Tradie sparks fierce debate after revealing why his salary isn't enough
An Aussie man who swapped an office corporate job for a construction site has expressed his shock after learning that a $120,000 salary wasn't enough to live on.
Jack, 29, divided TikTok viewers when he recently shared a video about how wealthy his teenage self thought a six figure income would make him.
'A hundred grand a year, you'd be driving a Mercedes and living in a luxury apartment. That's what I thought,' he said.
'The only thing I can buy with my six-figure salary is groceries without flinching.'
Some viewers slammed Jack for being privileged by complaining about how far his money went.
'My partner and I are on a combined income of $145k. To me this is wild,' one commented.
Another said: 'I make $50kish a year, can get by just fine and still saved good, I guess the more you earn the more you spend.'
But other Aussies sympathised, saying they had experienced similar financial struggles on six figure salaries.
'I used to think $100k was going to be good. Now I'm like $200k is adult money,' one wrote.
Another added: 'Bro I made $230k (pre tax) last year and I can tell you, I do not feel rich.
'I live alone and have a new VW because the 15 year old one was done. I also bought a unit but I'm essentially stretched.'
In a follow up video addressing the comments calling him out on his 'privileged' position, Jack agreed that it showed the dire experience of the average Aussie.
'The level of income that I've had to achieve to be able to do that is quite high,' he said.
'My parents think I'm rich, they think I'm minted.
'That gives you an understanding of how bad things have gotten for the average Australian that the bare necessities not being a problem for you, is a point of privilege.'
Now earning more than $140,000 a year, Jack is still struggling to scrap together a decent deposit to buy his first home, even after moving to regional Victoria.
He currently pays $2500 per month in rent but would be forking out $7000 in mortgage repayments if he bought in the same area.
'I'm in the top 10 per cent of income earners, so how screwed is everyone else?' Jack told news.com.au.
'If you work your butt off in Melbourne or Sydney and have a household income of $300,000 and you're both killing it, and if you're really lucky, you might be able to buy a home an hour away from where you work.
'That is just awful. That is so rough.'
Jack was previously earning between $50,000 to $60,000 a year in a corporate job after he graduated from university with an economics degree.
But after complaining to his uncle about his pay, he decided to ditch his suit for hi vis workwear three years ago so he could more than double his income.
'My uncle told me to get a pair of work boots and a white card and come and jump on a worksite and make $2000 a week,' he recalled.
'I will break up pieces of asbestos and throw them in a skip bin if I don't have to be in debt anymore.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Crossing the city-country divide: how do Australian farmers advocate for their industry in an urbanised world?
The view from my front lawn is paddocks and trees. From here, almost all I see is farmland and native bushland. A couple of years ago, I stood in this spot with a good friend, an immigrant from the UK. A smart, interested and interesting friend, and also a vegetarian. Which wouldn't be relevant except I'm a beef farmer, so for our friendship to prosper, this particular difference of opinion needs to be accommodated. Jess asked me what we would grow on our farm if we weren't growing livestock. The question initially confused me. Were we looking at the same landscape? Could she not see the steep hills, the prolific rocks, the lack of water? Assuming you still needed or wanted to use this land to produce food (which I do), to my mind, it is grazing land. Anything else would be extremely challenging. Not only are rocks and hills awkward to navigate, and our lack of irrigation problematic, the terrain is in places frankly a nightmare for the machinery and equipment essential to cropping. I think of a contractor who informed us he would not be working our paddocks any longer after his spreader truck got not one or two, but four flat tyres. We typically apply fertiliser by air now. I explained this to Jess, and she listened with interest. Sign up to receive Guardian Australia's fortnightly Rural Network email newsletter That's stuck with me, because it reminded me how many people have strong views about agriculture. And so they should. Farmers manage more than half of Australia's landmass. We are arguably custodians of one of the country's greatest assets: its ability to feed and clothe its own people, and the wider world. But knowledge about and personal experience of agriculture is dwindling. Perceptions of agriculture from outside of the industry – particularly in the cities where most Australians live – are often negative. Stories showcasing great custodianship and care don't make the front page – it's only news when something goes wrong. This isn't unique to our industry. I know the old newsroom adage: 'If it bleeds, it leads.' The difference in agriculture is that our work is increasingly foreign to the very people who rely on our produce every day. It's the challenge of our industry, and one I've personally taken on: to advocate in an environment where the divide between rural and urban communities is greater than ever before. In 2021, 66.9% of Australia's population lived in its greater capital cities. Many have little or no connection to the people who grow the products they eat, wear or use every day. Research by CQUniversity makes this gap even clearer. In 2021 they surveyed more than 5,000 primary and secondary school students to evaluate their knowledge of agriculture. The results were, to my mind, alarming. They found secondary students who believe Australian cattle are raised exclusively in sheds. (To clarify, only 4% of Australia's beef herd is in a feedlot at any given time and are generally raised on pasture. Only 20% of Australia's milk production comes from intensive or housed dairy systems.) They also found primary school students who believe cotton is an animal product not a plant; and who believe chickens are routinely fed hormones (a practice banned more than 60 years ago). I believe the work of an advocate, unlike that of an activist or influencer, is to build connection and knowledge. To start with a desire to understand: what do you think of agriculture? What would you like to know? I ask these questions not because I expect to change your mind, but I hope to engage with you. I hope you might share with me, so I might better understand perceptions of agriculture. I don't believe the future of agricultural advocacy lies simply in an exchange of facts, though I wholeheartedly agree all conversations should be underpinned by credible research and evidence. But it's the stories from agriculture that I believe truly show the deeply complex industry of which I'm a part. That shows you the heart of it, and what it has to offer. Sometimes those stories are dark. Death, not often part of everyday urban life, is a normal part of agriculture, especially livestock farming. That can be confronting, even for farmers with decades of experience. But it's part of our life. When my eldest daughter was two, we had a terrible calving season, with cows struck down by a condition called grass tetany. It resulted in the death of many cows straight after birthing. One morning my daughter asked me to play with her. 'Be a cow, Mummy!' I obliged and tried to look suitably bovine. 'Moo, Mummy!' I mooed. 'Now lie down dead!' I didn't know whether to laugh or cry. I probably did both. Stories can also share joy. I took a couple of orphan lambs we were hand-rearing into my daughter's childcare and gave a group of very excited three-year-olds the opportunity to interact with them. We bottle-fed the lambs and passed around handfuls of unprocessed wool, and some yarn, to compare textures and smell. The kids delighted in the experience, and our much-loved lambs fought over the milk bottle. All went well, with some added entertainment from my daughter casually taking a swig from the lambs' milk bottle. Raising livestock is complex. Together with my husband, we're dedicated to raising our children to appreciate the joy of caring for animals and providing them with an environment to thrive, alongside the understanding that we are growing animals for food and fibre. Farmers often say city people don't understand agriculture. But the gap goes both ways. Most farmers I know own the land they work. It's easy to forget what it's like to bid for a rental, move every 12 months, or raise kids in high-rise apartments with no green space. We complain about potholes and distances between towns, but we're not stuck on highways for hours each day, or wrangling toddlers and groceries on public transport. Bridging that divide isn't about proving who has it tougher. It's about recognising the difference and respecting what each life involves. I love the saying: 'No one in the history of calming down has ever calmed down because they were told to calm down.' I don't see a future for agricultural advocacy in telling people stuff. I see a future in listening and in sharing, openly. Does my friend Jess want me to grow plants, not animals, for food on our property? Maybe. Just because we have the same information doesn't mean we're going to have the same opinion. But I think she also understands why we grow beef. And while she won't be having steak on the barbecue with us any time soon, I'm grateful she gave me the chance to explain why we do what we do. Felicity Richards is the chairperson of Farmsafe Australia and the Tasmanian Biosecurity Advisory Committee. She runs a beef grazing operation in northern Tasmania with her husband, Mark. You can contact her here. Sign up for the Rural Network email newsletter
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Michael moved to a Uniting Church farmhouse in Brisbane to escape homelessness. Now his landlord is evicting him to build more houses
When Michael Guettler moved to Hungerford Farm, in Brisbane's north-west in 2022, he thought he was finally safe from homelessness. The home, at the centre of a 28-hectare former chicken run, is just an uninsulated 'four-bedroom shack', he says. At $280 a week it was all he and his partner could afford; they were without other options, so they were happy to stay. But on Monday, the Queensland civil and administrative tribunal signed off on an eviction notice for their landlord, the Uniting Church of Australia. Guettler believes they will be forced back into his car by the church's decision. He says despite the church billing itself as 'a strong advocate for social and affordable housing and ending homelessness', the decision was 'unchristian'. 'Where does Jesus fit into all of this?' he says. Guettler and his partner have been caught up in a fight over the historic lot at 76 Kooya Road, Mitchelton. The church plans to remove the house to make way for a 92-dwelling estate. Many locals oppose the scheme. If approved, it would mean the subdivision of the last of what were once many farms in Mitchelton. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Guettler claims he and his partner have been offered no alternative housing to the Mitchelton estate and cannot find anywhere on the private market they can afford on the disability support pension. This is a claim the Uniting church denies. 'The property managers operating on behalf of the Uniting Church have offered ongoing assistance with suitable alternative properties, rental applications and references, and the church has been offering ongoing social support,' a spokesperson for the church says. Brisbane's rental vacancy rates are near record lows at just 1%. The couple, meanwhile, have been on the social housing waiting list for about six years along with 47,818 other Queenslanders. 'We've got an application approved with the Department of Housing – which is as useful as an ashtray on a motorbike,' Guettler says. Development was the last thing on the mind of Greg Hungerford, the former owner of Hungerford Farm. His family had called 76 Kooya Road home since the 1920s as the suburb rapidly grew around them. Once just a scattered handful of semi-rural homes at Brisbane's north-west edge, the 1950s arrival of the car turned Mitchelton into one of Brisbane's fastest-growing suburbs. Unlike other landholders, the Hungerfords resisted selling, continuing to run their free-range poultry farm into the 70s, selling eggs to their increasingly numerous neighbours. Surrounded by suburbia on three sides and the Enoggera army barracks on the fourth, it remains untouched by development today. Curlews, bandicoots and even kangaroos continue to visit regularly. Greg Hungerford, who inherited the property, described it as 'like paradise in the city'. He died in 2015. In his will he directed his lawyers to sell the land to the Brisbane city council, that it 'be protected from commercial development, that its environmental and natural values be protected' and that it be converted into parkland 'for the benefit of the public in general'. The trustees were released from any obligation to obtain a fair market rate for the land; one of its few conditions of sale was that the park be named for his mother, Pearl. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion A spokesperson for Brisbane city council says it attempted to buy the site but 'sadly the executors of the will did not agree'. Instead, in 2020, it was sold to the Uniting Church of Australia property trust. The church reportedly considered converting the huge field into something like an aged care home but decided against doing so. In 2022, it submitted plans for a housing subdivision to Brisbane city council. Calling themselves 'Friends of Hungerford Farm', scores of neighbours wrote to the council to oppose the church development application. Many homes in the area display corflutes calling for a 'better deal for development at 76 Kooya Road' organised by the federal MP Elizabeth Watson-Brown. The Greens MP says the site lacks public and active transport access but is 'ideal for mixed-use development, maximising the benefit to the community'. A spokesperson from the Uniting Church in Australia's Queensland synod says 'the development application is now in its final stages'. 'The current situation highlights the overwhelming need for more affordable housing to be brought online as quickly as possible in Queensland.' As a tenant, rather than an owner, Guettler believes he has virtually no rights in the face of development. Brisbane's median rents for a house have increased from $461 to $752 since the beginning of the pandemic. The city passed Melbourne to become Australia's third-most expensive city and then Canberra to be second-most, both in 2024. Prices continue to increase, due to record-low development approvals. Guettler's tenancy will be terminated on 30 June, with a warrant of possession issued for 1 July. Guettler says he feels overwhelmed, anxious and stressed about returning to potentially being homeless. 'We're a first world developed country, it's really becoming so shameful,' he says.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
North West Shelf gas extension will deliver ‘almost nothing' to Australia's public purse
Extending the licence for the North West Shelf gas project won't assist Australia's energy transition, experts say, even as it allows Woodside and its foreign partners to profit from the nation's mineral wealth while delivering 'almost nothing' to the national purse. Environmental and Indigenous groups were dismayed this week after the environment minister, Murray Watt, granted conditional approval to extend the Woodside Energy-operated NW Shelf gas project out to 2070. The decision comes amid reports the Albanese government may consider creating an east coast gas reserve to prevent predicted shortfalls in domestic gas supplies over coming years. Australia is the world's third-largest liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporter after the US and Qatar, exporting nearly $70bn worth of the fuel in 2023-24. Austraila's proven gas reserves are more than 40 times the country's annual consumption, alongside a bounty of unconventional gas resources. Despite the huge revenues generated by exporters such as Woodside, Chevron and Santos, oil and gas companies contributed only $1.1bn in petroleum resource rent tax (PRRT) in 2023-24, according to budget papers. Woodside paid $175m in PRRT from the NW shelf project in 2022-23, according to the Australian Taxation Office. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The 40% PRRT is levied on offshore oil and gas projects once they become cash-flow positive, which usually takes years or decades because of generous rules that allow capital expenditure to be fully deductible upfront when assessing the PRRT liability. This last allowance has meant the hugely profitable east coast LNG producers have yet to pay any PRRT, although a tweak to the deductibility rules in August last year will force them to begin paying some tax. While the owners of the long-running North West Shelf project pay the resources rent tax, which is in addition to the 30% corporate income tax, experts believe the settings do not place a high enough underlying value on the extracted gas, and too much on the value added through the manufacturing process, which is not liable for PRRT. The independent economist Chris Richardson argues that the resources rent tax has proved entirely unfit for purpose. 'It is fair to say that how we tax gas in Australia is a massive fail,' he said. 'This is a national asset and Australians deserve a return, as indeed do the miners. This is something that should be shared. The problem is that Australia struck deals that ended up resulting in little tax from extracting the resources that we all own, and so the big gains go to owners of those businesses.' The $30bn proposed development of other offshore gas fields to feed Woodside's Karratha plant on the Burrup peninsula would, if it goes ahead, again be used to offset PRRT liabilities. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Alison Reeve, the deputy program director of the Grattan Institute's energy program, said extending the life of the project would have no impact on the major national policy challenges of power costs, availability and reliability. 'It might lower prices in WA because under WA's gas reservation policy a certain amount of gas needs to be put aside for domestic use,' she said. 'But WA already has lower gas prices than the east coast, and it will do nothing for east coast gas prices.' The NW Shelf project was essentially a huge export project, Reeve said. 'There's no benefit from this project to Australia's energy transition at all.' She said Australia had largely missed the opportunity to properly tax the gas boom but it must get the settings right in time for the next resources boom. 'If, as part of the energy transition, we are going to be exporting lithium or cobalt to the world, then we want to start pricing resource taxes properly now so we can actually do better next time.' Bob Breunig, the director of the Australian National University's Tax and Transfer Policy Institute, said resources rent taxes were highly efficient as they levied excess profits rather than production. Lobby groups and gas companies have long argued a less generous PRRT would lead to a drop in investment, but Breunig said the evidence did not support that argument. 'Norway has really high rent taxes and it doesn't stop companies drilling because they are still making profits,' he said, saying a rent tax of 50% in Australia would not be too high. 'The PRRT is a great structure for a tax. Really it's about fiddling with its setting.'
