor list, and Swirsky declined to do so. But he said the money came from around 90 donors, none of whom have contributed more than 5% of its total.
And Swirsky said among the contributors is GCM Grosvenor CEO Michael Sacks, a Democratic donor and close friend of former Mayor Rahm Emanuel. Sacks declined to comment when contacted by the Tribune.
The collective's first targets said the unspoken message — that progressives aligned with the mayor will face stiff opposition — would not change their course. Instead, they bashed the spending as, in the words of Ald. William Hall, 'sucker politics.'
'Show your face and your money,' said Hall, a key Johnson supporter. 'And your stance, which they don't have the courage to do.'
But as the mayor faces political turbulence of his own and early indications that some members of his progressive coalition are distancing themselves from him while looking at their own 2027 re-election prospects, it remains to be seen whether the dark money group's efforts to tie aldermen to Johnson make it tougher for him to pass his agenda.
In addition to Hall, mailers sent by the nonprofit and reviewed by the Tribune targeted Alds. Daniel La Spata, 1st, Byron Sigcho-Lopez, 25th, and Rossana Rodriguez-Sanchez, 33rd, each a Democratic Socialist who played a key role in narrowly passing the controversial January 2024 ordinance calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, among other progressive policy pushes.
The mailers reviewed by the Tribune could signal how the group might continue to deploy its funds. The cards feature a smiling photo of each alderman with the mayor and a message that says they 'refused to stand up to Johnson, raising our taxes while crime remains too high.' The mailers also share each alderman's office phone number and encourage recipients to call and tell the City Council member 'to show some courage and stand up to Mayor Johnson.'
On the other side, the mailers depict Johnson facing a black-and-white City Hall, his arms outstretched. 'Mayor Brandon Johnson is in over his head. And Alderman Hall has his back,' one read.
In a statement to the Tribune, Swirsky said the group aims to 'educate and mobilize local elected officials, build grassroots coalitions, and proactively engage voters around effective policies.'
'CGC will work to defeat extremist policies from both the far right and far left that seek and serve to divide our city,' he wrote. 'Common Ground Collective is supported by a large number of committed donors who care about Chicago and the State of Illinois.'
Swirsky previously served as a chief adviser to outgoing Chicago Public Schools CEO Pedro Martinez, who spent much of the last year in a series of high-profile battles with Johnson before the mayor fired him.
He has repeatedly criticized Johnson on social media — with much of it focused on the mayor's schools policy and stances on the war in Gaza — and has also criticized President Donald Trump. Swirsky declined the Tribune's interview requests.
The group is likely to continue painting Johnson in a harsh light in the coming months. But its deep pockets might also give the mayor an opportunity to present himself as a working-class-champion foil to the powerful and rich.
Amid the beginnings of the well-funded effort to discredit him and his allies, Johnson has in recent weeks fired off his own criticism of Emanuel and 'the neoliberal agenda' with little prompting.
Asked last month about Trump's expected cuts to federal education funding, Johnson said Trump 'is running the playbook Rahm Emanuel executed in the city,' a reference to Emanuel's sweeping school closures.
'We didn't get here because you just happen to have a tyrant in the White House,' he said. 'We got here because someone gave him the script.'
Emanuel declined to comment when contacted by the Tribune about the mayor's comments.
The group appears to have so far only targeted progressives, some of whom will soon face potentially close reelection campaigns.
In 2023, Hall, the only City Council rookie against whom Swirsky's group has so far sent out a mailer, earned a spot in a runoff with 23.82% of a primary vote and won election by just under 1,800 votes in the South Side ward that includes the Chatham neighborhood and surrounding areas.
La Spata avoided a runoff by just 15 votes, while Rodriguez-Sanchez and Sigcho-Lopez respectively dodged runoffs by 499 and 233 votes.
Hall and Sigcho-Lopez, both among the most outspoken City Council members, blasted the group that targeted them, even before hearing the eight-figure sum it says it has raised.
It's 'pretty early' for such attacks to be made so far from an election, Sigcho-Lopez said.
'The big money behind it reflects what I'm hearing in circles: that billionaires aren't happy that they don't have a mayor that does their bidding,' he said. 'These are people who do not believe in democracy, they believe they can buy their way into government.'
Hall called the group's work a 'millionaire tantrum' and said its backers are spending to sow 'seeds of division.' The mailers were sent to every voter in his South Side ward, he said. But he pledged the offensive would not move him.
'I was built for this. This is what I was born to do,' he said. 'They want what they don't have, and what they don't have is power. What they don't have is relevancy.'
La Spata said he was also targeted with similar digital ads linking to what he called the group's 'nothing burger of a website.' He believes the mailer targeting him was widely distributed across his Northwest Side ward.
Asked about the mailer, La Spata says he 'has not been shy' about disagreeing with Johnson on important issues, even if he sides with the mayor more often than he sided with former Mayor Lori Lightfoot.
'I do not do this work for Mayor Johnson,' he said. 'I'm not going to let those mailers determine how and why I govern. I'm going to continue to listen to my ward. I'm going to continue to act on the values and vision I ran on.'
La Spata, who has further distanced himself from Johnson in recent months than the other mailer targets, said he doubts the mailers would lead to a 'productive' conversation. He reached out to Swirsky for a meeting to discuss the issues the group raises, but did not hear back, he added.
He said he did know who funded the group, but added there is 'no one in the city that I think of as my enemy.'
'I have yet to meet anyone in the city that there isn't something that we agree on,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

These are the voters who should scare Democrats most
These are the voters who should scare Democrats most

Boston Globe

time13 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

These are the voters who should scare Democrats most

In dozens of interviews, working-class swing voters said they had misgivings about the Trump presidency -- but many also said they were just as skeptical of the Democratic Party. Five years ago, Raymond Teachey voted, as usual, for the Democratic presidential nominee. But by last fall, Teachey, an aircraft mechanic from Bucks County, Pennsylvania, was rethinking his political allegiances. To him, the Democratic Party seemed increasingly focused on issues of identity at the expense of more tangible day-to-day concerns, such as public safety or the economy. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'Some of them turned their back on their base,' Teachey, 54, said. Advertisement Working-class voters like Teachey, who supported Biden in 2020 but either backed Trump last year or, as Teachey did, skipped the 2024 presidential election, help explain why Democrats lost pivotal swing counties like Bucks and vividly illustrate how the traditional Democratic coalition has eroded in the Trump era. Now, Democrats hope to bring these voters back into the fold for the midterm elections in 2026, betting on a backlash to Trump and his party's far-reaching moves to slash the social safety net. Sarah Smarty, a home health aide and an author who voted for Joe Biden in 2020 but flipped to President Trump last year, in Mifflin County, Penn. HANNAH YOON/NYT But in interviews with nearly 30 predominantly working-class voters who supported Biden in 2020 before defecting or struggling deeply with their choices last year, many had a stinging message for the Democratic Party. Advertisement Just because we have misgivings about Trump, they say, it doesn't mean we like you. 'I think I'm done with the Democrats,' said Desmond Smith, 24, a deli worker from Smithdale, Mississippi, and a Black man who said he backed Biden in 2020 at the height of the racial justice protests. But last year, disillusioned by what he saw as the party's overemphasis on identity politics and concerned about illegal immigration, he voted for Trump. Asked how Democrats could win him back, he said, 'Fight for Americans instead of fighting for everybody else.' An in-depth postelection study from Pew Research Center suggests that about 5% of Biden's voters in 2020 switched to Trump in 2024, while roughly 15% of those voters stayed home last year. Trump retained more of his 2020 voters than Democrats did, a crucial factor in winning the election. Polling on the current attitudes of those Biden defectors is limited, but it is clear the Democratic brand, broadly, continues to struggle. A Wall Street Journal poll released in late July found that the party's image was at its lowest point in more than three decades, with just 33% of voters saying they held a favorable view of Democrats. 'They're doing nothing to move their own numbers because they don't have an economic message,' said John Anzalone, a veteran Democratic pollster who worked on that survey. 'They think that this is about Trump's numbers getting worse,' he added. 'They need to worry about their numbers.' Certainly, anger with Trump, an energized Democratic base and the headwinds a president's party typically confronts in midterm elections could help propel Democrats to victory next year. Advertisement Democrats have had some recruitment success (and luck), and they see growing openings to argue that Trump's domestic agenda helps the wealthy at the expense of the working class, a message they are already beginning to push in advertising. There is no top-of-the-ticket national Democrat to defend or avoid, while Republicans have virtually no room to distance themselves from Trump's least popular ideas. But interviews with the voters whom Democrats are most desperate to reclaim also suggest that the party's challenges could extend well beyond next year's races. Here are five takeaways from those conversations. Biden's disastrous reelection bid fueled a trust issue. It hasn't gone away. Bielski, 35, an executive chef at a private club, said he had typically voted for Democrats until last year's presidential election, when he backed Trump. Democratic leaders had insisted that the plainly frail Biden was vigorous enough to run, and they had encouraged skeptical voters to fall in line. Instantly after he dropped out, they urged Democrats to unite behind the candidacy of Kamala Harris, who was then the vice president. That did not sit right with Bielski, who said he was already distrustful of Democrats who had pushed pandemic-era lockdowns. Harris, he said, 'wasn't someone that I got to vote for in a primary.' 'It almost seemed wrong,' continued Bielski, who lives in Phoenix. 'It was kind of like, OK, the same people that were just running the country are now telling us that this is the person that we should vote for.' After Harris became the Democratic nominee, some voters interpreted her meandering answers in televised interviews as an unwillingness to be straight with them. By contrast, while Trump gave outlandish and rambling public remarks riddled with conspiracy theories and lies, some said they had gotten the general sense that he wanted to tackle the cost of living and curb illegal immigration. Advertisement 'It was difficult to understand what her point of view was,' said Bruce Gamble, 67, a retired substation maintainer for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority. Gamble said he voted for Biden in 2020 and Trump last year. Trump 'was able to communicate better to me,' he added, while Harris 'felt like she was talking over my head, so I didn't quite trust her.' Raymond Teachey, an aircraft mechanic in Bristol, Penn. HANNAH YOON/NYT Worried about paying the bills, they saw Democrats as too focused on cultural issues. Many in this multiracial group of voters said they thought Democrats had gone too far in promoting transgender rights or in emphasizing matters of racial identity. But often, they were more bothered by their perception that those discussions had come at the expense of addressing economic anxieties. 'It seemed like they were more concerned with DEI and LGBTQ issues and really just things that didn't pertain to me or concern me at all,' said Kendall Wood, 32, a truck driver from Henrico County, Virginia. He said he voted for Trump last year after backing Biden in 2020. 'They weren't concerned with, really, kitchen-table issues.' A poll from The New York Times and Ipsos conducted this year found that many Americans did not believe that the Democratic Party was focused on the economic issues that mattered most to them. 'Maybe talk about real-world problems,' said Maya Garcia, 23, a restaurant server from the San Fernando Valley in California. She said she voted for Biden in 2020 and did not vote for president last year. Democrats talk 'a lot about us emotionally, but what are we going to do financially?' Advertisement She added, 'I understand that you want, you know, equal rights and things like that. But I feel like we need to talk more about the economics.' But in a warning sign for Republicans, a recent CNN poll found that a growing share of Americans -- 63% -- felt as if Trump had not paid enough attention to the country's most important problems. Marlon Flores, a technician at a car dealership in Houston. DESIREE RIOS/NYT 'America First' gained new resonance amid wars abroad. As wars raged in the Middle East and Ukraine, some working-class voters thought the Biden administration cared more about events abroad than about the problems in their communities. 'They were funding in other countries, while we do not have the money to fund ourselves,' said Smarty, 33, a home health aide and an author. She said she voted for Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2024, adding that she viewed Trump as a man of action. 'I would really like to see more jobs,' she said. 'I would like to see them take good care of people who are homeless in our area.' Bielski said that against the backdrop of overseas turmoil, Trump's 'America First' message resonated. But these days, he does not think Trump is living up to that mantra. 'We're getting into more stuff abroad and not really focusing on economics here,' he said. 'It doesn't seem like he's holding true to anything that he's promised.' Flores, 22, a technician at a car dealership, said the foreign policy emphasis -- and a sense that life was tough regardless of the party in power -- helped explain why he skipped last year's election as well as the 2020 presidential race. Advertisement 'No matter how many times have we gone red, or even blue, the blue-collar workers' have seen little progress, Flores said. President Trump at the White House on Aug. 11. Alex Brandon/Associated Press They worry about illegal immigration. But some think Trump's crackdowns are going too far. These voters often said they agreed with Trump on the need to stem the flow of illegal immigration and strengthen border security. But some worried about the administration's crackdown, which has resulted in sweeping raids, children being separated from their parents, the deportation of American citizens and a growing sense of fear in immigrant communities. Several people interviewed said they knew people who had been personally affected. Smarty, for instance, said her friend's husband, who had lived in the United States for 25 years, had suddenly been deported to Mexico. Her friend is 'going through some health problems, and they have kids, and that's really hard on their family,' Smarty said. 'I don't really feel that's exactly right.' They're not done with every Democrat. But they're tired of the old guard. Many of the voters interviewed said they remained open to supporting Democrats -- or at least the younger ones. 'Stop being friggin' old,' said Cinnamon Boffa, 57, from Langhorne, Pennsylvania. As she recalled, she supported Biden in 2020 but voted only downballot last year, lamenting that 'our choices suck.' Teachey thought there was still room for seasoned politicians, but in many cases, it was time to get 'the boomers out of there.' He is increasingly inclined to support Democrats next year to check unfettered Republican power. 'They're totally far right,' he said of the GOP. 'Honestly, I don't identify with any party.' This article originally appeared in

Austin budget vote, likely triggering tax rate election, to happen this week
Austin budget vote, likely triggering tax rate election, to happen this week

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Austin budget vote, likely triggering tax rate election, to happen this week

AUSTIN (KXAN) — As soon as Wednesday, Austin city council could approve its budget for next fiscal year, and set a tax rate high enough to trigger an election. Because of a 2019 state law, taxing entities cannot raise the property tax rate more than 3.5% from the year prior without triggering a tax rate election, or TRE. That's where the city manager's base budget sits — at the 3.5% rate allowed without triggering a TRE — which would still mean a total increase of $218.16 annually for the 'average' ratepayer and taxpayer. City council and the mayor are considering asking voters to go higher than that, triggering a tax rate election in November, the month after the budget goes into effect. How much would a TRE cost you? Before we get to the tax rate election proposals on the table, below is the breakdown from city of Austin budget staff of how much each penny (per $100 of value) would raise the average homeowners property tax bill. The numbers below do not include the increase in cost for rates, which is something the city manager's base budget does include. The per-penny scenario is how leaders are presenting their tax rate election proposals. Proposals on the table Right now, the only council member outright against a TRE is Council Member Marc Duchen. 'I remain uncomfortable with the expensive proposals supported by the Council majority and therefore intend to vote against any budget that triggers a TRE,' Duchen said. Austin city manager proposes $6B+ budget, as mayor floats tax rate change Austin Mayor Kirk Watson posted a new 5 cent (per $100 valuation) proposal Tuesday, but he said it was an attempt to compromise with the majority of council members who wanted to go above his previously pitched 3.5 cent plan and that he still prefers his less expensive proposal. 'My 5 cent proposal offers to fully fund our Homeless Strategy Office Plan without adding items outside that plan, increased funding to important public safety requests, and prioritizes our parks, among other basics,' Watson said. Watson has told KXAN he will not vote for a TRE that funds anything but 'core, basic services.' Mayor Pro Tem Vanessa Fuentes and Austin City Council Members Ryan Alter, Chito Vela and Jose Velasquez also proposed a 5 cent tax increase Tuesday night — which tweaks the mayor's proposal. 'We have recently put forward a proposal … that funds homelessness, funds affordable housing, funds social services and allows for further conversation on refining that for an ultimate budget adoption,' Alter said. That group is suggesting their proposal be the base budget Austin city council works from Wednesday as it works through amendments. Meanwhile on Monday, Austin City Council Members Krista Laine, Mike Siegel, Paige Ellis and Zo Qadri came down from their initial 5.75 cent proposal to a new 5 cent proposal. While it would cost the same as the mayor's, it offers different services. Read the mayor's proposal here Read Fuentes, Alter, Vela and Velasquez' proposal here Read Laine, Siegel, Ellis and Qadri's proposal here 'After consulting with a broad array of stakeholders, and with the goal of building a proposal that can win a strong supermajority of Council support, we've developed a 5 penny proposal that reflects both the urgency of this moment to invest in our city's future and our shared responsibility to be careful stewards of public funds,' the group wrote Monday. According to the above chart, all of these proposals, at 5 cents, would raise the average homeowner's property tax bill by $302.14 annually. Again, that number does not include average rate increases — and it could go up or down as city council/the mayor add or take away line items. Austin City Council Member Natasha Harper Madison's chief of staff, Sharon Mays, told KXAN the council member is in favor of a TRE, but hasn't supported a specific proposal yet. 'CM Harper-Madison is still in favor of a TRE; however, she's more comfortable with the 5-cent option now. We're monitoring the message board to stay current on the updates being posted by the other council offices. If a TRE happens, CM Harper-Madison wants to make sure that it's an amount that the voters will pass,' Mays wrote. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store