Appeals court allows Trump to keep control of California National Guard
A US federal appeals court on Thursday ruled that President Donald Trump may retain authority over California's National Guard, at least temporarily, as a legal challenge by Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom continues.
The decision, handed down by a three-judge panel from the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, extends a freeze on a lower court ruling that found Trump had overstepped his legal authority when he federalized the state's National Guard to respond to unrest in Los Angeles.
The legal dispute began after US District Judge Charles Breyer ruled on June 12 that Trump's June 7, 2020, decision to deploy 4,000 National Guard troops in Los Angeles violated federal law. Breyer found that Trump failed to coordinate with the state governor and did not meet the legal criteria that allow a president to assume control over state troops, such as an invasion or rebellion.
'The conditions set out under the statute to allow this move… did not exist,' Breyer concluded in his ruling, ordering Trump to relinquish command back to Newsom. However, within hours, the appeals court temporarily blocked that order and has now extended the pause.
The case stems from a June 9 lawsuit filed by California, which argued that Trump's decision infringed on state sovereignty and contradicted laws prohibiting federal military involvement in civilian law enforcement. The state emphasized that while the protests in Los Angeles included scattered violence, they did not amount to a 'rebellion,' and local authorities were capable of managing the situation.
The deployment of federal troops, including 700 US Marines sent after the National Guard, sparked a nationwide debate about the domestic use of the military. While the Trump administration insists the troops are not involved in law enforcement, California officials argue otherwise, especially in the context of immigration raids that inflamed tensions.
At a recent hearing, the 9th Circuit panel, which includes two Trump appointees and one appointed by former President Biden, questioned the extent to which courts should intervene in presidential decisions related to military deployments.
The Department of Justice has maintained that a president's decision to federalize the National Guard in an emergency is not subject to judicial or gubernatorial review.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Roya News
5 hours ago
- Roya News
Appeals court allows Trump to keep control of California National Guard
A US federal appeals court on Thursday ruled that President Donald Trump may retain authority over California's National Guard, at least temporarily, as a legal challenge by Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom continues. The decision, handed down by a three-judge panel from the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, extends a freeze on a lower court ruling that found Trump had overstepped his legal authority when he federalized the state's National Guard to respond to unrest in Los Angeles. The legal dispute began after US District Judge Charles Breyer ruled on June 12 that Trump's June 7, 2020, decision to deploy 4,000 National Guard troops in Los Angeles violated federal law. Breyer found that Trump failed to coordinate with the state governor and did not meet the legal criteria that allow a president to assume control over state troops, such as an invasion or rebellion. 'The conditions set out under the statute to allow this move… did not exist,' Breyer concluded in his ruling, ordering Trump to relinquish command back to Newsom. However, within hours, the appeals court temporarily blocked that order and has now extended the pause. The case stems from a June 9 lawsuit filed by California, which argued that Trump's decision infringed on state sovereignty and contradicted laws prohibiting federal military involvement in civilian law enforcement. The state emphasized that while the protests in Los Angeles included scattered violence, they did not amount to a 'rebellion,' and local authorities were capable of managing the situation. The deployment of federal troops, including 700 US Marines sent after the National Guard, sparked a nationwide debate about the domestic use of the military. While the Trump administration insists the troops are not involved in law enforcement, California officials argue otherwise, especially in the context of immigration raids that inflamed tensions. At a recent hearing, the 9th Circuit panel, which includes two Trump appointees and one appointed by former President Biden, questioned the extent to which courts should intervene in presidential decisions related to military deployments. The Department of Justice has maintained that a president's decision to federalize the National Guard in an emergency is not subject to judicial or gubernatorial review.
Roya News
10 hours ago
- Roya News
European, Iranian diplomats to meet as US mulls joining 'Israel' campaign
European foreign ministers will hold talks Friday with their Iranian counterpart, hoping to reach a diplomatic solution to the war with 'Israel' as US President Donald Trump mulls the prospect of US involvement. 'Israel', claiming Iran was on the verge of developing a nuclear weapon, launched air strikes against its arch-enemy a week ago, triggering deadly exchanges. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has sworn Iran will "pay a heavy price" for a strike on an 'Israeli' hospital on Thursday, an attack Tehran said was targeting a military and intelligence base. European leaders urging de-escalation have scrambled to hold talks with Iran, as Trump said he would decide "within the next two weeks" whether to involve the United States in 'Israel's' bombing campaign. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi will meet with his French, German, British and EU counterparts in Geneva on Friday to discuss Iran's nuclear programme. Britain's Foreign Secretary David Lammy said "a window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution", after meeting senior US officials in Washington on Thursday. Lammy and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio "agreed Iran can never develop or acquire a nuclear weapon", according to the State Department. Netanyahu welcomed the prospect of US involvement in its campaign, while Russia, an Iranian ally, told the United States that joining the conflict would be an "extremely dangerous step". The UN Security Council is also due to convene on Friday for a second session on the conflict, which was requested by Iran with support from Russia, China and Pakistan. While Netanyahu has not publicly said that 'Israel' is trying to topple Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, defence minister Israel Katz warned after the strike on 'Israel's' Soroka hospital that Khamenei "can no longer be allowed to exist". A week of deadly exchanges between the two countries has plunged the Middle East into a new crisis, more than 20 months since Oct. 7, 2023. Iran imposed a "nationwide internet shutdown" on Thursday –the most extensive blackout since widespread anti-government protests in 2019– internet watchdog NetBlocks said. The shutdown "impacts the public's ability to stay connected at a time when communications are vital", NetBlocks wrote on X. Any US involvement in 'Israel's' campaign against Iran would be expected to involve the bombing of a crucial underground Iranian nuclear facility in Fordo, using specially developed bunker-busting bombs. The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump told aides he had approved attack plans but was holding off to see if Iran would give up its nuclear programme. The US president had favoured a diplomatic route to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons – an ambition Tehran has consistently denied – seeking a deal to replace the 2015 agreement he tore up in his first term. Dozens of US military aircraft were no longer visible at a US base in Qatar on Thursday, satellite images showed -- a possible move to shield them from potential Iranian strikes. Nuclear sites White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt claimed Iran was "a couple of weeks" away from producing an atomic bomb. Iran had been enriching uranium to 60 percent – far above the 3.67-percent limit set by the 2015 deal, but still short of the 90 percent needed for a nuclear warhead. 'Israel' has maintained ambiguity on its own arsenal, but the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute says it has 90 nuclear warheads. A key Iranian government body, the Guardian Council, threatened a "harsh response" if "the criminal American government and its stupid president... take action against Islamic Iran". On Thursday, 'Israel' said it struck "dozens" of Iranian targets overnight, including the partially built Arak nuclear reactor and a uranium enrichment facility in Natanz. Iranian atomic energy agency chief Mohammad Eslami confirmed in a letter to the UN nuclear watchdog that the Arak reactor was hit, demanding action to stop "violation of international regulations" by 'Israel'. Iranian media reported blasts in Tehran late Thursday, while the Revolutionary Guards said more than 100 "combat and suicide" drones were launched at 'Israel'. In the central 'Israeli' city of Bat Yam, the body of a woman was found in a site hit on Sunday, taking the death toll in Israel from Iranian missiles since June 13 to 25 people, according to authorities. Iran said Sunday that 'Israeli' strikes had killed at least 224 people, including military commanders, nuclear scientists and civilians. Authorities have not issued an updated toll since.
Roya News
10 hours ago
- Roya News
Oil prices rise as Iran-'Israel' tensions enter 7th day
Oil prices climbed Thursday amid ongoing military escalation between Iran and 'Israel', now in its seventh consecutive day, as concerns over potential US involvement fueled investor caution and heightened volatility in global energy markets. Brent crude futures rose $2.15, or 2.8%, to close at $78.85 per barrel. US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude for July delivery gained $1.72, or 2.3%, to settle at $76.86 per barrel. Trading volumes were light in US markets due to holiday, but geopolitical tensions remained the dominant force driving prices. Geopolitical Risk Premium 'There's a healthy risk premium priced in right now,' said Tony Sycamore, an analyst at IG trading platform, noting that markets are bracing for either a US strike on Iran or a diplomatic breakthrough. Goldman Sachs echoed this sentiment, stating that a geopolitical premium of around $10 per barrel is currently justified, citing reduced Iranian oil supply and the rising risk of wider conflict. The bank warned Brent could surge past $90 a barrel if the crisis deepens. Phil Flynn, senior analyst at Price Futures Group, said a return to $60, oil levels seen just a month ago, is unlikely even if the Middle East situation de-escalates, given the current market dynamics. Uncertainty Over US Response Trump stated he had not yet made a final decision on whether to intervene directly against Iran, promising to announce his position within two weeks. Priyanka Sachdeva, an analyst at Phillip Nova, said Trump's unpredictable foreign policy stance "keeps markets jittery, awaiting clearer signals that could impact supply flows and regional stability." RBC Capital's Helima Croft warned that any existential threat to Iran could provoke attacks on oil tankers or regional energy infrastructure, especially if Washington becomes directly involved in the conflict. Iran and the Strait of Hormuz Iran, the third-largest oil producer in OPEC, pumps about 3.3 million barrels per day and plays a crucial role in securing the Strait of Hormuz, a key waterway through which between 18 and 21 million barrels of oil and petroleum products pass daily. Any military disruption could choke global energy flows and send prices soaring. Russia and OPEC+ Reassess Strategy Speaking at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak reiterated the need to stay the course on production plans under the OPEC+ alliance. He projected rising oil demand in the coming summer months and emphasized the importance of market stability amid geopolitical headwinds.
