Strip baby penguins of English names, demand Indian nationalists
Leaders of the Right-wing Hindu nationalist party, led by Narendra Modi, the prime minister, said three-month-old Noddy, Tom and Pingu were born in the state of Maharashtra and should therefore have Marathi names.
'These chicks were born here, on our soil. They should reflect the Marathi identity. So why can't the penguins have a Marathi name?' Atul Shah, a BJP spokesman, told The Telegraph.
He said the party had suggested three alternative names to zoo authorities – Adu, Sanju and Teju – and added: 'It's a reasonable demand, and we are confident that they will accept it.'
Nitin Bankar, a local BJP leader, said he had written to authorities at the Byculla zoo, where the penguins are kept, at least twice a week since they were named in April.
This week, he led a protest outside the zoo, where demonstrators were seen holding penguin cutouts with red crosses over their disputed names.
Credit: X/@Nitinbankar259
Mr Bankar warned that the protests could continue and said he would try to have the zoo shut down if the chicks were not given Marathi names within 10 days.
Despite initial concerns that penguins would not survive India's heat, the birds have become a major attraction since the zoo acquired eight Humboldt penguins from South Korea in 2016.
Zoo authorities have received praise for successfully breeding penguin chicks, which have so far been given English names such as Flipper, Daisy, Bubble, Mr Molt and Dory.
The birds are monogamous and known for their lifelong pair bond with Mr Molt, the youngest male, and Flipper, the oldest female, becoming the zoo's most celebrated couple.
The penguins are kept within a climate-controlled 1,800 sq ft enclosure fitted with surveillance cameras, rocky terrain, synthetic ponds, and ice features.
Most other animals at the zoo have been given names of Indian origin.
The penguin controversy comes as political parties gear up for the upcoming municipal elections in Mumbai, which have often been fought over cultural identity issues.
The Byculla has not yet confirmed it will change the names of three chicks.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Daily T: Are Trump and Putin about to carve up Europe?
Three and a half years in to Moscow's war in Ukraine, the Russian and American presidents are set to meet in Alaska – possibly to decide its outcome over the heads of European long insisted that Kyiv would not cede any territory to Russia, Ukraine's President Zelensky could now be softening on that and Gordon are joined by Ukraine: The Latest hosts Dom Nicholls and Francis Dearnley to understand how this historic summit could play we read Nicola Sturgeon's memoir so you don't have to. The Telegraph's best-known Scot Alan Cochrane reviews her political record. Watch episodes of The Daily T here. You can also listen on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's trade war about to cost Americans 1.8% more in the short term, Yale analysis finds
The massive import taxes being imposed on Americans by President Donald Trump will liberate American households from approximately $2,500 that will be cut out from their yearly income as a result of higher prices. According to a new study from the Yale Budget Lab, the new Trump tariffs combined with existing import taxes will cause consumers to pay an overall effective tariff rate of 18.6 percent, the highest tariff level for U.S. imports since 1933. While Trump has frequently claimed that the tariffs are being paid by foreign nations as an entry fee for access to the American economy, they are actually import taxes typically paid by American importers and passed on to consumers, often in the form of higher prices. The Yale study found that prices will rise on average by 1.8 percent 'in the short run,' with the latest tariffs imposed by Trump set to disproportionately hit consumer purchases of clothing and textiles. For example, shoes and apparel will become 39 and 37 percent more expensive in the short run, the study found. The new tariffs include a whopping 50 percent tax on Indian imports, plus 35 percent taxes on goods from Laos, Switzerland, and Iraq. Everyday items ranging from coffee to Toyotas, home furnishings to Gap jeans, are expected to become more expensive as companies adjust their prices to counteract the impact of tariffs. While the president has asked companies to absorb any increases in costs, many cannot forever. Here are some of the goods expected to cost more: Alcohol Consumers of French, Italian or Spanish wines, Scotch whiskey, and aperitifs such as Aperol, can expect to see the price of their favorite alcoholic beverage rise due to the 15 percent tariff on the European Union. The E.U. is a major exporter of wines and spirits to the U.S. In 2024 alone, the E.U. accounted for $3.4 billion worth of imported spirits. Despite pleas from the beverage industry, the president's trade deal did not create exemptions for alcohol, which will likely drive up the price of imported wine or liquor – either in stores or restaurants. 'Without productive negotiations reducing reciprocal tariffs on wine and spirits, American wine retailers anticipate a significant decline in sales on top of the already difficult market, as well as significant job losses and subsequent business closures,' Tom Wark, the executive director of the Association of Wine Retailers, said. A letter to the president from the Toast Not Tariffs Coalition, a group of 57 associations representing the U.S. alcohol industry and related industries, said tariffs on the E.U. could result in 25,000 American job losses, and nearly $2 billion in lost sales. Diageo, the maker of Guinness, Bailey's, Johnnie Walker, and more, said the company expects to see a $200 million slump as a result of the tariffs. Cars and car parts Already, consumers have seen cars and car parts become more expensive over the last few months as a result of Trump's tariffs because the U.S. relies heavily on its trading partners for auto parts. Cox Automotive, an industry service and technology provider, expects the sticker price of vehicles to rise anywhere from 4 to 8 percent by the end of the year. That means the average car price would be above $50,000. While the president struck several deals with countries, many of them still make imported vehicles more expensive. Imported cars from the U.K., such as Range Rovers, are subject to a 10 percent tariff. Japan, which sells more cars to the U.S. than any other country, is facing a 15 percent tariff rate, which is expected to cause major disruption. Toyota said on August 7 it expects a $9.5 billion profit loss for the year. "It's honestly very difficult for us to predict what will happen regarding the market environment," Takanori Azuma, Toyota's head of finance, said. But given that many car parts are imported from Japan, the tariffs are likely to hurt U.S. carmakers as well. General Motors projects a $4 billion loss, Stellantis, the maker of Jeep, said it anticipates tariffs will add $1.7 billion in expenses, and Ford, which builds more cars in the U.S. than any of its rivals, said it expects tariffs to cause a $2 billion loss this year. Clothing Clothing is expected to see one of the most significant price increases, and much of it comes from countries in Asia. Vietnam, one of the largest exporters of appear to the U.S., has agreed to a 20 percent tariff. Brands such as Nike, Adidas, Zara, and Gap manufacture much of their clothing in Vietnam. While many can absorb some of those costs, even raising prices 10 percent would make a $65 pair of shoes $71.50, without tax. Bjorn Gulden, the CEO of Adidas, said the tariffs 'will directly increase the cost of our products for the U.S.' Other countries that are high producers of clothing face significant tariffs as well. Bangladesh has a 20 percent tariff, while Indonesia and Cambodia both face a 19 percent tariff. India, also a large producer of apparel, faces a steep tariff of 25 percent and Trump has threatened to increase that to 50 percent by the end of August if the country does not stop importing Russian oil. While the U.S. also imports a large portion of clothing from China, which is still negotiating a trade deal, Trump's decision to get rid of the de minimis exemption will make it more costly for consumers to purchase cheap clothing from stores like Shein or Temu. Coffee The U.S. relies heavily on Brazil to import coffee for the 165 million people who need their daily caffeine fix, but Trump's 50 percent tariff threatens the long-term availability and price of the drink. "When people go to their local coffee shop, whether it's Starbucks or something else, by and large they will likely be buying some form of Brazilian coffee," Monica de Bolle, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, told NPR.
Axios
8 hours ago
- Axios
Indiana wants flexibility in how it spends federal education dollars
Indiana wants more flexibility in how it spends federal education dollars designated for improving struggling schools, boosting programming for students learning English, and other specific initiatives. Why it matters: If approved, the flexibility could change where the dollars get directed and how they're spent, raising concerns that the money could flow away from students and schools in need of extra support. Driving the news: Late last month, the U.S. Department of Education sent a letter to states inviting them to seek waivers from the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) — a decades-old law meant to improve quality and address educational inequities. Indiana, Iowa and Oklahoma had already submitted flexibility waivers to the department. The big picture: The invitation for states to seek flexibility is in line with larger efforts to move money and decision-making away from the Education Department. President Trump signed an executive order in March to dismantle the department, and nearly half the workforce was slashed that same month. Education Secretary Linda McMahon has said Trump is "taking the bureaucracy out of education so that more money flows to the states." "Better education is closest to the kids, with parents, with local superintendents, with local school boards," she said in an interview with Fox News in March. "I think we'll see our scores go up with our students, and we can educate them with parental input as well." Zoom in: Indiana's waiver request asks for flexibility in spending the nearly $25 million in annual school improvement funds it receives, allowing it to spend those dollars at more schools — beyond those identified as needing improvement. It's also asking to receive its title funds — those meant for specific programs, such as professional development, supporting at-risk students, and English language acquisition — in a block grant, allowing those dollars to be used for any of the eligible title programs. Doing so would reduce time spent on compliance, the state says. Currently, the Indiana Department of Education allocates approximately $2.5 million annually in staff time to meet ESEA compliance requirements, according to the application.
