Microsoft Report Says AI Will Replace Advisors. Advisors Say, Not So Fast
Microsoft recently released a report on the jobs most likely to be replaced by artificial intelligence, and personal financial advisors landed at No. 30 on the list of 40, with a high AI applicability score. Advisors were alongside other professions at risk of an AI takeover, including market research analysts, editors and public relations specialists.
But advisors who spoke with WealthManagement.com don't see AI as a threat. Rather, they view it as an extension of the tech innovation that's been going on for decades; it can be used for certain tasks, such as proofreading and notetaking, to make them more efficient and create more capacity. However, as with other tech innovations, such as robo advisors, AI will not be able to replicate the human connection advisors have with their clients.
'I think the timeline for innovation is just going to accelerate because of this,' said Kevin Hrdlicka, head of wealth at Savant Wealth Management. 'Twenty years ago, there wasn't really even financial planning software. You did everything with Excel. Think of CRM workflows. Those are all things that have dramatically changed the roles for the people in the industry and financial advisors.'
Hrdlicka uses AI notetaking software as an example. Previously, his firm had a junior advisor who took notes at every meeting. Now, the notetaking technology handles that part so Savant can accelerate that advisor's training and development.
'Hopefully that will bear out as people can gain knowledge faster than they could have before because they don't have to be the scribe as part of their career,' he said. 'We're going to train on how to take good notes and follow up, but now there's technology. It's AI technology that will record and do a meeting follow-up, and it'll drop tasks into the CRM and all that stuff. It's been really helpful for people in seeing that those are skills that weren't adding a ton of value, and I can focus on things that are more important to the end client.'
The Microsoft report analyzes 200,000 anonymized user–AI conversations, sampled representatively from 9 months of Bing Copilot, Microsoft's AI chatbot, usage in the U.S. during 2024. The company measured how successfully different work activities are assisted or performed by AI.
The report found that people commonly sought AI assistance for information gathering, writing and executing financial transactions. By itself, AI was performing tasks such as providing information and assistance, writing, teaching and advising.
'And to me, everything that [the report is] pointing to is, I think, accurate in the sense that being able to gather information quickly, model 10 different scenarios, those are things AI is going to help advisors with,' Hrdlicka said. 'But I think it'll evolve how the human advisor works with end clients. It's more of a continuation across all industries of just change and technology that will impact how we do things.'
AI can help advisors lay a lot of the groundwork when advising a client on a certain life event. But the actual advice is going to be tailored to the individual client's goals and values, he said.
'It can serve up strategies, it can bring ideas, but then once you actually have the goals that the client and the person has, I think that is going to be hard to replicate,' he said. 'The best financial advice still comes from someone who knows your story, not from a spreadsheet.'
Brandon Galici, founder and financial planner at Galici Financial in San Juan Capistrano, Calif., said it's not just the knowledge and information the financial advisor brings to the client relationship; it's how to apply it. AI might be able to come up with some softer side, behavioral finance-type questions. But he doesn't believe that will be enough to get people to take action.
''Why is anyone ever going to pay an advisor an AUM fee? You could do robo advisor, and it's so much cheaper and effective,' Excuse me,' he said. 'But that just hasn't happened. And even those big companies are having a tougher time trying to get people on their platform without as much human connection.'
To be sure, Galici uses AI in his practice, primarily as a proofreader for the content he produces for clients. It speeds up some of his proofreading and research processes so he can spend more time on what he calls 'high-value tasks.'
'That's having those connections with clients, having conversations, sending emails back and forth where they feel seen, they feel heard, and they know that I'm helping them plan for their future, and I'm just constantly monitoring their situation.'
Chris Roy, a former senior client strategy at BNY Mellon Wealth Management, said human trust, connection, judgment, compliance and fiduciary guidelines will never be replaced by technology. But if firms use AI properly, it can 'turbo-boost' advisors' revenue generation and productivity.
'The firms that can develop secure proprietary AI models and ecosystems (which requires a huge investment) will see their advisors become far more productive and profitable,' he said. 'Many big banks and wirehouses still operate on overnight old batch processing mainframes, which restrict their agility.'
A recent study by Northwestern Mutual found that most Americans trust advisors over AI on a range of financial planning strategies. For instance, 56% of Americans surveyed said they trust humans more to create a retirement plan, versus 13% who said they would trust AI more.
'Financial planning isn't just about numbers on a spreadsheet—it's an emotional discussion around a person's life goals,' said Jeff Sippel, chief strategy officer at Northwestern Mutual, in a statement. 'These conversations are complex, delicate and deeply personal. Clients want to discuss their options with a trusted financial advisor who understands their needs and the trade-offs associated with these big financial decisions at a human level."
But the same study found that nearly half of Americans (47%) prefer to work with an advisor who understands and uses AI. The stat is even higher among younger investors, with 54% of Generation Z and millennials preferring to work with an advisor who uses the technology as part of their role.
Melissa Reaktenwalt, founder and advisor with EViE Financial Group in Upper Marlboro, Md., said she uses AI for many tasks, including notetaking, asset management and risk assessment. But she believes the human aspect of financial planning is still essential.
'There's a place for financial advisors from a human perspective, not just from the job perspective, but also for clients and what clients are looking for. So I'm not initially concerned more than any other takeover or shift that AI is going to bring, but I do think it's worth financial advisors paying attention to, certainly because I think there are some technical aspects of the job that likely can be replaced and likely will be.'
She's implemented a therapy model in her financial planning practice, allowing people to discuss how they feel about money.
'It's the most important part when people can talk through some of those things and have a partner in that and have the ability to also use not just a chatbot, but a human as a sounding board for some of those things and some of their ideas for wealth management or managing or organizing their finances,' she said.
But she believes AI is part of a new wave of innovation that can be both exciting and scary.
'If we just let the thing run by itself, we still have to be in charge of that; there still has to be a guardrail of some sort,' she said. 'For advisors, it's really helpful to just understand that these tools are really powerful. They can be significant game changers for a business and specifically for smaller independent firms. But good grief, there's still so much that we don't know, and there's a lot that still requires human direction and human guidance.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
We Think You Can Look Beyond 1&1's (ETR:1U1) Lackluster Earnings
Soft earnings didn't appear to concern 1&1 AG's (ETR:1U1) shareholders over the last week. Our analysis suggests that while the profits are soft, the foundations of the business are strong. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. How Do Unusual Items Influence Profit? To properly understand 1&1's profit results, we need to consider the €281m expense attributed to unusual items. It's never great to see unusual items costing the company profits, but on the upside, things might improve sooner rather than later. We looked at thousands of listed companies and found that unusual items are very often one-off in nature. And, after all, that's exactly what the accounting terminology implies. In the twelve months to June 2025, 1&1 had a big unusual items expense. As a result, we can surmise that the unusual items made its statutory profit significantly weaker than it would otherwise be. That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates. Our Take On 1&1's Profit Performance As we mentioned previously, the 1&1's profit was hampered by unusual items in the last year. Based on this observation, we consider it possible that 1&1's statutory profit actually understates its earnings potential! On the other hand, its EPS actually shrunk in the last twelve months. Of course, we've only just scratched the surface when it comes to analysing its earnings; one could also consider margins, forecast growth, and return on investment, among other factors. If you want to do dive deeper into 1&1, you'd also look into what risks it is currently facing. For example - 1&1 has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of. This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of 1&1's profit. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.


Axios
8 minutes ago
- Axios
Sam Altman: Never mind the launch mess — full speed ahead
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is still talking like the future belongs to him, a week after the rollout of the company's latest model raised a storm of criticism and questions about his strategy. The big picture: Altman has heard the concerns, integrated some lessons learned and is charging forward with plans to spend literally trillions of dollars to build a slew of products and services, led by an even more ubiquitous ChatGPT. What he's saying:"If you project our growth forward, pretty soon, like billions of people a day will be talking to ChatGPT," Altman said during a wide-ranging dinner with a small group of reporters in San Francisco Thursday night. "ChatGPT will say more words a day than all humans say, at some point, if we stay on our growth rate." These big plans require big spending. "You should expect OpenAI to spend trillions of dollars on data center construction in the not very distant future," Altman said. "And you should expect a bunch of economists to wring their hands and be like, 'Oh, this is so crazy. It's so reckless and whatever.'" "And we'll just be like, 'You know what? Let us, like, do our thing,' " Altman acknowledges that the company may have to devise new fundraising structures to gather that level of investment. "I suspect we can design a very interesting new kind of financial instrument for financing compute that the world has not yet figured out," he said. Altman's defense of OpenAI's billions in infrastructure spending is that it pays off. "Our answer is, we can spend $300 billion and sell $400 billion in services, and if we don't have the $300 billion in data centers, we just keep disappointing our customers." One big shift is that increasingly that capacity is going to answering queries rather than training new models. "Most of what we're building out at this point is the inference," he said — referring to the use of computing power to run rather than train AI models. Yes, but: It's the cost of training new models that is keeping OpenAI from turning a profit, he said. "We're profitable on inference. If we didn't pay for training, we'd be a very profitable company." "We will be always training the next thing, but if we needed to run the company profitably and stay ahead, I think we probably could do that." Altman likened the launch of GPT-5 to Dickens' famous "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times" line. "You have people that are like, 'you took away my friend. You're horrible. I need it back," he said, referring to users who wanted to keep using OpenAI's older models. At the same time, Altman said the company is finding scientists saying they can finally do real research using GPT-5. OpenAI has also seen traffic to its API double within 48 hours, to the point that it's limited by compute capacity. "We have really got the full spread of the human experience with this one," he said. Here's what else was on Altman's mind: 1. If Google is forced to sell its Chrome browser as part of an antitrust settlement, Altman would like to buy that, too. "If Chrome is really gonna sell, we should take a look at it. I don't have a number in mind, but I would like to have it." 2. A brain-computer interface company along the lines of Musk's Neuralink is something Altman said he's interested in setting up. "I think neural interfaces are cool idea," he said. "I would like to be able to think something and have ChatGPT respond to it." He said it would likely be a separate company from OpenAI, though its structure has yet to be finalized. 3. Altman said he grew up on Apple products and, as a self-described "fanboy," he "would love to work much more with Apple and I think it's cool some of the stuff we're doing together." 4. Altman also sees a public offering in the company's future — although he imagines someone else would be the executive handling quarterly earnings calls. 5. Altman expects some AI firms to optimize their AI for attention-grabbing and engagement rather than usefulness. "We are not going to do that. I do worry about it. The companies that are behind in getting AI adoption, this is the easiest way you can imagine to get more so, yes, I think you will see that. And I think it's bad, really bad." Fielding questions for an hour and a half, Altman weighed in on everything from his recent social media spat with Elon Musk ("There's no grand strategy... it was probably a mistake") to the timing of OpenAI's next big model after GPT-5. "I think it'll be faster than the previous [ones]," he said. "We're now at a place where there's a very strong research roadmap in front of us. " "I don't know an exact date," he said, but it won't be as long as it took to get from GPT-4 to GPT-5. What's next: Altman rejected some critics' view that GPT-5's more incremental advances mean that progress on improving AI models is hitting a wall. But he acknowledged that limits are starting to show up when it comes to the basic chatbot functionality of ChatGPT. "I think the models are still getting better at a rapid rate," he said. "One of the things that's interesting is the models have already saturated the chat use case. They're not gonna get much better. ... the Turing test has passed."


Entrepreneur
8 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
"We Got Funded!" Professional.me Raises US$3.1 Million to Power the Future of Hiring
With this new round of funding, will expand its engineering team, strengthen its network of data and research partnerships, and scale platform access to more employers across EMEA and beyond. You're reading Entrepreneur Middle East, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. an AI-powered platform redefining how companies match and manage talent, has closed a US$3.1 million seed round, led by Raha Beach Ventures, bringing total funding to US$4.6 million. introduces a breakthrough approach: personalized micro-LLMs, custom-trained language models for both employers and professionals. These tailored models deeply understand context and nuance, enabling smarter, faster, and more human hiring decisions. "We're not digitizing résumés; we're replacing them," said Ryan Adams, CEO of "Each company and each professional gets their own micro-LLM that acts as a context-aware advocate. It surfaces the best-fit matches automatically and meaningfully." With this new round of funding, will expand its engineering team, strengthen its network of data and research partnerships, and scale platform access to more employers across EMEA and beyond. Even advanced AI models like ChatGPT can only perform as well as the data they receive. Relying solely on résumés and job descriptions—often generic, outdated, or incomplete—leads to surface-level matches and missed opportunities. It's the classic case of garbage in, garbage out. addresses this by capturing a far richer, more structured layer of data: For employers, the platform analyzes organizational structures, current team dynamics, business unit goals, and past hiring outcomes. It builds predictive success profiles grounded in real context rather than generic role descriptions and can benchmark those profiles against industry peers. For professionals, the platform works directly with individuals to structure both public signals—such as portfolios, published work, thought leadership, project contributions, and peer recognition—and private indicators like ongoing learning, internal impact, mentoring, certifications, and industry engagement. These signals are just the beginning. Each professional's micro-LLM builds on the baseline of a résumé and expands it tenfold, capturing depth, nuance, and potential that traditional documents simply can't express. integrates seamlessly with existing hiring systems and workflows. Instead of replacing an ATS, it plugs into your current stack, enriching the pipeline with AI-driven shortlists, real-time skill inference, and context-aware matching. This allows hiring teams to spend more time on what matters most: authentic interviews and confident decisions. Since launching in October 2024, has created and tailored over 300,000 professional profiles, built a fast-growing user base across Europe, the UK, and MENA, and attracted over 138,000 followers on professional networks models are trained on hundreds of millions of data points spanning 167 industries and 1.2 million tasks. Its bias-aware recommendations and structured matching processes are designed to elevate human connection, not remove it. The company's globally distributed team includes talent from 14 nationalities across 3 continents and is proudly majority female, reflecting its commitment to fairness, equity, and inclusive innovation. "We're solving hiring at its core—not by adding more filters, but by rethinking how information is structured and understood," Adams added. "We believe AI should make hiring more intelligent, more inclusive, and more human." Related: The Best Man for the Job: Ryan Adams, Founder,