
The Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a year late and about $400 too expensive to sell
Look, I've been writing about mobile tech long enough to not be surprised anymore when a Chinese brand blows my mind with a groundbreaking new device only to keep said product exclusive to the world's most populous nation. Sad, maybe, but certainly not surprised. My expectations for Samsung, however, tend to be vastly different, and not just because the company is headquartered in South Korea rather than China. This is (still) the world's top smartphone vendor after all, and as such, you'd think Samsung would be inclined to treat all (major) global markets equally.
The Z Fold 7 comes with the exact same cover screen as the Z Fold Special Edition. | Image Credit -- PhoneArena Evidently, that's not always the case, and I think what grinds my gears the most about last year's Galaxy Z Fold SE is that it proves Samsung could have approached the Z Fold 6 differently and simply chose not to do that, keeping the screen sizes of 2023's Z Fold 5 virtually unchanged. Now how can I look at that glowing Galaxy Z Fold 7 hands on and feel excited about Samsung's "latest" foldable upgrades when I know they're so inexplicably late to the (global) party that it hurts and when I reasonably suspect another Z Fold "Special Edition" with even better specifications might be right around the corner? Adding insult to injury, Samsung's entire Z Fold 7 marketing campaign these last few weeks has revolved around the "Ultra" term, leading many of us to believe a second variant was also in the pipeline and making me hope that maybe, just maybe the company had found a way to distinguish this model from 2024's Z Fold Special Edition (in addition to the obvious design refinements, that is). At the end of the day, it almost feels like Samsung has taken a page from the OnePlus playbook with the Z Fold SE and Z Fold 7 , but while the OnePlus 13 needed a little over two months to expand from China to the US and Europe (which was also pretty disrespectful, if we're being honest), foldable fans had to wait an unforgivable nine months to see that 8-inch primary display, 6.5-inch cover screen, and 200MP camera go global. Not cool, Samsung!
As you may have guessed, I'm not a big baseball connoisseur. But I think I know enough about the struggling foldable market to correctly call a sales flop in the making. And I just don't see how the Galaxy Z Fold 7 could possibly hit box-office gold at a recommended price of $2,000. $2,000?!? That's more than two Galaxy S25 Ultra units at their reduced Prime Day 2025 price. And that's an actual Ultra phone with (almost) no compromises and a built-in S Pen. $2,000 is also seven whole Benjamins north of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025's list price, and if you don't think that's a fair comparison due to the very clear and very major differences between the book-style and flip designs, let's talk about the Pixel 9 Pro Fold really quickly as well.
Should you buy the Z Fold 7? Probably not. But I can definitely understand why you'd want to. | Image Credit -- PhoneArena Google's latest (book-style) foldable comes with extremely similar 8 and 6.3-inch screens as the Galaxy Z Fold 7 ... at a significantly lower regular price of $1,799... you can currently reduce by a whopping $415 with an Amazon Prime membership. You obviously can't compare Google's Tensor G4 chip with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, but that's where an improved Tensor G5-powered Pixel 10 Pro Fold is expected to come in soon. Believe it or not, that model was recently tipped to cost less at launch than its predecessor, so if you're actually thinking of buying the Galaxy Z Fold 7 , the least you could do is wait another month or so and compare its value with that of the Pixel 10 Pro Fold .
Who knows, maybe Samsung will understand (one of) its mistakes by then, slashing that ridiculous price to a much more sensible $1,600 (or less) to keep the competition at bay. After all, that's what competition is good for, right? Secure your connection now at a bargain price!
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase This offer is not available in your area.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


GSM Arena
an hour ago
- GSM Arena
Samsung Galaxy S26 may not launch
Samsung has already been rumored to replace the Galaxy S26 Plus with the thin S26 Edge, following in the footsteps of what Apple is allegedly going to do a few months earlier when it launches the iPhone 17 family in September (there will be no iPhone 17 Plus, instead we're getting the thin iPhone 17 Air). Today a new rumor goes even further, telling us we can actually expect a complete revamp of Samsung's flagship S-series in 2026. This will then comprise the Galaxy S26 Pro, Galaxy S26 Edge, and Galaxy S26 Ultra - no 'vanilla' model either. Samsung Galaxy S25, S25+, and S25 Ultra The information is said to come from evidence found in "an internal One UI 8 build". It's anyone's guess what all of this means, but odds are that the vanilla model will be renamed as Pro, the Plus variant replaced with the Edge as rumored before, and the Ultra stays the Ultra. If all of this pans out, then Samsung could be wanting to reposition its flagship lineup next year to reflect a more premium-focused approach, hence why there's not going to be a 'simple' S26 model. "Pro" implies better specs, but it remains to be seen whether we'll actually get that. The elephant in the room is that Samsung may want to bring a price hike to the base model alongside the renaming, after all a "Pro" phone should be more expensive than a non-Pro, right? We'll have to wait and see if more rumors start 'confirming' this, so hang tight. Source


Phone Arena
2 hours ago
- Phone Arena
The Galaxy S26 Ultra is controversial in this key way, but let me tell you why that's a good thing
Most of us like islands, right? Some folks immediately start to paint long, white-sanded beaches with picturesque dunes and palm trees, while others get that inner buzz of being on a small piece of land, surrounded by I like islands that have a nice, big X on their maps. With a dotted line to the X, where the treasure lies.I also like camera that's the protruded part of a phone's rear panel, surrounding and housing the camera(s). As a rule of thumb, the bigger the island, the higher the chances there's a real treasure to be found. The Galaxy S26 Ultra, for example, might grow a camera island on its back, per the latest leaks. Very hush-hush stuff. Although it seems pretty logical, once one comes to think of it. The Galaxy S25 Ultra for reference. | Image by PhoneArena It's important to note that the camera bump that's presented by PhoneArt (a.k.a. Ice Universe, as some of you might know them), as seen here: Image source – X …might grow because of a thinner Galaxy S26 Ultra chassis. So far, nobody knows exactly how thin the phone will be, but it's probably going to be 7.x mm thick. Naturally, a thinner body would make the camera setup pop up even further out of the rear panel. Maybe one day phone manufacturers will be able to fit it all in a sleek, flat body, but for now, we have to settle for raised camera islands. And that's not a problem at all for me. I tend to obsess about what a phone can do, not the way it is on the outside. Yeah, sure, I like some models (like the boxy, overly aggressive-looking Galaxy S24 Ultra) more than others, but if I had to choose between a Porsche-like phone with a small battery and a pathetic camera and the ugliest phone ever (but with great battery and camera), I'd definitely go for the hideous massive camera islands on phones look like they're about to launch into orbit – but they're actually doing real work. Bigger sensors need more room, and more lenses mean sharper shots, better zoom, and night photos that don't look like security cam footage from 2002. It's less about style and more about cramming a DSLR into your skinny jeans. Wobbly on the table, sure – but your photos won't be. I can live with that. The Galaxy S25 Edge and its camera bump. | Image by PhoneArena The Galaxy S26 Ultra 's alleged camera island design reminds me very much of the way these two brand-new Sammy phones are: Galaxy Z Fold 7 Galaxy S25 Edge The common theme is that both of these (despite one being a foldable) are super thin and the camera surroundings are protruding quite a bit: The Galaxy Z Fold 7 and its camera bump. | Image by PhoneArena It's only logical that the (allegedly thinner) Galaxy S26 Ultra will follow in suit. The $64,000 question is: So far, nothing is pointing at such a direction. As Sammy fans very well know, the Galaxy S24 Ultra dropped its predecessor's 10x zoom for a 5x lens. Most people weren't out there spying on mountaintops anyway, and the 5x hits the sweet spot for everyday zoom. Plus, with higher-res sensors doing the heavy lifting, you still get crisp detail without carrying a phone that feels like binoculars. The Vivo X200 Ultra has a camera bump with the size of Utah. | Image by PhoneArena Camera islands can get annoyingly large to the point where they're a bit impractical. Like my colleague Vic found out first hand: Vivo X200 Ultra Review: Impractical design, but an incredible camera This (otherwise excellent) phone feels awkward to hold due to its top-heavy design, which throws off the balance and makes it easier to fumble. While it's only slightly heavier than the Vivo X200 Pro at around 230 grams (comparable to other large phones) it's the uneven weight distribution that stands out more than the overall heft. I doubt that Samsung will slap a humongous camera island on the Galaxy S26 Ultra , but cons of large camera islands had to be highlighted. The more you know. The Galaxy S25 Ultra. | Image by PhoneArena I've praised camera islands so much that one would think nothing else is needed for capturing great shots. Nothing can be further from the truth. You may have the ultimate machine in your arsenal, you may have a camera island as big as Greenland on the back of your phone and still Because the hardware part is just one part of the equation here. Knowing what makes a photo great (the correct light for your needs, the angle, the best moment to press the shutter, etc.). If you keep ignoring the basic rules – or worse, if you abide by them all the time, without trying to break them – you'll end up in a limbo so deep that even the most expensive gear won't pull you out of. Like this dude's post I saw in a popular forum for dedicated cameras the other day: he was baffled as to why his brand-new gear (that cost him several thousand dollars) produced "lousy" shots. I know why: because the shots were taken in the worst lighting conditions, without any idea for composition or "story", no juxtaposition, no tone, no mood: just some random pics of flowers, people, buildings, etc. I often advise those who whine about not having a good enough camera to check out the iPhone Photography Awards (IPPAWARDS) from, say, 2018. If you keep telling yourself that your 2025 or 2024 phone "is not good enough", check out what some are able to do with iPhone 6 and iPhone 7 series. Great stuff.I really hope Samsung doesn't read that last part I just wrote, though. They might decide not to upgrade the Galaxy S26 Ultra camera setup at all. So far, there are some positive camera-related rumors surrounding the future flagship. Let's not jinx it. When you switch to Total Wireless, keep your number & grab 3 mo. of 5G We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer


Phone Arena
3 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Motorola's cheapest 2025 US phone is even cheaper than usual (with no strings)
Nowhere near as expansive as pretty much everywhere else around the world, Motorola's US Moto G family is still rich and eclectic enough to include three 2025-released members priced between $199.99 and $399.99. $25 off (13%) 5G, Unlocked, 128GB Storage, 4GB RAM, 6.7-Inch IPS LCD Screen with 1604 x 720 Pixel Resolution and 120Hz Refresh Rate Technology, MediaTek Dimensity 6300 Processor, Android 15, 50 + 2MP Dual Rear-Facing Camera System, 16MP Front-Facing Camera, 5,000mAh Battery, 30W Charging Capabilities, Vegan Leather Finish, Forest Gray Color Buy at Motorola $25 off (13%) 5G, Unlocked, 128GB Storage, 4GB RAM, 6.7-Inch IPS LCD Screen with 1604 x 720 Pixel Resolution and 120Hz Refresh Rate Technology, MediaTek Dimensity 6300 Processor, Android 15, 50 + 2MP Dual Rear-Facing Camera System, 16MP Front-Facing Camera, 5,000mAh Battery, 30W Charging Capabilities, Vegan Leather Finish, Forest Gray Color Buy at BestBuy That's the one you normally have to pay just two Benjamins for, so as you can imagine, the discount offered by Motorola itself and Best Buy is not exactly mind-blowing... in value. But 25 bucks is 25 bucks, and it slashes a decent 12 percent off the handset's aforementioned list price... for the first time ever. At $174.99, you're obviously looking at an even stronger value proposition than usual, and although our Moto G (2025) review a little while back was not exactly glowing with praise, it's hard to argue with the appeal of that sleek vegan leather finish, incredibly smooth 120Hz refresh rate-supporting IPS LCD screen, and hefty 5,000mAh battery equipped with blazing fast 30W charging technology... in the sub-$200 segment. The vegan leather finish is undoubtedly one of the biggest Moto G 2025 selling points. | Image Credit -- PhoneArena Yes, it'd have been nicer if the 6.7-inch display used AMOLED tech instead of LCD or at least offered a higher resolution than 1604 x 720 pixels, but all in all, this is clearly one of the best budget 5G phones around, and its 50MP primary rear-facing camera and reasonably powerful MediaTek Dimensity 6300 processor only make that more obvious and difficult to deny. The big question you need to ask yourself before pulling the trigger here (at either Best Buy or Motorola's official US website) is whether or not Samsung's $200 Galaxy A16 5G (which can occasionally be found at $175 or less) will make you happier than the Moto G (2025). The design is clearly inferior on the humblest 2025 member of the Galaxy A family available stateside, and the same goes for things like charging speeds. But the Galaxy A16 rocks a surprisingly high-quality Super AMOLED panel with 90Hz refresh rate technology and a resolution of 2340 x 1080 pixels, and the long-term software support is always better on Samsung phones compared to their Motorola rivals. Tough decision, eh?