logo
Rachel Reeves refuses to rule out MORE tax hikes after spending spree plunged into crisis

Rachel Reeves refuses to rule out MORE tax hikes after spending spree plunged into crisis

The Sun12-06-2025
RACHEL Reeves refused to rule out hiking up taxes after her spending plans were threatened by dismal growth figures.
The Chancellor insisted she wasn't going to write Budgets for the next four years after the UK economy for shrank by 0.3 per cent in April - the biggest monthly drop for 18 months.
1
The move came after she hit back at suggestions she was the 'Klarna Chancellor' after accusations her spending review was buy now and pay later.
Ms Reeves told LBC News: "I am not going to write four years worth of budgets... It would be very risky for a Chancellor to write a budget in a world as uncertain as this.
"I can say I won't have to repeat a budget like last year, I wiped the slate clean. We do now have that path to lower borrowing and debt".
The Chancellor was speaking after she revelled in a £300 billion spending splurge increasing spending for health and defence and outlining new infrastructure projects.
But Ms Reeves pointed to "uncertainty about tariffs" had led to the fall in GDP for April following Donald Trump''s global tariff war.
The world trade war combined with stubborn inflation and slow growth are likely to see tax rises or major spending cuts at the Budget this autumn.
She said: 'We know that April was a challenging month.
"There was a huge uncertainty about tariffs, and one of the things if you dig into those GDP numbers today is exports weakening and also production weakening because of that uncertainty in the world around tariffs.'
Analysis: Growth figures are wake up call after spending splurge
By Ryan Sabey, Economics Editor
Rachel Reeves revelled in a major spending splurge yesterday - but this morning she wakes up to a reality check.
The Chancellor says that the figures are "clearly disappointing" but its a stark reminder of the fragility of the UK economy and how difficult it will be to turbo-charge growth.
The effects of 'Awful April' - when a slew of added costs for business including that national insurance rise came in - has hit home.
This Labour government has put that push for growth as their number one mission which will have the knock-on effect of driving up living standards.
After a positive start to the year - where we saw growth up by 0.7 per cent - today we see it drop by 0.3 per cent for April.
We shouldn't take one month's figures in isolation but the fear is conditions for business and entrepreneurs have hit them hard.
The hike to national insurance contributions and minimum wage for firms kicked in at the start of April and this is how the economy has reacted.
As the British Chambers of Commerce outline the NI rise has hit investment, recruitment and prices.
The uncertainty of Donald Trump's tariffs is also a drag on the UK with the largest monthly fall on record in goods exports to the US.
With dismal economic growth, the global trade war and stubborn inflation, the Chancellor will surely be left with little choice but to cut spending or raise taxes in the autumn.
She has iron-clad fiscal rules she insists are non-negotiable so it feels inevitable something will have to give.
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch hit out at Ministers saying they were waging a "war" with business.
She highlighted how ' Awful April' when National Insurance contributions for business were hikes and minimum wage payments went up.
The party leader said: "This is a war on the private sector, where private businesses are having to cut their coat according to their cloth.
"They're having to downsize. They're having to let go of staff, but no reforms are being asked for any parts of the public sector.
'Of course, we want to fund public services, but we need to make sure that we're doing things better.'
Ms Reeves outlined her spending review yesterday saying it was time for national renewal.
She told Labour MPs at an event last night that she needed to "sell" the benefits of her plans to voters on the doorstep.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Policing must strike a balance between transparency and justice
Policing must strike a balance between transparency and justice

The Independent

time20 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Policing must strike a balance between transparency and justice

Given the sensitivity of the issue, the high level of public interest, and the clear danger of legitimate public protests descending into mob rule, it is entirely right that the police should be given new guidance on releasing details of the ethnicity and nationality of a suspect in some, limited circumstances. The new interim guidance, issued by the National Police Chiefs' Council and the College of Policing, is, if anything, somewhat overdue – because it has been distressingly clear that surmise, conjecture, speculation, misinformation, propaganda, 'asking questions', and downright lies about serious crimes, can be weaponised by malign agents. Conspiracy theories have generated enormous public concern, and then disorder. Some calm analysis is required. Crime is crime, and criminals are criminals, and crime cannot be racialised. The release of information concerning a suspect's nationality, race, or immigration status (as has been suggested but, for the moment, resisted) cannot be used as an excuse for a riot. An offence is not more serious because it has been committed by, say, an asylum seeker, and an individual is not in some sense more guilty because of the colour of their skin. Except in cases involving a racial motive or incitement to hatred, such considerations ought to be irrelevant. Generally, they will continue to be. That has to be the default position. However, if a senior police team judges that the safety of the public is best served by the release of certain defaults, then a degree of discretion is justified. 'Guidance' is just that – a set of guidelines, not hard rules. The violent summer riots of 2024 were serious enough, but they could have been much worse had the truth about the Southport murders not emerged when it did, and had the untrue rumours about the suspect being a Muslim asylum-seeker who had come straight off a small boat not been dispelled – not that it should have made a difference in terms of criminal justice. As in all operational matters, the police should have an appropriate degree of discretion in the particular circumstances of any given situation they face, and equally, they should be free of political interference – and the demands of certain populist politicians and 'activists' to use heinous crimes and the suffering of victims for their own cynical purposes. These particular public figures don't care, in any case, whether people they don't like receive a fair trial, and are cheerfully contemptuous of the rule of law, particularly the provisions of the Contempt of Court Act 1981. But no democratic society should concede the universal principle of the right to a fair trial, uncontaminated by widespread misreporting of circumstances and motives such that a jury cannot do its job. The Home Office has not written these new guidelines – which is as it should be – but it has welcomed the interim proposals. The home secretary, Yvette Cooper, is complementing the move by asking the Law Commission to clarify how increased transparency and limited discretion for the police to release certain details could affect a free and fair trial. At the same time, the police have to be able to justify and defend their own actions in a world in which corrosive and baseless allegations of 'two-tier' policing, and 'cover-ups', are thrown around with such recklessness on social media and, sadly, by the so-called mainstream media as well. Like the guidance on what the police can reveal about suspects, the law on contempt of court also needs to be revisited. Since the relevant legislation was put on the statute book, the world has changed beyond recognition. Then, it was a matter of ensuring that a relatively small number of domestic press outlets and broadcasters behaved responsibly. For many years, because journalists are not on the whole bent on causing injustice and triggering retrials, the arrangements worked well. Times change. The last year or so, in particular, has proved how social media operates in an entirely different way. It is practically lawless. A very old adage springs to mind when one considers the speed of modern dissemination – a lie can be halfway around the world before the truth has got its boots on. This is an environment in which none of the tech giants take full responsibility for what appears on their platforms, or for the very real harm it can inflict. Vile racial slurs about non-existent crimes or suspects can originate far from the UK, and be amplified by bots and augmented by AI. There is a balance to be struck, essentially, between transparency and justice. That balance requires constant monitoring and periodic adjustment as technology moves forward and public expectations evolve. There will never be complete consensus, or success, often because the radical populists, both online and off, have a vested interest in fostering – indeed, creating – such unpleasant myths and conspiracies. But there is a sense here of a government and a police service being alert to the urgency of the challenge. In an often bleak social-media landscape, that is encouraging.

Donald Trump warns Putin there will be 'VERY severe consequences' if Russia does not stop the war in Ukraine
Donald Trump warns Putin there will be 'VERY severe consequences' if Russia does not stop the war in Ukraine

Daily Mail​

time20 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Donald Trump warns Putin there will be 'VERY severe consequences' if Russia does not stop the war in Ukraine

Donald Trump has warned Vladimir Putin 'there will be very severe consequences' if Russia does not agree to stop the war in Ukraine after their meeting on Friday. The US President took a tougher tone against the dictator yesterday saying he was yet to be convinced he would be able to persuade Putin to stop killing civilians. European leaders also said Mr Trump had agreed to make an immediate ceasefire at the start of negotiations a priority - something that will be painful for Moscow which is gaining territory by the day. In more encouraging news for Ukraine, the US President said tomorrow is only 'setting the table' for a second meeting where Volodymyr Zelensky will be present. Mr Trump cautioned that if he 'doesn't get the answers' he needs on Friday 'then we're not going to have a second meeting'. Asked if Russia will face consequences in that scenario, Mr Trump said: 'Yes, they will. There will be consequences.' Asked if that would be sanctions or tariffs, Trump said: 'I don't have to say. There will be very severe consequences.' But he hoped that there would be a 'quick second meeting' following the summit between Putin, Zelensky 'and myself if they'd like to have me there'. Trump said he hoped that there would be a 'quick second meeting' following the summit between Putin, Zelensky 'and myself if they'd like to have me there' In more encouraging news for Ukraine, the US President said tomorrow is only 'setting the table' for a second meeting where Volodymyr Zelensky will be present Describing the purpose of Alaska, Mr Trump said it was 'to find out where we are and what we are doing' before a 'more productive meeting' with Ukraine present. It is hoped that this second summit would take place in a neutral European country. Yesterday it emerged Mr Trump is planning to offer Putin access to rare earth minerals to incentivise him to end the war including opening up Alaska's natural resources to Moscow and lifting some sanctions. It may also include giving Russia access to the rare earth minerals in the Ukrainian territories under their occupation, the Telegraph reported. JD Vance yesterday said the US President had vowed that they would 'bring peace to Europe' in a speech at RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire. He channelled the spirit of how America and Britain had brought peace by victory in World War Two after spending the week with Foreign Secretary David Lammy at Chevening House in Kent. Describing what he and Mr Lammy had discussed, the Vice President said: 'What we did is we worked on one of our most important shared security goals in Europe, which is the end of the war between Russia and Ukraine. 'The President of the United States came in six months ago, and I just talked to him right before I came on the stage, and he said very simply that we are going to make it our mission as an administration to bring peace to Europe once again.' It marked a successful day of European diplomacy after Mr Trump's deeply concerning press conference on Monday where he appeared to blame Mr Zelensky for the war and take a softer stance against Putin. EU leaders scrambled to hold a virtual summit with the US President and the Ukrainian leader yesterday which Mr Trump said he 'would rate a 10'. Afterwards Mr Zelensky, who dialled in from Berlin where he was meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, described the talks as 'constructive and good'. He said that 'Trump supported us today' and that leaders around the world are unified towards reaching 'peace in Ukraine'. Mr Zelensky also warned leaders that Putin 'is bluffing' that sanctions 'do not matter to him and are ineffective' as they are in fact 'hitting Russia's war economy hard'. Chancellor Merz reiterated to Mr Trump that they must apply more 'pressure' on Putin if there is no movement towards peace. He said the US president 'knows this position and agrees with it'. Chancellor Merz also stressed that a ceasefire must come at the beginning of negotiations - and that Mr Trump 'also wants to make this one of his priorities'. Sir Keir Starmer, who was also present on the call, said the 'coalition of the willing' is ready to deploy a 'reassurance force' when the moment arises. In more encouraging signs, Mr Vance joined a call for the coalition of the willing for the first time yesterday, dialling in from RAF Fairford before Mr Trump also joined. It marks a significant turn around since the Vice President disparagingly dismissed the peacekeeping proposal in March as '20,000 troops from some random country that hasn't fought a war in 30 or 40 years'. Sir Keir said yesterday: 'For three-and-a-bit years this conflict has been going on and we haven't got anywhere near the prospect of actually a viable solution, a viable way of bringing it to a ceasefire - and now we do have that chance because of the work that the president has put in.'

In our first year Labour fixed the foundations – now we must build a stronger economy for a renewed Britain
In our first year Labour fixed the foundations – now we must build a stronger economy for a renewed Britain

The Guardian

time21 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

In our first year Labour fixed the foundations – now we must build a stronger economy for a renewed Britain

These past few weeks I have met dozens of businesses from across the United Kingdom. Pub and restaurant owners in Cornwall and Kent. Defence manufacturers in Belfast and Moray. Investment opportunities in Aberdeenshire and Port Talbot. I have seen an economy that has the ingredients for success – a skilled and committed workforce, world-class universities, innovative businesses. You don't hear Reform or the Conservatives talk of this success. They want you to believe the economy is broken. That our best days are behind us and that the path of decline is inevitable. I fundamentally reject that. It is not the country I see around us, and it is not the future I believe in. Britain's economy is not broken, but I know that in recent years it has got stuck. Austerity, a chaotic Brexit and Liz Truss's disastrous mini-budget led to more than a decade of stagnation. Our economy became trapped in a cycle of low growth, repressed investment and stagnant income that weakened our competitiveness on the global stage. The months and weeks before any budget are filled with people speculating about – or claiming to know – what tax and spend decisions I will take or what the Office for Budget Responsibility will conclude. This budget is no different – I get that. I will set out the decisions I take in a responsible manner. But just as my focus over the past 12 months has been about kickstarting economic growth for the benefits of working people, so will my next. Because Britain's productivity problem is not an abstract, technocratic one – it directly affects every working family in Britain who feel they are squeezing every penny to make ends meet. When businesses can't grow, wages stagnate and there is less money in the pockets of working people. When infrastructure is inadequate, costs rise, and opportunities are lost. When skills do not match economic needs, potential goes unfulfilled. With lower productivity, tax revenues go down and our public services face cuts. And with the world changing, Britain has been left too exposed to global shocks. Working people across Britain are striving and grafting, but they haven't had the tools they need for the job. They have not seen their incomes rise as a reward for their hard work. There is that sinking feeling that families and businesses across the country feel at the end of every month that they are working hard, but getting nowhere. There is nothing progressive – nothing Labour – about an economy that is not productive and does not reward those who contribute. Since I became shadow chancellor and then chancellor, I have known that breaking this cycle will require our sustained effort across many fronts. Because if renewal is our mission and productivity is our challenge, then investment and reform are our tools. It's investment into our infrastructure, from the train lines and roads that connect businesses and communities to each other to the building of new houses that working people need to fulfil the dream of owning a home. It's investing in British workers and raising skills in this country, so we end business reliance on cheap migrant workers. We are providing that investment and unblocking the barriers to it too. Breaking down the planning system to get Britain building, cutting the unnecessary red tape that has stifled innovation rather than enabled it, and filling the skills gaps that are leaving businesses unable to expand and working people unable to progress. We are making progress: wages grew faster in our first 10 months in power than the first 10 years of Conservatives, 384,000 more jobs have been created, trade deals now struck with the United States, India and the European Union, the cost of a representative new variable rate mortgage lower than when we were elected, and millions of working people getting a pay rise from a boost to the national minimum wage. But I know there is more to do – and that is what this autumn will be about. Because I do not accept decline as inevitable. If Labour's first year in power was about fixing the foundations, then the second year is about building a stronger economy for a renewed Britain. A renewed economy that works for working people – and rewards working people. That is my priority. That is my mission. That is what I am determined to deliver. Rachel Reeves is chancellor of the exchequer

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store