Class no longer main dividing line in UK politics, survey shows
Age and education have displaced class as the main demographic dividing line in British politics, according to a leading study on trends in public views.
The British Social Attitudes survey, which has run annually since 1983, found that traditional class-based support for parties had diminished.
'The underpinnings of the system have disappeared, have been eroded. So class no longer equals vote. We now have multidimensional politics,' said Prof Sir John Curtice, a senior research fellow at the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen) and a co-author of the report.
'Trust in government, trust in politicians, is at an all-time low. So you can see all these things going on is creating an environment that means it looks more difficult for the Conservatives and Labour to hang on.'
The analysis found that in the 2024 general election, Labour did not reconnect with its traditional base of working-class voters, whose support dropped substantially in 2019. Among those in semi-routine and routine occupations, 30% voted Labour, compared with 42% of people in professional and managerial jobs.
'London is now the most pro-Labour part of the country and actually the core Labour voter is a young, often first-generation, middle-class professional living in London,' Curtice said.
The survey found that age and education were more often determining factors in voting intention. It said only 6% of 18- to 24-year-olds voted Conservative, compared with 36% of those aged 65 and over. Across age groups, just 5% of graduates voted for Reform UK, it found, compared with 25% of those with qualifications less than an A-level.
'Brexit speeded up a process which is that our politics are no longer simply about left versus right,' Curtice said. 'We now have a second dimension, which has always been there to a degree but which now matters far, far more. And that is basically culture wars, it's social liberals versus conservatives, it's libertarians versus authoritarians.'
The survey found record levels of support for electoral reform. For the first time, a majority of supporters of all parties favour electoral reform – 55% of Labour supporters, 52% of Conservatives and 56% of Liberal Democrats, as well as 90% of Greens and 78% of Reform voters.
In total, a record 60% of survey respondents said there should be a change in the electoral system 'to allow smaller political parties to get a fairer share of MPs'.
Curtice said: 'It does show how civil society, in the wake of what was the most disproportional outcome in British electoral history, has moved on.'
Alex Scholes, the research director at NatCen, said the 'political landscape is poised for potential transformation'. He added: 'The 2024 election highlighted significant challenges to Britain's traditional two-party system and the result has yet to restore public trust and confidence.'
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
The survey found plummeting levels of satisfaction with public services. A record 59% of people are now dissatisfied with the NHS, compared with 25% in 2019. Only 21% are satisfied, down from 60% in 2019.
It also found that 53% are dissatisfied with the provision of social care, compared with 37% in 2019.
A record 26% said they were struggling to live on their current income, up from 16% before the pandemic. The proportion who said they were living comfortably fell over the same period from 50% to a record low of 35%.
Curtice said: 'People who say they're struggling on their income are less likely to be trusting politicians. Those who think the health service is not doing very well are less likely to be trusting politicians and governments. So these things are related.
'The risks that face this government and the opposition collectively were very, very clearly there in the election – you have to cast your eyes away from Westminster. The majority of 174 is a creature of the electoral system, it is not a reflection of what happened in terms of how people voted.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Starmer says vote on welfare cuts bill happening on Tuesday amid growing Labour revolt
Update: Date: 2025-06-25T08:41:27.000Z Title: Keir Starmer says he is going ahead with welfare benefits cuts as number of Labour MPs joining rebellion grows Content: Good morning. MPs are due to vote on the universal credit (UC) and personal independent payments (Pip) bill next week, the legislation enacting the disability and sickness benefit cuts worth around £5bn. As Pippa Crerar and Aletha Adu report in our overnight story, Keir Starmer insisted yesterday that he was pressing ahead with the plans. But this morning it seems all but certain that, if the government goes ahead with the vote without offering a colossal concession, it will lose. And, if governments know they are going to get defeated on flagship legislation, they normally pull the vote at the last minute. Here are the key developments this morning. The Labour rebellion is growing – even though some cabinet ministers spent yesterday trying to persuade rebel Labour MPs to back the bill. By last night, 123 Labour MPs had signed the amendment, up from 108, plus 11 MPs from opposition parties, all from Northern Ireland. You can read all their names on the order paper here. They are the MPs who have signed Meg Hillier's amendment, listed under business for Tuesday 1 July. Starmer has failed to quell speculation that the vote will be postponed. Despite what he said publicly yesterday, the BBC is reporting a source close to government thinking saying: 'Once you take a breath, it is better to save some of the welfare package than lose all of it.' And the Times is reporting: Privately, some close to the prime minister are preparing to delay next Tuesday's vote in an attempt to buy time and find concessions to win enough of the rebels around. One minister described the mood in government as one of 'panic'. But Starmer has again confirmed the vote will go ahead. He told LBC: There'll be a vote on Tuesday, we're going to make sure we reform the welfare system. He said the welfare system had to change: It traps people in a position where they can't get into work. In fact, it's counterproductive, it works against them getting into work. So we have to reform it, and that is a Labour argument, it's a progressive argument. John Healey, the defence secretary, refused to rule out the government making further concessions before the vote in an interview on the Today programme this morning. Kemi Badenoch has in effect confirmed that the Tories will not support the bill. She implied the opposite in a statement she released last night, saying: The government is in a mess, their MPs are in open rebellion. If Keir Starmer wants our support, he needs to meet three conditions that align with our core Conservative principles. The first condition is that the welfare budget is too high, it needs to come down. This bill does not do that. The second condition is that we need to get people back into work. Unemployment is rising, jobs are disappearing, and even the government's own impact assessments say that the package in this bill will not get people back to work. The third is that we want to see no new tax rises in the autumn. We can't have new tax rises to pay for the increases in welfare and other government spending. We are acting in the national interest to make the changes the country needs. And if Keir Starmer wants us to help him get this bill through, then he must commit to these three conditions at the dispatch box. There is no chance of the government committing to no tax rises in the autumn, and so, while sounding supportive, this statement is anything but. The bill also fails Badenoch's first condition, because it would not stop spending on disability benefits still rising (but by less than it would without the cuts). Ministers have made this point to Labour rebels in a bid to persuade them the bill is not as harsh as people suppose. Here is the agenda for the day. 9.30am: Stephen Timms, minister for social security and disability, gives evidence to the Commons work and pensions committee about the proposed disability benefit cuts. 10am: Darren Jones, chief secretary to the Treasury, gives evidence to the Commons Treasury committee about the spending review. Morning: Keir Starmer and other leaders arrive at the Nato summit in The Hague. Starmer is expected to hold a press conference in the afternoon, after the main meeting. Noon: Angela Rayner, the deputy PM, takes PMQs. Also, Wes Streeting, the health secretary, is giving a speech in Blackpool where he will say that England's poorest areas will get billions in extra health funding under new government plans to tackle stark inequalities. If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can't read all the messages BTL, but if you put 'Andrew' in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word. If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @ The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary. I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can't promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Calderdale campaigners for natural flood defences meet MPs
Campaigners who are passionate about building natural flood defences to protect their local area are meeting MPs on Wednesday to tell them about their work. Slow the Flow is a charity in Calderdale, West Yorkshire, which was set up after the area was hit by devastating floods in December group were invited to Parliament by their MP Josh Fenton-Glynn to talk about their work in the hope they can help shape the government's flood management policy. Adrian Horton, the charity's chair, said their most successful project to date was at Hardcastle Crags in Hebden Bridge, where volunteers had built more than 1,000 leaky wooden dams to slow the flow of water into the Calder Valley. He said they had worked with the National Trust on the project since 2017. "Leaky woody dams, if you put them into tributaries and small streams, slow the flow of water into the larger rivers," he said. "They all serve to create that slowing effect of water into the valley bottom, which if you do it enough times, has an effect of reducing the flood risk... into our towns and villages. "The work that we've been doing at Hardcastle Crags has been really important to prove a point, and to prove that this kind of work can work." The group travelled to Parliament last year to lobby government on natural flood defences, but are going again now there is a Labour government. They plan to tell MPs about their "key messages" which include prioritising sustainable drainage systems for sewer overflows, stopping excess water flowing into rivers and streams, increasing funding to natural flood management schemes and developing skills and expertise in environmental issues. Mr Horton said they also wanted every local authority to follow Calderdale Council's example by appointing a natural flood management officer. Meanwhile, in Leeds work is also taking place to slow the flow of water and reduce pressure on the city's flood defences. The Aire Resilience Company (ARC) was launched last week to help deliver long-term natural flood management interventions in the Aire is a collaboration between Leeds City Council, Yorkshire Water, the Environment Agency and the Rivers Trust as a direct response to the threat of climate change and increasing flood risk. Leeds City Council said ARC's work would complement the recently-completed £200m Leeds Flood Alleviation Scheme, which protects the city and surrounding areas from extreme Jonathan Pryor, the council's deputy leader and executive member for economy, transport, and sustainable development, said: "By supporting nature-based solutions alongside our major flood defence schemes, we are not only strengthening flood resilience but also contributing to our wider environmental and net zero ambitions." The Environment Agency has said it is committed to reducing future flood risk to communities in Calderdale. A spokesperson said: "We have completed schemes in Mytholmroyd, Shaw Wood Road in Todmorden and most recently in Copley Village."Construction is under way in Brighouse, along with several other projects in advance stages of development such as Hebden Bridge, Wheatley in Halifax, Walsden and Back Waterloo in Todmorden."Natural flood management will play an important part in reducing flood risk in Calderdale by working in unison with traditional flood alleviation schemes." Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
UK says it will buy F-35 jets capable of carrying nuclear bombs
The United Kingdom will buy 12 U.S.-made F-35 fighter jets capable of carrying nuclear bombs and will join NATO's shared airborne nuclear mission, in a major expansion of its nuclear deterrent, Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced Wednesday. The government called it 'the biggest strengthening of the U.K.'s nuclear posture in a generation.' Starmer made the announcement while attending a NATO summit in the Netherlands. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte welcomed the decision, calling it 'yet another robust British contribution to NATO.' The U.K. phased out air-dropped atomic weapons in the 1990s after the end of the Cold War. Its nuclear arsenal now consists of submarine-based missiles. Only three NATO members – the U.S., Britain and France – are nuclear powers, while seven nations contribute to the alliance's nuclear mission by contributing jets that can carry either conventional or weapons or American B61 bombs stockpiled in Europe. The use of nuclear weapons by the U.K. as part of the mission would require the authorization of the alliance's nuclear planning group as well as the U.S. president and British prime minister. Starmer also announced that the U.K. will provide 350 air defense missiles to Ukraine, funded by 70 million pounds ($95 million) raised from interest on seized Russian assets. The announcements come as the U.K. and other NATO members pledge to increase spending on security to 5% of gross domestic product by 2035. The total includes 3.5% on defense and another 1.5% on broader security and resilience efforts. The U.K. currently spends 2.3% of national income on defense and says that will rise to 2.6% by 2027.
