New Fiat Tris EV three-wheeler is here to take the Piaggio Ape's throne
If the new Fiat Panda seems a little too refined for your tastes, then you could consider the company's new Tris – a three-wheeled, all-electric pick-up truck.
We're familiar with the Reliant Robin and Morgan 3 Wheeler here in the UK, but over in Italy the market for three-wheeled vehicles has been dominated by the motorbike-based Piaggio Ape. However, due to European regulations, the Ape was removed from sale in the EU and is only being offered in India and Africa from now on.
That's where this Fiat Tris steps in. Under the Fiat Professional commercial vehicle brand, the Tris will go on sale in India and Africa, although Fiat CEO Olivier Francois has given hope of a launch here, saying, 'We believe its potential goes far beyond. Europe may be next, because this kind of smart, sustainable solution speaks a universal language." Advertisement - Article continues below
The Tris isn't designed to rival conventional vans. Instead, Fiat says, its little electric three-wheeler is aimed at so-called 'last-mile' deliveries, transporting 'diverse goods such as fruit, sand, or furniture' – or, we suspect, anything within its 540kg payload.
Powering the Tris is a 6.9kWh battery (larger than a Citroen Ami's 5.5kWh unit), which will return a 55-mile range on the World Motorcycle Test Cycle (WMTC), nine miles more than the Citroen. The Fiat's 12bhp electric motor is good for a top speed of 28mph.
Charging is via a standard domestic plug, so a zero to 80 per cent recharge will take 3.5 hours; a full charge from flat takes almost five hours. However, Fiat points out, this allows professionals to charge their vehicle overnight or between shifts, 'ensuring maximum uptime and efficiency for daily operations'.
The Tris has no doors (which Fiat says will help with jobs that require the driver getting in and out frequently), but the cabin does feature multiple storage cubbies, a glovebox, a USB-C charging port, a 12-volt socket and even a 5.7-inch digital instrument cluster.
There's no word on pricing for the vehicle's intended market just yet, although we know the Tris will be offered with a choice of three bodies: pick-up bed, chassis-cab and flat-bed.
Did you know you can sell your car through Auto Express ? We'll help you get a great price and find a great deal on a new car, too .
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
31 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
JP Magnier handed €50,000 in 'brown' envelopes to estate agent in land sale, court hears
The High Court has heard that billionaire bloodstock magnate John Magnier's son, JP, handed over two "brown" envelopes containing a total of €50,000 in cash to an estate agent involved in a failed €15 million property deal which were delivered to the beneficiaries of the estate as a show of "appreciation". The court also heard that a solicitor involved in the proposed conveyance of Barne Estate, Co Tipperary, the subject of a legal action by John Magnier - who alleges a €15 million deal was reneged upon by the vendors - has told the High Court that an agreement was in place between the parties before an exclusivity document was signed. Advertisement Joseph Fitzpatrick, of Smithwick Solicitors, was giving evidence in the hearing on Thursday and told counsel for the Barne Estate that he secured an exclusivity agreement signed by both sides to run from August 31st to September 22nd after hands were allegedly shaken on the deal. Lawyers acting for Mr Magnier, founder of the world-famous Coolmore Stud, have claimed before the High Court that a US-based construction magnate, Maurice Regan, the preferred buyer, engaged in a "full-frontal assault" on Mr Magnier's claimed deal to buy the 751-acre tract. Mr Magnier's proceedings claim that Barne Estate reneged on the alleged deal, preferring to sell the land at the higher price of €22.25 million to Mr Regan, the founder of the New York building firm JT Magen. Mr Magnier – along with his adult children - wants to enforce the alleged deal. Advertisement The Magnier side says the deal was struck at an August 22, 2023, kitchen meeting at Mr Magnier's Coolmore home. They also claim an exclusivity agreement that was in effect from August 31 to September 30 stipulated that the estate would not permit its representatives to solicit or encourage any expression of interest, inquiry or offer on the property from anyone other than Mr Magnier. Barne Estate has been held for the benefit of Richard Thomson-Moore and others by a Jersey trust. The Magnier side has sued the Barne Estate, Mr Thomson-Moore and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey) Ltd group, seeking to enforce the purported deal, which they say had been "unequivocally" agreed. The Barne defendants say there was never any such agreement, as they needed the consent of the trustees to finalise any agreement, and subsequently they preferred to sell the estate to Mr Regan. Advertisement Mr Regan is not a party to the case. Mr Magnier's son, JP, told Paul Gallagher SC, for the Magnier side, that his father asked him to get €50,000 in cash on September 8, 2023, and to put it into two envelopes to be given to the Thomson-Moores. He said the money was an "appreciation" for letting the Magnier side onto the Barne land, for their loyalty in honouring the deal and because they were allegedly "cash strapped". JP Magnier said he put the money into two envelopes and gave it to the estate agent at Barne Estate for them to be passed on to the Thomson-Moores. Advertisement On September 11, 2023, however, he said the estate agent met with JP Magnier and "pushed" the envelopes in his direction, saying that the Thomson-Moores were concerned that their farm manager may have seen the original transaction. Niall F Buckley SC, for the Barne side, asked what colour the envelopes were and was told by JP Magnier that they were brown. Mr Buckley put it to JP Magnier that the envelopes were to keep the Thomson-Moores "sweet", as John Magnier was concerned they were going to pull out of the deal. JP Magnier said his father never said that to him. "I take it you didn't ask for a receipt?" asked Mr Buckley. JP Magnier replied: "No." Advertisement "Doesn't that say it all," remarked Mr Buckley. "Knowing what you did about my clients' family circumstances and the need for them to provide for their child and given the vast amount of land you have, did it ever occur to you to let this one go?" "It wouldn't be my call," said JP Magnier. Mr Fitzpatrick told Martin Hayden SC, for the Barne Estate, that the exclusivity agreement was not to further any negotiation but to keep the "status quo" of the alleged sale agreement in order to further the preparation and receipt of the contracts. "Exclusivity was not for negotiations going forward but to facilitate the contract," said Mr Fitzpatrick. Ireland Supreme Court decision on compensation over power... Read More Mr Fitzpatrick said Mr Magnier had deposited €15 million in the Smithwicks' client account before any purported contract was signed in order to "show good faith". However, a week before the exclusivity agreement expired, the Thomson-Moores said they were taking tax advice, he said. "We invited them to a meeting and that was refused, then the extension of the exclusivity was refused. It was clear they had no intention of signing with us and were running down the clock," said Mr Fitzpatrick. The case continues in two weeks' time before Mr Justice Max Barrett.
The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Wise goes to the US. Will its founder's supercharged voting rights follow?
Back in 2021, the arrival on the London stock market of Wise, a rapidly expanding money transfer company, generated a feelgood factor at a useful moment. It came a month after overhyped Deliveroo flopped on debut. And, since Wise was a pure fintech business, as opposed to a pizza delivery outfit with an app, there was reason to think the UK might be getting its act together in the sector that politicians swoon over. Shoreditch's finest, and its Estonian founders, would show the way in UK fintech. Wise sported a £9bn valuation. Now the company wants to switch its primary listing to New York in search of a wider pool of investors, more active trading in its shares and 'a potential pathway to inclusion in major US [stock market] indices'. A secondary listing will be retained in London, but we know what usually happens. Nine-tenths of the share trading gravitates to the primary location. The obligatory description on these occasions – 'a fresh blow for London' – applies. Wise, with revenues of £1.2bn and underlying pre-tax profits of £282m, is a bad one to see succumb to the temptations of New York. Rachel Reeves may take note. The chancellor is cajoling UK pension funds to shove cash into private markets (at a moment when even private equity insiders worry that the golden years for returns could be over) but it is the public markets that are more in need of love and affection from No 11. She won't do it (almost certainly), but the first step would be to cut the UK's uncompetitive 0.5% rate of stamp duty on share purchases. There is plenty of evidence that a reduction would pay for itself in increased trading. Yet let's not overlook a weirdness about Wise's move – and an unanswered question. The oddness is that the company, now so keen on getting into a US index, never tried to enter a UK one. At flotation, its dual-class share structure meant it could not be included in FTSE indices. Why not now join the grown-ups? With a £12bn valuation these days, Wise would rank halfway up the Footsie. It would be a big fish. The danger in having the main listing in New York is that the firm will be a relative minnow in a tech pond populated by the trillion-dollar likes of Nvidia. But that's a risk its founder, Kristo Käärmann, is clearly prepared to take in pursuit of greater US visibility for 'major US growth opportunities'. Or perhaps the dual voting structure is a bigger part of the story. Wise's statement described the US listing as having 'a structure that aligns with US market practices including those of our US-listed tech peers, which we believe allows us to remain laser-focused on delivering our mission'. That sounds suspiciously like a reference to the enhanced voting rights that now allow Käärmann to own 18% of the shares but have 50% of the votes. Such unequal arrangements cause little fuss in the US, but they remain controversial in the UK, even if they are now allowed for index-inclusion purposes after a change in the rules a couple of years ago. A key point about Käärmann's supercharged rights, however, is that they are due to expire next summer under a 'sunset clause' agreed at listing. Wise could, if it wished, ask its UK shareholders for an extension but that may cause a row in itself – a sunset is meant to mean what it says. Perhaps the company thinks it is easier to wrap continued enhanced rights into a package where the main element is the change of main listing. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Käärmann offered zero clarity on whether he wants to keep his supercharged rights. 'It depends on the structure we are going to land on,' he said, adding that all would be clear in the formal circular later this month. Curious. London's acceptance of dual rights – but, critically, only with a five-year sunset clause – was meant to be a way to entice UK tech founders to list in London. It was a pointless change if it just encourages them to leave when the sun is about to set.
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Harassment by Ubisoft executives left female staff terrified, French court hears
Three former executives at the French video game company Ubisoft used their position to bully or sexually harass staff, leaving women terrified and feeling like pieces of meat, a French court has heard. The state prosecutor Antoine Haushalter said the trial of three senior game creators for alleged bullying, sexual harassment and, in one case, attempted sexual assault was a 'turning point' for the gaming world. It is the first big trial to result from the #MeToo movement in the video games industry, and Haushalter said the case had revealed 'overwhelming' evidence of harassment. In four days of hearings, female former staff members variously described being tied to a chair, forced to do handstands, subjected to constant comments about sex and their bodies, having to endure sexist and homophobic jokes, drawings of penises being stuck to computers, a manager who farted in workers' faces or scribbled on women with marker pens, gave unsolicited shoulder massages, played pornographic films in an open-plan office, and another executive who cracked a whip near people's heads. The three men deny all charges. Haushalter said 'the world of video games and its subculture' had an element of 'systemic' sexism and potential abuse. He said the #MeToo movement in the gaming industry had allowed people to speak out. 'It's not that these actions were not punished by the law before. It's just that they were silenced, and from now on they will not be silenced,' he said. Ubisoft is a French family business that rose to become one of the biggest video games creators in the world. It has been behind several blockbusters including Assassin's Creed, Far Cry and the children's favourite Just Dance. The court in Bobigny, in Seine-Saint-Denis, heard that between 2010 and 2020 at Ubisoft's offices in Montreuil, east of Paris, the three executives created an atmosphere of bullying and sexism that one member of staff likened to a 'boys' club'. One alleged victim told the court: 'The sexual remarks and sexual jokes were almost daily.' Tommy François, 52, a former vice-president of editorial and creative services, is accused of sexual harassment, bullying and attempted sexual assault. He was alleged once to have tied a woman member of staff to a chair with tape, pushed the chair into a lift and pressed a button at random. He was also accused of forcing one woman wearing a skirt to do handstands. 'He was my superior and I was afraid of him. He made me do handstands. I did it to get it over with and get rid of him,' one woman told the court. At a 2015 office Christmas party with a Back to the Future theme, François allegedly told a member of staff that he liked her 1950s dress. He then allegedly stepped towards her to kiss her on the mouth as his colleagues restrained her by the arms and back. She shouted and broke free. François denied all allegations. Another witness told the court that during a video games fair in the US, François 'grabbed me by the hair and kissed me by force'. She said no one reacted, and that when she reported it to her human resources manager she was told 'don't make a big thing of it'. The woman said that later, in a key meeting, another unnamed senior figure told staff he had seen her 'snogging' François, 'even though he knew it had been an assault'. She said François called her into his office to show her pictures of his naked backside on his computers and on a phone. 'Once he drew a penis on my arm when I was in a video call with top management,' she said. The woman said these incidents made her feel 'stupefied, humiliated and professionally discredited'. François told the court he denied all charges. He said there had been a 'culture of joking around'. He said: 'I never tried to harm anyone.' Serge Hascoët, 59, Ubisoft's former chief creative officer and second-in-command, was accused of bullying and sexual harassment. The court heard how at a meeting of staff on an away day he complained about a senior female employee, saying she clearly didn't have enough sex and that he would 'show how to calm her' by having sex with her in a meeting room in front of everyone. He was alleged to have handed a young female member of staff a tissue in which he had blown his nose, saying: 'You can resell it, it's worth gold at Ubisoft.' The court heard he made guttural noises in the office and talked about sex. Hascoët was also alleged to have bullied assistants by making them carry out personal tasks for him such as going to his home to wait for parcel deliveries. Hascoët denied all the charges. He said: 'I have never wanted to harass anyone and I don't think I have.' The former game director Guillaume Patrux, 41, is accused of sexual harassment and bullying. He was alleged to have punched walls, mimed hitting staff, cracked a whip near colleagues' faces, threatened to carry out an office shooting and played with a cigarette lighter near workers' faces, setting alight a man's beard. He denied the charges. The panel of judges retired to consider their verdict, which will be handed down at a later date.
