Never-ending parliamentary village build ‘a cash cow'
Civic activists have called on authorities to investigate why the Mpumalanga government has not finished the construction of the province's parliamentary village.
The project, begun in 2014 and should have been completed in 2017, was originally budgeted to cost R300 million, but has now sucked up more than R500 million.
Mpumalanga provincial spokesperson George Mthethwa said the government was 'striving to finish the project as soon as we can.
Mpumalanga's parliamentary village remains incomplete
'A lot of work has been done.'
But he added, that 'one of the major factors of delays is interruption of projects by communities demanding employment and the construction mafias, who demand 30% from contractors.'
ALSO READ: Dam level warnings intensify in Mpumalanga
'These challenges put the lives of workers at risk, thereby obstructing the finalisation. In some instances, delays are caused by natural causes, such as rain.'
A source close to the matter said the project was being delayed intentionally because 'there are government officials who rented out their houses to associates of their colleagues, so they fear the completion of the project will interrupt their businesses'.
Wayne Duvenage, CEO of the non-profit civil rights group, Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse, said it was another example of a combination of gross maladministration, stemming from a possible combination of poor leadership, lack of oversight and high probability of corruption.
Example of gross maladministration, lack of oversight and corruption
Duvenage said the only reason the project did not reach finality is that someone, or persons, was making a lot of money out of an ongoing and overpriced project.
'I don't think for one minute that this is an innocent delay.
ALSO READ: Armed men rob Mbombela filling station, flee on foot
'If there is no corruption involved, then it is gross incompetence and lack of leadership oversight, in which case someone should be fired.
'But that won't happen, because there is a high possibility of connected cadres and cronies eating from this healthy flow of money.
'Unfortunately for you and I and every [tax-paying] citizen, just as this has happened in many similar incidents in the past, we will bear the brunt of this loss and the likelihood of anyone being held accountable is extremely slim.'
'This is outrageous' – Godi
Former MP Themba Godi said: 'This is outrageous.
'Budgets cannot be allocated yearly to the same project and yet there is no completion.
ALSO READ: Mpumalanga education opens housing allowance fraud case against two officials
'The departments submit annual procurement plans to the National Treasury. Surely there should be mechanisms to account for and confirm expenditure on previous projects?
'If money is spent but the projects are not complete, clearly the money has been misappropriated.
'The money has been stolen.
Money stolen
'A simple forensic check would reveal the corruption of the tender holder and the officials who made the payments.'
The DA in the province has called on the government to immediately act against the construction mafia, which has crippled the construction industry and delayed infrastructure projects.
NOW READ: David Mabuza's funeral date confirmed as Mokonyane dismisses ANC criticism claims
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
14 hours ago
- The Citizen
High Court sentences Seth Nthai for soliciting R5 Million bribe
In a landmark judgment delivered by the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division in Johannesburg on July 30, former senior counsel Seth Nthai was convicted for soliciting a R5m bribe linked to a high-profile international arbitration case. Nthai, who represented the South African government in the high-profile Piero Foresti arbitration dispute, pleaded guilty to soliciting a substantial bribe from Italian businessman Mario Marcenaro during a meeting in Sandton on October 10, 2009. The intended bribe aimed to sway the arbitration outcome in favour of Marcenaro and co-claimants, threatening the integrity of a case involving the South African government itself. Also read: Sandton crime stats show ups and downs While the R5m was never paid, the court emphasised that even the solicitation of such a bribe represents a severe violation of ethical and legal responsibilities. The sentence included a R500 000 fine or two years' imprisonment, plus a five-year suspended prison sentence contingent on avoiding further offences. The National Prosecuting Authority's regional spokesperson, Phindi Mjonondwane, praised the conviction as a milestone in the fight against corruption, particularly within the legal sector. 'This case exposes how corruption can undermine justice and public trust, especially when legal professionals manipulate the system for personal gain.' 'Although the R5m was never paid, the court found that the mere solicitation of such a bribe constituted a serious breach of legal and ethical duty.' Also read: Billboard visually pollutes Bryanston Highlighting the complex legal proceedings, including the recusal of a judge and retrials, Mjonondwane said that Nthai's cooperation and guilty plea were factored into the sentencing. 'The case had a complex legal history, including extensive trial proceedings and the recusal of the initial presiding judge after several state witnesses had already testified. This led to the matter being restarted before a new judge, ultimately resulting in the current plea agreement. 'This conviction affirms our commitment to fighting corruption, especially within the legal profession and among public office bearers. The abuse of public trust and the justice system by legal professionals is a serious threat to the rule of law. Mr Nthai's actions were a betrayal of that trust, and this sentence sends a clear message that no one is above the law.' Follow us on our Whatsapp channel, Facebook, X, Instagram and TikTok for the latest updates and inspiration!
Eyewitness News
15 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Morero under pressure to sort out Joburg's finances or risk losing Treasury funding
JOHANNESBURG - The mayor of Johannesburg, Dada Morero, is again under pressure to sort out the city's finances or risk losing funding from the National Treasury. This after Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana recently wrote to the mayor, complaining about the poor management of the municipal coffers. In a letter, dated July 30th, Godongwana said National Treasury would stop its conditional grant funding if it did not see improvement in the handling of the city's finances. READ MORE: • Treasury threatens to stop funding Joburg municipality if it doesn't get its finances in order • Joburg DA wants Morero to publicise the terms of reference of his 'bomb squad' • CoJ launces probe into corruption allegations within its Transport Dept In his letter, Godongwana raised concerns over the city racking up over R22 billion in unauthorised, irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenditure for the 2023/24 financial year. Godongwana said that as the mayor, Morero had a responsibility to ensure that the city's finances were under control. The mayor's office has yet to respond to queries from EWN, however, at a media briefing on Sunday, Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi said that he had discussed the matter with Morero. "The executive mayor is very clear, with the bomb squad he has established and the presidential team that has been assigned to assist us here, all these issues that are identified are issues they have moved on them. They have attended to them, its just that the letter came on the basis that what they are seeing is the last report they have received, but inbetween this period the letter was written and what they have done as a municipality, there has been meaningful progress." Meanwhile, the Democratic Alliance (DA) in Johannesburg has warned that losing grant funding from National Treasury would collapse the city, with residents suffering the most.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Court halts auction of father's car amid paternity dispute
The court came to the aid of a father whose car was due to be auctioned to pay for his arrears in child maintenance. Image: File A father received a temporary lifeline during an urgent application when the court stopped his R300,000 car from being auctioned off over R21,000 outstanding maintenance debt. The man told the Limpopo High Court, sitting in Thohoyandou, that he is disputing that the child for which he has to pay maintenance, is in fact his. He reasoned that if his car is auctioned off to foot the bill for the outstanding maintenance towards a child which is not even his, he will suffer irreparable harm. The man and his wife are embroiled in divorce proceedings and the husband was ordered by a court to pay interim maintenance. As the husband is disputing his paternity to the child he stopped paying the interim maintenance as per the court order. He claimed that the maintenance order had been obtained fraudulently as his wife maintained that he is the father. He said there is a court application pending, where the issue of paternity will be addressed. He said a grave injustice will be done if the car is sold before the pending application. Following his non-payment, the Sheriff removed the vehicle of the First Respondent upon the instruction of his wife's attorney for purposes of selling it on a public auction. The husband submitted that he would suffer irreparable harm if the application was not heard on an urgent basis and the Sheriff were to proceed with the selling of his vehicle on a public auction, seeing that the amount to be repaid in terms of the warrant of execution is R21,000,00 whereas the value of the motor vehicle is approximately R300,000,00. The wife, on the other hand, said she and the applicant entered into a valid customary marriage and that he has accepted the child to be his. She argued that there is a maintenance order in place and he should thus pay-up. She said the court is the upper guardian of all children and therefore should protect the rights of the child. The court said everyone has the right to have any dispute that can be resolved by the application of law decided in a fair public hearing before a court. It noted the fact that the amount owing being a mere R21,000,00 and the value of his vehicle being about R300,000,00 and said should it be sold on a public auction his loss would be inordinate in relation to the amount owing. He would never be able to recover the loss if it is found that he is not the father and does not need to pay maintenance, the court said in granting him the interdict. It also noted that the child has the right to know who her biological father is. The interdict will thus remain in place until the finalisation of the maintenance and paternity battle. The Sheriff was in the meantime ordered to hand the vehicle back to the man. [email protected]
