The 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ Is One Massive EV
It also weighs approximately 9000 pounds, owing to its all-electric powertrain and a massive (there's that word again) lithium-ion battery with 205.0 kWh of usable energy. That's enough juice to power the Escalade IQ for a claimed 460 miles. Note: This Cadillac is exempt from EPA testing and labeling requirements because its Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) exceeds 10,000 pounds. It has an 800-volt electrical system that can replenish the battery at up to 350 kW, which is sufficient to add 100 miles of range in 10 minutes, according to Cadillac. These figures are similar to those for the GMC Hummer EV pickup, but in our testing the Hummer took 19 minutes to add 100 miles and required a full 109 minutes to charge from a 10 to 90 percent. We will see.
A pair of permanent-magnet motors teams up to produce 750 horsepower and 785 pound-feet of torque in the raciest mode, Velocity Max. That tops even the Cadillac Escalade-V's supercharged 6.2-liter V-8 and its 682 horsepower and 653 pound-feet of twist, though the IQ's normal output amounts to 680 horses and 615 pound-feet. Press the accelerator and the Escalade IQ responds with verve, if not the neck-snapping response of some EVs. Still, a claimed 4.7-second 60-mph time is nothing to sneeze at for something weighing four-plus tons, especially given that we got the merely 6290-pound Escalade-V to 60 mph in 4.3 seconds. Yes, we said "merely" in referencing the Escalade-V's 6290 pounds. That's the kind of rejiggering necessary to understand the Escalade IQ. It bends reality around itself.
The brakes are strong in the IQ as well. There are three regenerative-brake settings, including off. In this mode the braking feels natural, in that the vehicle rolls with the slight drag you might get from engine braking. When you work the brake pedal to slow down further, the effort is precisely matched to the deceleration you get. There's little sensation of the colossal weight you're controlling—it's just normal. Conversely, step up the regen to the highest level, and you never have to touch the brake at all except for panic-stop situations. Just bleed off speed with the accelerator, and you can soon learn to bring the IQ smoothly to a stop. The middle setting is still good for one pedal operation, too, but if your driving is the least bit aggressive you'll find yourself dabbing the brakes now and again.
The steering is where things get interesting. At first, it feels noncommittal, neither too communicative nor too numb. Twirl the wheel in parking lots and around tight corners, however, and rear-wheel steering of up to 10 degrees comes to the fore, trimming the turning circle to just less than 40 feet, which is seriously impressive for a vehicle with a grand 136.2-inch wheelbase. There's also Arrival mode, which turns the rear wheels in line with the fronts to allow the vehicle to crab sideways. It's fun, but this a mere parlor trick that has few uses in the real world.
Upper and lower control arms with air springs at all four corners support the Escalade IQ, with the air springs able to be lowered up to two inches or raised as much as an inch. Fourth-generation MagneRide magnetorheological dampers do their best to smother impacts, and they carry out this task with supreme efficiency in Tour mode. The IQ's ride felt considerably stiffer in Sport mode on the tight, technical (and lumpy) roads of Northern California, which we somewhat expected given the massive (there's that word again) 24-inch wheels wrapped with 35-inch tires. Still, the big rollers do a credible job of taking it in stride over all but the most punishing pavement.
Inside, the handsome seats are spacious and well trimmed, but we did struggle to get in because of tight toe space on the sidestep, which made us stand a bit tall to duck in. We also would have liked it if the steering wheel telescoped out a bit more, but in the end, we were able to settle in well enough. Setting the outside mirrors was a bit of a trick, because the mirror on the passenger side loses is convex shape, which is required by law for vehicles this heavy. Cadillac's solution: camera mirrors that pop up when you signal a turn. Not bad, but that doesn't help much if you're just taking a peek at traffic. And you'll want to use the rear camera mirror because the sloping roofline impedes rear visibility.
Once inside and settled, the first thing you notice is the colossal 55.0-inch pillar-to-pillar expanse of screen before you. Thankfully, it's a bit predictive, placing things you're bound to need on a smaller central cockpit screen. Normally the home of HVAC controls, this screen switches to power door controls when you have selected Park, and it also can display the regenerative braking controls. It brings up the Arrival mode display when you select that feature too. Further back, the second row is likewise roomy and comfortable. The third row is more of a kids-only affair, which is why some might wait for the 2026 Escalade IQL and its 4.2 inches of additional length, plus a slightly less aerodynamic roofline that adds an inch of third-row headroom.
The 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ is on sale now. It comes in two trims, Sport and Luxury, with Super Cruise, a head-up display, and a 12-cubic-foot front trunk all included. Basically, you get a splash of chrome trim and model-specific wheels with the Luxury for $129,990 or body-color trim and different wheels with the Sport for $130,490. The main upgrade bundle costs $20K for each, resulting in a Luxury 2 model for $149,990 or a Sport 2 for $150,490. This enhancement consists of an upgrade from 11.5 to 19.2 kW for the onboard charger, an integrated trailer brake controller and other towing features, an AKG premium audio system, night vision, 126-color ambient lighting, power seats with massage, power open/close doors, and more.
The 2025 Escalade-V, on the other hand, starts at $164,495. Sure, it's quick and sounds mean, but yikes. Viewed in that light, the 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ's price, while substantial, is one of the few things about it that isn't supermassive.
You Might Also Like
Car and Driver's 10 Best Cars through the Decades
How to Buy or Lease a New Car
Lightning Lap Legends: Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
E&E News
3 hours ago
- E&E News
EPA unplugs biogas-to-electricity in renewable fuel standard
The Trump administration is putting the brakes on an already sputtering effort to turn farm wastes into power for electric vehicles. In its latest proposal for biofuel volumes as part of the federal renewable fuel standard, EPA said it intends to remove electricity as a qualifying fuel for the incentive program — and thus kill the credits producers might have claimed for making electricity from manure gases. That's a big setback for the biogas industry and organizations that hoped EVs might help turn waste into profits. Advertisement It's not just manure that's losing out as biogas from municipal sewage treatment plants can also generate electricity. But the demise of so-called eRINs — or electric renewable identification numbers — is part of a mixed picture for agriculture in an administration that touts a 'farmers first' agenda.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
EPA To Reverse Finding That Greenhouse Gases Are Bad For Humans
Happy Wednesday! It's July 30, 2025, and this is The Morning Shift, your daily roundup of the top automotive headlines from around the world, in one place. This is where you'll find the most important stories that are shaping the way Americans drive and get around. In this morning's edition, we're looking at the EPA's new ruling in the face of all science, as well as how Porsche and Aston Martin are responding to tariffs. We'll also look at how Toyota's weathered the trade war storm, and the desperation of lithium miners in a world with fewer EVs than they'd hoped. Read more: 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ Is All About Big Numbers 1st Gear: The EPA Says Greenhouse Emissions Aren't Bad Any More, And In Fact We Could All Use Some More The dangers of greenhouse gases, to both our environment and the people that live within it, have been known for decades. The science has long been settled, but the science is inconvenient for the people who make their money selling greenhouse gas emitters. So, in the face of scientific consensus, the Trump administration has found a new response: Nuh-uh. From the New York Times: Lee Zeldin, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, said on Tuesday the Trump administration would revoke the scientific determination that underpins the government's legal authority to combat climate change. Speaking at a truck dealership in Indianapolis, Mr. Zeldin said the E.P.A. planned to rescind the 2009 declaration, known as the endangerment finding, which concluded that planet-warming greenhouse gases pose a threat to public health. The Obama and Biden administrations used that determination to set strict limits on greenhouse gas emissions from cars, power plants and other industrial sources of pollution. "The proposal would, if finalized, amount to the largest deregulatory action in the history of the United States," Mr. Zeldin said. He said the proposal would also erase limits on greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks on the nation's roads. Scientific consensus is often overturned, but it's generally overturned by new, more accurate science. That's not what's happening here, no prior theories are being disproven based on new data. This is just looking at decades of scientific research into a thing that's killing us, and simply saying that it's good actually. We live in hell and it's only getting worse. 2nd Gear: Porsche And Aston Martin Jack Up Prices Due To Tariffs The U.S. has a tariff deal with the European Union, sort of. We at least know that cars will be subject to a 15% tariff, which is a massive hike from the 2.5% tariff they faced before the Trump administration. Now that that number is set in stone, automakers are responding the simplest way they know how: Raising prices. From Reuters: European luxury carmakers including Porsche and Aston Martin have shot to the front of the grid with U.S. price hikes, which could point the way for bigger brands to follow in their wake as companies pass on the cost of tariffs. ... On Wednesday, Volkswagen's luxury brand Porsche said it had raised U.S. prices by between 2.3% and 3.6% in July, with no plans for now to establish a U.S. production presence - a move that would let it avoid the levies. "This is not a storm that will pass," Porsche CEO Oliver Blume said after the company cut its full-year profit target and flagged a $462 million hit from tariffs in the first half. "We continue to face significant challenges around the world." ... British sports-car maker Aston Martin said it had made incremental price increases in the United States since last month, issuing a profit warning citing a hit from U.S. import tariffs and prolonged suppressed Asian demand. As of yet, no automaker has matched the tariff hike with a 7.5% flat price increase across its lineup. It's not inconceivable that cars do make that jump, but companies may try to conceal it in model year changes or facelifts to help the pill go down. 3rd Gear: But Toyota's Doing Just Fine Toyota, though, is unlikely to jack up its prices to such a degree. The company's already doing well enough, already moving enough units to the U.S., that it simply may not need to hike MSRPs. Lower profits, higher volume, these things can come out in the wash. From Automotive News: Toyota shrugged off the impact of U.S. tariffs on vehicles and parts in June as its auto exports to the U.S. kept climbing and helped drive record sales for the world's biggest automaker. Toyota's exports to the U.S. rose 16 percent to 52,745 vehicles in June, more than two months after U.S. President Donald Trump imposed duties on shipments from Japan and other countries.. The upswing helped fuel a 2.7 percent increase in global sales to 937,246 in June for Toyota Motor Corp., including volume from the Toyota and Lexus brands as well as deliveries from the Daihatsu minicar subsidiary and Hino truck-making unit. Japan gets the same auto tariff rate as Europe, so we'll see how Toyota fares as both the company and its consumers start to feel the effects of that. One thing's for sure, though: Even from a company the size of Toyota, don't expect prices to drop any time soon. 4th Gear: Lithium Miners Are Getting Desperate As EV Sales Flatten When EVs were skyrocketing in adoption, thinkpieces the world over began to wonder if we even had enough lithium on Earth to meet demand. Now that demand outside of China is beginning to stagnate as EVs face the problem of crossing the chasm, and lithium miners are being caught with their pants down. From Bloomberg: A slew of corporate reports from Australian lithium producers has thrown a fresh spotlight this week on an industry riven by write-downs, cost controls and hard choices as the world's electric-vehicle transition runs into headwinds. IGO Ltd. and Mineral Resources Ltd. flagged potential impairments, Pilbara Minerals Ltd. stressed cost-cutting efforts, and Liontown Resources Ltd. said it had to resell some material originally earmarked as offtake for Ford Motor Co. "I don't think there's anyone globally making much in the way of margins there or enjoying the period we're in," IGO's chief executive officer Ivan Vella said on an investor call Wednesday. Now that the United States is fully shoving its head in the sand with regard to climate science, what will that mean for the EV market? Whatever it is, it can't be good. Reverse: Medicare For Some We haven't made much progress on the "achieving the standard of healthcare offered by any other wealthy nation" front in the decades since. On The Radio: King Tuff - 'Rainbow's Run' It's kind of weird that Ty Segall so rarely hits for me, because I'm a fan of seemingly everyone in his orbit. He's even on this album! Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Indiana leaders welcome EPA's proposed rollback on climate change
The head of the Environmental Protection Agency proposed eliminating a rule that guides much of the country's ability to fight climate change during a visit July 29 to an Indianapolis auto dealership. Rescinding the pivotal 2009 air pollution guidance would eliminate greenhouse gas standards and regulations, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said at a press conference attended by Gov. Mike Braun and other state and federal officials. 'If finalized, today's announcement would amount to the largest regulatory action in the history of the United States,' Zeldin said. Environmental advocates responded, saying the move is a devastating assault on clean air protections, and will exacerbate climate change, endanger public health and even slow the economy. Braun, who formerly operated an automotive parts company now embroiled in a Clean Air Act legal battle, said he was 'tickled pink' the EPA chose to partner with Indiana — a state whose auto manufacturing industry could benefit from emission deregulation — in announcing the proposal. Zeldin claimed the original finding that allowed the EPA to regulate greenhouse gasses relied "on assumptions that ended up not being true. They ended up making predictions about the science that many respects were not just pessimistic, they turned out not to be true.' Environmental and public health advocates don't agree. In a statement, the Sierra Club said the effort to repeal was the "most direct assault thus far on the movement to mitigate the climate crisis." 'The vast majority of scientists will disagree with him,' said Meredith Hankins, an attorney at the Natural Resources Defense Council. 'Science has gotten stronger at demonstrating the harmful effects from greenhouse gases.' Suzanne Jawaroski, the Indiana secretary of energy and natural resources, said Indiana's model of balancing economy and emissions could now scale nationally. She didn't mention Indiana ranks below all other states for its natural environment, according to a US News report. What is the endangerment finding? Greenhouse gases weren't always classified as air pollutants under the Clean Air Act. Concerns about motor vehicles emissions rising throughout the early 2000s led to a petition where 19 organizations called upon the EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. The EPA rejected the petition, arguing the gases weren't considered air pollutants subject to the Clean Air Act. Litigation ensued. And in 2007, the Supreme Court categorized greenhouse gases as 'without a doubt' air pollutants in a ruling leading to the endangerment finding. In 2009, the finding gave the EPA authority to regulate six greenhouse gases — including carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide — as threats to human health. That move contributed to regulations on emissions from cars, trucks, power plants and the oil and gas industry. The agency considered "the full weight of scientific evidence" when finalizing the finding under the Clean Air Act, and at the time, the EPA found the greenhouse gasses were dangerous to both public health and welfare for current and future generations. Then-EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson cited assessments from the U.S. Global Climate Research Program, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the National Research Council as supporting evidence of the endangerment finding. "This long-overdue finding cements 2009's place in history as the year when the United States Government began seriously addressing the challenge of greenhouse gas pollution and seizing the opportunity of clean-energy reform," Jackson said in a 2009 statement. "In less than 11 months, we have done more to promote clean energy and prevent climate change than happened in the last eight years." Indiana's push to stop the endangerment finding The state of Indiana has long opposed the endangerment finding. Before it was finalized in 2009, the state submitted comments to the EPA expressing disagreement over the quality of the science cited by the agency. The endangerment finding proposal "is not supported by sound science," wrote Thomas Easterly, then-head of IDEM. The state expressed disbelief that human-caused greenhouse gas emissions have any direct impact on public health or welfare. After pointing to studies outlining the Earth's history of temperature fluctuation, the report argued that a clear link between climate change and greenhouse gas emissions hadn't yet been established. The state requested the EPA conduct more research before making a finding that could result in "cumbersome and costly regulatory actions" — but ultimately, the endangerment finding was finalized later that year. Since 2009, climate change research has proliferated. NASA has determined that despite the Earth's history of climatic changes, the current rate of warming is unprecedented when compared to 10,000 years of the planet's history. But Indiana hasn't stopped pushing for the deregulation of greenhouse gas emissions. IDEM Commissioner Clint Woods assisted in the completion of a chapter of The Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 — a conservative vision for President Donald Trump's second term. The chapter, which focused on the EPA, recommended an "update the 2009 endangerment finding." In March, the Trump administration initiated a formal reconsideration of the endangerment finding, and this month, IDEM participated in a meeting with the federal Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs to discuss Indiana's perspective. "IDEM did not have access to the underlying proposal but shared previous State of Indiana comments on related issues, including on the '2009 Endangerment Finding,'" wrote Allen Carter, a spokesperson for IDEM. On July 25, state Rep. Beau Baird, R-Greencastle, invited Zeldin to visit Indiana to tour conservation sites and discuss environmental issues. Just four days later, Zeldin was in Indianapolis to announce a proposal to repeal the finding. Repeal provides economic benefits, some say Zeldin's tenure as EPA's administrator has been marked by deregulation in the name of economic progress. Braun and Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita both commended the administrator's efforts to align the agency with Trump's efforts in the White House. The Indiana Manufacturers Association also made a statement saying this will remove burdens that hindered economic growth. Ashton Eller, vice president of governmental affairs at IMA, wrote that burdensome regulatory actions cost jobs, drive up energy prices and are counterproductive. 'This is a significant victory for manufacturers and other large stationary sources that face burdensome regulations and increased costs under the previous framework,' Eller added. Environmental advocates say it is a step backward Several environmental organizations and Democrat lawmakers have expressed frustration with the EPA's proposal to rescind the endangerment finding. Rep. Carey Hamilton, D-Indianapolis, said repealing the rule is shortsighted from not only a human health perspective, but an economic one, too. 'China is eating our lunch when it comes to clean energy manufacturing,' Hamilton told IndyStar. 'Indiana — thanks to the Inflation Reduction Act — has significant investments going into EV battery and solar panel manufacturing.' She is concerned the proposal to rollback the endangerment finding threatens these investments and weakens Indiana's foothold in renewables as the rest of the global economy is moving away from fossil fuels. Rep. Sue Errington, D-Muncie, the ranking minority member of the House Environmental Affair Committee, said summers in Indiana are already 'hotter, longer and more dangerous than they were a decade ago." Eliminating greenhouse gas standards, she said, will accelerate climate change and harm public health. 'Environmental protections, long supported on a bipartisan basis, are now being used as a political tool," Errington said. "Hoosiers deserve better than short-term political gain at the expense of our land, water and health.' IndyStar's environmental reporting project is made possible through the generous support of the nonprofit Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust. Karl Schneider is an IndyStar environment reporter. You can reach him at Follow him on BlueSky @ or X @karlstartswithk. Sophie Hartley is an IndyStar environment reporter. You can reach her at or on X at @sophienhartley. This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Indiana leaders welcome EPA's proposed rollback on climate change Solve the daily Crossword
