I'm just a bride-to-be. Looking for a suit. That doesn't make me look like a politician
It's a month until my wedding, and my suit has arrived in the post, unceremoniously crammed into a plastic postage bag. I wasn't expecting it to come from China, but China is of course where things come from. Unbagging the crinkled jacket and trousers for my supposed Big Day felt a little deflating.
Although I'm not sure what I did have in mind. I've never fantasised about getting married. As a gay woman, this wasn't even an option for me until 2013. In fact, the closest I ever came to daydreaming about this occasion was when I was around four and I'd inferred from Disney movies that 'getting married' was the act of a prince ballroom dancing with a princess. The dancing was neither here nor there, but I knew I wanted to be the prince.
There wasn't a single a-ha moment when I twigged that feminine clothes made me feel like the world's most reluctant drag queen (a drag peasant?), but gradually I embraced being butch. And casual butch I can do – wearing Carhartt, Finisterre, even M&S menswear for that middle-aged dad look.
Then it comes to formalwear. Not that 'formal' was what I had in mind aesthetically for the wedding (so far it's looking more like a very slightly upmarket children's birthday party). But turning up on the day dressed like a contractor feels like a tantrum, and there's no small part of me that wants to look nice, whatever that means. I settled on the idea of a suit: something classic and well tailored.
In women's sections of high-street shops, lurid blazers with flouncy embellishments seem to whisper to each other about me, like a pack of vicious teen girls who only found out what a lesbian is by watching a controversial episode of their favourite soap. After several trips like this, I hadn't tried anything on, and bespoke women's suits from some of the beautiful female tailors of Savile Row are financially out of the question.
It's surprising to me how stressed I've become about looking good on my wedding day. But weddings get to you. No matter how much of a non-wedding wedding you think you're having, it's still … a wedding. While doing my utmost to queer the term 'bridezilla', I'm just a woman looking for a suit that doesn't make me look like a member of the shadow cabinet.
When the desperation hit after another three hours' Googling variations on 'women's suit wedding androgynous', I finally submitted to the eerie siren song of a site claiming to make affordable bespoke suits. With its slick UX and promise to solve an issue that had now been consuming me for months, I was sold. I designed my perfect suit – dark navy, streamlined and flattering without any frills – added it to my cart and entered my card details in a trance.
A month later my AI-generated, SEO-advertised, Shein-era bag of 'what did you think you were getting?' flew in from Shanghai. I'd thought I was ordering it from a Europe-based company, but the item had been 'dropshipped', sent directly from the manufacturer rather than the e-commerce retailer I bought it from. The jacket was at least five inches longer than what I thought I'd ordered, and putting it on felt a little bit like trying on one of my dad's blazers as a kid.
The suit looked better after having been left to hang for 24 hours, but marriage material it is not. After a brief identity crisis in which I wondered whether my gender expression might be 'scam victim', I managed to override a lifetime's worth of social conditioning and enter a full-on menswear store. I'd been drawn to the brand, Percival, since it released a Seinfeld-inspired collection. Even if I'm way more of a George than a Kramer. The moment I walked through the door, I also managed to find a near-perfect outfit. Which turned out to be a green linen suit – exactly the same one that was worn by Sadiq Khan last year. My partner tried to console me on this matter by reminding me that 'we did vote for him'.
Yes, I'll be taking my Sadiq suit to a tailor to shorten the arms and bring in the shoulders. No drastic alterations, though. Even if you have boobs, I've learned, the term 'menswear' should be consigned to the past, along with bathroom carpeting and lobotomies. While we're at it, bring on the grooms in white dresses.
Eleanor Margolis is a columnist for the i newspaper and Diva
Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D1200%26auto%3Dwebp%26quality%3D75&w=3840&q=100)
Evening Standard
4 hours ago
- Evening Standard
Rachel Zegler's bold Evita move sparks fierce debate among West End theatre fans
Zegler is no stranger to online debate. During the promotional campaign for Disney's Snow White, her remarks about the original story attracted significant attention. She was also recently at the centre of controversy after a post about Palestine sparked widespread discussion on social media.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘Queer as a $3 bill': celebrating 100 years of LGBTQ+ art for Pride month
As curator Pietro Rigolo was combing through the Getty's archives in search of material for his new show, he came upon a strange sight – a $3 bill. 'I was in this section of the archive dealing with the Black Panther movement, the WPA, the gay rights movement and protest material related to HIV/Aids,' Rigolo told me during a video interview. 'In there, I found this little piece of ephemera that was this fictive $3 bill. This specific banknote bears the portraits of Harvey Milk and Bessie Smith.' According to Rigolo, the idea for the bill came from the phrase 'queer as a $3 bill', a once-pejorative remark that was claimed by the LGBTQ+ community as a rallying call and even term of endearment. Distributed during pride in 1981, the bill featured two gay icons: Milk, the first openly gay man elected to public office in California who was murdered in cold blood in 1978, eventually resulting in a city-wide riot. Smith was another queer icon, one of the most celebrated and beloved entertainers of the jazz age and known as the 'empress of the blues'. The bill is a fitting namesake for Rigolo's new show at the Getty Center, which showcases over 100 years of queer art, packing a powerful irreverence and defiance. Case in point, $3 Bill: Evidence of Queer Lives gets off to a engaging start with one of Cuban-American artist Félix González-Torres's candy piles. Named Untitled (Para Un Hombre en Uniforme), the 1991 work weighs about 220 pounds and features red, white and blue lollipops. Visitors are encouraged to take a lollipop. According to Rigolo, the weights of González-Torres's candy piles often refer to specific human beings, and the piles' dwindling nature makes a poignant metaphor for the withering away of so many LGBTQ+ people who fell ill during the Aids crisis of the 1980s and 1990s. Its themes draw in the debate over gays serving in the armed forces that was occurring in the 1990s, as well as its colors implicating the American, Cuban and Puerto Rican flags, all of great personal significance to González-Torres. 'The public is invited to take a candy, and it's up to the institution when to replenish the pile, so this pile gets smaller and smaller as the exhibition progresses,' Rigolo said. 'It's this beautiful metaphor for a body that is consumed and loses weight and gains weight again, this circle of illness, death and eventually rebirth. It also establishes this relationship with the visitors consuming the candy, so it's also this metaphor of the virus spreading.' Although Untitled (Para Un Hombre en Uniforme) is a loan from the Hessel Museum of Art at Bard College, most of the works in $3 Bill come from the archives of the Getty itself. The vast holdings of the Getty Research Institute include a library with nearly one million volumes, as well as major archives dedicated to Robert Mapplethorpe and Harmony Hammond, and records of Entendido, a magazine that ran from 1980-83 as the first publication by and for a gay readership in Venezuela. The exhibition starts in 1900, not long after the word 'homosexual' was first coined and brought into wider use, signaling a new era in defining queer lives versus straight ones. It is broken up into four periods – 1900 through Stonewall, the protest era of the 1970s, and Aids epidemic of the 1980s and then the 90s to present. 'It's much more colorful, bright and in your face than other Getty shows,' said Rigolo. 'The color scheme really makes clear the different times, different moods, and different areas you find yourself in – it's thanks to the great graphic design of Alan Konishi and Chaya Arabia.' One standout piece from the post-90s era is The Aids Chronicles, in which mostly female members of the Institute of Cultural Inquiry, a Los Angeles-based non-profit organization, collected every single front page from the New York Times from the 26 years from 1993 through 2019. They then painted each page with a deep red acrylic paint that looks like blood, sparing only headlines and stories that deal with the Aids epidemic. The result is a monumental work about erasure of the epidemic from the mainstream media, and one that remains relevant as the Times continues to contemporarily erase and spread misinformation about transgender lives. 'This is the first time that we have a chance to show material from the Institute of Cultural Inquiry, and The Aids Chronicles are placed right in the middle of the galleries,' said Rigolo. 'They're a total showstopper and a really, really interesting project.' Holdings from Hammond include the artist's magnificent and bewitching Hair Bags, which she made in the early 1970s, dedicating one to each member of her feminist consciousness-raising art group. Hammond actually used hair from the women in the group in the bags and intended them to remain as a set. These strange, groundbreaking pieces emerged out of a period in which the queer icon was experimenting more and more with making art bags, as well as moving closer to being out as a lesbian. 'She was very important not only as an artist, but also as a scholar and curator, particularly of lesbian art,' Rigolo said. The show also draws on the Getty's archives of the Johnson Publishing Company, which publishes major African American magazines such as Jet and Ebony. Issues in $3 Bill showcase pictures of Harlem drag balls from the 1940s and 1950s, treated with surprising dignity for the time. 'It's interesting how these events were covered in these magazines. The language they used would definitely not be considered PC by today's standards, but at the same time the tone seemed to be pretty open within certain boundaries.' One of the big successes about $3 Bill: Evidence of Queer Lives is that it's such a broadly encompassing show, offering the true diversity of the LBGTQ+ community. 'It's really a show that strives not only to present the accomplishments of our communities in the realm of art but also our presence and our significance in society overall,' said Rigolo. 'I'm really happy about how this show encompasses a very wide spectrum of sexualities and genders.' $3 Bill: Evidence of Queer Lives is on show at the Getty Center in Los Angeles until 28 September
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
I'm just a bride-to-be. Looking for a suit. That doesn't make me look like a politician
It's a month until my wedding, and my suit has arrived in the post, unceremoniously crammed into a plastic postage bag. I wasn't expecting it to come from China, but China is of course where things come from. Unbagging the crinkled jacket and trousers for my supposed Big Day felt a little deflating. Although I'm not sure what I did have in mind. I've never fantasised about getting married. As a gay woman, this wasn't even an option for me until 2013. In fact, the closest I ever came to daydreaming about this occasion was when I was around four and I'd inferred from Disney movies that 'getting married' was the act of a prince ballroom dancing with a princess. The dancing was neither here nor there, but I knew I wanted to be the prince. There wasn't a single a-ha moment when I twigged that feminine clothes made me feel like the world's most reluctant drag queen (a drag peasant?), but gradually I embraced being butch. And casual butch I can do – wearing Carhartt, Finisterre, even M&S menswear for that middle-aged dad look. Then it comes to formalwear. Not that 'formal' was what I had in mind aesthetically for the wedding (so far it's looking more like a very slightly upmarket children's birthday party). But turning up on the day dressed like a contractor feels like a tantrum, and there's no small part of me that wants to look nice, whatever that means. I settled on the idea of a suit: something classic and well tailored. In women's sections of high-street shops, lurid blazers with flouncy embellishments seem to whisper to each other about me, like a pack of vicious teen girls who only found out what a lesbian is by watching a controversial episode of their favourite soap. After several trips like this, I hadn't tried anything on, and bespoke women's suits from some of the beautiful female tailors of Savile Row are financially out of the question. It's surprising to me how stressed I've become about looking good on my wedding day. But weddings get to you. No matter how much of a non-wedding wedding you think you're having, it's still … a wedding. While doing my utmost to queer the term 'bridezilla', I'm just a woman looking for a suit that doesn't make me look like a member of the shadow cabinet. When the desperation hit after another three hours' Googling variations on 'women's suit wedding androgynous', I finally submitted to the eerie siren song of a site claiming to make affordable bespoke suits. With its slick UX and promise to solve an issue that had now been consuming me for months, I was sold. I designed my perfect suit – dark navy, streamlined and flattering without any frills – added it to my cart and entered my card details in a trance. A month later my AI-generated, SEO-advertised, Shein-era bag of 'what did you think you were getting?' flew in from Shanghai. I'd thought I was ordering it from a Europe-based company, but the item had been 'dropshipped', sent directly from the manufacturer rather than the e-commerce retailer I bought it from. The jacket was at least five inches longer than what I thought I'd ordered, and putting it on felt a little bit like trying on one of my dad's blazers as a kid. The suit looked better after having been left to hang for 24 hours, but marriage material it is not. After a brief identity crisis in which I wondered whether my gender expression might be 'scam victim', I managed to override a lifetime's worth of social conditioning and enter a full-on menswear store. I'd been drawn to the brand, Percival, since it released a Seinfeld-inspired collection. Even if I'm way more of a George than a Kramer. The moment I walked through the door, I also managed to find a near-perfect outfit. Which turned out to be a green linen suit – exactly the same one that was worn by Sadiq Khan last year. My partner tried to console me on this matter by reminding me that 'we did vote for him'. Yes, I'll be taking my Sadiq suit to a tailor to shorten the arms and bring in the shoulders. No drastic alterations, though. Even if you have boobs, I've learned, the term 'menswear' should be consigned to the past, along with bathroom carpeting and lobotomies. While we're at it, bring on the grooms in white dresses. Eleanor Margolis is a columnist for the i newspaper and Diva Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
