Mass. Gov. Healey announces hiring freeze for executive branch agencies
For the second time in just about a year, Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey has hit state agencies with a hiring freeze.
The freeze announced Wednesday comes in response to what the Democratic administration has described as 'widespread economic uncertainty' at the national level, and a 'tightening budget outlook' at home.
The freeze, which is set to take effect May 27, will apply to all executive branch agencies and departments under the administration's control.
Those agencies, which range from the Department of Transportation and Correction to Health and Human Services, will be barred from hiring new employees. And there won't be a waiver process, Healey's office said in a statement.
There will be exemptions, however, for certain positions, including public safety officers and direct care providers, the administration said.
'The people of Massachusetts expect us to protect and maximize their tax dollars, and that's exactly what we're doing,' Healey said in a statement.
'Tariffs and funding cuts from Washington are causing so much economic damage and instability.' she continued. 'We are taking this step to prepare for more uncertain economic times, protect taxpayer dollars, and move our state forward while ensuring funding will be available for the vital services people need.'
Healey and her Democratic allies on Beacon Hill have repeatedly made it clear that the state won't be able to backfill the potential loss of billions of dollars in federal funding targeted by the Trump administration.
A more than $61 billion budget plan approved by the majority-Democrat state House, for instance, is premised on $16 billion in federal support.
The top Democrat in the state Senate has described the messages coming from Washington as a form of 'whiplash.'
'I think if this keeps up, we'll be all walking around with neck braces,' Senate President Karen E. Spilka, D-Middlesex/Norfolk, told MassLive earlier this year.
The Ashland Democrat, like Healey and other lawmakers, has since intensified her criticism of the Republican White House amid attacks on Harvard University and its on-again, off-again trade war.
A hiring freeze across the executive branch will give the state 'added flexibility in the budget to respond and react to unforeseen program needs and other deficiencies that may arise,' state Administration and Finance Secretary Matthew J. Gorzkowicz said.
Massachusetts collected $6.8 billion in taxes in April, which was 8.1% more than it collected in April 2024, and $1.1 billion, or 19.5% ahead of its benchmarks, according to state Revenue Department data.
Year-to-date collections totaled $36.5 billion, which is $2.6 billion or 7.8% more than actual collections in the same period at this time last year, and nearly $1.9 billion, or 5.5% ahead of projections, that same data show.
Still, the state's 'uncertain economic future in the [fiscal 2026 budget year] has been made less predictable by the threat of federal funding cuts and recent market upheaval,' Gorzkowicz continued. 'While we hope for the best, it is both prudent and responsible to be prepared and take control of what we can now.'
Healey's office said it would review the hiring freeze once lawmakers pass, and the Democratic signs, a new budget for the fiscal year that starts July 1.
The Senate's top budget-writer said earlier this month that he's hopeful the Legislature will pass a budget by the June 30 deadline.
It has been more than a decade since lawmakers have met that obligation.
In April 2024, the administration implemented what officials at the time called 'hiring controls' -- not a 'freeze' -- that required Executive Office for Administration and Finance approval of new employees.
Those measures expired Nov. 1. Officials said the policies saved about $21 million, according to State House News Service.
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BlackRock removed from Texas boycott list after quitting climate groups
By Ross Kerber (Reuters) -Texas on Tuesday removed BlackRock from a list of companies seen as boycotting the energy industry, a step the New York asset manager won only with steep cuts to its climate ambitions. Texas Comptroller Glenn Hegar said the decision reflected BlackRock's retreats from industry climate groups like the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative. He also noted how the firm has lowered its support for shareholder environmental resolutions and backed a new Texas Stock Exchange. BlackRock "has acknowledged the real social and economic costs, both here in Texas and globally, that come from limiting investment in the oil and gas industry," Hegar said in a statement. The delisting will make it easier for Texas state agencies and funds to do business with the top asset manager. It could also help BlackRock answer claims brought by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton over its environmental record. BlackRock representatives did not immediately comment. Hegar had added BlackRock and various European managers to his list in 2022 under a state law passed the prior year in response to Wall Street's embrace, at the time, of environmental and social investment priorities. Faced with the political pressure, various BlackRock rivals had also left industry climate groups and cut back on their support for shareholder resolutions, which called for changes like emissions cuts or limits. Democratic leaders and climate activists have accused the companies of going soft on their support for environmental matters they once touted. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk Slams Trump's Spending Bill: ‘A Disgusting Abomination'
A serious rift has erupted between Elon Musk and President Trump over the massive government spending bill the president has urged Congress to pass. Musk, who donated nearly $275 million toward Trump's 2024 election campaign, on Tuesday posted on X an unambiguous denunciation of the bill, which is called the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act. More from Variety London Mayor Sadiq Khan Hails 'Adolescence' for Having 'Mainstreamed' Conversation About 'Epidemic' of Violence Against Women Jon Stewart Tackles Elon Musk's Exit From the Trump Administration: 'This Guy Has Seen Some S--' Elon Musk Says New York Times Is 'Lying Their Ass Off' About His Alleged Drug Use; Newspaper Defends Coverage 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' The tech mogul wrote that the bill 'will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit' and that 'Congress is making America bankrupt.' Musk, the world's richest person, also posted a warning that voters would 'fire all politicians who betrayed the American people' in the 2026 midterm elections. On May 28, Musk announced the he would end his tenure as a 'special government employee' — leading the White House's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE — after 128 days. Per the U.S. Department of the Interior, a person cannot serve in such a role for more than 130 days in a consecutive year. Sen. Ran Paul (R-Kentucky) was among those chiming in to agree with Musk. 'We have both seen the massive waste in government spending and we know another $5 trillion in debt is a huge mistake. We can and must do better,' he wrote, quoting Musk's post. Trump, on Truth Social, earlier in the day slammed Paul, writing 'Rand Paul has very little understanding of the BBB, especially the tremendous GROWTH that is coming. He loves voting 'NO' on everything, he thinks it's good politics, but it's not. The BBB is a big WINNER!!!' At a White House press briefing, Fox News correspondent Peter Doocy asked press secretary Karoline Leavitt 'how mad do you think President Trump is going to be' about Musk's comments? Leavitt responded that Trump 'already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it.' The One Big, Beautiful Bill Act passed the Republican-controlled House but has yet to clear the Senate. The legislation would make Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent (with wealthy Americans benefiting the most) and increase funding for the U.S. military and immigration enforcement. In addition, the version that passed the House cuts funding for health, nutrition, education and clean energy programs. Musk has criticized the 'Big Beautiful Bill' before, but using tamer terminology. Last week, for example, Musk criticized Trump's 'massive spending bill' in an interview with CBS's 'Sunday Morning,' saying the legislation 'undermines the work' of DOGE. Best of Variety What's Coming to Netflix in June 2025 New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts?


New York Times
30 minutes ago
- New York Times
There Are Limits to Republican Lawmakers' Reach, Even in Texas
For weeks, Republicans lawmakers in Texas had promised that they would require proof of citizenship to vote in most elections, hoping the 2025 Legislature would be a vanguard for other conservative states considering similar measures. Voting rights groups cried foul. An analysis showed that the bill could disproportionately harm Republicans, who were less likely than Democrats to have the required documents. Then, as the Texas legislative session ended on Monday, the bill died. Its failure was one of the many surprising results of this year's legislative session, which was among the most conservative in recent memory. The Legislature passed measures requiring the Ten Commandments in every classroom and creating publicly funded vouchers for private-school tuition. But the session also revealed the limits of right-wing governance, even in a state that President Trump won decisively and that is controlled by Republicans at every level of power. Lawmakers failed to pass strict curbs on wind and solar energy, and a tightened ban on abortion pills from out of state. Texas was a particularly good test case for the G.O.P.'s reach because for the first time in years, Republicans in the Legislature were not actively warring. Gone were the internal fights between House and Senate Republicans that had marred the last several sessions, which occur every two years. Instead, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who controls the State Senate with a firm hand, got mostly what he wanted, a more compliant Texas House. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.