logo
Daily subject-wise quiz: Polity and Governance MCQs on Vice-President of India, Sessions of Parliament and more (Week 120)

Daily subject-wise quiz: Polity and Governance MCQs on Vice-President of India, Sessions of Parliament and more (Week 120)

Indian Express22-07-2025
UPSC Essentials brings to you its initiative of daily subject-wise quizzes. These quizzes are designed to help you revise some of the most important topics from the static part of the syllabus. Attempt today's subject quiz on Polity and Governance to check your progress.
🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for July 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at manas.srivastava@indianexpress.com🚨
With reference to the Sessions of Parliament, consider the following statements:
1. India has a fixed parliamentary calendar.
2. Parliament generally meets for three sessions in a year.
3. The longest session is the Monsoon session.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
(a) Only one
(b) Only two
(c) All three
(d) None
Explanation
— India does not have a fixed parliamentary calendar. By convention, Parliament meets for three sessions in a year. Hence, statement 1 is not correct and statement 2 is correct.
— The longest, the Budget Session, begins towards the end of January and ends by the end of April or the first week of May. The session is adjourned so that Parliamentary Committees can debate budget suggestions. Hence, statement 3 is not correct.
— The second session is the three-week Monsoon Session, which typically starts in July and ends in August. The parliamentary year concludes with a three-week Winter Session, which runs from November to December.
Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
(Other Source: prsindia.org)
With reference to the summoning of Parliament, consider the following statements:
1. It is based on a provision of the Government of India Act, 1935.
2. It is not specified in the Constitution of India.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Explanation
— The summoning of Parliament is specified in Article 85 of the Constitution. Like many other articles, it is based on a provision of the Government of India Act, 1935. Hence, statement 1 is correct and statement 2 is not correct.
— This provision specified that the central legislature had to be summoned to meet at least once a year, and that not more than 12 months could elapse between two sessions.
Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
(Other Source: prsindia.org)
Consider the following statements about ancestral property:
1. A tribal woman is not entitled to an equal share in ancestral property.
2. In the absence of a specific law governing intestate succession among Scheduled Tribes, the principle of 'justice, equity and good conscience', extending the provisions of the Central Provinces Laws Act, 1875, is invoked.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Explanation
— The Supreme Court held that a tribal woman would be entitled to an equal share in ancestral property. The SC observed that denying a female heir right in the property unless otherwise prescribed in law only exacerbates gender division and discrimination, which the law should weed out. Hence, statement 1 is not correct.
— In the absence of a specific law governing intestate succession among Scheduled Tribes, Justices Sanjay Karol and Joymalya Bagchi invoked the principle of 'justice, equity and good conscience', extending the provisions of the Central Provinces Laws Act, 1875 to the case and set aside the July 1, 2022 judgement of the Chhattisgarh HC, which had upheld the lower court order denying her the inheritance rights. Hence, statement 2 is correct.
Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer.
Which of the following articles of the Constitution of India provides for the reservation of seats for women in the Legislative Assemblies of the States?
(a) Article 331
(b) Article 332
(c) Article 332-A
(d) Article 333
Explanation
— Article 332-A of the Constitution of India provides for the reservation of seats for women in the Legislative Assemblies of the States.
— Seats shall be reserved for women in the Legislative Assembly of every State.
— As nearly as may be, one-third of the total number of seats reserved under clause (3) of article 332 shall be reserved for women belonging to the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes.
— As nearly as may be, one-third (including the number of seats reserved for women belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes) of the total number of seats to be filled by direct election in the Legislative Assembly of every State shall be reserved for women.
Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer.
(Source: Constitution of India)
With reference to the removal of a judge, consider the following statements:
1. A notice for the removal of a judge has to be signed by not less than 50 members in the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha.
2. Once the MPs submit the motion, the presiding officer of the House has to accept it.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Explanation
— Across party lines, 145 Lok Sabha members and 63 Rajya Sabha members have given notice to file a motion demanding the dismissal of former Delhi High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma, who is currently placed at Allahabad High Court. Justice Varma is at the focus of a controversy when a Supreme Court-appointed commission found credibility in allegations that wads of cash notes were discovered at his official residence when a fire broke out on March 14.
— A notice for the removal of a judge has to be signed by not less than 100 members in the Lok Sabha and 50 in the Rajya Sabha, as per the Judges Inquiry Act, 1968. Hence, statement 1 is not correct.
— Once the MPs submit the motion, the presiding officer of the House can either accept or reject it. If accepted, a three-member committee, comprising two judges and a jurist, will be constituted to probe the complaint and determine if it is a case fit for initiating the process of impeachment. Hence, statement 2 is not correct.
Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer.
Consider the following personalities who held Constitutional positions in India:
1. V.V. Giri
2. R. Venkataraman
3. Shankar Dayal Sharma
Which of the above-mentioned Vice-Presidents of India resigned before completing their term to contest the presidential elections?
(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 2 only
(c) 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3
Explanation
— Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar's resignation late on Monday night has created a rare mid-term vacancy in the country's second-highest constitutional office. He is only the third Vice-President in India's history to resign before completing his term, after V.V. Giri and R. Venkataraman—both of whom stepped down to contest presidential elections and were succeeded by Gopal Swarup Pathak and Shankar Dayal Sharma, respectively.
Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
Consider the following statements with reference to the office of Vice President of India:
1. In case of vacancy, the Constitution requires it to be filled within six months.
2. The elected candidate serves a full five-year term from the date of assuming office — not just the remainder of its predecessor's tenure.
3. The Constitution does not provide for an acting Vice-President.
Which of the above given statements is/are true?
(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 3 only
(c) 2 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3
Explanation
Who performs the Vice-President's duties now?
— The Constitution does not provide for an acting Vice-President. However, since the Vice-President is also the ex officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, the Deputy Chairman will preside over the House in his absence. Hence, statement 3 is true.
When will the election be held?
— In the case of the President, the Constitution requires that a vacancy be filled within six months. But for a Vice-Presidential vacancy, there is no such fixed deadline. The only requirement is that the election be held 'as soon as possible' after the post falls vacant. The Election Commission will announce the schedule. The poll is conducted under the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952. As per convention, the Secretary General of either House of Parliament is appointed as the Returning Officer, in rotation. Hence, statement 1 is not true.
How long will the new Vice-President serve?
— The elected candidate serves a full five-year term from the date of assuming office — not just the remainder of the predecessor's tenure. Hence, statement 2 is true.
Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer.
With reference to election of Vice-President of India, consider the following statements:
1. The Vice-President is elected by an electoral college made up of members from both Houses of Parliament — Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha — excluding nominated members.
2. To be declared elected, a candidate must reach a required minimum number of votes — called the quota which is calculated by dividing the total number of valid votes by two and adding one (fractions, if any, are ignored).
Which of the above given statements is/are true?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Explanation
How is the Vice-President elected in India?
— The Vice-President is elected by an electoral college made up of members from both Houses of Parliament — Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha — including nominated members. Unlike in a presidential election, state legislatures do not participate. Hence, statement 1 is not true.
— Voting is held in Parliament House in New Delhi, by secret ballot, using the system of proportional representation with a single transferable vote. Each MP casts a vote by ranking candidates in order of preference. All votes carry equal value.
— To be declared elected, a candidate must reach a required minimum number of votes — called the quota. This is calculated by dividing the total number of valid votes by two and adding one (fractions, if any, are ignored). If no candidate crosses the quota in the first round, the one with the fewest first-preference votes is eliminated, and their votes are transferred to the remaining candidates based on second preferences. The process continues until one candidate crosses the quota. Hence, statement 2 is true.
Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer.
Daily Subject-wise quiz — History, Culture, and Social Issues (Week 118)
Daily subject-wise quiz — Polity and Governance (Week 119)
Daily subject-wise quiz — Science and Technology (Week 119)
Daily subject-wise quiz — Economy (Week 119)
Daily subject-wise quiz — Environment and Geography (Week 119)
Daily subject-wise quiz – International Relations (Week 119)
Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week.
Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.
Manas Srivastava is currently working as Senior Copy Editor with The Indian Express (digital) and leads a unique initiative of IE - UPSC Essentials. He majorly writes on UPSC, other competitive exams and education-related projects. In the past, Manas has represented India at the G-20 Youth Summit in Mexico. He is a former member of the Youth Council, GOI. A two-time topper/gold medallist in History (both in graduation and post-graduation) from Delhi University, he has mentored and taught UPSC aspirants for more than five years. His diverse role in The Indian Express consists of writing, editing, anchoring/ hosting, interviewing experts, and curating and simplifying news for the benefit of students. He hosts the YouTube talk show called 'Art and Culture with Devdutt Pattanaik' and a LIVE series on Instagram and YouTube called 'LIVE with Manas'.His talks on 'How to read a newspaper' focus on newspaper reading as an essential habit for students. His articles and videos aim at finding solutions to the general queries of students and hence he believes in being students' editor, preparing them not just for any exam but helping them to become informed citizens. This is where he makes his teaching profession meet journalism. He is also the editor of UPSC Essentials' monthly magazine for the aspirants. He is a recipient of the Dip Chand Memorial Award, the Lala Ram Mohan Prize and Prof. Papiya Ghosh Memorial Prize for academic excellence. He was also awarded the University's Post-Graduate Scholarship for pursuing M.A. in History where he chose to specialise in Ancient India due to his keen interest in Archaeology. He has also successfully completed a Certificate course on Women's Studies by the Women's Studies Development Centre, DU. As a part of N.S.S in the past, Manas has worked with national and international organisations and has shown keen interest and active participation in Social Service. He has led and been a part of projects involving areas such as gender sensitisation, persons with disability, helping slum dwellers, environment, adopting our heritage programme. He has also presented a case study on 'Psychological stress among students' at ICSQCC- Sri Lanka. As a compere for seminars and other events he likes to keep his orating hobby alive. His interests also lie in International Relations, Governance, Social issues, Essays and poetry. ... Read More
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SC questions U.P.'s use of ordinance to take control of Banke Bihari temple
SC questions U.P.'s use of ordinance to take control of Banke Bihari temple

The Hindu

time25 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

SC questions U.P.'s use of ordinance to take control of Banke Bihari temple

NEW DELHI The Supreme Court on Monday (August 4, 2025) questioned the Uttar Pradesh government's haste in promulgating an ordinance to take over the management of the ancient Banke Bihari temple at Vrindavan in Mathura. A Bench headed by Justice Surya Kant also expressed disapproval of the 'clandestine' manner employed by the State to secure the court's permission, getting a judgment on May 15 by filing a civil dispute to use temple funds to develop the Shri Banke Bihari Temple Corridor project. The Bench orally considered recalling its directions in the May verdict allowing the use of the temple funds for the corridor development project, which may spell a blow to the State Government's plans. The court also suggested passing an order to have a committee manage the temple until the High Court decided the validity of the ordinance. The Bench adjourned the case to August 5, asking Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj, who appeared for Uttar Pradesh, to take instructions from the State Government on the suggestions. Find a way out 'This is the land of Lord Krishna. He was the first mediator known to the world. Let's find a way out to resolve this dispute that has been pending for years and develop the area in the interests of lakhs of devotees who visit these iconic religious places. Basic amenities need to be created, as nowadays religious tourism is one of the biggest sources of revenue,' Justice Kant remarked. The bench assured all the stakeholders, including factions engaged in pitch rivalry over the temple management, that a responsible person would take care of temple affairs besides implementing the mandate to develop the adjoining areas and small temples in nearby localities. The managing committee members and other petitioners, who sought the recall or modification of the May 15 decision, were asked for suggestions with respect to the management of the temple. The court was hearing a plea by the management committee of the temple, which has challenged the ordinance.

Rahul Gandhi ‘certified anti-national', says BJP after Supreme Court pulls up Congress MP
Rahul Gandhi ‘certified anti-national', says BJP after Supreme Court pulls up Congress MP

Hindustan Times

time25 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Rahul Gandhi ‘certified anti-national', says BJP after Supreme Court pulls up Congress MP

The Bharatiya Janata Party launched a scathing attack on Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, describing him as a "certified anti-national" after the Supreme Court reprimanded him over his remarks about the Indian Army. BJP national spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia said with the top court's observations, Rahul Gandhi's credibility has gone down to "zero".(PTI) The BJP alleged that Gandhi has vowed to "weaken India and strengthen China", claiming that the "China Guru" and his party "hate" the Indian armed forces. They demanded an apology from him and the Congress for his remarks. The Supreme Court on Monday stayed the proceedings against the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha before a Lucknow court for his remarks about the Army during his December 2022 Bharat Jodo Yatra. However, the top court bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih slammed Gandhi, saying that he would not say such a thing if he were a true Indian. Union minister Dharmendra Pradhan said in a post on X that for the first time in India's parliamentary history, a Supreme Court had to make a "stern remark" against a Leader of the Opposition. "Rahul Gandhi and the Congress have a history of insulting the army, whether it is the surgical strike or Operation Sindoor. They have questioned the sacrifices of our brave soldiers at every opportunity," Pradhan said in a post on X. He said that the Congress' loyalty is not to the nation but only to one family, which is why respect for the nation is not even a part of their "fundamental thinking". "Today, the entire country is hurt by this anti-national mentality and expects an apology from Rahul Gandhi and the Congress," Pradhan added. BJP national spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia also cited the apex court's observations and alleged that Rahul Gandhi keeps making "immature, irresponsible and anti-India comments" even though various courts have rapped the Congress leader for such remarks in the past. "Today when the Supreme Court's comment has come, it won't be wrong to say that Rahul Gandhi has certainly vowed to weaken India and strengthen China," Bhatia said during a press conference. Rahul has 'Pakistan, China in his veins BJP IT head department Amit Malviya took to X to slam 'China Guru' Rahul Gandhi. He said, "The Supreme Court has once again reprimanded 'China Guru' Rahul Gandhi for making irresponsible statements concerning India's national security and territorial integrity." "Imagine, a leader of the opposition being repeatedly rebuked for speaking such recklessly," he added. "Rahul Gandhi is now a certified anti-national," Malviya charged in another post. During the press conference at the BJP headquarters in Delhi, Bhatia also showed a purported picture of Rahul Gandhi signing some document in the presence of Sonia Gandhi and Chinese President Xi Jinping. The BJP spokesperson claimed that the LoP signed a party-to-party memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the Communist Party of China. "That's why Rahul Gandhi was saying that our soldiers were thrashed by Chinese soldiers, be it (in) Doklam or Galwan, while every Indian was standing by India and brave soldiers of India," he said. Bhatia added that they never tell the people of India what was in that MoU with the Communist Party of China. "It seems Rahul Gandhi has love for China and Pakistan in his veins, but no love for India," Bhatia added. The BJP spokesperson termed the Supreme Court's observations as "very serious" and said that with this, Gandhi's credibility has gone down to "zero". "Does India deserve a more responsible and a better Leader of Opposition (LoP)? As the LoP who has taken oath under the Constitution to protect the sovereignty of our country, is he destroying the sovereignty of our country? Is he helping nations that are inimical to our country? Is he demoralising the brave Indian armed forces?" he asked. Additionally, BJP leader Amit Malviya took on the Congress leader for his "dead" economy remark, calling it a "diplomatic disaster on multiple fronts". "His recent 'dead economy' jibe is just the latest in a long series. In doing so, he implicitly admitted that Russia, a long-standing ally, is struggling, while bizarrely endorsing a hostile state like Pakistan as having a robust economy," he said. BJP spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla referred to Gandhi's remarks on the surgical strike and Operation Sindoor, alleging that the Congress leader and his party "hate" Indian armed forces. In a post on X, he said, "Sena ka Apman Congress ki pehchan (Insulting the Army is the hallmark of the Congress). Rahul and Congress hate Indian Armed Forces. Today SC has slammed him." BJP national spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari also said that the Supreme Court's condemnation of Gandhi exposed him. "Supreme Court asks Rahul Gandhi - 'How did you know that China had occupied land?'" he said. Bhandari said that this question did not "expose" Gandhi, but further got the attention back on the "secret MoU that Gandhi-Vadra family had with China". "Rahul is working under the remote control of foreign forces," he charged.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store