logo
Why is the BBC so obsessed with Munroe Bergdorf?

Why is the BBC so obsessed with Munroe Bergdorf?

Spectator30-06-2025
Can the BBC do anything right? Just days before it messed up spectacularly by failing to cut away from Bob Vylan's offensive performance at Glastonbury, it released a podcast in which activist Munroe Bergdorf told listeners 'how transitioning allowed her to discover love'. The BBC, the former broadcaster that's now a HR department with some channels attached, is increasingly ladling up such tatty 'content'. But this podcast episode – part of the 'How To Be In Love' series – marks a new, desperate low.
'We are constantly told that trans people are an abomination,' says Bergdorf. Really?
Hosted by the amiable and intelligent Rylan Clark, whose wit and charm are, frankly, being frittered away on such rubbish, Bergdorf – who was born a man but has now 'transitioned' – appears to claim to be a lesbian, on the basis of having fallen in love with another man who also claims to be a woman. Yes, you read that right.
'I never thought I would fall in love with another woman,' Bergdorf tells Rylan, who listens with an admirably straight face that is a picture to behold. Why are we paying for this?
Bergdorf goes on. And on. And on. 'We are constantly told that trans people are an abomination, that we shouldn't even be friends with trans people, that you shouldn't employ trans people,' Bergdorf says, speaking from an alternative universe where that is actually happening.
Who exactly is 'constantly telling' us this? Who is saying we shouldn't be friends with trans people? And which companies have said they won't give them a job? There aren't any, because if there were, they'd soon find themselves in court. As Debbie Hayton has pointed out in The Spectator repeatedly, trans people are not being routinely persecuted in Britain. The Equality Act protects these individuals from discrimination based on their gender.
Yet claims about trans people being persecuted have become louder in the wake of the Supreme Court's verdict earlier this year, when judges said that the legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex. That decision finally restored some much-needed common sense to the gender debate. I've been stewed like a prune in this discussion for nigh on a decade, and all I've seen is women demanding their basic, sex-based rights and safeguards from men – and being given the cold shoulder. Finally, those brave women have been backed up by the judges. But, despite what some might like to suggest, it didn't lead to a pogrom of trans people.
Yet the fact that the BBC was willing to broadcast Bergdorf's rant – coming hot on the heels of the the Corporation allowing a woman to appear on its gay dating show I Kissed A Boy – shows that it has some catching up to do. No special dispensations have been removed from trans people in Britain. But the BBC loves a victim, and at the sight of a picturesque character like Bergdorf, the bigwigs down at Broadcasting House's tails start wagging like the clappers.
Bergdorf looks like a gay man's idea of a glamorous lady that straight men would desire. But we shouldn't forget that Bergdorf – a former Labour advisor, of course – once claimed that 'the white race is the most violent and oppressive force of nature on Earth'; called a Twitter follower a 'hairy barren lesbian; and spoke of wanting to 'gay bash' a television star. What's all that about? And why does the BBC think anyone cares what Bergdorf thinks after saying those things?
Bergdorf's book, Transitional, was marketed as a 'landmark manifesto from the pioneering activist and model'. I've had the misfortune of having read it, and let me tell you this: there's nothing 'landmark' about this book. Although it is admirably frank, I'll give Bergdorf that – it was more disturbing than I expected. What emerges is a picture of Bergdorf that also comes across in the interview with Clark: nobody loves Bergdorf more than Bergdorf, and nobody hates Bergdorf more than Bergdorf. Certainly, nobody else is anywhere near as interested in Bergdorf as Bergdorf. And this is who the BBC is turning to for advice on relationships? Do yourself a favour and read the horoscopes: you'll find more wisdom there.
The BBC has not afforded anything like the same welcome to the detractors of the LGBTQ+ movement as it has done to the likes of Bergdorf. Why aren't Helen Joyce, Kathleen Stock or the authors of The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht being invited regularly on Woman's Hour? I'd happily pay my licence fee if they did. Instead, they think giving a platform to Bergdorf is a better investment of our cash.
This gender gibberish is, fingers crossed, coming to an end, but the BBC – another thing hopefully nearing its demise – is still rolling along with it. Let them go down together.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

We hated Andy Carroll - he was HORRIBLE: Lou Teasdale's friends tell KATIE HIND every poisonous detail of a break-up that's the talk of Essex, reveal appalling 'last straw' and spill 'perfect f*** you' from wife he left for her
We hated Andy Carroll - he was HORRIBLE: Lou Teasdale's friends tell KATIE HIND every poisonous detail of a break-up that's the talk of Essex, reveal appalling 'last straw' and spill 'perfect f*** you' from wife he left for her

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

We hated Andy Carroll - he was HORRIBLE: Lou Teasdale's friends tell KATIE HIND every poisonous detail of a break-up that's the talk of Essex, reveal appalling 'last straw' and spill 'perfect f*** you' from wife he left for her

When Andy Carroll and Lou Teasdale were packing for Glastonbury earlier this summer, they were looking forward to a joyous week surrounded by friends to celebrate their one-year anniversary together. They had met at the music extravaganza the previous June, shortly before former England star Andy announced he was splitting from wife of two years Billi Mucklow – formerly of reality TV show The Only Way Is Essex.

Destination X reveals savage ‘sabotage' twist as player handed game-changing advantage ahead of brutal cliffhanger
Destination X reveals savage ‘sabotage' twist as player handed game-changing advantage ahead of brutal cliffhanger

Scottish Sun

time6 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Destination X reveals savage ‘sabotage' twist as player handed game-changing advantage ahead of brutal cliffhanger

DESTINATION X unveiled a brutal 'sabotage' twist - with one player receiving a huge advantage amid a savage cliffhanger. The BBC programme sees a group of strangers try to figure out where they are in Europe through a series of clues in a bid to win £100,000. 5 Viewers have been gripped by new competition series Destination X Credit: BBC 5 Host Rob Brydon revealed a game-changing twist to one player Credit: BBC 5 Josh received massive power within the competitive game Credit: BBC Contestants will try any tactic to win and the latest episode saw one given a massive advantage. The players balance champagne glasses on a tray - while answering tough questions about their opponents. Josh, a 26-year-old pilot, emerged as the victor and soon learned of a huge twist. Host Rob Brydon privately informed Josh that he would have the power to sabotage a rival. Elimination occurs when the line-up place their 'X' markers based on where they believe themselves to be. Josh received the ability to move someone's 'X' by 250km, which could effectively ensure their exit. Reacting to the game-changing news, he said: "I feel like I've got a lot of influence on the game, which I like having." Josh also didn't have to take part in the next challenge - but got to see a big clue alongside the winners. Elsewhere, he identified fellow players Nick, Judith and Claire as potential targets for sabotage. Although Josh seemingly planned to choose Nick, viewers will have to learn the outcome. Destination X viewers slam show for being 'too easy' after they guess location - as contestant makes huge clue blunder This episode ended on a tense cliffhanger - with Rob having dropped a huge bombshell. Namely, that the bottom two players' X markers were only 600 metres apart. One viewer wrote online: "The sabotage is not fair." Another remarked: "Sorry but why did Josh get to win a ridiculously overpowered advantage AND get the winning clue just from the standard side game??" Whether Nick - who was identified by the others as the biggest threat - has his exit sealed or survives to play on remains to be seen. Viewers will also have to wait to discover where exactly the latest Destination X is. Players and fans alike seem to agree it's Italy, but are divided on the precise spot. One person wrote on X: "They're defo on the south of Italy near Sicily." Another penned: "Changed me mind, Italy, Venice?" A third chimed in: "Donatella Versace. That drink looks like a Campari Spritz. Milan?" Destination X continues on BBC One and iPlayer. 5 Josh had a big decision to make Credit: BBC

Destination X reveals savage ‘sabotage' twist as player handed game-changing advantage ahead of brutal cliffhanger
Destination X reveals savage ‘sabotage' twist as player handed game-changing advantage ahead of brutal cliffhanger

The Sun

time6 hours ago

  • The Sun

Destination X reveals savage ‘sabotage' twist as player handed game-changing advantage ahead of brutal cliffhanger

DESTINATION X unveiled a brutal 'sabotage' twist - with one player receiving a huge advantage amid a savage cliffhanger. The BBC programme sees a group of strangers try to figure out where they are in Europe through a series of clues in a bid to win £100,000. 5 5 5 Contestants will try any tactic to win and the latest episode saw one given a massive advantage. The players balance champagne glasses on a tray - while answering tough questions about their opponents. Josh, a 26-year-old pilot, emerged as the victor and soon learned of a huge twist. Host Rob Brydon privately informed Josh that he would have the power to sabotage a rival. Elimination occurs when the line-up place their 'X' markers based on where they believe themselves to be. Josh received the ability to move someone's 'X' by 250km, which could effectively ensure their exit. Reacting to the game-changing news, he said: "I feel like I've got a lot of influence on the game, which I like having." Josh also didn't have to take part in the next challenge - but got to see a big clue alongside the winners. Elsewhere, he identified fellow players Nick, Judith and Claire as potential targets for sabotage. Although Josh seemingly planned to choose Nick, viewers will have to learn the outcome. Destination X viewers slam show for being 'too easy' after they guess location - as contestant makes huge clue blunder This episode ended on a tense cliffhanger - with Rob having dropped a huge bombshell. Namely, that the bottom two players' X markers were only 600 metres apart. One viewer wrote online: "The sabotage is not fair." Another remarked: "Sorry but why did Josh get to win a ridiculously overpowered advantage AND get the winning clue just from the standard side game??" Whether Nick - who was identified by the others as the biggest threat - has his exit sealed or survives to play on remains to be seen. Viewers will also have to wait to discover where exactly the latest Destination X is. Players and fans alike seem to agree it's Italy, but are divided on the precise spot. One person wrote on X: "They're defo on the south of Italy near Sicily." A third chimed in: "Donatella Versace. That drink looks like a Campari Spritz. Milan?" Destination X continues on BBC One and iPlayer. 5 5

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store