logo
It Ends With Us actor says he's ‘surprised' by Blake Lively's ‘nearly nude' claims

It Ends With Us actor says he's ‘surprised' by Blake Lively's ‘nearly nude' claims

Independent08-04-2025

Adam Mondschein, who played a doctor in It Ends With Us, has said he was 'surprised' by claims Blake Lively made in her legal action against director and co-star Justin Baldoni.
When Lively filed an amended lawsuit against Baldoni in February, one of her complaints was that he had cast his friend Mondschein to play the doctor for a scene in which she was depicted giving birth.
The legal complaint stated that Baldoni 'introduced his 'best friend' to play the role of the OBGYN, when ordinarily, a small role of this nature would be filled by a local actor.'
It continued: 'Ms Lively felt that the selection of Mr Baldoni's friend for this intimate role, in which the actor's face and hands were in close proximity to her nearly nude genitalia for a birth scene, was invasive and humiliating.'
In a new statement to Page Six, Mondschein said: 'I'm not going to speculate as to Ms Lively's motivations for mentioning me in the complaint. Needless to say, my experience working with her is very different than the one she described in her lawsuit.
'Indeed, I was surprised to read her description of the scene.'
Responding to the suggestion that Lively was 'nearly nude,' Mondschein claims: 'Her costume included a full hospital gown, black shorts and torso-covering prosthetic to make her appear pregnant in addition to whatever personal garments she chose.'
He goes on to state that Lively 'never complained or expressed discomfort at any point because nothing unusual or improper occurred. It was entirely professional.'
As to whether another actor should have been cast, Mondschein wrote: 'Ms Lively's insinuations regarding my qualifications are offensive, as my bonafides are easily searchable online.
'Lastly, I was, in fact, a local hire (my wife and I are from New York and spend significant time there). As such, I, like any actor accepting that contract, was required to cover my own travel and living expenses in connection with the job.'
Mondschein added that he would be willing to testify if the lawsuit makes it to trial, saying: 'If I'm called to testify in the case I will answer truthfully, and more freely, whatever is asked of me with all the legal protection that affords. In particular, by noting that Ms Lively was not 'nearly nude' in the scene we shot together.'
The case is currently scheduled to go to trial starting March 9, 2026.
Lively is suing Baldoni
Baldoni is also suing The New York Times for $250m over their reporting of the case, and he is countersuing Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds for allegedly attempting to 'destroy' his reputation and career.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jury resumes deliberations in Harvey Weinstein sex crimes retrial
Jury resumes deliberations in Harvey Weinstein sex crimes retrial

South Wales Argus

time18 hours ago

  • South Wales Argus

Jury resumes deliberations in Harvey Weinstein sex crimes retrial

The panel, which was handed the case on Thursday morning, has requested to hear a readback of some testimony from two of Weinstein's accusers, as well as to see medical records from one of those women. The jury of seven women and five men is considering two counts of criminal sex act and one count of rape against the 73-year-old Oscar-winning movie producer, with the criminal sex act charges the higher-degree felonies. Harvey Weinstein has denied all the charges against him (Jefferson Siegel /The New York Times via AP, Pool/PA) Weinstein has pleaded not guilty. Sexual misconduct allegations against Weinstein propelled the #MeToo movement in 2017. He was eventually convicted of sex crimes in New York and California, but the New York conviction was overturned last year, leading to the retrial before a new jury and a different judge. Jurors heard more than five weeks of evidence, including lengthy testimony from three accusers.

Jury resumes deliberations in Harvey Weinstein sex crimes retrial
Jury resumes deliberations in Harvey Weinstein sex crimes retrial

Western Telegraph

time18 hours ago

  • Western Telegraph

Jury resumes deliberations in Harvey Weinstein sex crimes retrial

The panel, which was handed the case on Thursday morning, has requested to hear a readback of some testimony from two of Weinstein's accusers, as well as to see medical records from one of those women. The jury of seven women and five men is considering two counts of criminal sex act and one count of rape against the 73-year-old Oscar-winning movie producer, with the criminal sex act charges the higher-degree felonies. Harvey Weinstein has denied all the charges against him (Jefferson Siegel /The New York Times via AP, Pool/PA) Weinstein has pleaded not guilty. Sexual misconduct allegations against Weinstein propelled the #MeToo movement in 2017. He was eventually convicted of sex crimes in New York and California, but the New York conviction was overturned last year, leading to the retrial before a new jury and a different judge. Jurors heard more than five weeks of evidence, including lengthy testimony from three accusers.

Blake Lively offers to do FUNERAL arrangements for fans in bizarre It Ends With Us themed post amid lawsuit
Blake Lively offers to do FUNERAL arrangements for fans in bizarre It Ends With Us themed post amid lawsuit

Daily Mail​

time2 days ago

  • Daily Mail​

Blake Lively offers to do FUNERAL arrangements for fans in bizarre It Ends With Us themed post amid lawsuit

Blake Lively left fans perplexed over her latest social media post as she playfully offered her floral arranging services to fans amid her legal war with Justin Baldoni. Although she has certainly had her hands full navigating her ongoing lawsuit against her former It Ends with Us costar, 41, the Gossip Girl star, 37, took a much-needed break from defending herself to show off one of her many talents. 'My flowers babies, from seeds, to cutting, to arrangement,' she wrote on her Instagram Story, alongside an innocuous picture of peonies and Russian sage placed into a vase on her dining room table. In a bizarre move, the mother-of-four, who has an estimated personal net worth of $30 million, joked that she was open for business to create floral arrangements for her followers' 'next graduation, funeral or wedding.' During her press tour for It Ends With Us last year, in which she a florist named Lily Bloom, Lively shared her love for floristry as a form of 'straight-up peace' to her. Prior to filing her sexual harassment lawsuit against Baldoni, who denies all her claims, the Another Simple Favor actress admitted she's 'always thought' of herself as a florist, well before playing one. 'I buy corner store flowers, take them home, reassemble them & give them new life,' she revealed on Instagram. 'Ever since I moved to the city at 19, that's been one of my creative and meditative anchors. It's design, it's interacting with nature, it's a multi sensory joy.' She continued: 'Whenever I get the opportunity to garden from scratch and assemble fresh arrangements, I feel like the luckiest person on the planet. It's straight up peace. No there's no joke coming. Just me being earnest about flowers. Ugh pure sincerity. I hate it here.' In an interview with People last August, Lively also reflected on how flowers played a meaningful part in how her husband Ryan Reynolds wooed her. 'When my husband and I first got together, he would send me a bouquet of flowers every week but he would always send a card and it would just be a sentence of something that had happened that week. Something funny or emotional that one of us said,' she gushed. ''It was just a little quote of the week. It was such a beautiful, romantic thing.' Lively and Reynolds first met on the set of The Green Lantern in 2010 and exchanged vows in 2012. They're the proud parents of three girls James, 10, Betty, 8, and Inez, 5, and one son - Olin, 2. Her latest post comes just days after suffered another courtroom blow in her ongoing legal battle with Baldoni. Earlier this week, a New York judge threw a curveball in her attempt to withdraw her 'emotional distress' claims against the actor Court filings obtained by the Daily Mail reveal the two parties had been slugging it out over the actress's claims that her co-star had caused her emotional distress, with Baldoni's team demanding she provide proof from her medical records. Lively's team instead then attempted to quietly drop that element from her blockbuster lawsuit on Friday but, critically, without prejudice – meaning the claim could be refiled at a later date. She also filed a motion on Monday to block Baldoni's request for her medical records arguing that she voluntarily sought to withdraw the claim in 'good faith to streamline the dispute'. On Tuesday, Judge Lewis Liman agreed to deny Baldoni's motion based on Lively's decision to drop the claims, however, he also ruled that both sides will now have to negotiate whether her emotional distress element will be dismissed from the case permanently. In another blow, Judge Liman said even if the claims are not dismissed, Lively's team will no longer be able to produce evidence of emotional distress in court. The 24-hour legal spat has already seen claims and counterclaims traded by both sides, with Baldoni's team saying Lively is trying to 'have it both ways'. On Monday, legal representatives for Lively hit back with a furious statement accusing Baldoni of orchestrating a 'press stunt' and saying they had offered to drop the emotional distress claims in 'good faith.' In a statement released to the Daily Mail, attorneys Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb said: 'Once again this is a routine part of the litigation process that is being used as a press stunt. 'We are doing what trial lawyers do: preparing our case for trial by streamlining and focusing it; they are doing what they do: desperately seeking another tired round of tabloid coverage. 'The Baldoni-Wayfarer strategy of filing retaliatory claims has exposed them to expansive new damages claims under California law, rendering certain of Ms. Lively's original claims no longer necessary. 'Ms. Lively continues to allege emotional distress, as part of numerous other claims in her lawsuit, such as sexual harassment and retaliation, and massive additional compensatory damages on all of her claims.' Then, in a fiery letter obtained by the Daily Mail, Gottleib and Hudson attempted to have Baldoni's motion to compel medical records dismissed, arguing it was based on 'two brazenly false assertions.' But that move failed thanks to Judge Liman, with Lively's emotional distress claims now off the table. Despite the win, Baldoni will still have to defend himself over her other claims which include sexual harassment and the orchestration of a smear campaign against her. The 41-year-old is also pursuing a $400million countersuit of his own that also claims defamation and accuses the glamorous blonde of damaging his reputation and career. The legal spat has produced months of negative headlines for Lively who has also had to look on as her friendship with superstar bestie Taylor Swift deteriorates in public, largely due to the singer's fury at being dragged into the case. Last month, the singer found herself on the receiving end of a now withdrawn subpoena and in the middle of a row over whether Lively had tried to force her to issue a supportive message by threatening to release a decade's worth of text messages. The former provoked a stinging response from her rep who said the megastar had had nothing to do with It Ends With Us beyond providing a song for the soundtrack. The statement read: 'Taylor Swift never set foot on the set of this movie, she was not involved in any casting or creative decisions, she did not score the film, she never saw an edit or made any notes on the film, she did not even see It Ends With Us until weeks after its public release, and was traveling around the globe during 2023 and 2024 headlining the biggest tour in history.' Her spokesperson added: 'The connection Taylor had to this film was permitting the use of one song, 'My Tears Ricochet. 'Given that her involvement was licensing a song for the film, which 19 other artists also did, this document subpoena is designed to use Taylor Swift's name to draw public interest by creating tabloid clickbait instead of focusing on the facts of the case.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store