
India warns WTO it may impose retaliatory tariffs on U.S. over steel, aluminium duty hikes
At a time when India and the U.S. are in talks over a trade deal, fresh tensions have emerged as India has notified the World Trade Organisation of its proposal to impose tariffs on $7.6 billion worth of imports from the U.S. in retaliation for that country raising its import duties on steel and aluminium to 25%.
According to a communication from the WTO, India's reciprocal measures could kick in 30 days from the date it sent its notification to the WTO — May 9. The WTO said it was circulating the communication 'at the request of the delegation of India'.
The matter first became a point of friction during U.S. President Donald Trump's first term, when in 2018 he had first imposed higher tariffs on steel and aluminium imports. Then, in February 2025 with effect from March, at the start of his second term, he modified this by imposing tariffs of 25% on imports of steel and aluminium and removing all country-specific and product-specific exemptions that most countries had managed to obtain.
While the U.S. had declined overtures from India in April for talks over the matter, saying these higher tariffs were not safeguard measures but were taken in the interest of national security, India has maintained that they are safeguard measures.
'The measures have not been notified by the United States to the WTO, but are, in essence, safeguard measures,' India asserted in its communication to the WTO. 'India maintains that the measures taken by the United States are not consistent with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT 1994) and Agreement on Safeguards (AoS).'
Further, it said that since the U.S. did not hold mandatory consultations under Article 12.3 of the AoS, India had the right to retaliate.
It added that 'India reserves the right to suspend concessions or other obligations… that are substantially equivalent to the adverse effects of the measure to India's trade'.
India further said that its proposed measures would be in the form of a suspension of concessions or other obligations on selected products originating in the U.S., which would in effect result in an increase in tariffs on these items.
'India reserves its right to suspend concessions or other obligations after the expiration of thirty days from the date of this notification (May 9, 2025),' it added.
The communication further said that the U.S.' measures would affect $7.6 billion worth of imports into the United States from India, on which the duty collection would be $1.91 billion.
'Accordingly, India's proposed suspension of concessions would result in an equivalent amount of duty collected from products originating in the United States,' it added.
India said it would inform both the Council for Trade in Goods and Committee on Safeguards of the WTO on 'the next appropriate steps'.
If India does go ahead with its retaliatory measures, it would not be the first time. In June 2019, India imposed higher tariffs on 28 products from the U.S. after the U.S. removed India from its Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) and refused to discontinue its 2018 steel and aluminium tariffs.
The duties — covering $240 million in trade value — were withdrawn in September 2023, after Prime Minister Narendra Modi's state visit to Washington.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Critical minerals will remain a problem in US-China talks. These industries are at risk.
Critical minerals will likely remain a source of leverage for Beijing in trade talks with the U.S., even if President Donald Trump's Thursday call with Xi Jinping speeds up the flow of rare earths to feed auto, industrial and other supply chains. The issue dates back to early April, when China imposed restrictions on exports of the metals as part of its retaliation against Trump's imposition of tariffs of up to 145% on its exports to the U.S. In mid May, after negotiators met in Geneva, the U.S. said China had agreed to lift the restrictions as the countries agreed to a 90-day pause on levies that were choking off trade between them. The problem is that while China is allowing exports of rare earths, used in magnets that go into automobiles, for example, companies that want to export them need licenses. Companies say they aren't easy to get, though Reuters reported on Friday that Beijing had granted temporary licenses to suppliers of the big three U.S. auto makers. Its report cited people familiar with the matter. A spokesperson from the Chinese embassy said he wasn't aware of the situation specifically related to the licensing, reiterating that the export control measures are in line with international common practices, nondiscriminatory, and not targeted at specific countries. While only a fraction of the members of the American Chamber of Commerce in China—mostly technology and industrial companies—were affected by rare-earth export restrictions, three-quarters of those said their supplies would run out within three months, according to a survey from the trade group. While the survey found that Chinese suppliers to U.S. companies had recently been granted six-month export licenses, they noted continued uncertainty because there is a large backlog of license applications. Gracelin Baskaran, a mining economist and director of the Critical Minerals Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said about 25% of licenses applied for have been given out, but that they aren't being processed fast enough. Part of that is due to the administrative task. China is the source of 100% of the rare-earth processing capability in the world, so it is issuing licenses for exports not just to the U.S., but for many other countries. But it could also be part of the negotiations. 'China has made it very clear it's not satisfied with the 90-day tariff pause and looking for a more durable solution to the tariff conundrum," said Baskaran, noting the deflationary impact of the tariffs on China's economy. 'It's not in their incentive to give out licenses quickly as their economy is in a downward spiral. These licenses are their leverage." The U.S. had been the dominant rare-earth producer until the 1990s, but China steadily took market share, ramping up production to levels that made it unprofitable for others, forcing them out, Baskaran said. A similar phenomenon is currently under way in nickel, she U.S. has been producing rare earths in California and is building out separation and processing capabilities, with companies like MP Materials boosting their refining abilities. 'It's a perfectly solvable problem and one the U.S. is working at warp speed to address," Baskaran said. 'It's not a forever problem." That said, it could continue be a source of pain, leaving the U.S. vulnerable in talks with China. An array of industries reliant on these critical minerals, from autos to electronics, semiconductors, and defense, are likely to suffer. Write to Reshma Kapadia at

Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Iran furious over Trump's travel ban on 12 countries: ‘Racist, supremacist mentality'
An Iranian official denounced the "racist mentality" of US policymakers as US President Donald Trump reinstated the travel ban on 12 countries. Director General for the affairs of Iranians broad, Alireza Hashemi-Raja, said on Saturday the move was "a clear sign of the dominance of a supremacist and racist mentality among American policymakers." He lambasted Trump's travel ban, saying that it "indicates the deep hostility of American decision-makers towards the Iranian and Muslim people". Meanwhile, Reuters quoted Iran's foreign ministry as saying in a post on X, "The decision to ban the entry of Iranian nationals - merely due to their religion and nationality - not only indicates the deep hostility of American decision-makers towards the Iranian people and Muslims but also violates... international law." US President Donald Trump signed a new order on Wednesday banning the citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States. The countries affected by the latest travel ban are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. As per the order, the entry of people from seven other countries will be partially restricted. These include Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. The ban takes effect on June 9, 2025 (Monday) at 12:01 am EDT (0401 GMT). The ban, which Trump said was necessary to protect against "foreign terrorists", was reminiscent of a similar move he implemented during his first term in office from 2017 to 2021, when he barred travellers from seven Muslim-majority nations. (With inputs from agencies)
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Tighter H-1B rules, tech layoffs push Indians to alternate US visas
As scrutiny around H-1B work visa applications intensifies and tech layoffs continue to rattle the US job market, Indian professionals and their employers are increasingly exploring alternative visa routes to live and work in the US, reported The Economic Times. Among the most sought-after options now are the L-1 and O-1 non-immigrant visas. Simultaneously, there's a significant uptick in interest for the EB-5 immigrant investor visa programme. 'These trends aren't entirely new, but we've seen a sharp rise in the number of people reaching out over the past few months,' Gnanamookan Senthurjothi, a US immigration attorney, told The Economic Times. The shift comes as the US, under the Donald Trump administration, has ramped up its scrutiny of H-1B visa applications since the start of the year. According to recent data from the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), H-1B visa approvals this year dropped by 27 per cent Year-on-Year—marking the lowest since the pandemic-hit FY21. Each year, the US allots 85,000 H-1B visas to foreign professionals, with Indians accounting for nearly 70 per cent of the total. However, a wave of layoffs across major tech firms including Microsoft, Google, and Intel has deepened uncertainty among Indian workers in the US. 'Our clients have become more fearful and anxious, particularly regarding international travel and visa 'stamping' at consular posts abroad,' said Joel Yanovich, attorney at the Murthy Law Firm. 'I don't think a day goes by where I don't have a client or two asking me whether it's safe to travel.' Rise in L-1 and O-1 applications In response to growing apprehensions around the H-1B process, more applicants are turning to L-1 and O-1 visas—both of which do not have annual numerical limits. The L-1 visa facilitates intracompany transfers, while the O-1 visa is designed for individuals with extraordinary ability in fields such as science, arts, or business. 'Part of this [spike in demand] is seasonal, based on people not being selected for the H-1B lottery,' Yanovich said. 'But part of it appears to stem from employers and individuals hoping to avoid the heightened scrutiny they fear the H-1B program may face.' Canada as a staging ground Adding to the shift, companies are also considering temporary assignments outside the US as a strategic move to qualify employees for other visa categories. 'What we are also seeing is that some companies are transferring their employees to countries like Canada or elsewhere outside the US for a short time so that they will qualify for the L-1 visa,' Sukanya Raman, country head – India & GCC practice team at Davies & Associates LLC, was quoted as saying by The Economic Times. This tactic typically applies to professionals in managerial roles who may later transition to the EB-1C visa, which can lead to a green card, she said. There's also rising interest in the EB-2 NIW (National Interest Waiver)—a green card category for individuals with advanced degrees whose work is deemed to benefit the US on a national level. EB-5 investor visa sees surge The EB-5 immigrant investor visa has also seen a notable 50 per cent increase in demand since January 2025, according to Raman. 'These are in current status for Indian nationals, which means that visas are available and applicants can receive their authorisation and travel documents in just 3-6 months,' she noted. 'This allows them to stay in the US legally.'