Game of skills involving money is gambling: Govt to SC
The government has informed the country's apex court that the moment a financial stake is introduced—even in games requiring skill—the activity becomes a form of betting and gambling. This submission was made as a crucial hearing on the applicability of GST to online gaming, fantasy sports, and casinos began on Monday in the Supreme Court. The government contended that such activities fall squarely within the purview of taxable actionable claims under the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017.
A bench comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan is examining whether the Goods and Services Tax (GST) is lawfully applicable to online games, fantasy sports platforms, and casinos, particularly when they involve monetary stakes.
The GST department's argument is based on the premise that once money is staked, the game—regardless of whether it involves skill or chance—enters the domain of gambling, a position previously upheld by Supreme Court judgments. Citing state laws, the revenue department has argued that state gambling statutes exempt games of skill from criminal prosecution only when played without stakes. 'When stakes are involved, such games may be considered gambling,' it stated in court.
The revenue department has further submitted that the 101st Constitutional Amendment transferred taxing powers for betting and gambling to the Centre under Article 246A. It, therefore, argues that regulatory powers of the states cannot be construed as taxation powers.
The government has also stated that the 2023 amendment was merely clarificatory in nature, asserting that the power to tax actionable claims existed even before the amendment.
Abhishek A. Rastogi, founder of Rastogi Chambers and counsel for one of the petitioners before the Supreme Court, said: 'If games of skill are treated as gambling solely because of monetary stakes, we risk blurring crucial legal boundaries. The decision will not just impact revenue collection, but the future of lawful, skill-based digital enterprises across India.'
The government contends that a 28% GST should apply to the total contest entry amount, effectively taxing the entire prize pool. However, gaming companies argue that GST should only be levied on their platform fees or commission, as many of these games involve skill rather than chance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Water sharing: Will Telangana attend deferred meet on Tribunal Award?
HYDERABAD: The Ministry of Jal Shakti will hold a consultation meeting on the implementation of the Brijesh Kumar Tribunal Award in Delhi on June 18. The meeting, originally proposed on May 7, was postponed due to some unavoidable reasons. According to information received here, the Jal Shakti minister will convene the meeting at 3 pm on June 18 in the national capital. Ministers of stakeholder states — Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Maharashtra — were invited to the meeting. If the Brijesh Kumar Tribunal Award is notified, it would provide immediate benefits to AP, Karnataka and Maharastra but not Telangana. According to sources, Maharashtra and Karnataka have been exerting pressure on the Centre to notify the Tribunal Award. It is not clear if the Telangana government is in favour of the consultation process initiated by the Jal Shakti Ministry and also notifying the Tribunal Award in the gazette. 'We will discuss it in the Cabinet and take a final decision on whether or not to attend the Jal Shakti meeting,' Irrigation Minister N Uttam Kumar Reddy said. It may be recalled that the Union government referred the Krishna water tribunal disputes between AP and Telangana to the existing Tribunal under Section 3 of the Interstate River Water Disputes Act, 1956, for the allocation of Krishna waters afresh between the two sibling states.
NDTV
40 minutes ago
- NDTV
Explained: The 1950 Act That Lets Assam Expel Foreigners Directly
Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Saturday said the state was actively considering using a long-forgotten law from 1950 to directly expel illegal migrants without going through the courts. The law in question, the Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act, 1950, empowers even a district commissioner to issue an order for the immediate removal of a person identified as an illegal immigrant. What Is The Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act, 1950? The Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act, 1950, was enacted by the Parliament in the early years of independence to address a pressing crisis in Assam. During the years after the Partition in 1947, Assam witnessed a massive influx of immigrants from East Bengal, which later became East Pakistan and then Bangladesh. The migration was largely driven by communal violence, displacement and the open border. To tackle this issue, the IEAA was passed on 1 March 1950. It gave the Central Government the power to remove any person or group from Assam if their presence harmed public interest or affected the rights of Scheduled Tribes. The law also allowed the government to give these powers to local officers, such as district commissioners, so they could issue expulsion orders directly, without going through the courts. The law was applicable across India but tailored to Assam. Over time, the law was mostly ignored. When the Assam Movement started in 1979, led by the All Assam Students' Union (AASU), people again raised strong concerns about illegal migration. This led to the Assam Accord in 1985, which decided that anyone who came into Assam after March 24, 1971, would be treated as a foreigner. This Act predates several key legislations that are currently used to deal with immigration issues in India, such as the Foreigners Act, 1946; Section 6A of the Citizenship Act; the Foreigners (Tribunals) Order, 1964; the Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1920; and the Passport Act, 1967. In October 2024, the Supreme Court of India upheld Section 6A of the Citizenship Act and clearly said that the 1950 Act was still valid. A Constitution Bench of five judges pointed out that the law allowed even a district commissioner to order the removal of illegal immigrants. The court said this Act can work alongside the Citizenship Act and the Foreigners Act to detect and deport illegal migrants. What Himanta Sarma Said "For whatever reason, our lawyers had not informed us about [the law], and we weren't aware of it either," Mr Sarma said, as reported by The Times Of India. Now that this has come to attention, the government is seriously discussing it, he said. He added that the state had already begun preparations over the last few days to act on this provision. "This time, if someone is identified as a foreigner, we will not send them to a tribunal. We will straightaway push them back." He clarified that those who have already moved court will not be affected by this. Himanta Sarma said that the process of identifying foreigners, which had slowed down due to complications around the National Register of Citizens (NRC), will now be sped up by using the legal powers available under this old but still valid Act.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
FIR against BJP leader, kin of Ex-PM Chandrashekhar's son, for threatening Dalit scholar
A BJP leader closely associated with former prime minister Chandrashekhar's son Neeraj Shekhar has been booked for allegedly threatening a Dalit research scholar from Lucknow University, police said on Tuesday (June 10, 2025). According to police, the FIR was lodged late Monday (June 9, 2025) night at Ubhaon Police Station on the complaint of Deepak Kannaujia, a native of Turtipar village. Police said that in his complaint, Mr. Kannaujia, a scholar at the Lucknow University, alleged that BJP leader Alok Singh called him on May 21 and abused him and threatened to kill him. "Record this conversation if you want. I am not afraid of the administration or the law and order in Uttar Pradesh," Alok Singh said, according to the complaint. BJP's Bilthara Road area president Arun Kant Tiwari confirmed that Alok Singh is affiliated with the BJP and is a close relative of Neeraj Shekhar. Mr. Kannaujia alleged that Alok Singh had a longstanding political enmity with his family. He said his father, Kamlesh Kannaujia, died of a heart attack on October 31 last year due to the stress caused by repeated harassment. He said he was afraid Alok Singh might get his mother, who lives alone in the village, killed. Superintendent of Police Omveer Singh told PTI on Tuesday that an audio clip related to the incident had recently gone viral on social media. A preliminary inquiry was conducted by Rasra Circle Officer Alok Gupta, after which Alok Singh was booked under sections 352 (intentional insult) and 351(3) (criminal intimidation) of the BNS, and provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
