Tech takes centre stage as Chinese students weigh up major choices
After evaluating his score and studying the universities and programmes he qualified for, He focused on engineering when submitting his applications a few weeks ago.
Information and communications technology, as well as vehicle engineering, were the top choices, the young man from east China's Zhejiang province said, because they 'represent the direction of future industrial development'.
'Many of my classmates have also chosen majors related to new technology and engineering, because we think there's quite a lot of demand for such talent in Hangzhou,' He said, referring to the provincial capital that is home to artificial intelligence (AI) start-up DeepSeek and humanoid robotics firm Unitree Robotics.
While international trade and urban planning were among the most popular subjects with students two decades ago, when China joined the World Trade Organization and its property market started to boom, a new wave of technology-focused academic priorities is reshaping higher education.
Engineering disciplines related to possible technological advancements have reigned supreme as China's state-driven system funnels students into such fields amid intensified tech competition with the United States.
While interest in technology is also rising in the US, experts said interest in the technical and liberal arts was better balanced there, reflecting a flexible and market-driven system and a broader range of career paths.
'New engineering has been quite popular in recent years because it points to good employment prospects, either in terms of the number of jobs or the amount of government investment,' said Chu Zhaohui, a senior researcher at the Beijing-based China National Academy of Educational Sciences think tank.
Introduced by the Ministry of Education in 2017 and gaining traction in recent years, 'new engineering' encompasses a range of interdisciplinary and emerging majors designed to align with technological advancements and industry needs. They cover fields including AI and data science, intelligent manufacturing, robotics and bioengineering.
But such preferences were often 'short-sighted and utilitarian' and lacked the support of personal passion, which meant that many graduates might only be able to perform at a relatively low level, Chu warned.
Chinese students have flocked to such disciplines over the past few years as universities have accelerated adjustments of priorities.
Shanghai's Fudan University, a top institution known for its strength in liberal arts, announced earlier this year that it would reduce the proportion of liberal arts admissions from over 30% to 20% to make more room for engineering students.
It will offer over 1,000 undergraduate admission slots in engineering this year, accounting for nearly 30% of its total enrolment plan and representing a year-on-year increase of over 20%, according to an announcement released in May.
The adjustment of university majors is a response to national strategic priorities, as Beijing emphasises technology-driven economic growth and promotes high-end manufacturing.
Over the past decade, the Ministry of Education has approved about 20,000 new undergraduate programmes covering 655 majors, with engineering majors accounting for the highest number, according to research from Huazhong University of Science and Technology that was published in March. American families are not as utilitarian, and there is no phenomenon of society or the government guiding the choice of majors
There had been a similar trend in the US as universities shifted their focus from diversity, equity and inclusion to employment outcomes following US President Donald Trump's return to the White House in January, said Chen Hang, co-founder of WholeRen Group, an education consultancy based in Pittsburgh.
'This means that people are becoming more pragmatic in their choice of majors, leaning towards fields like technology, healthcare and education,' he said.
Chen gave the example of the University of California, a leading public research university, where its computer science master's programme has an enrolment quota of 500 students but received 7,000 applications. In contrast, other programmes at the university had vacancies, he said, citing its president.
But social science degrees were still popular in the US because they were relatively easier to acquire and represented career versatility, he said. Compared with Chinese families, 'American families are not as utilitarian, and there is no phenomenon of society or the government guiding the choice of majors', he added.
While engineering dominates in China, accounting for 36% of undergraduates in 2022 according to data from Statista, the rate in the US is 5%.
Business is the top major in the US, accounting for 19% of undergraduates in the 2021–2022 academic year, followed by health professions and social sciences, according to data from the National Centre for Education Statistics.
But that did not mean America was weaker in technological innovation than China, Chu, the Beijing researcher, said.
'For any individual to achieve their best, they must independently choose to pursue what interests them,' he said, adding that following that logic, the emphasis on personal enthusiasm in the US ultimately led to higher societal efficiency.
Having been consulted by many Chinese students on which fields to study over the past decades, he said 'few had a clear idea what they wanted to do in the future and picked majors accordingly'. – South China Morning Post
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
4 minutes ago
- The Star
Head of China's Shaolin Temple removed over embezzlement claims
BEIJING: The head of the Chinese temple known as the birthplace of kung fu will be disrobed for "extremely" bad behaviour, Beijing's top Buddhist authority said Monday, (July 28) after allegations of embezzlement saw him placed under investigation. The Shaolin Temple said on Sunday that Abbot Shi Yongxin, known as the "CEO monk" for establishing dozens of companies abroad, was suspected of "embezzling project funds and temple assets". The monastery said Shi had "seriously violated Buddhist precepts", including by allegedly engaging in "improper relationships" with multiple women. "Multiple departments" were conducting a joint investigation, it said in a statement on WeChat. In response, the Buddhist Association of China, overseen by the ruling Communist Party, said Monday it would cancel Shi's certificate of ordination. "Shi Yongxin's actions are of an extremely bad nature, seriously undermining the reputation of the Buddhist community, hurting the image of monks," the association said in an online statement. The association "firmly supports the decision to deal with Shi Yongxin in accordance with the law". Shi had previously been accused by former monks of embezzling money from a temple-run company, maintaining a fleet of luxury cars and fathering children with multiple women. China's government exercises authority over the appointment of religious leaders, and "improper" conduct is often grounds for removal from office. A hashtag related to the temple scandal had been viewed more than 560 million times on social media platform Weibo as of Monday morning. The last post to the abbot's personal account on Weibo declared: "when one's own nature is pure, the pure land is here in the present". Shi faced similar allegations in 2015 which the temple called "vicious libel". Shi, 59, took office as abbot in 1999 and in the following decades expanded Shaolin studies and cultural knowledge overseas. He helped the temple establish dozens of companies -- but received backlash for commercialising Buddhism. The temple, established in AD 495, is known as the birthplace of Zen Buddhism and Chinese kung fu. Shi was first elected vice-chairman of the Buddhist Association of China in 2002 and has served as a representative to the National People's Congress, the country's top lawmaking body. - AFP
The Star
34 minutes ago
- The Star
What to know about the hack at Tea, an app where women share red flags about men
A fast-growing app for women was hacked after it shot to the top of app download charts and kicked off heated debates about women's safety and dating. The app, Tea Dating Advice , allowed women worried about their safety to share information about men they might date. Its premise was immediately polarising: Some praised it as a useful way to warn women about dangerous men, while others called it divisive and a violation of men's privacy. On July 25, Tea said that hackers had breached a data storage system, exposing about 72,000 images, including selfies and photo identifications of its users. Here's what to know about the situation. What is the Tea app? Released in 2023, the US-based app says it is a resource for women to protect themselves while dating, with some online likening it to a Yelp service for women dating men in the same area. Women who sign up and are approved can join an anonymous forum to seek feedback on men they are interested in, or report bad behaviour from men they have dated. Other tools on the app allow users to run background checks, search for criminal records and reverse image search for photos in the hope of spotting 'catfishing', where people pass off photos of others as themselves. According to Tea's site, the app's founder, Sean Cook, launched the app because he witnessed his mother's 'terrifying' experience with online dating. He said she was catfished and unknowingly engaged with men who had criminal records. When did it take off? Interest in the app this week escalated after it became the subject of videos and conversations about dating and gender dynamics on social media. On Thursday, Tea reported a 'massive surge in growth', saying on Instagram that more than 2 million users in the past few days had asked to join the app. It was listed as the top free app in Apple's download charts, and was also highly ranked in the Google Play store. Critics however, including some users on 4chan, an anonymous message board known for spreading hateful content, called for the site to be hacked. What happened in the breach? On Friday, Tea said that there had been a data breach of a 'legacy storage system' holding data for its users. The company said it had detected unauthorised access to about 72,000 images, including about 13,000 selfies and images of identification documents, which the company solicited to verify that users are women. Images from posts, comments and direct messages in the apps were also included in the breach, it said. Whose data was hacked? Tea said that the data belonged to users who signed up before February 2024. According to Tea's privacy policy, the selfies it solicits are deleted shortly after users are verified. The hacked images were not deleted. That data set was stored 'in compliance with law enforcement requirements related to cyberbullying prevention', Tea said in its statement, and was not moved to newer systems that Tea said were better fortified. Where did it end up? Data from the hack, including photos of women and of identification cards containing personal details, appeared to circulate online Friday. An anonymous user shared the database of photographs, which the user said included driver's licenses, to 4chan, according to the tech publication 404 Media, the first outlet to report on the breach. Some circulated a map, which The New York Times was unable to authenticate, that purported to use data from the leak to tie the images to locations. That thread was later deleted. According to an archived version of the thread, the user accused the Tea app of exposing people's personal information because of its inadequate protections. What happens now? Tea said that it was working with third-party cybersecurity experts, and that there was 'no evidence' to suggest other user data was leaked. The app's terms and conditions note that users provide their location, birth date, photo and photo ID during registration. Tea said, that in 2023, it removed a requirement for photo ID in addition to a selfie. The conversation around Tea has tapped into a larger face-off over the responsibility of platforms that women say can help protect them from dating untrustworthy or violent men. Many of them, such as 'Are We Dating the Same Guy?' groups, have spread widely on platforms like Facebook. But such groups have increasingly drawn accusations of stoking gender divisions, as well as claims from men who say the groups have defamed them or invaded their privacy. – ©2025 The New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Regulating online fraud: Malaysia's OSB vs China's approach
INITIATED in the 2010s, China's Digital Silk Road (DSR) aims to enhance digital connectivity across nations through infrastructure, trade, finance, people-to-people exchanges and policy coordination. It presents new commercial opportunities for Malaysia by fostering collaboration between Chinese and Malaysian businesses, strengthening Malaysia's digital economy ecosystem. The convergence of China's DSR, the Covid-19 pandemic, and the rapid rise in artificial intelligence (AI) have significantly accelerated the adoption of digital technologies in business processes and operations within Malaysia. However, while digitalisation offers numerous benefits, it has unfortunately also led to a significant surge in online criminal activity. A recent report by The Star revealed that nearly RM600mil was lost to online fraud from January to March, according to the Bukit Aman Commercial Crime Investigation Department. The report highlighted that criminals are exploiting technological advancements and modern lifestyles, using fake digital identities, fraudulent websites, chatbots and deepfakes to deceive victims. Recognising the escalating threat posed by these sophisticated methods, regulatory interventions focused on online content have become a prevailing trend. Malaysia, in line with this trend, passed the Online Safety Bill (OSB) 2024 in December. It is awaiting official gazettement, and its effective date will be determined by Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil. The new law aims to enhance online safety in Malaysia by regulating harmful content and establishing duties and obligations for application service providers (those who provide network services such as Internet access), content application service providers (those who provide content such as broadcasting and video streaming), and network service providers (those providing cellular mobile services and bandwidth services) operating within and outside Malaysia. According to Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reforms) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said, it applies to licensed application and content service providers such as Instagram, WhatsApp, TikTok and YouTube. The Bill regulates two categories of content: 'harmful content' and 'priority harmful content'. Its First Schedule defines the scope of harmful content, which includes content on financial fraud, excluding content that promotes awareness or education related to financial fraud. The content on financial fraud listed in the First Schedule is also classified as 'priority harmful content' in the Second Schedule. Key duties imposed on service providers include the obligation to implement measures to detect and mitigate harmful content (Section 13), issue user guidelines (Section 14), establish mechanisms for handling user reports of potentially harmful content (Sections 16 and 17), and prepare an Online Safety Plan (Section 20). For priority harmful content, such as financial fraud, service providers must take steps to prevent user access (Section 19). Despite Fahmi's assurance that the government's intention in introducing the OSB is to serve as a measure to combat crime, such as financial fraud, and not to restrict freedom of expression, critics remain concerned about its potential to restrict freedom of expression and be used as a censorship tool by the government. These are valid concerns, particularly considering the vague definition of harmful content in the OSB and the vast powers conferred on a commission reporting to the Communications Ministry. This commentary limits its discussion to the Bill's role concerning content on financial fraud. It is undeniable that unregulated content involving financial fraud, such as online scams, can damage business reputations and cause financial losses. Deputy Communications Minister Teo Nie Ching reported that RM1.224bil was lost to online crimes and scams in Malaysia within the first 10 months of last year, with many victims falling prey to sponsored advertisements on social media platforms. Indeed, a duty should be imposed on service providers to prevent these platforms from profiting from sponsored advertisements involving financial scams, for which they receive payment to promote products or services. Nevertheless, the provisions in the OSB are still lacking when viewed from the perspective of curbing online fraud. In China, the government passed the Anti-Telecom and Online Fraud Law ('ATOF Law') in September 2022. This law is more specific, aiming to prevent, deter and punish telecommunications and online fraud, strengthen efforts against such fraud, and protect the rights and interests of citizens and organisations. It imposes responsibilities on key businesses in the telecommunications, financial, and Internet sectors to prevent fraud risks. Among these requirements, the law requires service providers to verify users' identities before providing a range of services, such as web hosting, content and software distribution, livestreaming and advertising (Article 21). The law also imposes a duty of reasonable care on service providers to monitor, identify, and address the use of their services to commit fraud (Article 25). The ATOF Law provides a model regulation for targeted fraud prevention. While Malaysia and China operate within different legal and cultural frameworks, there are valuable lessons to be learned from China's experience in addressing online fraud. China's preventive measures have contributed to a more secure digital environment for businesses and consumers, minimising the impact of online fraud. While the Malaysian government's efforts to ensure a secure online environment and build trust in the digital ecosystem are laudable, more targeted provisions focused on the specific mechanics of online fraud would be more efficient, like China's ATOF Law, instead of a broad content regulation approach. China's ATOF Law, which emphasises user verification and platform monitoring for fraudulent activities, would allow for a more focused approach to content regulation. It is imperative that the Malaysian government review the adequacy of the OSB in achieving its intended purpose of curbing online crime. To enhance its efficacy, the government could consider incorporating more granular provisions that mandate specific actions from service providers and establish clear and enforceable guidelines and penalties. A well-regulated online environment, one that builds trust and security, can attract foreign investment and facilitate DSR-related collaborations, shaping the long-term trajectory of Malaysia's digital economy. Lai Chooi Ling is a lecturer at Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology (TAR UMT). The views expressed here are entirely the writer's own. The SEARCH Scholar Series is a social responsibility programme jointly organised by the South-East Asia Research Centre for Humanities (SEARCH) and TAR UMT.
