logo
Trump calls again for a Fed cut but resilient jobs report makes that even less likely

Trump calls again for a Fed cut but resilient jobs report makes that even less likely

Yahooa day ago

President Trump once again suggested the Federal Reserve should lower rates, but any slim chance of a June cut evaporated Friday with a jobs report that showed continued resilience in the labor market.
There were questions about the possibility of a June cut this week following a weak ADP National Employment Report released Wednesday, said Wellington Management fixed income portfolio manager Brij Khurana, but the new Labor Department report released Friday "is good enough that it takes away June."
"The labor market is not cracking yet even though it is decelerating," he added.
What the Labor Department said Friday is that the US economy added 139,000 nonfarm payrolls in May, more than the 126,000 expected by economists. The unemployment rate held steady at 4.2%.
Following the release, Trump posted on social media that 'AMERICA IS HOT' and said, in a reference to Fed Chair Jerome Powell, that ''Too Late' at the Fed is a disaster!'
He also suggested more cuts were now necessary, referring to moves made by other central banks to ease monetary policy.
'Europe has had 10 rate cuts, we have had none. Despite him, our Country is doing great. Go for a full point, Rocket Fuel!' That follows a similar post from the president Wednesday where he called Powell 'unbelievable!!!' and said "'Too Late' Powell must now LOWER THE RATE."
But Friday's Labor Department report makes it even less likely the Fed will consider rate cuts in the near term, Fed watchers said, since it doesn't show that the jobs market is grinding to a halt.
Investors currently are betting there is virtually no chance of a cut out of the June 17-18 meeting, and that the central bank won't ease its policy again until September at the earliest.
The Fed has not altered its benchmark rates at all in 2025 after reducing them by a full percentage point at the end of 2024, citing uncertainties about Trump's policies.
In fact, in recent days several fed policymakers have made it clear they are more worried about inflation than employment — and thus are content to be patient about any changes to the Fed's current stance.
"I see greater upside risks to inflation at this juncture and potential downside risks to employment and output growth down the road, and this leads me to continue to support maintaining the FOMC's policy rate at its current setting if upside risks to inflation remain," Federal Reserve governor Adriana Kugler Kugler said Thursday in a speech at the Economic Club of New York.
Kansas City Fed president Jeff Schmid also said Thursday he is very focused on the risk for higher inflation from tariffs and that the Fed should 'not let down our guard.'
'While the tariffs are likely to push up prices, the extent of the increase is not certain, and likely will not be fully apparent for some time,' Schmid added.
Schmid noted that "the extent of the drag on growth and employment is also unclear but "I intend to remain focused on the importance of maintaining credibility on inflation."
But there is certainly a divide emerging among some Fed policymakers about whether to hold rates steady or get more comfortable about cuts later this year.
Some policymakers are arguing for "looking through" the impact of the duties as temporary, a stance that would leave the door open for cuts.
Federal Reserve governor Chris Waller is now firmly in the first camp. Last Sunday, he made an argument for why any impact on inflation from tariffs likely won't last.
"Given my belief that any tariff-induced inflation will not be persistent and that inflation expectations are anchored, I support looking through any tariff effects on near-term inflation when setting the policy rate," Waller said in a speech in Seoul, South Korea.
Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sunday shows preview: Trump-Musk spat leaves admin reeling; ‘Big, beautiful bill' hits speed bump
Sunday shows preview: Trump-Musk spat leaves admin reeling; ‘Big, beautiful bill' hits speed bump

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Sunday shows preview: Trump-Musk spat leaves admin reeling; ‘Big, beautiful bill' hits speed bump

President Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk's feud spilled out in public on Thursday, with the world's richest man and the world's most powerful leader trading barbs that engulfed news cycles in Washington and abroad. Musk, a Trump ally, was vocal about his disappointment with Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' currently sitting in the Senate. Musk, who spent millions during the 2024 presidential campaign to help elect Trump, called the massive piece of legislation a 'disgusting abomination.' Trump then weighed in on Thursday at the White House during German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's visit, saying, 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore.' The spat intensified, with Musk floating the prospects of creating a third party, claiming that without his political contributions, Trump would not be victorious against ex-Vice President Harris in November and accusing the president of having ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Trump threatened to cut off federal contracts awarded to Musk's companies. Later on Thursday, Musk signaled he might be open to brokering a truce with the commander-in-chief. After speaking with several news outlets Friday morning, Trump suggested he is ready to move on and indicated that he will not be speaking with Musk for a while. Trump told CNN Friday morning that he is 'not even thinking about Elon' and added that the SpaceX and Tesla CEO has 'got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem.' In the Senate, Trump's agenda bill, which passed the House chamber last month, has sparked concerns and criticism from GOP senators. The first group of GOP Sens., which consists of Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), are arguing they could vote against the bill if it slashes Medicaid benefits. Others, including Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) have previously said they would not back the legislation if it retains the current debt and spending levels. The GOP can have three defections total if all Democrats vote against the legislation. Sen. Johnson will be on CNN's 'State of the Union where he will likely discuss if any of his concerns regarding the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' have been addressed. As part of a push to root out waste, fraud and abuse within Medicare, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said this week that a bill sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), that would crack down on Medicare Advantage overpayments known as 'upcoding,' could be inserted into Trump's massive legislation. Cassidy will be on NewsNation's 'The Hill Sunday,' where he will likely discuss the latest on the reconciliation package along with his recent visit to the White House. NewsNation's 'The Hill Sunday': Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.); Rep. Sarah Elfreth (D-Ma); U.S. Chamber of Commerce chief policy officer Neil Bradley. ABC's 'This Week': Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy; House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.). NBC's 'Meet the Press': Sens. James Lankford (R-Okla.), and Cory Booker (D-N.J.). CNN's 'State of the Union': 'Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), and Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.); Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.). CBS' 'Face the Nation': National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett; Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.); Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Texas); Save the Children U.S. President and CEO Janti Soeripto. 'Fox News Sunday': Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought; Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.); Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas). Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures': White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt; Secretary Of Interior Doug Burgum, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.); House Ways And Means Committee Chairman Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.); Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.). Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Trump order seeks to boost U.S. drone industry
Trump order seeks to boost U.S. drone industry

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

Trump order seeks to boost U.S. drone industry

June 7 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump is taking aim at drone technology from two directions -- boost the U.S. industry and crack down on malicious activity. Trump on Friday signed executive orders on efforts to spur U.S. production relevant to drone technology, increase U.S. drone security and regulation efforts, and an unleated one to promote design and eventual use of commercial supersonic aircraft. "Unmanned aircraft systems, otherwise known as drones, offer the potential to enhance public safety as well as cement America's leadership in global innovation," an executive order titled Restoring American Airspace Sovereignty read. "But criminals, terrorists, and hostile foreign actors have intensified their weaponization of these technologies, creating new and serious threats to our homeland. Another order, titled Unleashing American Drone Dominance, declares that "building a strong and secure domestic drone sector is vital to reducing reliance on foreign sources, strengthening critical supply chains and ensuring that the benefits of this technology are delivered to the American people." There are more than a million registered drones in the United States, according to the FAA with more than 400,000 commercial drones and more than 350,000 for recreational use. In a press release, the Commercial Drone Alliance said it has "believed that innovation and security are two sides of the same coin. Outdated regulations have long impeded technological innovation and hindered transparency in our airspace." Lisa Ellman, chief executive of the Commercial Drone Alliance, also lauded the executive orders for aiming at both innovation and security simultaneously. "We fully support the long-overdue steps taken by the Trump administration in these Executive Orders -- establishing a framework to scale safe and secure drone operations while enhancing drone security and airspace transparency -- to modernize our domestic drone policy and assure American aviation leadership into the next century of flight," she said in the release. Drone dangers Trump has warned that drones have been used to smuggle drugs across borders, and could threaten large public gatherings, such as the 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Summer Olympics, both in the United States. "It is the policy of the United States to ensure control over our national airspace and to protect the public, critical infrastructure, mass gathering events, and military and sensitive government installations and operations from threats posed by the careless or unlawful use of UAS," the security related order reads. Chinese-made drones from companies like DJI or Autel are not outright banned, but the Federal Acquisition Security Council has been called on to "publish a Covered Foreign Entity List ... identifying companies that pose supply chain risks." In 2022, the U.S. Treasury added DJI and seven other companies to its Chinese Military-Industrial Complex list, which indicates some level of national security concern. The includes a ban on U.S.-based companies exporting technology to them. The majority of drones are estimated to be built in China, The New York Times reported. The Justice Department and FAA were told to enforce civil and criminal penalties for drone operators who violate laws or airspace restrictions. There will be grants for state and local law enforcement to access drone-detection and tracking equipment. The Federal Aviation Administration requires all drones weighing more than 0.55 of a pound to be registered, in addition to restricting how high they can be flown without authorization. The Justice Department and FAA were told to more robustly enforce civil and criminal penalties for drone operators who violate laws or airspace restrictions. Grant programs are planned for state and local law enforcement to access drone-detection and tracking equipment., the order also indicates Drone industry growth In his first term, Trump sought to increase the use of drones and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has been directed to promote exports of U.S.-made drones, in addition to federal agencies being ordered to prioritize purchases of them. "The United States must accelerate the safe commercialization of drone technologies and fully integrate UAS into the National Airspace System," the order reads. "The time has come to accelerate testing and to enable routine drone operations, scale up domestic production, and expand the export of trusted, American-manufactured drone technologies to global markets." The order directs the FAA to allow commercial users and public safety officials not to fly drones beyond their range of sight, meaning that a user must be able to see the drone they are operating. "Building a strong and secure domestic drone sector is vital to reducing reliance on foreign sources, strengthening critical supply chains, and ensuring that the benefits of this technology are delivered to the American people," the order says. Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy was directed to initiate artificial intelligence tools to assist in and expedite the review of a UAS waiver application, and the Transportation Department was told to develop an Electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing Pilot Program to accelerate the deployment of safe and lawful eVTOL operations in the United States. Supersonic flight An additional executive order titled "Leading the World in Supersonic Flight" seeks to promise planes that travel at supersonic speeds, which are greater than the speed of sound at approximately 768 mph at sea level, or Mach 1. "The United States stands at the threshold of a bold new chapter in aerospace innovation," the order reads. "For more than 50 years, outdated and overly restrictive regulations have grounded the promise of supersonic flight over land, stifling American ingenuity, weakening our global competitiveness, and ceding leadership to foreign adversaries." The order noted that "advances in aerospace engineering, materials science, and noise reduction now make supersonic flight not just possible, but safe, sustainable, and commercially viable." The order repeals regulations prohibiting cross-country supersonic flights, which for decades have precluded nonmilitary air travel over land at faster-than-sound speeds. The Concorde was manufactured from 1965 to 1979, but are no longer flown by airlines, however, Boom Supersonic and NASA are currently developing new supersonic passenger jets. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

Want To Be In The Top 5% Of Households? Here's Exactly How Much You Need—And It's Much Lower Than You'd Guess
Want To Be In The Top 5% Of Households? Here's Exactly How Much You Need—And It's Much Lower Than You'd Guess

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Want To Be In The Top 5% Of Households? Here's Exactly How Much You Need—And It's Much Lower Than You'd Guess

How do you know if you're actually rich — like, rich rich? If you've ever wondered whether your savings, investments, or home equity stack up to the country's wealthiest, there's a number that draws the line. And while it might sound like an elite bracket reserved for finance bros and inheritance babies, the top 5% isn't as far out of reach as some might think. You'll hear people toss around figures like "I want to retire with $5 million," or "You're not rich until you never check your balance." Fair. But in the background, many are just quietly checking to see if their net worth is even close to making the cut. You'll spot them in Reddit threads, in comment sections, or sitting across from you at brunch, casually mentioning their Roth IRA. So—how rich do you need to be to join the top 5% of households? Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . According to the Federal Reserve's Survey of Consumer Finances, you'd need a net worth of about $3.8 million to break into the top 5% of U.S. households. That includes everything you own—retirement accounts, investments, your home—minus any debts you owe. Seems steep? Compared to the median net worth in America, which is around $192,700, it is. But if you've been aggressively saving, investing wisely, or just got lucky with some real estate timing, you might be closer than you think. The average net worth of households in the U.S. is about $1.06 million, but don't let that fool you. Averages get warped by the ultra-wealthy. The median is a better measure for the "typical" household—and that's why $192,000 matters. If you're above it, you're ahead of most. If you're below it, you're not alone. Trending: Invest where it hurts — and help millions heal:. This number includes: Retirement savings (401(k), IRA) Brokerage and investment accounts Real estate equity Business ownership or equity Cash and bank holdings Minus credit card debt, student loans, mortgages, etc. It doesn't count income—this is strictly net worth, not how much you make. Whether you're halfway there or just getting started, here are a few things that actually move the needle: Automate your investing. Consistency beats timing. Pay down high-interest debt. It eats your momentum. Own appreciating assets. Think equities or property, not depreciating toys. Reinvest wisely. Compound interest rewards the yourself to others isn't the recipe for happiness—but it is human nature. Benchmarks like this help give context, not judgment. Some people live well below their means and still feel broke. Others drive a 15-year-old car and feel free. Your version of "rich" might mean peace of mind, flexibility, or just not sweating the small stuff. These numbers are guideposts, not gospel. But if you're aiming for top 5% status? Now you know the number. The rest is strategy. Read Next: Here's what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy. Image: Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Want To Be In The Top 5% Of Households? Here's Exactly How Much You Need—And It's Much Lower Than You'd Guess originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store