US's F-47, China's J-35, or Russia's Su-57: Which is the most advanced fighter jet in the world? Its speed is.., top features include...
Several countries, including the United States, Russia, and China, are continuously advancing their fifth- and sixth-generation fighter programs to enhance their air superiority. But is America's F-47 truly the most advanced of them all? Or do Russia's Su-57 and China's J-35A outperform it in key areas?
Expected to be ready for action by 2029, the F-47 is the United States' next big leap in fighter jets. It is a cutting-edge sixth-generation stealth aircraft currently in the early stages of development. Built by Boeing as part of the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program, this jet is designed to redefine what aerial combat means and keep the US ahead in the skies.
F-47 (NGAD)
Known to be the successor to the F-22 Raptor, this sixth-generation stealth fighter has been in Boeing's works since 2020. Interestingly, prototypes of the aircraft took to the skies back in 2019 and 2022, showing promising progress. The plan is to have it fully ready and operational sometime between 2025 and 2029, bringing a new era to air combat.
Speaking about its speed, the F-47 can fly at speeds exceeding Mach 2 (about 2,470 km/h) and has a combat radius of over 1,000 nautical miles—around 70% farther than the F-22's range. Nicknamed 'Stealth++,' its stealth technology outperforms both the F-22 and F-35, making it incredibly hard to detect by radar or infrared sensors.
The F-47 is powered by advanced turbofan engines such as the Pratt & Whitney XA103 or GE XA102.
It is equipped with a modular weapons system that allows for long-range missile launches and even drone control. On top of that, it incorporates advanced sensor fusion, AI-powered data networking, and coordinated drone operations, making it a truly next-generation fighter.
The F-47 is built to work as part of a 'system of systems,' meaning it can team up with two to five cooperative combat drones like the YFQ-42 and YFQ-44 to take on missions together. However, this advanced capability comes with a hefty price. Surprisingly, each jet costs between $160 and $300 million, which is a lot more than the F-35. While it promises impressive potential, its true combat performance is still waiting to be tested in the field.
Speaking about Russia's Su-57 Felon, it is a fifth-generation stealth fighter that first took to the skies back in 2010. Later in 2020, it was inducted into the Russian Air Force. It can reach speeds above Mach 2 and even supports supercruise, meaning it can fly at supersonic speeds without needing afterburners.
One of its strengths is its impressive range—it can fly up to 3,500 km without refueling and extend that to 4,500 km using external tanks. However, its stealth isn't quite as advanced as some rivals; with a radar cross-section between 0.1 and 0.5 square meters, it's easier to detect than jets like the F-35.
The Su-57 is powered by two AL-41F1 engines, each producing 35,000 pounds of thrust, and it carries a wide range of weapons on 12 hardpoints, including internal bays. Due to thrust vectoring technology, it's incredibly agile and excels in maneuverability.
It's also much more affordable, costing between $35 and $50 million per jet. However, production has been limited to fewer than 40 units, with output slowed down by the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. So far, its combat experience is limited, mostly involving missions in Syria.
China's J-35A is an advanced version of the Shenyang FC-31, built as a fifth-generation stealth fighter specifically for naval missions. It made a striking debut at the 2024 Zhuhai Airshow and can reach speeds up to Mach 1.8 (around 2,200 km/h), with a range close to 2,000 km.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'No foreign students should be in the country right now,' says Steve Bannon: What it means for your H-1B visa and future in the US
As the United States re-enters a tumultuous debate on immigration and workforce priorities, a controversial remark from one of President Donald Trump's closest former advisers has reignited alarm among international students and skilled foreign workers alike. Steve Bannon, a former White House chief strategist and staunch advocate of Trump-era nationalism, made an incendiary call for what he described as a 'complete purge' of foreign students from the country. Speaking on a podcast, Bannon stated, 'I don't think you should have any foreign students in the country right now,' warning that the continued presence of international students is elbowing out opportunities for American youth. His remarks signal more than rhetoric—they potentially foreshadow the revival of a hardline immigration agenda under a possible second Trump administration. A call for an exit visa, not a green card Bannon's suggestion wasn't merely to restrict future inflow, but to ensure that international students currently studying in the US leave immediately after graduation. 'Instead of stapling a green card to their diploma,' he said, 'you staple an exit visa. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dementia Has Been Linked To a Common Habit. Do You Do It? Memory Health Learn More Undo Boom, you are out of here.' Such a stance, if echoed in policy, would upend the current post-study visa pipeline. At present, the F-1 student visa often serves as a bridge to Optional Practical Training (OPT), and later, H-1B sponsorship, a route that many foreign graduates from US universities depend on to begin their careers. Bannon's comments challenge this pathway head-on, positioning international students as an economic threat rather than an asset. What does it mean for H-1B visa holders? While Bannon's comments targeted students, the implications extend deep into the realm of skilled immigration, particularly the H-1B visa program. The United States approved nearly 400,000 H-1B visas in 2024, according to recent figures, with the majority being extensions for current visa holders working at tech giants such as Amazon, Microsoft, and Google. Despite widespread layoffs across the tech sector, approximately 80,000 jobs cut this year, according to foreign workers continue to dominate the tech workforce. This dynamic has stoked resentment among some American workers and fueled narratives like Bannon's, which argue that the system favors outsiders at the expense of domestic job seekers. Compounding this, Vice President JD Vance recently warned tech firms that it is 'unacceptable' to lay off Americans while hiring foreigners, signaling bipartisan political scrutiny of the H-1B process. The politics of global talent and national allegiance Bannon's framing of global talent acquisition as a form of 'imperialism' invokes deeper ideological currents. 'Absorbing all the talent from across the world is not going to make the world better,' he said. 'That's how the British ran their empire.' The remark reflects a broader nativist sentiment: That the US, rather than acting as a global hub for merit and innovation, should focus inward, preserving opportunity for its own citizens. This worldview has gained ground in recent years, particularly as the political Right paints immigration not just as a demographic issue, but as an economic and cultural one. Labour market signals raise the stakes The release of the July jobs report according to US media reports, which showed a steep decline in employment growth, with just 73,000 jobs added and 258,000 cut from previous months' data, adds fuel to Bannon's argument. A sluggish labour market could create the perfect storm for populist calls to restrict foreign labor, even as economists argue that immigrants often fill critical skill gaps. While many tech firms defend their hiring practices as a necessity in a globalized, AI-driven economy, the optics of high foreign hiring amid domestic layoffs present a narrative that could be weaponized politically in the months ahead. A warning shot or a policy preview? Bannon may not currently hold a government post, but his remarks often serve as ideological test balloons for upcoming Republican agendas. With Trump increasingly surrounding himself with loyalists ahead of the 2026 election cycle, Bannon's statements cannot be dismissed as fringe commentary. If this vision materializes into policy, foreign students could face rapid changes, from visa restrictions and shortened work authorization periods to tightened scrutiny of university enrolments. In short, the traditional American dream for international students may be in jeopardy. What international students and H-1B hopefuls should do now Given the intensifying rhetoric, foreign students and workers are advised to stay informed and proactive: Monitor policy shifts : Immigration policy may change swiftly under a future administration. Keep abreast of Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and USCIS updates. Strengthen employment documentation : Ensure all OPT, CPT, and H-1B filings are airtight and well-documented. Explore alternative pathways : Consider options in Canada, Europe, or Australia if uncertainty persists in the US visa policy. Engage with advocacy groups : Organizations such as NAFSA, and local student coalitions can offer legal updates and resources. The future of meritocracy or a turn toward nationalism? At its heart, the debate over international students and H-1B visas is a debate about what kind of nation the US wants to be: A bastion of global meritocracy or a closed system prioritizing national loyalty over global integration. Steve Bannon's words may seem extreme, but they reflect a sentiment that is gaining traction, and one that could soon translate into real-world consequences for the hundreds of thousands who cross oceans in search of opportunity. As the political winds shift, one thing is clear: For international students and skilled immigrants in America, the stakes have never been higher. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
India.com
3 hours ago
- India.com
US' F-35 Lightning II and Russia's Su-57 Felon fighter: Why India need fifth generation fighter jets, they are special because..., India's AMCA is...
The F-35 Fighter jet-Image for representational purpose In a major push towards Atmanirbharta (self-reliance), Defence Minister Rajnath Singh approved the Execution Model for the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) programme recently. As per a report by IANS news agency, the AMCA clearance marks a critical step towards realising India's goal of joining an elite club of nations in designing and producing its own fleet of next-generation combat aircraft. India's answer to fifth-generation air power The AMCA, widely seen as India's answer to fifth-generation air power, will give a major boost to achieving 'atmanirbharata' in the defence sector and will become a hallmark of India's growing defence capabilities. Why India's AMCA will be special? Being the fifth-generation stealth multirole fighter equipped with cutting-edge technology, it will be suited for all-weather operation. Designed with low radar cross-section and supercruise capability, the AMCA is seen as the successor to the frontline Sukhoi Su-30MKI fighter jets. (With inputs from agencies)
News18
6 hours ago
- News18
F-35, Su-57 Or AMCA: Which Fifth-Generation Fighter Aircraft Will Help India Fly Higher & Better?
The Indian Air Force currently operates a variety of fighter jets, including the Russian-origin Su-30MKI, French Rafale, indigenous Tejas, Mirage 2000, and Jaguar India's need for a fifth-generation fighter aircraft has sparked ongoing speculation for several months as the nation weighs its options amid a complex geopolitical landscape. With its indigenous Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) still years away from operational readiness, expectations are turning toward potential acquisitions from foreign manufacturers. Only two viable contenders are practically available: the American F-35 Lightning II and Russia's Su-57 Felon. Yet, despite the buzz, neither the Indian government nor defence analysts have signalled a clear preference, leaving the future of this critical procurement uncertain. Given recent developments in trade between India and the US, reports suggest India has conveyed decision on the F-35 to the US. However, Minister of State for External Affairs, Kirti Vardhan Singh, recently clarified in Parliament that 'no formal discussions have been held as yet on this issue" concerning the F-35. He referred to the India-US Joint Statement from February 2025, following Prime Minister Narendra Modi's meeting with President Trump, in which the US agreed to 'undertake a review of its policy on releasing fifth-generation fighters (such as the F-35) and undersea systems to India." However, this was only a policy review, and no proposal or negotiation has been initiated between the two nations. The offer from the United States to potentially supply F-35 fifth-generation stealth fighters has been a headline-grabbing development since its inception, but an analysis of India's defence ecosystem, technical realities, and indigenous ambitions shows why this deal is unlikely to materialize soon. Speaking on the current scenario, Dinakar Peri, Fellow, Security Studies at Carnegie India says, 'While the lack of a fifth generation fighter jet is going to be a glaring gap in the IAF for the near term, the choice of importing a FGFA in small numbers is a hard one to make. The indigenous AMCA is just taking off in development terms and is about a decade away. Another interim buy may take resources and time away from the crucial programme." Why Not F35? The Indian Air Force currently operates a variety of fighter jets, including the Russian-origin Su-30MKI, French Rafale, indigenous Tejas, Mirage 2000, and Jaguar. Over the past few years, India has created an ecosystem supporting these fighters, with advantages in desired integration, interoperability, availability of expert crew, and maintenance facilities. 'When selecting an aircraft, it's not just about acquiring a platform that can fly. You must consider its compatibility with your operational needs—whether it can integrate with existing systems, communicate effectively with other platforms, and support your current weapons and infrastructure. The F-35 introduces a completely new ecosystem with predominantly American systems, which may limit flexibility and pose challenges for existing systems," said a senior Indian Air Force fighter pilot, speaking on condition of anonymity. Dinakar Peri says, 'The F-35 is the cutting edge of stealth and military aviation. However, that necessarily doesn't mean it is the best bet for India for a variety of reasons. India doesn't have the US fighter ecosystem and going through the curve will be a long curve." 'A more pertinent aspect is how much the US wants the F35 to be integrated into India's military ecosystem which has high-end Russian systems like SU-30MKIs, S-400 air defence systems in addition to French and Israeli system among others. Without seamless integration, the F35 cannot become an effective platform that it's envisaged to be, nor can the aircraft itself be fully exploited to its full potential," he added. Su-57 As An Option Many consider the Russian Su-57 a viable option given the circumstances surrounding the F-35. However, this option comes with its own challenges. Along with the fear of sanctions and political pressure, there are sufficient reasons to believe that deliveries will be delayed, and the jet may not fully serve its intended purpose. While the Su-57 offers benefits like technology transfer and easier integration given India's existing Russian aircraft ecosystem, its issues—delayed production, sanctions risks, past technological concerns, payment hurdles, and alignment complexities— bring challenges. Wait For AMCA Following Defence Minister Rajnath Singh's approval, public and private sector companies can collaborate to execute India's Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) program. While development is progressing rapidly, the prototype is not expected before 2027-28. DRDO officials have indicated that the aircraft's induction will likely occur no earlier than 2036. This timeline exacerbates the existing shortage of fighter jets in the Indian Air Force. Consequently, experts suggest inducting 4th Generation Plus (4Gen+) aircraft to bridge the gap until the AMCA is operational. top videos View all Dinkar Peri, talking on the way out, says 'The real crisis in the IAF today is shortage of fighters, 4th gen plus, and the numbers are set to go down further. The primary focus should be on ramping up the LCA production and the MRFA that are meant to address this." Indian Air Force currently operates 30-31 squadrons against a sanctioned strength of 42.5 squadrons. While there were expectations that the LCA Mk1A and Mk2 would help bridge this gap, delays in their delivery have hindered progress. With adversaries like China and Pakistan accelerating their aircraft production and inductions, the geopolitical scenario pushes the urgency to address this shortfall which experts believe is very important to focus on. About the Author Akash Sharma Akash Sharma, Defence Correspondent, CNN-News 18, covers the Ministry of Defence and Ministry of Railways. In addition, he also follows developments in the national capital. With an extensive experience More Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : fighter jets India Air Force news18 specials view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 03, 2025, 15:53 IST News india F-35, Su-57 Or AMCA: Which Fifth-Generation Fighter Aircraft Will Help India Fly Higher & Better? Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
