Mark Ruffalo criticises Trump, defends immigrants in fiery political statement
Actor and activist Mark Ruffalo has launched a scathing critique of U.S. President Donald Trump and wealthy elites, arguing that billionaires—not immigrants—pose the greater threat to American society.
In a video shared to social media and in a statement posted on Instagram, Ruffalo said that immigrants "add to our economy by the billions" and are unfairly demonised, while billionaires are 'stealing you blind.' The Oscar nominee and Marvel actor accused the ultra-wealthy of manipulating power and fostering economic desperation, stating, 'It's time to take our country back from extreme wealth that has its hands all over the power of the nation.'
Ruffalo, who has long been vocal on political and social issues, particularly immigration policy, participated in the recent No Kings protest opposing Trump-era deportation practices. He condemned ongoing ICE raids and criticised the mindset of Americans who blame immigrants for societal problems. 'You want to get rid of the people who are picking your food… but not question those who dull your minds with lies and disinformation,' Ruffalo wrote.
He also criticised Trump directly, referring to him as a 'grifter' and accusing his family of profiting through dubious ventures, including cryptocurrency schemes. 'You are worried about the poorest of the poor ruining your life?' Ruffalo asked, 'while the billionaire up top is stealing you blind.'
Ruffalo expanded his criticism to include tech billionaires, saying they were enriching themselves with taxpayer money while ignoring urgent social issues like famine, disease, and political persecution.
Outside activism, Ruffalo continues to take on major roles in Hollywood. He stars in Bong Joon Ho's upcoming sci-fi film Mickey 17 and will lead the new HBO series Task, a police drama from Mare of Easttown creator Brad Ingelsby, set to premiere in September.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
24 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Trump on Iran strikes: ‘I may do it, I may not do it'
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said Wednesday he was still deciding whether to join Israel's strikes on Iran, claiming Tehran now wants talks at the White House but may have waited too long. Trump held his second Situation Room meeting in two days with his national security team as he left the world guessing about his potential order of military action. 'I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do,' Trump told reporters at the unveiling of one of two giant new flagpoles at the White House. 'I can tell you this, that Iran's got a lot of trouble, and they want to negotiate.' He added that 'the next week is going to be very big' when it comes to determining Iran's fate. Iran launches hypersonic missiles against Israel in new attack: state TV Trump's comments came after the Islamic republic's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei rejected his demands for an unconditional surrender and warned the United States of 'irreparable damage' if it intervenes. A day after saying Khamenei was an 'easy target', Trump told AFP in the Oval Office that a change of leadership in Tehran 'could happen.' But Republican Trump, who faces opposition from the isolationist wing of his support base to joining any more foreign wars, insisted that he had not yet made up his mind on whether to take US action. 'I have ideas as to what to do, but I haven't made a final (decision),' Trump said. 'I like to make the final decision one second before it's due, because things change. Especially with war.' The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump had told aides on Tuesday he had approved attack plans for Iran but was holding off to see if Iran would give up its nuclear program. 'All options are on the table,' a White House official told AFP when asked about the report. 'Very late' Trump appeared to be in no hurry to reach what would be one of the most consequential decisions of his presidency – spending more than an hour dealing with the installation of his new flagpoles. He said Iran was reaching out to try to strike a deal on its nuclear program to end the conflict with US ally Israel. 'They want to come to the White House, I may do that,' Trump said. He added however that it was 'very late to be talking… There's a big difference between now and a week ago.' Iran denied it had offered to send officials to Washington. 'No Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House,' Iran's mission to the United Nations posted on X. Iran's Khamenei rejects Trump's call for unconditional surrender Trump had favored a diplomatic route to end Iran's nuclear program, seeking a deal to replace the agreement he tore up in his first term in 2018. But since Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched strikes on Iran six days ago Trump has moved in behind the key US ally and is now weighing whether to use American military power against Tehran too. Trump said Wednesday that Iran was 'weeks' away from being able to make a nuclear bomb. He noted that the United States is the only country with 'bunker buster' bombs capable of taking out Iran's Fordow nuclear plant 'but that doesn't mean I'm going to do it.' The US president said he had told Netanyahu to 'keep going' with Israel's offensive against Iran, adding that they were speaking every day. Trump however rebuffed Russian President Vladimir Putin's offer to mediate in the Israel-Iran conflict, saying Russia should end its own war in Ukraine first. 'He actually offered to help mediate, I said 'do me a favor, mediate your own. Let's mediate Russia first, okay? You can worry about this later,'' Trump said.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Israel will spread nuclear arms everywhere
Listen to article When ISIS started around 2014, many people opined that this terrorist group was created by the United States in order to further its interests in the Middle East. While that was not true, the United States actually created the conditions, which created the terror group. The US invaded Iraq and captured and tortured some of the men who had nothing to do with Al-Qaeda. Some of those men went on to create ISIS as a result of the humiliation they had faced at the hands of American occupiers. Similarly, the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty has been successful in preventing most of the states around the world from acquiring nuclear weapons not because the Pakistani nuclear scientist Abdul Qadeer, who was accused of selling the formula for nuclear bomb to US-designated rogue states, was confined but because most states did not feel the need to go nuclear. Nation states strongly believed that international laws, international bodies, and especially the United States would do the moral thing if these states ever faced aggression from other countries. That may have changed for good now if not before. Libya was one of those states that gave up its nuclear programme in exchange for benefits and guarantees from the United States. Gaddafi faced the result of that bad calculation and Libya is no longer there as we knew it. North Korea showed defiance in the face of similar pressure to give up its nuclear programme and while it is very poor, it has survived the American onslaughts and shenanigans. Pakistan is a vivid example as well. Iran signed the NPT. It allowed international inspectors on its soil to satisfy the needs of the world that it was not making a nuclear bomb. The result was that Iran was always accused of cheating and planning to rush toward making a bomb. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned the world that Iran would become a nuclear armed state within 3 to 5 years. He first said that in 1992 and then in 1995. He said it in 2015 and before and after that as well. None of it was true. Every time an American president opened his mouth about Iran, he issued a threat against it. Obama said, "I don't bluff" and "all options are on the table" including the "military component". After the 1979 revolution in Iran, America has worked against Iran at every step. It provided chemical weapons to Iraq to be used against Iran. It has imposed sanctions on Iraq and deterred other countries from buying Iranian oil. All despite Iran choosing not to go nuclear or maybe because of it. The truth is Iran never wanted to make a bomb. But that may have just changed. Their calculus, if they have people who can do so much as add and subtract, would only come to one conclusion: Iran must have nuclear weapons in order to deter the world from acting against it. Israel and its unconditional supporter America criticise and impose sanctions on nations that are capable of fighting and defending their sovereignty. Bloody wars are waged against countries that are defenseless, that are not nuclear armed states. Israel would have never ever dared of attacking Iran, had Iran been a nuclear armed state. More importantly, Iran playing the nice guy and being the norms following player have not yielded any defence benefits for it. It has rather weakened its defence. And this is not just playing inside the mind of Iran but rather inside the mind of every nation state. Being in the good books of the US by giving up the thought of nuclear weapons isn't a currency strong enough to be banked upon to ensure defence should a US ally attack you. Israel is creating the desire for states to want to go nuclear. Despite the habit of the world to tap itself on the shoulder for being civilised, in the end survival comes down to brute power. Not values, not education, not anything else.
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
President Trump hosts Field Marshal Munir over lunch at White House
President Donald Trump on Wednesday hosted Pakistan's army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir for lunch in an unprecedented White House meeting, Aaj News reported. The meeting, listed on the president's official schedule, was held in the Cabinet Room and closed to the press. It was the first time that a U.S. president has hosted the powerful head of Pakistan's army, widely regarded as having sway over the country's national security policies, at the White House unaccompanied by senior Pakistani civilian officials. Trump's lunch with Field Marshal Asim Munir represented a major boost in U.S.-Pakistan ties, which had largely languished under Trump and his predecessor Joe Biden, as both assiduously courted India as part of efforts to push back against China. Asked what he wanted to achieve from the meeting, Trump told reporters at the White House: 'Well, I stopped a war … I love Pakistan. I think (Indian Prime Minister Narendra) Modi is a fantastic man. I spoke to him last night. We're going to make a trade deal with Modi of India. 'But I stopped the war between Pakistan and India. This man was extremely influential in stopping it from the Pakistan side, Modi from the India side and others,' he did, referring to Munir. 'They were going at it - and they're both nuclear countries. I got it stopped.' On Tuesday, the COAS and the overseas Pakistanis pledged to work together towards a more secure, prosperous, and resilient Pakistan. The COAS who is on an official visit to United States interacted with the overseas Pakistani community in Washington DC, said the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) in a press release. 'The diaspora warmly appreciated the outstanding performance of the Armed Forces during Operation Bunyanum Marsoos / Marka-e-Haq, showcasing their bravery and professionalism,' the ISPR said. 'He emphasized the importance of engagement with the overseas Pakistanis, highlighting the need for continued collaboration and cooperation to address common challenges and promote cooperation.'
