NC Senate passes bill to reform prescription drug market, enhance transparency
The North Carolina Senate passed Wednesday, with unanimous support, a bill sponsors say is aimed at leveling the playing field for independent pharmacies and enhancing transparency through new regulations and oversight.
The bill 'is one of the most sweeping reforms with respect to how we regulate the prescription drug market here in North Carolina,' said Sen. Benton Sawrey, a Clayton Republican and a primary sponsor of the bill..
It 'provides us with needed transparency' and 'protects our consumers,' Sawrey said Wednesday.
The House passed its own pharmacy-related bill in late April, which also seeks to reform the industry.
Senate leader Phil Berger said the Senate's bill was 'vetted significantly' by many interests with a stake in the health care industry.
In response to concerns that the bill could lead to increased health care costs, Berger said, 'It's my belief that the Senate approach actually addresses those concerns in a way that should not lead to the kind of cost inflation that the House approach would lead to.'
He said he believed the North Carolina Chamber of Commerce, a statewide business advocacy organization, supports the bill.
Efforts to regulate pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs, have failed in the past, including a stalled 2023 attempt by Rep. Wayne Sasser, who criticized PBMs for their opaque practices, as reported by The News & Observer.
The House and Senate will need to reconcile their versions of the bill for it to become law — something that has eluded the legislature for years.
On the possibility of a consensus being reached, Berger said it 'remains to be seen.'
'I'm hopeful that we will. I think everybody agrees something needs to be done in that space, and we've just not been able to get something that we can build some agreement on,' he said.
Convoluted industry
The pharmaceutical distribution industry is complex, with numerous players.
In broad terms: Drug manufacturers produce medications and distribute them to wholesalers or sometimes directly to pharmacies. Wholesalers then sell these drugs to various customers, including pharmacies.
Pharmacy benefit managers — the PBMs — are a middleman. They negotiate rebates and discounts on drugs with manufacturers and wholesalers, on behalf of health plans. Pharmacies contract with PBMs to gain access to networks and submit claims for reimbursement at negotiated rates.
Community pharmacies have been struggling to keep up, with low prescription reimbursements by PBMs and insurance plans cited as the cause by some. PBMs are often owned or are affiliated with mail-order or retail chains —for example, CVS Health owns the PBM CVS Caremark. PBMs have been accused of steering customers toward their own pharmacies.
Since January 2022, at least 100 community pharmacies have closed in North Carolina. Nationally, 300 independent pharmacies closed in 2023 alone, according to the National Community Pharmacy Association (NCPA), which represents independent community pharmacies.
Independent pharmacies often rely on Pharmacy Services Administrative Organizations, or PSAOs, to negotiate contracts with PBMs.
The Senate bill regulates various players in this industry. Among other things, it would prohibit PBMs from reimbursing pharmacies in pharmacy deserts at rates below what they pay to acquire medications. PSAOs would also face new rules, needing to be licensed and regulated by the state's Department of Insurance.
The bill would require the State Health Plan, which covers state employees, to consider adopting most of the bill's provisions in its next PBM contract. The plan's current PBM is CVS Caremark.
The House bill focuses largely on PBMs, banning spread pricing — a practice where PBMs charge insurers more for a drug than they reimburse pharmacies and keep the difference.
It also limits the fees PBMs can impose on pharmacies and prohibits favoritism toward PBM-affiliated pharmacies.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
13 minutes ago
- New York Times
Live Updates: Police Clear Protesters in Seattle, Las Vegas and L.A.
California liberals welcomed Gov. Gavin Newsom's speech condemning President Trump, but some remained skeptical of the governor. Republicans, meanwhile, saw his address as opportunistic and blamed him for the state's turmoil. For months, Californians weren't sure what to make of Gov. Gavin Newsom. There was the new podcast on which he interviewed right-wing influencers and said he felt trans athletes shouldn't participate in women's sports. There was the meeting in February with President Trump in the White House. And there were occasional snipes at Republicans, but nothing like those Mr. Newsom had dished out in years past. Then came a blistering nine-minute speech on Tuesday in which Mr. Newsom warned Americans that Mr. Trump was destroying democracy and acting as an authoritarian who would eventually send the military to states across the country. Many liberals in California cheered Mr. Newsom, finally seeing in him the leader of the resistance that they had been missing. Those feeling confused and fearful since Mr. Trump started his second term were looking for someone to stick up for them and said they appreciated Mr. Newsom's forcefulness. 'In a time of rising fear and growing threats to democracy, he spoke not just as a governor, but as a moral leader,' said Representative Lateefah Simon, Democrat of California. 'He named the danger plainly.' But others, while supportive of his message, were not entirely convinced. They said testing the political climate ahead of a potential run for president. 'Even if you're late to the party, you know, welcome to the fight,' said Hugo Soto-Martinez, a progressive City Council member in Los Angeles, who appreciated what Mr. Newsom said but wished the governor had stood up to the president sooner. Adrian Tirtanadi, executive director of Open Door Legal, a nonprofit which provides free legal representation for immigrants and others, said he liked all of the words in Mr. Newsom's speech. But, he said, he wondered why the governor was not backing up the rhetoric with more financial support for immigration lawyers who could fight deportation. Big talk without much action, Mr. Tirtanadi said, is often the California way. Still, others appreciated that Mr. Newsom had demanded that Mr. Trump stop workplace raids and filed lawsuits seeking to block the deployment of National Guard troops and Marines in Southern California. That has given some hope to immigrants who have felt powerless. When David Campos was 14, he and his family traveled by foot and by bus, across deserts and over mountains, to California from their home in Guatemala. They scurried under a border fence and settled in South Central Los Angeles without legal papers. The family eventually obtained citizenship through his father's carpentry job. Mr. Campos went on to Stanford University and Harvard Law School, served on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and is now the vice chairman of the California Democratic Party. Mr. Campos said he was glad that Mr. Newsom, the former San Francisco mayor with whom he sometimes clashed, took a defiant stance toward Mr. Trump. 'I'm glad he's rising to this moment,' Mr. Campos, 54, said in an interview. 'The governor reminded us that if the president can do this in California, he can do it anywhere in this country. That's how a democracy can die.' Republicans in California, many of whom have aligned with President Trump, said they were decidedly unimpressed with the governor's speech. Senator Brian Jones, the State Senate minority leader, said that the governor seemed to have been filming an early campaign commercial with his speech, from the way the flags were set in his backdrop to the suit he was wearing. 'It doesn't do anything to lower tensions in L.A.,' Mr. Jones said. 'When he says we all need to stand up, is he encouraging more people to show up to the riots and participate?' James Gallagher, the Republican leader of the California State Assembly, called the governor's address 'self-righteous political posturing.' Mr. Gallagher said California's policy of preventing local law enforcement from working with federal immigration officials created the current tension. He said he found it funny that Mr. Newsom was accusing Mr. Trump of being authoritarian when the governor ordered Californians to close their businesses, stay home from church, attend school on Zoom, wear masks and get vaccinated during the Covid-19 pandemic. 'He was a total tyrant, and he has no business talking about authoritarianism because he is exhibit A,' Mr. Gallagher said. Mr. Newsom's speech, as well as his sharp-tongued retorts to Republicans on social media this week, won some plaudits from younger influencers. Dwayne Murphy, Jr., a 34-year-old content creator who lives in Downey, Calif., and said he votes Democrat, said he appreciated that the governor 'seems to be hyper-focused on standing up for this state at a time like this, and I feel like that's what people are very encouraged by.' Inkiad Kabir, 20, a pop culture content creator who lives in the Inland Empire region of California, said that Mr. Newsom was the rare Democrat willing to go on the attack, calling him 'basically liberal Trump, in a way.' Mr. Kabir created a popular TikTok video this week in which he called the governor 'Daddy Newsom' and likened the governor to a 'toxic ex that you promise you're not going to go back to, but you always go back to.' For now, it seems, Mr. Kabir has gone back.


Medscape
14 minutes ago
- Medscape
Home Is the New Hospital: Nurses Rethink Where Patients Heal
Hospitals are struggling with long emergency room (ER) wait times, capacity issues, and staffing shortages. A growing number of patients with cellulitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, pneumonia, and other chronic conditions are being asked to skip hospital stays and return home. Hospital at Home models may be the answer. The explosion of Hospital at Home programs now makes it possible to provide acute level care at home. Today, 378 hospitals in 140 health systems and 39 states have been approved to provide healthcare at home. And a recent report found that 71% of health systems planned to launch Hospital at Home models. 'Digital care is the way of the future,' said Melissa Meier, MSN, RN, manager of Digital Care for OSF OnCall, the Digital Health Division for OSF HealthCare in Peoria, Illinois. 'We're always looking at ways to help reach more patients [and] always being on the cutting edge to reach our patients wherever they are is super important…[Hospital at Home] is certainly an answer for that.' About Medscape Data Medscape continually surveys physicians and other medical professionals about key practice challenges and current issues, creating high-impact analyses. For example, Medscape's Nurse Career Satisfaction Report 2024 found that Only 3% of surveyed nurses work in a home health/visiting nurse capacity. Advanced Practice Registered Nurses are more likely to work for medical groups. About 9% of nurses said the worst part of the job was not enough time with patients. A New Model of Care In 2020, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the Acute Hospital Care at Home initiative that made it possible for Medicare-certified hospitals to provide inpatient-level care at home. The COVID-era waiver was designed to address capacity issues during the pandemic but has proven popular as a long-term solution. Mass General Brigham is among the hospitals that launched programs to offer inpatient care in patient homes. Since the 2017 pilot, the Boston-based hospital has served more than 6000 patients and unlocked 30,000 bed days through its Healthcare at Home program. 'Patients absolutely love this service,' said Stephen Dorner, MD, MPH, emergency physician and chief clinical and innovation officer at Mass General Brigham Healthcare at Home. 'The experience is unmatched.' Hospital at Home is best suited to patients with infectious diseases or respiratory, circulatory, or renal conditions. Patients receive in-home visits from providers at least twice a day, continuous monitoring of vital signs, portable ultrasounds, blood work, and other diagnostics, and access to medications and other therapeutics. The programs also include 24-hour access to virtual care teams. Mass General Brigham begins screening for eligibility for Healthcare at Home in the emergency room based on clinical criteria, distance from the hospital, and payer coverage. In Renton, Washington, Providence takes a similar approach to screening patients who are eligible for its Hospital at Home program before initiating a conversation with patients to assess their interest in receiving care at home. 'Unsurprisingly, it's not right for everyone,' explains Christopher Dale, MD, MPH, medical director, Clinical Innovation at Providence. 'It could be that they [patients] don't want other people in their home…and there's a segment of people who feel more comfortable getting care in the hospital, thinking that the nurses and doctors are right there all the time…and they feel safer that way.' However, there can be significant benefits for patients who receive acute care at home. Studies have linked Hospital at Home programs to reduced hospital-acquired infections, less time spent in skilled nursing facilities, fewer hospital readmissions, and lower mortality rates; there are revenue benefits, too. Hospital at Home programs at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, saved 19%-30% compared to in-hospital care. 'It's a way to create capacity in the system,' said Dale. 'We all know about [issues with] boarding in the emergency department and how long it takes to get a bed…and we don't want that…and this creates capacity so that hospitals can stay available for the sickest of the sick.' Providers have embraced the model. Physicians and registered nurses providing acute in-home care reported lower burnout, higher job satisfaction, healthier work environments, and a feeling that their professional values were well-aligned with the program in a home hospital pilot program. 'We know that healthcare is hard, and this has provided another model of care for nurses, physicians…to still have that in-person care component and be able to provide hands-on care in a different setting that really helps them to focus on one patient at a time,' Meier added. 'It really has helped to remind them [nurses] why they got into healthcare in the first place.' Charting the Challenges The model might be successful, but Hospital at Home is not without its challenges. The logistics are complicated. Mass General Brigham manages a dedicated Healthcare at Home team, schedules home visits, provides access to 24-hour virtual patient care, and ensures that healthcare providers have the right supplies to provide patient care. To facilitate communication, OSF HealthCare does (virtual) interdisciplinary rounds every morning to bring the whole care team together. 'The coordination of ensuring you've got the right people with the right supplies at the right place in a remote location gets very complicated very quickly,' Dorner said. Launching a successful Hospital at Home program requires a strong commitment from leadership. It touches multiple hospital departments, from providers to revenue, accreditation, and food services, and, as an initiative still in its adolescence, Dale cites the importance of working with leadership to adjust as needed. Health systems are always concerned about navigating the logistics; they are considering the long-term viability of Hospital at Home. CMS has extended the Acute Hospital Care at Home waiver, initially set to expire at the end of 2024 and now extended through 2026 — but the future is uncertain. Reimbursement remains challenging. Under the waiver, Medicare-certified hospitals can provide inpatient-level care at home, but most private payers have not followed suit. The lack of reimbursement coupled with uncertainty about waiver extensions has made some hospitals reluctant to launch Hospital at Home programs. Dorner believes that making Hospital at Home a permanent option for patients is critical to the future of healthcare and plays a critical role in alleviating burnout, reducing wait times, and providing safe, effective, value-based care. 'We're not going to be able to exclusively build our way out of the capacity crisis…and so we have to find new ways to support that growing demand,' he said. 'It's hard to look at the landscape of what can be afforded through home hospital care delivery from a quality perspective, an experience perspective, a capacity perspective, a financial perspective and think, 'No, we don't want to do that.''


CBS News
17 minutes ago
- CBS News
UC Davis students can now bottle and sell their wines made on campus to support scholarships
UC Davis students can sell their own wines made to support scholarships UC Davis students can sell their own wines made to support scholarships UC Davis students can sell their own wines made to support scholarships DAVIS -- For 145 years, UC Davis has helped forge the future of the wine industry from the heart of its Yolo County campus. But now, for the first time, the university is finally allowed to bottle up and sell the wines made by students in its Department of Viticulture and Enology. It took a law change to get there and the creation of the nonprofit Hilgard631 for the state institution to legally sell wine. "That's 12 years in a nutshell. I'm glad we are here, able to celebrate this," said Professor David Block. Wednesday night, the department hosted an event celebrating the first-ever release and sale of the student creations. "They can share it with their friends and families, which is something they couldn't do before. So this is very exciting," said UC Davis head winemaker Leticia Chacon Rodriguez. Dozens of supporters showed up to taste-test the wines Wednesday, lining up after to purchase a bottle. "It's a good sauvignon. I like it. This is from a student?" asked one woman in surprise, tasting a delicious white wine. The magic happens from start to finish at UC Davis. Most of the grapes are grown at the vineyard on campus, and they are then fermented in the winery classroom as the students' visions come to life. Each pour represents a sense of accomplishment for those in the program. "There's a lot of pride and just excitement to share it," said student winemaker Naomi Morales. "If you're interested in the way that art and science collide, consider winemaking." Inside the teaching and research winery, their creations are made over the course of 10 weeks. Before this year, the wines made on campus had no sustainable future. "Unfortunately, before, the wine got just poured down the drain," said Ben Montpetit, chair of the Department of Viticulture and Enology. Now, the department is also able to teach students the business of winemaking too as they learn to design their own labels and sell their wines. It's helping raise a glass the the future for an industry seeing declining sales. "There's classes where they are given the freedom to do what they want and they really push the envelope. New varieties, new ways of making wine, new packaging," said Ben Montpetit. Hilgard631 handles public sales, now allowing the transfer of up to 20,000 gallons of department-made wines. The department bottled roughly 500 gallons of wine to sell for this release. All proceeds from the wine sales will support student scholarships. Bottles can be purchased in person only at the on-campus research winery at 631 Hilgard Rd. in Davis.