My donor and me: What it was like meeting my sperm donor after years of wondering
At eight I couldn't really grasp what my parents were telling me about donor conception.
Eight years old was the recommended age to tell children these things, according to research my parents had read - before they develop a full sense of self. And so it was for us.
There wasn't an earth-shattering moment when I started to panic about who I was; I just enjoyed my nuggets along with my siblings and we carried on with our childhoods.
Now, I'm not going to go into detail as to why my parents used sperm donation; that's not my story.
My story began later, at around 11, when I finally started to have questions about who I was and what made me, me.
I became obsessed with the show Missing Pieces. I loved it - I'd picture myself meeting my donor with the help of David Lomas. Dramatic music would crescendo as we walked across a field into each other's arms, the camera panning around us…
When I started dating at around 16, it dawned on me that the sperm donor might have helped other families across New Zealand. What was stopping me from accidentally falling for my half-brother or sister?
Tiptoeing around the subject of biology became routine for me on a second date. Careful questions about genetics. I'd ask which parent they thought they looked the most like. Anything to try and confirm they knew their entire make-up.
I reached out to Fertility Associates in 2019 after becoming sick of trying to figure out if I was genetically related to every potential date.
But even then - what if their biological dad was my sperm donor?
By 2019, I had had enough of that routine and I contacted Fertility Associates. They told me I had a half-sister born in 2000 like me, and a half-brother born in 2001.
Reaching out
It wasn't until March this year, at 24, that I decided to finally find my sperm donor, and learn about the other half of my genetics.
I had realised I would be devastated if I waited longer and he died while I bided my time.
I emailed the donor-linking team at Fertility Associates and they told me the process usually began with the donor-conceived child writing a letter to the donor.
Include a bit of detail, they said: first name, where you grew up, a few interests and a small explanation of why you are are reaching out.
I wondered, who should I address it to? To my biological father? Dear Donor? A simple 'Kia Ora' is what I landed on.
'My name is Rachel, and I am here today because of your generosity, possibly over three decades ago,' I wrote.
'I would love to learn a bit more about your personality if you would be open to it, and how that might have made up who I am today.
'I understand you said at the time you were okay to be identified. I hope this is still the case.'
I wasn't prepared to feel such a need to be liked.
A daughter wanting her father's approval is nothing new, but this felt complicated and foreign.
I suddenly feared he would be disappointed his genetics made me.
On the flip side of that - what if I didn't like him? What if he embodied all the things I most hated about myself?
I chose to soldier on.
After I sent the letter into what felt like an abyss, I heard nothing for weeks. I had been warned that even identifiable donors moved or changed phone numbers without updating their information, making it impossible to find them.
Little did I know, I was in luck. Just as Fertility Associates began the process of trying to track him down, my donor updated his information for the first time in years.
He would later tell me he 'just knew' he had to. I've never been religious but it made me consider whether there really could be a higher power.
In May I received a reply: and started crying as soon as I realised it was from him.
'I'm just so glad he's sane! And nice!' I cried to my friend later that day.
His name was Wayne. He said he was a '64-year-old blue-eyed Virgo' (I mean, what boomer man knows his star sign!?)
'I would certainly like to learn more about you and share some of the many happenings that I have accumulated in my life,' he wrote.
A few more emails revealed his full name. For several days and three sleepless nights I resisted the urge to search him up online - determined to have my moment and see him for the first time in person.
But I was too curious - and when I laid eyes on his photo, all the wind was knocked out of me. As I looked at him, I saw my own eyes staring back at me.
My coworker - who I'd been updating on my progress - peered over at me, and my screen, and said 'Holy s***, that's him.'
When I look at photos of me and Wayne together now, I still find small similarities between our looks, like our cheeks and how our eyes are an identical shade of blue. Photo / Michael Craig.
A few weeks, emails and texts later, a date to meet was set. King's Birthday weekend at the Mission Bay fountain.
It was a good mid-point between Thames (his home) and Whangarei (mine) - and it also had a decent pub nearby.
This was going to be it. 17 years of questions, finally answered.
The Meeting
There is no guidebook on how to feel, what to wear and how bold a lip to apply before you meet your sperm donor (I chose a red jumper, jeans and light makeup).
I decided to share this experience because I have noticed a lack of positive stories about donor-linking.
The headlines tend to focus on the crazed scientist who fathered 500 children, or the donor-conceived adult who accidentally married a half-sibling.
So when I walked across the field and past the fountain, looking at Wayne on the other side, there was no script and I had no clue how to feel.
Would I feel enlightened by our meeting? Would an inner voice say 'now I know who I am'?
My siblings, Wayne and his partner and I enveloped each other in hugs before stepping back and staring at each other, taking it all in. We all had tears in our eyes.
'Not finished yet,' Wayne's partner said as I tried to pull away from the initial hug, and even though I am not usually someone who enjoys physical closeness with others, I felt comfortable staying in her arms.
My parents arrived shortly after we sat down at the restaurant, and the pattern started up again - long hugs, looks of bewilderment and wonder.
Mum didn't just shed a few tears - hers streamed down her face as she held Wayne.
At the end, we fought over the bill (Wayne paid), walked along the beach with ice creams (I paid) and met up with my siblings' partners and my brother's children.
We laughed at my brother's dodgy jokes about sperm, shared stories of our funniest childhood mishaps and learned about Wayne's life.
I felt closure. I felt whole. I felt answered - and I felt like I knew myself properly for the first time in my life.
Our future
That was a few months ago now.
I've since travelled to Te Puru, ten minutes north of Thames, to film and speak with Wayne for this story.
He intends to meet up with us in Whangarei soon too - to check out where we are from.
We have a group chat: Wayne, his partner, my siblings, our parents and me -where we send life updates and photos.
DD and DD - it is still crazy to me how such an easy natural bond has formed.
We have discussed what to call each other. The actual terms 'dad' and 'father' didn't feel right - I have my dad and this was never about looking for another one.
Wayne didn't raise me, I didn't feel like he earned the title, and he felt the same.
We've started referring to each other as DD, for 'donor daughter' and 'donor dad'.
Sometimes when he texts me, he starts with 'Hi young lady'. That's verging on some pretty dad-like territory, but I am happy to let it slide.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

NZ Herald
4 days ago
- NZ Herald
My donor and me: What it was like meeting my sperm donor after years of wondering
'One day, if you want to meet him, you can. Now, who wants McDonald's?' At eight I couldn't really grasp what my parents were telling me about donor conception. Eight years old was the recommended age to tell children these things, according to research my parents had read - before they develop a full sense of self. And so it was for us. There wasn't an earth-shattering moment when I started to panic about who I was; I just enjoyed my nuggets along with my siblings and we carried on with our childhoods. Now, I'm not going to go into detail as to why my parents used sperm donation; that's not my story. My story began later, at around 11, when I finally started to have questions about who I was and what made me, me. I became obsessed with the show Missing Pieces. I loved it - I'd picture myself meeting my donor with the help of David Lomas. Dramatic music would crescendo as we walked across a field into each other's arms, the camera panning around us… When I started dating at around 16, it dawned on me that the sperm donor might have helped other families across New Zealand. What was stopping me from accidentally falling for my half-brother or sister? Tiptoeing around the subject of biology became routine for me on a second date. Careful questions about genetics. I'd ask which parent they thought they looked the most like. Anything to try and confirm they knew their entire make-up. I reached out to Fertility Associates in 2019 after becoming sick of trying to figure out if I was genetically related to every potential date. But even then - what if their biological dad was my sperm donor? By 2019, I had had enough of that routine and I contacted Fertility Associates. They told me I had a half-sister born in 2000 like me, and a half-brother born in 2001. Reaching out It wasn't until March this year, at 24, that I decided to finally find my sperm donor, and learn about the other half of my genetics. I had realised I would be devastated if I waited longer and he died while I bided my time. I emailed the donor-linking team at Fertility Associates and they told me the process usually began with the donor-conceived child writing a letter to the donor. Include a bit of detail, they said: first name, where you grew up, a few interests and a small explanation of why you are are reaching out. I wondered, who should I address it to? To my biological father? Dear Donor? A simple 'Kia Ora' is what I landed on. 'My name is Rachel, and I am here today because of your generosity, possibly over three decades ago,' I wrote. 'I would love to learn a bit more about your personality if you would be open to it, and how that might have made up who I am today. 'I understand you said at the time you were okay to be identified. I hope this is still the case.' I wasn't prepared to feel such a need to be liked. A daughter wanting her father's approval is nothing new, but this felt complicated and foreign. I suddenly feared he would be disappointed his genetics made me. On the flip side of that - what if I didn't like him? What if he embodied all the things I most hated about myself? I chose to soldier on. After I sent the letter into what felt like an abyss, I heard nothing for weeks. I had been warned that even identifiable donors moved or changed phone numbers without updating their information, making it impossible to find them. Little did I know, I was in luck. Just as Fertility Associates began the process of trying to track him down, my donor updated his information for the first time in years. He would later tell me he 'just knew' he had to. I've never been religious but it made me consider whether there really could be a higher power. In May I received a reply: and started crying as soon as I realised it was from him. 'I'm just so glad he's sane! And nice!' I cried to my friend later that day. His name was Wayne. He said he was a '64-year-old blue-eyed Virgo' (I mean, what boomer man knows his star sign!?) 'I would certainly like to learn more about you and share some of the many happenings that I have accumulated in my life,' he wrote. A few more emails revealed his full name. For several days and three sleepless nights I resisted the urge to search him up online - determined to have my moment and see him for the first time in person. But I was too curious - and when I laid eyes on his photo, all the wind was knocked out of me. As I looked at him, I saw my own eyes staring back at me. My coworker - who I'd been updating on my progress - peered over at me, and my screen, and said 'Holy s***, that's him.' When I look at photos of me and Wayne together now, I still find small similarities between our looks, like our cheeks and how our eyes are an identical shade of blue. Photo / Michael Craig. A few weeks, emails and texts later, a date to meet was set. King's Birthday weekend at the Mission Bay fountain. It was a good mid-point between Thames (his home) and Whangarei (mine) - and it also had a decent pub nearby. This was going to be it. 17 years of questions, finally answered. The Meeting There is no guidebook on how to feel, what to wear and how bold a lip to apply before you meet your sperm donor (I chose a red jumper, jeans and light makeup). I decided to share this experience because I have noticed a lack of positive stories about donor-linking. The headlines tend to focus on the crazed scientist who fathered 500 children, or the donor-conceived adult who accidentally married a half-sibling. So when I walked across the field and past the fountain, looking at Wayne on the other side, there was no script and I had no clue how to feel. Would I feel enlightened by our meeting? Would an inner voice say 'now I know who I am'? My siblings, Wayne and his partner and I enveloped each other in hugs before stepping back and staring at each other, taking it all in. We all had tears in our eyes. 'Not finished yet,' Wayne's partner said as I tried to pull away from the initial hug, and even though I am not usually someone who enjoys physical closeness with others, I felt comfortable staying in her arms. My parents arrived shortly after we sat down at the restaurant, and the pattern started up again - long hugs, looks of bewilderment and wonder. Mum didn't just shed a few tears - hers streamed down her face as she held Wayne. At the end, we fought over the bill (Wayne paid), walked along the beach with ice creams (I paid) and met up with my siblings' partners and my brother's children. We laughed at my brother's dodgy jokes about sperm, shared stories of our funniest childhood mishaps and learned about Wayne's life. I felt closure. I felt whole. I felt answered - and I felt like I knew myself properly for the first time in my life. Our future That was a few months ago now. I've since travelled to Te Puru, ten minutes north of Thames, to film and speak with Wayne for this story. He intends to meet up with us in Whangarei soon too - to check out where we are from. We have a group chat: Wayne, his partner, my siblings, our parents and me -where we send life updates and photos. DD and DD - it is still crazy to me how such an easy natural bond has formed. We have discussed what to call each other. The actual terms 'dad' and 'father' didn't feel right - I have my dad and this was never about looking for another one. Wayne didn't raise me, I didn't feel like he earned the title, and he felt the same. We've started referring to each other as DD, for 'donor daughter' and 'donor dad'. Sometimes when he texts me, he starts with 'Hi young lady'. That's verging on some pretty dad-like territory, but I am happy to let it slide.

RNZ News
11-06-2025
- RNZ News
Players undergoing fertility procedures to get protected ranking, says WTA
Angelique Kerber and Ash Barty hug, Wimbledon 2021. Photo: Paul Zimmer / PHOTOSPORT Female players who choose to undergo a fertility protection procedure will be allowed to take time away from the sport and return to competitive action with a protected ranking, the governing body of women's tennis has said. The new rule aims to support women athletes to balance their family goals and career ambitions and comes three months after the WTA offered players up to 12 months of paid maternity leave for the first time. "The new rule means that players can now take time away from professional tennis for a fertility protection procedure such as egg or embryo freezing and safely return to competition with a protected ranking," the WTA said in a statement. "Eligible players will receive a Special Entry Ranking (SER), which can be used to enter up to three tournaments, based on the 12-week average of their WTA Ranking from eight weeks prior to the start of their out-of-competition period." Sloane Stephens, the 2017 US Open champion, has previously called for egg freezing to be recognised as a protected ranking activity and called Wednesday's announcement a "ground-breaking" move. "I'm incredibly proud of our sport in recognising the importance of fertility treatments for female athletes. For any woman, the conversation of family life versus a career is nuanced and complex," the former world No.3 said. "The WTA has now created a safe space for players to explore options and to make the best decisions for themselves." The WTA also said players will benefit from paid maternity leave and grants for fertility protection through the WTA Maternity Fund sponsored by the Saudi Public Investment Fund. -Reuters

RNZ News
31-05-2025
- RNZ News
Babies for sale: New Zealanders commissioning illegal surrogacy in Thailand
By Jeremy Wilkinson, Open Justice multimedia journalist of Oranga Tamariki has identified a trend where Kiwis are travelling to Thailand to commission illegal surrogacy arrangements. Photo: NZME / Paul Slater New Zealanders are travelling overseas to illegally commission surrogate babies from Thai women, and bringing them back home to adopt them despite opposition from Oranga Tamariki. It's a practice the agency has labelled a "concerning trend" and it said there had been five cases where surrogate parents have flouted international law to have children in recent years. In one of those cases a gay man paid a Thai fertility clinic worker to subvert the country's strict surrogacy laws, which prohibits foreigners from commissioning children from surrogate mothers. The man paid a "significant" sum of money, according to a Family Court ruling, to find a surrogate and then his sperm was used to fertilise a donor's egg. Once back in New Zealand, the man applied to the Family Court to adopt his son so he could be legally recognised as his father. Under the current legislation, which was written in 1955, every parent of a child born by surrogacy, whether the practice is illegal in the country of birth or not, must effectively adopt their own child even if they have a genetic link to them. This is because when the law was written more than 70 years ago lawmakers didn't foresee the advances in fertility medicine such as in vitro fertilisation. That legislation is currently before a select committee after the Improving Arrangements for Surrogacy Bill was first tabled before Parliament in 2022. The proposed law would effectively create a mechanism that accounts for these changes in science, technology and culture and mean that parents, lawyers and judges won't need to rely on a piece of legislation that was never intended to account for surrogacy. However, it's unlikely to change things for people who commission surrogacy arrangements in countries where it's illegal. They will still come under scrutiny from the courts when they attempt to bring their children back into New Zealand. It's a practice that Oranga Tamariki says is occurring more frequently, at least in Thailand, and there's a possibility New Zealanders desperate to have children will look further abroad to other countries as well. In the case of the gay man who paid a Thai surrogate, which made its way through the Family Court last year, Judge Belinda Pidwell noted that the law around surrogacy was complex and there was no statute in New Zealand to provide clarity. "A number of illegal steps or breaches of laws occurred in the creation of [the child]. However, he has now been born, and as a result, has the right to grow and thrive, to have a nationality, and the right to know and be cared for by his parent," her ruling reads. "The irregularities in his creation, or the sins of his father, should not be visited upon him." However, Oranga Tamariki objected to the adoption being granted by the courts, despite finding that the father was the only real parental option for the child and that, barring the illegal way in which the baby was created, he was an otherwise suitable parent. Lawyers for the agency tabled a report from a senior adviser in its Intercountry Adoption Team, which identified a "concerning trend where New Zealanders have engaged in surrogacy around involving Thai surrogates, despite the illegality". "The concern is if children born of illegal surrogacy arrangements are allowed entry into New Zealand, and their parentage is then endorsed by an adoption order, that could be seen as an endorsement of unlawful actions," the report read. Oranga Tamariki says the release of its report could cause diplomacy issues, but didn't give the courts any evidence about why. Photo: NZME / Supplied Oranga Tamariki refused to release the full report to NZME under the Official Information Act, and then opposed its release through the Family Court claiming that it could impact New Zealand's diplomatic relations with other countries. However, it didn't provide any evidence about that specific impact. Judge Pidwell recently released the full report to NZME, which outlines how there has been an increased demand for women to become surrogates, and this demand has caused an increase in the number of women being trafficked from countries where the practice has been banned. The report found that between 2015 and 2020 the agency wasn't aware of any evidence New Zealanders had been involved in these situations, but from 2020 it had encountered five cases where a commercial surrogacy arrangement had been commissioned by Kiwis involving Thai surrogates. Three of these cases have involved the transfer of the surrogate across international borders for the purpose of an embryo transfer. In the other two cases, the mothers were transferred to another country to give birth. "Not only do these emerging trends demonstrate New Zealanders are breaching and demonstrating disregard to Thailand's domestic laws, but there are also significant concerns about the risks these practices pose for the safety and wellbeing of surrogates and the children born via the arrangements," the report reads. "Whilst we have noticed these examples of illegal practices have occurred in Thailand, we are mindful to the possibility of surrogacies being commissioned in other countries where it is illegal and would place similar scrutiny on New Zealanders engaging in illegal surrogacy arrangements in any jurisdiction." In New Zealand there is currently no legal pathway for a surrogate child to obtain residency except via an exemption from the ministers of immigration or internal affairs, or through the antiquated Adoption Act. Oranga Tamariki receives referrals from commissioning parents, private lawyers or requests from the Family Court to complete reports under the Adoption Act, which assesses their suitability to adopt. Since international surrogacy was outlawed in Thailand in 2015, Oranga Tamariki as well as the Ministry of Social Development, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Immigration New Zealand and the Department of Internal Affairs have all published advice for New Zealanders about the law change. Those agencies held a meeting in January 2024 to discuss the trend where New Zealand was flouting these rules. Then in May, Oranga Tamariki effected a policy to refuse to provide pre-court adoptive applicant assessments for people who commission surrogacy in a country where it is illegal. NZME asked Oranga Tamariki questions about whether it had liaised with the Thai Government about its concerns, about other countries where New Zealanders were commissioning illegal surrogacy and about its submissions to the new bill. New Zealand First MP and Children's Minister Karen Chhour says she hasn't received advice from Oranga Tamariki about the report. Photo: NZME / Mark Mitchell In an emailed statement the agency did not respond to those questions, instead noting that following an inter-agency meeting in 2024 Oranga Tamariki put in a formal policy to not support an immigration exemption for anyone commissioning an illegal surrogacy. "As outlined, we do not undertake any pre-court assessments of adoptive applicants who commission an international surrogacy in a country where it is illegal but will undertake such an assessment if we are required to do so by the court once an adoption application is received," the spokesperson said. "Oranga Tamariki has contributed along with other agencies to the review of surrogacy that has been led by the Ministry of Justice. "Through the course of that work, discussions were held about the issue of illegal surrogacy actions." A spokesperson for the Minister for Children, Karen Chhour, confirmed her office had not received any reports or advice from Oranga Tamariki about the illegal surrogacy its staff had identified. The Thai Embassy in Wellington did not respond to questions about whether it had seen the report, and was concerned by it. Domestic surrogacy, where someone volunteers to carry a baby for someone else, is legal in New Zealand, as long as no money changes hands. However, there's also no legal pathway to enforce this arrangement meaning that if the birth mother wants to keep the child, she can. If in vitro fertilisation needs to be done to get a surrogate pregnant then it has to be approved by the Ethics on Human Assisted Reproductive Technology committee (ECART). Oranga Tamariki will also assess the intended parents for their suitability. According to official information released by Oranga Tamariki there were 89 domestic surrogacy adoptions in New Zealand between 2020 and 2024, and over the same period there were 69 from international surrogacy arrangements. Barrister Margaret Casey, KC, says not much will change under proposed new legislation when it comes to illegal surrogacy. Photo: NZME / Supplied Margaret Casey, KC, is one of three legal experts who assist with surrogacy arrangements in New Zealand and told NZME under the new proposed surrogacy law, people would no longer have to adopt their own genetic children, rather it would become a parenting order. "The courts will still be juggling the same kinds of issues, it will just be through a different lens," she said. "Illegal surrogacies will still come before the court, and the court will still look at the background and make a decision about whether or not when you balance it all out it can make a parentage order." In terms of illegal surrogacy, Casey said not much would change under the new legislation, and there were already checks and balances in place that served to disincentivise people deliberately pursuing illegal arrangements. "You may not get to live where you want or with your child for a long time, you may have to give detailed evidence at a court hearing, be subject of further reports from Oranga Tamariki ... you will live in this state of uncertainty and probably panic for a long period of time," she said. In all five cases in recent years where New Zealanders have commissioned babies in Thailand, the New Zealanders who had paid a surrogate claimed that they didn't know it was illegal, despite clear advice from agencies in New Zealand to the contrary. Casey said this was likely born from optimism, rather than wilful blindness. "People are paying too much attention to the process of creating the baby and not concentrating on whether they can bring the child home and how long it will take, and is there anything I'm doing that will be a problem," she said. "Do your research and ask questions. If you don't do that and rely on an agency whose business is reproductive optimism, then you might not look as deeply as you should." Associate Minister for Justice Nicole McKee said the Improving Arrangements for Surrogacy Bill won't prevent people from seeking illegal surrogacies abroad. "It will expressly enable the Family Court to scrutinise these arrangements. The court will be able to consider whether it is in the surrogate-born child's best interests for the intended parents to become the child's legal parents," she said in a statement. Another expert in New Zealand surrogacy law is Jennifer Wademan, who agreed that in her experience there's nothing Machiavellian in parents seeking out illegal surrogacy. "I've never come across a case where someone has had the knowledge that it is illegal and still gone ahead. We simply point them in a direction where people can do it legally," she said. Wademan said she primarily gets two kinds of clients; those who work with her from the start, and those who only come to her once they realise their baby's foreign birth certificate won't get them through the border in New Zealand. "By the time these families are turning to international surrogacies they've been through hell and back and their desire to have a child is so great, it's optimism rather than deliberate avoidance of research," Wademan said. "I think for many it's putting the blinkers on. As human beings we can all understand that." As for Oranga Tamariki identifying cases of this happening, Wademan said that while the numbers might appear small, a spike of five is quite significant in the world of international surrogacy. "It's enough for me to go, hmm, I don't like that," she said. In terms of the proposed law change, Wademan doesn't see it changing much in the way of illegal surrogacy, but for domestic parents she predicts it will change the landscape altogether for an area of law that is particularly ad hoc. "Every day we get a new challenge," she said, "We're having to be innovative about legislative process about science and culture because our legislation doesn't provide for it. "The international landscape will always be more complex because we're dealing with another country's laws that we have no control over. "At the end of the day, these are overwhelmingly New Zealanders who just want to be parents so badly." -This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .