Australians could cut power bills by 90% if they made their homes more energy efficient, report finds
Discussions over coal versus renewables, the role of gas and the speed of infrastructure rollout to bring renewables online had been 'important', Menzel said. 'But there's a whole other conversation we need to be having. And that's about how we are using energy.'
Menzel and other energy experts say political noise has often overshadowed the role of energy efficiency in Australian homes and how to cut rising household bills.
The latest of several reports to make the case for boosting energy efficiency is from the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA).
IEEFA found Australian households could cut their power bills by more than 90% by implementing a range of energy efficiency measures.
Released on Wednesday, the report calculated potential savings of between 82% and 94% if households installed solar and a home battery and used efficient appliances – such as heat pumps, air-conditioners and electric induction cooktops.
The report said with federal and state government policies to incentivise home energy efficiency, a goal of halving household energy bills in a decade is achievable.
'We've seen over the last few years that energy prices and cost of living has become an emerging concern, but the debate has been around one-off rebates or debates on how to generate power,' Jay Gordon, an energy finance analyst at IEEFA, said.
'That's important, but it misses the point when you see these 80% to 90% cost reductions.'
Last month, energy experts congratulated the Victorian government for a suite of measures to improve home energy efficiency, including a ban on gas heating and hot water systems in new homes from January 2027.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
The Albanese government's new $2.3bn home battery program, which officially kicked off last week, provided discounts of about 30% on batteries.
Wednesday's IEEFA report projected that households could make savings of between 82% and 94% if they:
Installed an 8kw rooftop solar system and a 10kwh battery
Used reverse-cycle air conditioning instead of gas or electric heaters
Swapped gas or old electric water heaters for heat pumps
Replaced gas cooktops with electric induction
The IEEFA modelling did not take into account the further gains that Gordon said can be made by improving the thermal efficiency of homes: how well they can hold heat in the winter or keep heat out in summer.
More thermally efficient homes give households the option to use more daytime energy from solar to either pre-heat or pre-cool their homes ahead of the evening peak.
Menzel said though technologies such as heat pumps and solar are well established, policies to encourage their take-up are a challenge.
'With electrification and efficiency you're talking about a much broader range of product types and interventions that look different in different parts of the economy,' he said.
'It's a heavier lift, but it's where we need to go.'
Australian homes use about a quarter of the country's electricity, and account for more than 10% of greenhouse gas emissions. Cutting gas use in homes could also ease the supply pressures in the east coast, Menzel said.
Two reports in 2023 and 2024 from the independent Climateworks Centre, based at Monash University, have made the case for a 'renovation wave' across homes in Australia, especially those built before 2003 when minimum energy efficiency rules were introduced to national building codes.
Steps such as upgrading windows, adding insulation to walls, ceilings and floors, and upgrading appliances could save up to $2,200 a year on a household bill, the centre's research has claimed.
Dr Gill Armstrong, the centre's buildings program manager, said: 'They're tried and tested. It's low-hanging fruit, but it's also the one area where we can move fast for households to get the benefit of lower bills.
'There's a growing awareness that homes can be improved quite quickly. It's a no-brainer for the federal government.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
25 minutes ago
- Reuters
Colombia's Petro threatens to alter Glencore contract over Israel coal exports
BOGOTA, July 23 (Reuters) - Colombian President Gustavo Petro on Tuesday threatened to unilaterally alter Glencore's (GLEN.L), opens new tab concession contract if the mining giant continues to export coal to Israel, though the company said it has already ceased the shipments in compliance with a presidential decree. "I am willing to unilaterally change the concession contract," Petro said during an energy event for the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC). The president also warned that if Glencore refuses to comply with the decree to suspend the shipments, he would ask the local community near the mine to stage blockades. In response, the company said it was already in compliance with the order. "Cerrejon has acted in accordance with the decree issued by President Petro. In fact, our last shipment of coal was some two weeks before the decree came into effect," the company told Reuters. Petro suspended exports of the fuel source to Israel over its assault on the Gaza Strip. Israel's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Glencore's Cerrejon operation, located in Colombia's northeastern La Guajira province, is one of the world's largest open-pit coal export mines. It includes a 150-kilometer (93-mile) railway line and a port on the Caribbean Sea. Cerrejon's production reached 19 million metric tons in 2024. In March, the company announced it would cut its annual thermal coal production by between 5 million and 10 million tons due to low mineral prices.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Why this picturesque Aussie city could soon be wiped off the map
Thousands of North Queensland jobs could be lost as Swiss mining giant Glencore considers shutting down its operations in Mount Isa and Phosphate Hill. Business advocacy group Townsville Enterprise said the ripple effects could put up to 17,000 jobs at risk across the Northern Queensland economy. Mount Isa, a city with a population of about 20,000 in the state's Gulf Country region, is largely dependent on mining, in particular Glencore's copper and silver-lead zinc facilities. A memo circulated to staff on Wednesday painted a bleak outlook. Glencore's interim CEO warned the company is 'fast reaching the point' where it must place both facilities into care and maintenance unless a rescue deal is reached. 'To date Glencore has been absorbing losses hopeful that a viable solution could be found,' the memo stated. 'However, we are fast reaching the point at which Glencore cannot continue to absorb these losses. We need to know in the coming weeks whether there is a viable solution on the table from governments.' The closure of the two copper operations would directly impact around 550 Glencore workers, with an additional 500 jobs under threat at Dyno Nobel's Phosphate Hill operations. Roland Lobegeiger, field services manager at mechanical firm Isadraulics, said the consequences for Mount Isa would be far-reaching. 'Without it, the town's not going to be here,' he told 'There are other mines, there would be other work in the area, but would the town recover? It's hard to say,' he said. 'It would be a significant change for a lot of businesses, homes, house prices – you name it. It's definitely a bit of a dark cloud over the area. Everyone's still optimistic that they won't shut it down, but no one knows.' Senior Glencore executive Suresh Vadnagra told The Australian the miner was still hopeful of a partnership with government to keep the sites alive, potentially including a public equity stake. 'We have been engaging with government for the past five months,' he said. 'We need to know in the coming weeks whether there is a viable solution on the table from governments or whether we start to planning to transition the copper smelter and refinery into care and maintenance. Time is running out.' Glencore expects the two copper assets could lose billions of dollars over the next seven years, citing rising costs and an increasingly uncompetitive business environment. The warning comes amid broader struggles across Australia's smelting sector. Rio Tinto-owned Tomago, the nation's largest aluminium smelter, is also seeking government support as it battles soaring energy prices and competition from China. Industry Minister Tim Ayres signalled the federal government was open to stepping in, telling The Australian Financial Review. 'The truth is, if these facilities didn't exist, governments would be trying to build them,' he said. Meanwhile, Dr John Coyne, Director of National Security Programs at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute warned the closure could risk national security. 'Without access to local smelting, transport and processing costs will increase, threatening their viability and accelerating the decline of Australia's domestic metals processing sector.' Coyne said. He argued that China, the United States and Europe were moving to secure their own supply chains, in the case of a crisis. 'Australia's failure to think strategically puts its long-term prosperity at risk. Copper demand is expected to double over the next decade' he said.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
How much it costs to run a dehumidifier, according to experts
With soaring bills, inflating grocery prices and surging living costs, every pricey purchase feels even more costly. That's especially true when buying appliances like dehumidifiers. Though a little expensive, these machines have plenty of benefits. They not only extract moisture and dampness from your surroundings and, in turn, reduce the risk of mould, but they can potentially halve your laundry-drying times and save you spending money on tumble drying. The multipurpose machines are also great for allergy sufferers, tend to be noise-free and have the added benefit of neutralising harmful bacteria in your home. If you've noticed mould, condensation or a musty odour around your home, it may be time to invest in a dehumidifier. But before you take the plunge, it's worth knowing that some of these appliances can add to your energy bills. We consulted the experts to find out exactly how much dehumidifiers cost to run, and some tips for saving money when you use them. How much does it cost to run a dehumidifier? 'On average, a dehumidifier might be used for 4-6 hours daily, especially during colder months or in damp environments. In particularly humid conditions or larger spaces, it could be used for longer,' explains Katie Lilywhite, air treatment expert at AO. 'The exact cost depends on how often they're used and how energy-efficient the model is.' Chris Michael, founder and chair of leading dehumidifier company Meaco, elaborates: 'Choosing an energy-efficient model is key; regardless of size, as a cheaper model with high energy consumption is a false economy.' However, size can be a factor. 'Smaller models, which are ideal for flats or smaller homes, can cost as little as 4p per hour to run, while larger models, suited to bigger or damper properties, may cost up to 15p per hour,' Michaels says. What affects costs? Several factors can influence how much it costs to run a dehumidifier, including room temperature. 'Dehumidifiers are more efficient in warmer conditions,' says Lilywhite. Air flow is also important: 'Placing the unit centrally with good air circulation helps it work faster and use less energy.' Finally, leaving windows and doors open can impact costs. 'Leaving these open during use means the dehumidifier has to work harder to constantly remove new moisture that continually enters from outside,' Lilywhite explains. According to Michaels, other factors to consider include: 'Room size, how often the dehumidifier runs, the model's energy efficiency and electricity prices, which all play a role.' Michaels also suggests that the initial investment matters. 'Better quality machines often cost more but last longer and consume less energy, leading to savings in the long term.' Tips for saving money 'To reduce costs, try to keep the windows and doors closed whilst the dehumidifier is in use,' suggests Lilywhite. Location is just as important. 'One of the biggest mistakes many people make when using a dehumidifier is putting them in the wrong location,' Lilywhite says. 'Most people tend to put them in a corner, when instead you should be positioning the dehumidifier in the centre of the room to remove moisture. This ensures that there is enough space around the dehumidifier for the air to circulate.' Another mistake is neglecting regular maintenance or drainage. 'Doing so can lead to the growth of mould and bacteria inside the dehumidifier. Many dehumidifiers have a removable tank that needs to be emptied regularly,' Lilywhite explains. 'Proper maintenance is key to ensuring that your appliance lasts longer and performs effectively.' Michaels also suggests choosing an energy-efficient model with a humidistat. 'This allows the dehumidifier to maintain a set humidity level, switching off automatically when that level is reached and only turning back on if humidity rises,' he says. 'It means the unit only runs when needed, saving electricity.' He adds that it's also worth looking for models with a long warranty, 'as this often reflects better build quality and means you're less likely to need a replacement every couple of years.' Dehumidifiers have also become a popular way to dry laundry. Martin Lewis suggested this method as a money-saving technique as dehumidifiers are far cheaper to run than tumble dryers. It's also much faster than many other drying methods. 'When drying washing indoors, place the dehumidifier next to the clothes rack and keep the door closed. To reduce drying time, position a cooling fan opposite the dehumidifier,' Michaels suggests. 'Fans are energy efficient and help create airflow that pushes moisture out of the clothes and into the air for the dehumidifier to capture.' The best dehumidifier to buy Our expert guide to the best tried and tested dehumidifiers has plenty of recommendations, and Duux's bora smart 30l dehumidifier secured the top spot. Tester and air quality expert Joanne Lewsley found that 'It's a high-performance model that's as stylish as it is functional. It might be large, but it features a premium, minimalist design, which is ideal if you're after a dehumidifier that won't ruin your home aesthetic.' With a 30l per day extraction rate and a generous 4l water tank, it's great for larger rooms or open-plan spaces. Joanne says, 'What really sets it apart is its smart functionality. The Duux app is intuitive, responsive, and packed with helpful features. It provides real-time air quality readings and enables you to control everything from fan speed to humidity settings, whether you're on the sofa or away from home.'
