African Development Bank to pick new head to confront US funding cuts
Washington wants to cut $555 million in funding to the AfDB and its African Development Fund, which offers low-priced financing to the continent's poor nations.
'This is going to be a major task and it is effectively the new president's first test,' said Hannah Ryder, founder of Development Reimagined, an Africa-focused consultancy.
The annual gathering of heads of state and finance officials, taking place this year in Abidjan, is one of the biggest finance meetings on the continent.
It comes as heavily indebted governments in the region are searching for new sources of financing to bankroll their development projects.
AfDB, which is Africa's largest development finance institution with $318 billion capital, is owned by 54 African states and G7 nations such as the U.S. and Japan. Its biggest shareholder is Nigeria.
The next round of replenishment for the ADF, which is held on a three-year cycle, is scheduled to take place in November. It is targeting to raise $25 billion, up from $8.9 billion in the last round.
The new president will have to try to persuade the U.S. to reinstate the funding, seek additional funds from non-regional members of the bank like China, or Gulf countries like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, in return for more say, or ask African states to contribute more, Ryder said.
Five candidates - from South Africa, Senegal, Zambia, Chad and Mauritania - are vying to replace outgoing President Akinwumi Adesina, who will step down in September after serving the maximum two five-year terms.
AfDB will focus on boosting electricity connections, increasing food production, fostering industries, integrating economies on the continent and lifting people's living standards over the next decade, Adesina told a media reception at the meeting on Monday.
The winner, who must secure at least 50.01% of the votes from the 54 African member states of the bank, and in a second vote from all 81 members, including non-African ones, will be announced on Thursday.
The bank is grappling with the challenges of a changing global economy after U.S. President Donald Trump returned to the White House, including higher U.S. import tariffs.
'We expect the meeting to discuss implications of current global events arising from the Trump administration,' said Fred Muhumuza, a lecturer at Makerere University's business school in Kampala. 'Many of the key contributors have been cutting bilateral support to African countries.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Truce call triggered Modi-Trump fallout
Listen to article A tense phone call between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump over a ceasefire between India and Pakistan has emerged as a key flashpoint in the dramatic collapse of ties between the two leaders, according to a report published by American financial publication Bloomberg. The two leaders spoke during the June G7 summit in Canada, where Modi attended as a guest. At Trump's request, the two held a 35-minute call, which Indian officials say, centred on Trump's insistence that Washington deserved credit for brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan following four-days of clashes in May. Modi, according to the Indian account, rejected Trump's claims, asserting that the talks to cease military hostilities took place directly through military channels between New Delhi and Islamabad, and only at Pakistan's request. "India has not accepted mediation in the past and will never do so," Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri told reporters after the call. Misri's claim was in sharp contrast with President Trump's insistence that he had brokered the truce between India and Pakistan. Islamabad has also repeatedly said that Modi approached the American leader with a request to play a role in cessation of hostilities between the two nuclear neighbours. Tensions escalated sharply after the Indian leader learned that Trump planned to host Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir, for a lunch at the White House the following day. According to officials briefed on the matter, that moment brought the diplomatic tension to a head. Bloomberg reports that on June 17, Trump extended an invitation to Modi for a formal dinner at the White House. However, the Indian premier declined the invite, fearing that the meeting could be used to orchestrate a direct encounter with Field Marshal Munir. The fallout quickly spilled into the public sphere. Within weeks, Trump imposed additional 25% tariffs on Indian exports, citing New Delhi's continued purchases of Russian oil as a core concern. With some duties now reaching as high as 50%, India is facing one of the steepest tariff barriers of any US trading partner. The tariffs are expected to take effect on August 17, unless a trade deal is reached in time. Speaking at a press event this month, Trump described the Indian economy as "dead", slammed India's "obnoxious" trade barriers, and accused the country of showing little concern for Ukrainian casualties in its neutral stance on the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The breakdown in relations marks a stark reversal in a strategic partnership that has been nurtured for decades. Both countries have long viewed each other as critical democratic allies, particularly as a counterweight to growing Chinese influence in the Indo-Pacific. "The carefully crafted consensus of successive administrations has brought the two largest democracies together for almost three decades," said Eric Garcetti, who served as US Ambassador to India until January. "The administration's actions could endanger this progress if not brought to quick resolution. I hope cooler minds prevail in both capitals. There's too much at stake." Since the contentious June call, Modi and Trump have reportedly not spoken again. India's Ministry of External Affairs did not respond to media requests for comment, while the White House also declined to clarify the US role in the India-Pakistan ceasefire or provide updates on bilateral relations. Meanwhile, State Department deputy spokesperson Tommy Pigott, during a Thursday briefing, said Trump was "taking action to address concerns about trade imbalances and India's continued purchases of Russian oil."
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Tense Trump-Modi call triggered US-India fallout
US President Donald Trump speaks with the press as he meets with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on February 13, 2025. Photo: AFP Listen to article A tense phone call between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump over a ceasefire between India and Pakistan has emerged as a key flashpoint in the dramatic collapse of ties between the two leaders, according to a report published by American financial publication Bloomberg. The two leaders spoke during the June G7 summit in Canada, where Modi attended as a guest. At Trump's request, the two held a 35-minute call, which Indian officials say, centred on Trump's insistence that Washington deserved credit for brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan following four-days of clashes in May. Modi, according to the Indian account, rejected Trump's claims, asserting that the talks to cease military hostilities took place directly through military channels between New Delhi and Islamabad, and only at Pakistan's request. 'India has not accepted mediation in the past and will never do so,' Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri told reporters after the call. Misri's claim was in sharp contrast with President Trump's insistence that he had brokered the truce between India and Pakistan. Islamabad has also repeatedly said that Modi approached the American leader with a request to play a role in cessation of hostilities between the two nuclear neighbours. Tensions escalated sharply after the Indian leader learned that Trump planned to host Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir, for a lunch at the White House the following day. According to officials briefed on the matter, that moment brought the diplomatic tension to a head. Bloomberg reports that on June 17, Trump extended an invitation to Modi for a formal dinner at the White House. However, the Indian premier declined the invite, fearing that the meeting could be used to orchestrate a direct encounter with Field Marshal Munir. The fallout quickly spilled into the public sphere. Within weeks, Trump imposed additional 25% tariffs on Indian exports, citing New Delhi's continued purchases of Russian oil as a core concern. With some duties now reaching as high as 50%, India is facing one of the steepest tariff barriers of any US trading partner. The tariffs are expected to take effect on August 17, unless a trade deal is reached in time. Speaking at a press event this month, Trump described the Indian economy as 'dead', slammed India's 'obnoxious' trade barriers, and accused the country of showing little concern for Ukrainian casualties in its neutral stance on the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The breakdown in relations marks a stark reversal in a strategic partnership that has been nurtured for decades. Both countries have long viewed each other as critical democratic allies, particularly as a counterweight to growing Chinese influence in the Indo-Pacific. 'The carefully crafted consensus of successive administrations has brought the two largest democracies together for almost three decades,' said Eric Garcetti, who served as US Ambassador to India until January. 'The administration's actions could endanger this progress if not brought to quick resolution. I hope cooler minds prevail in both capitals. There's too much at stake.' Since the contentious June call, Modi and Trump have reportedly not spoken again. India's Ministry of External Affairs did not respond to media requests for comment, while the White House also declined to clarify the US role in the India-Pakistan ceasefire or provide updates on bilateral relations. Meanwhile, State Department deputy spokesperson Tommy Pigott, during a Thursday briefing, said Trump was 'taking action to address concerns about trade imbalances and India's continued purchases of Russian oil.'
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Rethinking Russia-SA ties in global and African context
The writer is a Doctor of Philosophy in Semiotics and Philosophy of Communication from Charles University Prague. She can be reached at shaziaanwer@ Listen to article Not more than three months ago, President Donald Trump admitted he didn't know what BRICS was, referring to it dismissively as a "club of a few trying to play naughty", while his Secretary of State was unaware of which countries constitute ASEAN. This ignorance is a direct result of the deliberate media blackout surrounding any development that seeks to construct a more cohesive worldview, one that registers and respects the voices and opinions of the Global South. A recent example of such overlooked significance is the Third Russian-African Conference of the Valdai Discussion Club, titled "Realpolitik in a Divided World: Rethinking Russia-South Africa Ties in a Global and African Context". Held in Pretoria, South Africa, the event brought together more than 60 prominent experts and policymakers from across Africa and Russia, including participants from Egypt, Zimbabwe, Côte d'Ivoire, Tanzania, South Africa and Russia. This year's conference reinforced the Valdai Club's tradition of fostering Russian-African dialogue. It followed last year's forum held in Tanzania and the 2023 event in St Petersburg, which coincided with the Russia-Africa Summit. The conference emphasised the shared intention of Russia and South Africa to strengthen mutually beneficial bilateral cooperation, underscoring the growing importance of expert diplomacy in addressing complex global challenges. The conference featured four expert discussion sessions: G20 and BRICS — Strategic Roles in an Evolving Global Order; Humanitarian Cooperation and the Role of Historical Memory; Bilateral Relations Between Russia and South Africa — Current State and Prospects; and Trump and the World Order. The four sessions collectively explored the evolving dynamics of global governance, highlighting the strategic roles of Russia and South Africa within BRICS and G20, especially amid the rising assertiveness of the Global South. Emphasis was placed on inclusive development, economic sovereignty and South Africa's 2025 G20 presidency as a chance to promote equity and sustainability, calling for independent investment mechanisms, climate initiatives and high-tech cooperation tailored to the Global South's needs. The legacy of former Soviet support for African liberation was discussed as a cultural and humanitarian foundation for modern Russia-Africa relations, advocating locally driven cooperation and African agency. As the conference theme and discussion points suggest, collective consciousness, memory and shared history are the cornerstones of any long-term planning in culturally diverse and historically entangled nation-states of the Global South. The Western mantra of liberal democracy and the Western-led rules-based order has never fully harmonised with the diverse political, cultural and philosophical tapestry of non-NATO/Global South countries. The statement that "Europe is a garden — and the rest of the world is a jungle" was made by Josep Borrell, the High Representative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, in October 2022 during his speech at the European Diplomatic Academy in Bruges. His full quote is: "Europe is a garden. We have built a garden. Everything works. It is the best combination of political freedom, economic prosperity, and social cohesion that humankind has been able to build — the three things together. The rest of the world — is not exactly a garden. Most of the rest of the world is a jungle, and the jungle could invade the garden." I have always found myself agreeing with his statement, though not in the way he intended. To me, the jungle is what is organic, mysterious, diverse, and rich in knowledge. A garden, on the other hand, is a superficial manifestation of the destruction of bio-semiotics: a forced arrangement of flora and fauna, a sheer negation of natural order. Without dwelling too deeply on this metaphor, I always keep an eye on the events happening across the so-called jungle, and I am glad to note that this year's Russia-Africa conference was, once again, right on point in terms of the topics and ideas it addressed.
