2L to attend Soren's shraddh at Nemra
Hemant Soren
, who has been camping here.
Authorities are expecting a turnout of over 2 lakh people, including Union and state ministers, legislators, and members of the tribal community, during Friday's Shraddh and the next day's community feast.
Nine IPS officers, 49 DSP ranked officials will marshal a heavy battery of police personnel on both the days.
DC Faiz Aq Ahmad Mumtaz said, "Three helipads have been set up for VIP movement. Several parking spaces have been created.
Autorickshaws will ferry people."
JMM general secretary Fagu Besra said, "Ceremonies will be held in accordance with Santhali tradition. More than 5,000 goats and roosters have been brought for worship and sacrifice."
A quick response team has also been put on standby to monitor the movement of elephant herds in the area, forest officials said.
The tribal dominated village has undergone overnight overhaul in infrastructure and basic amenities. It looked like a capital city with streetlights, a traffic control room, security check posts along the 12 km route connecting Nemra to Barlanga, and a heavy deployment of security personnel.
Stay updated with the latest local news from your
city
on
Times of India
(TOI). Check upcoming
bank holidays
,
public holidays
, and current
gold rates
and
silver prices
in your area.
"Get the latest news updates on Times of India, including reviews of the movie
Coolie
and
War 2
."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kerala govt's focus on welfare development and unity: Pinarayi
Thiruvananthapuram: Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan on Friday said state govt was committed to the goal of strengthening people's welfare and the state's development. In his Independence Day address, Vijayan said, "We are at a stage where we have undertaken the mission to transform Kerala into a knowledge-based innovative society. Kerala is being built on a knowledge-based economy to secure the future of our coming generations. We are moving forward by strengthening both people's welfare and state's development. On one hand, there is eradication of extreme poverty and on the other, building the future Kerala. This is also the occasion to pledge that all efforts will be made for these goals. We are advancing into a new era, achieving digital literacy and more. This is a comprehensive advancement that includes everyone." It's time to renew our commitment to make the country free of poverty, hunger deaths, child labour, illiteracy, caste bias, religious intolerance, lack of basics and unemployment, he added. "An India without poverty, starvation deaths, child labour, illiteracy, caste discrimination, religious hatred, denial of basic necessities and unemployment. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Have we been able to make this dream a reality? The truth is, we have not. Therefore, during this Independence Day celebration, we must rededicate ourselves to making all these dreams come true," said Vijayan. "India's greatest achievement in the past decades is that, except for a brief period, we have been able to maintain democracy in the country. This is no small feat. We have seen neighbouring countries where democracy was overthrown and replaced by military rule. We have seen calls for theocracy gaining strength in some places. We have also seen democratic govts being replaced by puppet regimes under imperial control," he said. "No matter what shortcomings exist at any level, the framers of our Constitution have reflected in it the determination that democracy should not ultimately be destroyed. We must protect it," he added. "Even as external imperial threats rise against the sovereignty of the country, divisive threats that can fracture the unity of the people are emerging from within. Forces of communalism are intensifying efforts to fracture the 'idea of India' along caste and religious lines. We must be able to resist and defeat this with unity beyond all divisions. This is the occasion to take such a pledge," he said. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Krishna Janmashtami Wishes ,, messages , and quotes !
Hindustan Times
40 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Deadline for guvs, Prez will tilt power balance: Centre
The Union government has cautioned the Supreme Court that imposing fixed timelines on governors and the president to act on state bills, as mandated by the court in an April ruling, would amount to one organ of government assuming powers not vested in it, upsetting the delicate separation of powers and leading to a 'constitutional disorder'. The Supreme Court building in New Delhi. (HT Photo) In detailed written submissions filed in a presidential reference under Article 143, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued that the apex court cannot, even under its extraordinary powers in Article 142, amend the Constitution or defeat the intent of its framers by creating procedural mandates where none exist in the constitutional text. According to SG Mehta, while there may be 'limited issues in the operationalisation' of the assent procedure, these cannot justify 'relegating the high position of the gubernatorial office to a subservient one'. The positions of the governor and the president, he argued, are 'politically plenary' and represent 'high ideals of democratic governance'. Any perceived lapses, he said, must be addressed through political and constitutional mechanisms, and 'not necessarily judicial' interventions. The bench, comprising Chief Justice of India Bhushan R Gavai and justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, PS Narasimha and Atul S Chandurkar, has set aside nine days of hearings, starting from August 19 and spreading into September, to decide 14 constitutional questions referred by President Droupadi Murmu under Article 143. These questions stem from the Supreme Court's April 8 judgment that, for the first time, imposed binding timelines on governors and the president in relation to state bills, and held that prolonged inaction could result in 'deemed assent' under Article 142. The April verdict, delivered by justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan, arose from a petition by the Tamil Nadu government alleging that its governor had indefinitely delayed action on 10 important bills. It directed governors to act 'forthwith' or within one month on re-passed bills, and to decide within three months whether to grant assent or reserve them for presidential consideration. The ruling described the governor's inaction as 'illegal' and a constitutional subversion, prompting a fierce debate on the limits of judicial review over high constitutional functionaries. Challenging the foundations of that decision, Mehta has told the court that Articles 200 and 201, which deal with the governor's and the president's options upon receiving a state bill, deliberately contain no timelines. 'When the Constitution seeks to impose time limits for taking certain decisions, it specifically mentions such time limits. Where it has consciously kept the exercise of powers flexible, it does not impose any fixed time limit. To judicially read in such a limitation would be to amend the Constitution,' he said. Articles 200 and 201, Mehta emphasised, employ four different verbs -- 'assent', 'withhold', 'reserve' and 'return' -- each carrying distinct meaning and discretionary scope. This flexibility, he said, was 'carefully crafted' by the framers to meet exigencies that cannot always be anticipated. Any attempt to fix rigid timelines 'renders the intention of the framers nugatory' and hampers the ability of these high functionaries to safeguard constitutional compliance, democratic principles and the national interest. The submissions further contend that certain 'high-plenary' constitutional functions are inherently non-justiciable because they are textually committed to the political branches, and there are no judicially manageable standards for reviewing them. 'The assent of the governor or the president is integrally connected with the legislative process of a state legislature and attracts the constitutional bars on judicial inquiry under Articles 122 and 212,' Mehta said. Such acts, he added, fall within the category of proceedings that cannot be called into question in a court of law. The SG also cited Article 361, which grants immunity to the president and governors from court proceedings for acts done in the exercise of their official duties. The phrase 'done or purported to be done' in discharge of constitutional responsibility, Mehta said, is of 'wide import' and bars any relief that would require these functionaries to explain their decisions or act in a particular fashion. The Centre has argued that Article 142, which allows the Supreme Court to do 'complete justice', is curative and procedural in nature, and cannot be used to override constitutional provisions or reallocate powers vested in other organs. 'The very width of the power brings with it a high threshold of duty to not exercise the same in such a manner that amends the text of the Constitution itself and fundamental constitutional and legal principles,' the submissions stated. Article 142, Mehta insisted, is 'not a supervening judicial power' that can run contrary to the constitutional scheme. The presidential reference, the first of its kind in several years, poses far-reaching questions: whether 'deemed assent' is constitutionally valid; whether timelines for governors and the president can be imposed through judicial orders; whether the exercise of their discretion under Articles 200 and 201 is justiciable; whether constitutional immunity under Article 361 precludes such review; and whether disputes of this nature can be decided through the court's writ jurisdiction or only under Article 131, which governs disputes between the Union and states. Kerala and Tamil Nadu have already challenged the maintainability of the reference, calling it an attempt to re-litigate settled law and a disguised appeal against the April ruling. The bench will hear their preliminary objections for an hour on August 19 before moving to the merits of the Union's case. Since Independence, Article 143 has been invoked at least 14 times to seek the Supreme Court's advisory opinion on questions of law and public importance. While not binding on the president, such opinions have historically influenced constitutional interpretation in significant ways.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Stalin hits out at Centre, pushes for state's rights
Tamil Nadu chief minister and DMK president M K Stalin in his Independence Day speech said state governments are closer to the people, and need greater power but with Union laws, court judgments, and discrimination in devolution of funds, states are being pushed into dependence on the Union Government. Chennai: Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin during the 79th Independence Day celebration at the State Secretariat, in Chennai on August 15(PTI) 'In the last few years, we have seen many attempts by the Union government to take away rights of the state governments in various sectors. State rights in key areas such as education and healthcare are instead being continuously eroded,' Stalin said, speaking at Fort St. George in Chennai on Friday after hoisting the national flag. 'The only solution to overcome this is to take political and legal steps to restore the role of state governments and devolution of power and funds.' That a state government has to always struggle, argue and file court cases to get its rightful funds from the Centre does not augur well for federalism, the chief minister said. 'After 14 years, in our Dravidian model regime, Tamil Nadu's economic growth has increased to 11.9 per cent and has touched a great new high,' he said and reiterated that the southern state is the fastest developing economy in India. Such a growth was not shared by any other big state.'The nation's growth rate itself is 6.5 per cent. However, Tamil Nadu has achieved 11.19 per cent growth,' he added. The CM conferred the Thagaisal Thamizhar (Distinguished Tamilian) Award on Indian Union Muslim League leader, 85-year old KM Khader Mohideen at the I-Day event. ISRO Chairman V Narayanan was presented with the Dr APJ Abdul Kalam Award. Awards under several other categories were also presented. Stalin who boycotted governor R N Ravi's 'at home' reception hosted in the Raj Bhavan on Independence Day over his attack on the ruling party, reiterated his criticism of the BJP-led Union government. 'It is not good for the federal principles of India for states to always have to fight, argue and file lawsuits to get its due funds. This will affect the development of the state as well as India,' Stalin said. A day ago, on Thursday, Stalin had decided to boycott the event at Raj Bhavan after the governor tore into the ruling DMK in his customary speech delivered on the eve of Independence Day, adding to the already soured relationship between governor Ravi and the Tamil Nadu government. DMK's allies, Congress, CPI (M), CPI, Viduthalai Chiruthaikal Katchi (VCK) and Manithaneya Makkal Katchi (MMK), also boycotted the event to protest against the governor, who they alleged, was acting against the interests of the state. The governor charged that the state is facing four major challenges– educational and social discrimination of the poor and marginalised; alarming rise in suicides; fast spreading drug abuse among youth; and steep rise in rape and other sexual offences against women and girls. Since Ravi became governor in 2021, he has been in loggerheads with the government over myriad issues by supporting policies of the BJP-led Centre such as NEP, NEET, walking out of the assembly without reading his customary speech and omitting portions of the speech prepared by the state, changing the name of Tamil Nadu to Tamizhagam in a public invitation released by the Raj Bhavan. But, it was his sitting on bills passed by the state legislation that led the government to move court against him based on which the Supreme Court in a landmark verdict on April 8 set deadlines for the President and governors to clear the bills passed by state legislatures. The top court also found governor Ravi's action keeping bills pending as illegal. President Droupadi Murmu on May 13 put forth 14 questions before the Supreme Court on constitutionality of its April 8 verdict. In response on Thursday, higher education minister Govi Chezhiaan said that the governor's actions as chancellor is the reason for many state universities functioning without vice chancellors. He announced that he will boycott two convocations at Alagappa University and Thiruvalluvar University to be held on August 18 and 19 while the chief minister will skip the governor's event. (With inputs from PTI)
