
BRICS fills soft-power vacuum as Trump-led U.S. retreats
Highlighting this approach was the group's two-day summit that ended Monday in Rio de Janeiro, where member states took a firm stance on topics such as strengthening multilateralism, establishing international artificial intelligence standards and tackling climate change as the BRICS aims to become a credible alternative to the established international order.
'This year's summit — particularly its efforts to align positions on artificial intelligence, health care and climate change — indicates that BRICS is evolving into a credible voice for the Global South, capable of setting new standards and norms,' said Sebastian Maslow, an associate professor at the University of Tokyo.
Maslow laid out a laundry list of areas where the U.S., under President Donald Trump, appears to be retreating.
From withdrawing from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Paris climate agreement and undermining the World Trade Organization to engaging in unilateral military action against Iran and scaling back international aid, BRICS' emphasis on multilateral cooperation and development can be viewed as 'an attempt to fill the global governance vacuum' created by the Trump administration.
'As the U.S. grows increasingly unpredictable due to its 'America First' trade posture, BRICS has positioned itself as a defender of the international trade order, emphasizing rules and norms,' he added.
Yet the grouping, which represents about 40% of global economic output, also faces several issues, the greatest of which is arguably cohesion. BRICS heterogeneous nature makes it increasingly difficult for members to align their agendas across the board and therefore fully compete with — or complement — the U.S.-led Group of Seven.
The original bloc comprised Brazil, Russia, China and India. It later included South Africa, and last year added five new members — Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates — with 10 others becoming partner nations.
While the BRICS' expansion has given it boosted diplomatic and economic heft, it also means that its members, some of which are regional rivals, are increasingly divided over what the grouping's primary role should be.
For instance, it's still unclear whether it is mainly a multilateral organization focused on boosting development, a geopolitical instrument aimed at countering Western — particularly G7 — dominance, or a platform to overcome international isolation, as is notably the case with Russia.
'While the expansion increases the group's geographic footprint and share of the world's economy and population, it also underscores growing internal contradictions by bringing together democracies and autocracies with varying global ambitions,' said Mario Braga, Latin America analyst at U.S.-based geopolitics and intelligence firm RANE.
This, Braga added, 'will make it increasingly hard to reach consensus over the coming years.'
Trump sought to capitalize on these divisions by threatening on Sunday an additional 10% tariffs on any country that supports what he described as the BRICS' 'anti-American' policies. Trump didn't provide any explanation, but he had previously warned the bloc not to create a new currency or take steps to replace the U.S. dollar as the world's reserve currency.
For now, Trump's stance appears to have been effective.
'At the BRICS summit, the group adopted a more cautious stance, driven by concerns over possible retaliatory measures from Washington,' said Eurasia Group expert Julia Thomson.
BRICS nations are looking to fill a soft-power vacuum as the U.S., under President Donald Trump, appears to be retreating from the global stage. |
BLOOMBERG
'The final communique was notably broad and avoided contentious subjects, such as U.S. trade policy or BRICS initiatives that might diminish the dominance of the dollar, including the promotion of trade with local currency,' she added.
Nevertheless, the differences among member states haven't prevented leaders from gathering or carving out areas of alignment, including on climate change, health care and development aid, AI and global governance — collective efforts that continue to gain momentum among emerging economies.
On climate change, BRICS leaders formally endorsed at the summit the Tropical Forests Forever Facility mechanism Brazil had proposed at the United Nations COP28 climate summit in 2023. The TFFF framework aims to attract public and private investment to support forest preservation via a $125 billion endowment, RANE's Braga said, with China already signaling its willingness to invest.
China is key in this regard as it has become the world's leading producer of renewable energy and the largest producer of solar panels and wind turbines. Meanwhile, Brazil, which will be hosting the COP30 in November, is third globally in terms of installed renewable energy capacity, with 88% of its energy mix coming from renewable sources.
Arguably the most important factor for Global South countries is economic development, an area where the BRICS has pushed hard to promote its soft power by financing infrastructure and sustainable development projects through the group's New Development Bank (NDB).
'South-to-south collaboration in trade and investment continues to grow,' said Warwick Powell, an adjunct professor at the Queensland University of Technology. 'The NDB has increased its financing of development and infrastructure projects and will continue to do so.'
China, for its part, has made direct contributions to economic development via its Belt and Road initiative.
Meanwhile, the summit also saw the BRICS, which now represent more than half the world's population, aim to assume global leadership in eliminating what are called socially determined diseases, which are broadly defined as illnesses that "are closely linked to poverty, inequality, and inadequate living conditions."
In addition to promoting the research and development of innovative health approaches, BRICS leaders also recalled the central role in fostering multilateral and regional cooperation of the WHO — an organization the U.S. has withdrawn from twice under Trump.
Another area where BRICS nations are targeting a global role is in regulating nonmilitary AI. Leaders of the grouping are calling for international frameworks to avoid regulatory fragmentation — a move that could help avoid having individual states following their own set of rules.
Chinese Premier Li Qiang attends the BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro on Sunday. |
AFP-JIJI
'Global South nations see AI as something that must be developed and governed in an inclusive manner,' Powell said, adding that this stands in contrast to the more zero-sum approach so far articulated by the Trump administration.
On the issue of multilateralism, BRICS has long pushed to reform global institutions such as the U.N. Security Council and the International Monetary fund to reflect what it views as the realities of multipolarity and the growing clout of emerging economies.
Yet experts such as Braga say that while there is indeed a gradual but growing shift in the global balance of power, the G7 will likely retain its status and decision-making power given its economic muscle and influence over global institutions.
If BRICS aspires to become a credible player in global governance, it must first 'institutionalize cooperation' in areas such as health care, climate action and humanitarian aid, Maslow said.
'Cooperation in these domains should develop a tangible presence similar to that achieved by development financing through the NDB,' he said.
Additionally, Maslow noted, BRICS members should temper anti-Western sentiments and its push to challenge the U.S. dollar.
'Such actions risk deepening internal divides,' he said. 'Countries like Brazil and India are unwilling to jeopardize their relationships with G7 members.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Japan Today
an hour ago
- Japan Today
In American life, a growing and forbidding visual rises: the law-enforcement officer in a mask
By DEEPTI HAJELA FILE - Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents escort a detained immigrant into an elevator after he exited an immigration courtroom, Tuesday, June 17, 2025, in New York. (AP Photo/Olga Fedorova, file) In a matter of months, it has become a regular sight around the country — immigration enforcement agents detaining people and taking them into custody, often as public anger and outcry unfold around them. But in the process, something has disappeared: the agents' faces, covered by caps, sunglasses, pulled-up neck gaiters or balaclavas, effectively rendering them unidentifiable. With the year only half over, the covered face — as deployed by law enforcement in a wave of immigration crackdowns directed by President Donald Trump's White House — has become one of the most potent and contentious visuals of 2025. The increase in high-profile immigration enforcement was already contentious between those opposed to the actions of Trump's administration and those in support of them. The sight of masked agents carrying it out is creating a whole new level of conflict, in a way that has no real comparison in the U.S. history of policing. Trump administration officials have consistently defended the practice, saying that immigration agents have faced strident and increasing harassment in public and online as they have gone about their enforcement, and hiding their identities is for their and their families' safety to avoid things like death threats and doxxing, where someone's personal information is released without their permission on the internet. 'I'm sorry if people are offended by them wearing masks, but I'm not going to let my officers and agents go out there and put their lives on the line, their family on the line because people don't like what immigration enforcement is,' Immigration and Customs Enforcement acting director Todd Lyons said last month. Democrats and others, including the several state attorneys general, have pushed back, saying the use of face masks generates public fear and should be halted. In a letter to Lyons last week, a group of Democratic senators said the stepped-up immigration enforcement in workplaces, restaurants and other sites was already causing dismay and the increasingly common sight of masked agents 'represents a clear attempt to compound that fear and chaos – and to avoid accountability for agents' actions.' In American culture, covering one's face has often gone hand in hand with assumptions of negative behavior. Think bandits donning bandanas in cowboy movies, or robbers putting on ski masks before pulling a heist on a bank. Even comic-book superheroes who cover their faces have been swept up in storylines in recent years that derisively refer to them as 'masks' and say their decision to hide their identities while enforcing justice is transgressive. And the presence of masked police or paramilitary forces in other countries has been seen by Americans as antithetical to promised democracy and justice for all — and to the common-law principle of being able to face your accusers. Mask-wearing overall in American life took another hit during the COVID-19 pandemic, when many Trump supporters scoffed at notions that protective masks would insulate people from the deadly virus and scorned people who wore them. More recently, Trump has come out against masks, at least when they're being worn by protestors. He posted on social media last month that demonstrators wearing masks should be arrested. Given all that cultural context, it's even more problematic that those enforcing laws be the ones with their faces covered, said Tobias Winright, professor of moral theology at St. Patrick's Pontifical University in Maynooth, Ireland. He has worked in law enforcement in the U.S. and writes frequently about policing ethics. If 'what you're doing is above board and right," he said, 'then why conceal your identity?' For those who question why it's different for law enforcement to wear masks if protestors and non-law enforcement personnel are doing it, it's because symbols have different meanings based on the power and position of the people using them, said Alison Kinney, author of 'Hood,' a book about that clothing item and the various ways people have used it. 'ICE agents are agents of the state. and they're invested with not only power but also with protections in carrying out their job,' she said. 'But that job is also supposed to be public service. It's also supposed to be accountable and responsible to the public." 'And so they have a greater responsibility for transparency and accountability and making themselves known so that we can hold them accountable for the justice or injustice of their actions,' she said. Concerns over how law enforcement is held accountable to the public have come up before. Advocates pushed for officers to wear body cameras and demanded that police officers have visible names and badge numbers. But there hasn't previously been much discussion around police masking because there isn't a history of it being done in any kind of official widespread way in the United States, outside of SWAT- or undercover-type operations, Winright said. The most high-profile example of mask-wearing in American history for the purpose of hiding identity is also its most negative one — racist attacks carried out by the members of the Ku Klux Klan. The masks served a purpose, of course, of keeping the wearers' identities secret, said Elaine Frantz, a history professor at Kent State University and author of 'Ku-Klux: The Birth of the Klan during Reconstruction.' But they also made it easier for those wearing them to commit violent acts against others, she said. 'One thing about a mask is it kind of works like being behind a riot shield,' Frantz said. 'When you have more of separation from the person you're attacking, it's easier to dehumanize that person.' Winright said he hoped law enforcement mask-wearing wouldn't be normalized. There has been at least one expansion into local policing. In Nassau County, on Long Island just outside New York City, County Executive Bruce Blakeman last week signed an executive order allowing police officers to wear masks during certain types of work, including working with immigration agents. Winright is concerned, though, that the move could strain police-community relations even more, thus putting officers at even more risk. 'Wearing a mask seems to increase fear and decrease trust, and policing from federal to local in America needs trust and transparency and community relations that are positive,' he said. He added: 'The harms, the risks, are greater by wearing masks, not only to the individual officers, but to the profession itself, as well as to the United States society. It's just going to further exacerbate the us-versus-them polarization, the lack of trust, and that's the probably the last thing we need right now.' © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Nikkei Asia
an hour ago
- Nikkei Asia
Philippine President Marcos to meet Trump, seeking trade deal
WASHINGTON/MANILA (Reuters) -- Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. will meet U.S. President Donald Trump this week, hoping Manila's status as a key Asian ally will secure a more favorable trade deal before an Aug. 1 deadline. Marcos will be the first Southeast Asian leader to meet Trump in his second term. Trump has already struck trade deals with two of Manila's regional partners, Vietnam and Indonesia, driving tough bargains in trade talks even with close allies that Washington needs to keep onside in its strategic rivalry with China. "I expect our discussions to focus on security and defense, of course, but also on trade," Marcos said in a speech before leaving Manila. "We will see how much progress we can make when it comes to the negotiations with the United States concerning the changes that we would like to institute to alleviate the effects of a very severe tariff schedule on the Philippines." The United States had a deficit of nearly $5 billion with the Philippines last year on bilateral goods trade of $23.5 billion. Trump this month raised the threatened "reciprocal" tariffs on imports from the Philippines to 20% from the 17% threatened in April. Although U.S. allies in Asia such as Japan and South Korea have yet to strike trade deals with Trump, Gregory Poling, a Southeast Asia expert at Washington's Center for Strategic and International Studies, said Marcos might be able to do better than Vietnam, with its agreement of a 20% baseline tariff on its goods, and Indonesia at 19%. "I wouldn't be surprised to see an announcement of a deal with the Philippines at a lower rate than those two," Poling said. Marcos, who arrived in Washington on Sunday, went to the Pentagon on Monday morning for talks with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and will see Secretary of State Marco Rubio later in the day, before meeting Trump at the White House on Tuesday. He will also meet U.S. business leaders investing in the Philippines. Philippine officials say Marcos' focus will be on economic cooperation and Manila's concerns about the tariffs. They say he will stress that Manila must become economically stronger if it is to serve as a truly robust U.S. partner in the Indo-Pacific. Philippine Assistant Foreign Secretary Raquel Solano said last week trade officials have been working with U.S. counterparts seeking to seal a "mutually acceptable and mutually beneficial" deal for both countries. Trump and Marcos will also discuss defense and security, and Solano said the Philippine president would be looking to further strengthen the longstanding defense alliance. Philippine media quoted Manila's ambassador to Washington, Jose Manuel Romualdez, as saying on Sunday that the visit would see a reaffirmation of the seven-decade-old mutual defense treaty and "discussions on how we can continue to cooperate with the United States, our major ally." With the Philippines facing intense pressure from China in the contested South China Sea, Marcos has pivoted closer to the U.S., expanding access to Philippine military bases amid China's threats toward Taiwan, the democratically governed island claimed by Beijing. The United States and the Philippines hold dozens of annual exercises, which have included training with the U.S. Typhon missile system, and more recently with the NMESIS anti-ship missile system, angering China. Manila and the U.S. have closely aligned their views on China, Poling said, and it was notable that Rubio and Hegseth made sure their Philippine counterparts were the first Southeast Asian officials they met. Poling said Trump also seemed to have a certain warmth toward Marcos, based on their phone call after Trump's reelection.


NHK
6 hours ago
- NHK
Japan's top negotiator for US tariff talks leaves for Washington
Japan's top negotiator for trade talks with the United States has left for Washington as the US is poised to impose a 25-percent tariff on imports from Japan starting August 1. Economic Revitalization Minister Akazawa Ryosei departed from Tokyo's Haneda Airport on Monday morning. It is his eighth trip to the US capital for tariff negotiations. Speaking to reporters before his departure, Akazawa said that negotiations would not be easy as both Japan and the US need to protect their national interests. He said he wants to hold sincere and robust discussions to find common ground between the two sides. Arrangements are under way for a meeting with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Monday or later, local time. Akazawa is also seeking meetings with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. Japanese government officials say that Washington is now reviewing Tokyo's proposal to make massive investments and import more American goods to reduce the US trade deficit with Japan. Akazawa says he wants to confirm how the US side is proceeding with its review. Akazawa aims to reach an agreement that can benefit both countries as the August 1 deadline for what US President Donald Trump calls "reciprocal" tariffs approaches.