
EU, UK reach fishing and defence deals hours before first-ever summit
Brussels and London on Monday agreed new deals on fishing, energy, youth mobility and defence following marathon talks that concluded just a few hours before the first-ever EU-UK summit was to be held.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen, and European Council chief Antonio Costa are set to agree on three documents: a joint statement where they set out common ground on key geopolitical challenges, a security and defence partnership, and a Common Understanding.
For both sides, the summit was initially aimed at showing just how closely aligned on key global issues they are at a time when the post-war multilateral world order is being attacked by Moscow, Beijing, and now increasingly Washington.
But the spectre of Brexit quickly loomed large with bilateral and sectoral issues taking talks to the wire and risking to turn this summit into a damp squib. On the one side, the EU stuck to its position that nothing is agreed until everything is agreed, while on the other, Britain's Labour government had to contend with bruising local elections where Brexiteer Nigel Farage's Reform Party performed well.
The Common Understanding, which sets out the parametres of the relationships over a number of bilateral issues including thorny ones such as fishing rights, Sanitary and Phytosanitary rules (SPS), and youth mobility, was therefore the hardest to thrash out, with negotiations continuing overnight on Sunday.
Politically, the hardest domestic sell for host Keir Starmer, are a 12-year extension of full reciprocal access to waters to fish and the European Court of Justice having jurisdiction over SPS matters.
The current fishing rules are set to expire in June 2026 and numbers that had been floated before the deal was finalised hovered around a five-year extension.
British Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds insisted on Monday morning that the government hadn't sacrificed fishing for closer alignment on other issues, stressing that access to the EU market for the UK fishing industry "is fundamental".
"We need some certainty in place, you don't want things on an annual basis," he also told BBC radio.
Both sides were keen to stress that the package is ambitious, balanced and crucially did not cross any red lines they both had going into the talks.
An EU official said, for instance, that the summit "shows that we have entered a new chapter in our relations with UK – a neighbour, an ally and a global partner" and that "we are turning a page and moving towards a new strategic partnership".
"The negotiation process in the run-up to this summit went until the last minute. But negotiations took place always in good faith on both sides, and the result is very positive for both," the official added.
This good faith will need to continue as both sides will have to return to the negotiating table quickly to formalise the sectoral deals included in the Common Understanding with legal agreements.
The same applies to the security and defence cooperation as the partnership struck on Monday does not yet allow the UK to take part in the EU's €150 billion SAFE programme to boost joint procurement. How much the UK will need to contribute to the EU budget to take part, for instance, has yet to be defined.
The instrument, part of the EU's Readiness 2030 plan to strengthen the bloc's defence sector and capabilities, includes a so-called European preference under which some 65% of the weapon systems bought must be made in the EU or in third countries with which it has agreements in place. This currently excludes the UK and its defence manufacturers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sustainability Times
2 hours ago
- Sustainability Times
Shocking Revelation in Tech Industry: A 1.5 Billion Dollar 'Fake AI' Exposed With 700 Real-Time Coders Operating From India
IN A NUTSHELL 🔥 , a British startup, was exposed for using 700 engineers in India instead of advanced AI technology to code applications. , a British startup, was exposed for using 700 engineers in India instead of advanced technology to code applications. 💰 The company raised over $480 million from investors like Microsoft, only to inflate revenue projections by 300% and face financial turmoil. ⚖️ Ongoing investigations include a UK insolvency process and a US federal probe, with founder Sachin Dev Duggal facing money laundering allegations in India. 🌐 The scandal highlights the widespread issue of 'AI washing' in the tech industry, where human labor is misrepresented as AI work. In the fast-paced world of technology, the allure of artificial intelligence (AI) often promises to streamline processes and reduce human intervention. However, the story of a British startup once valued at $1.5 billion, reveals a darker side to this narrative. The company, which claimed to revolutionize app development through AI, was found to rely heavily on manual coding by 700 engineers in India. As the facade crumbled, it became a cautionary tale of how technological advancements can sometimes mask traditional labor practices. This incident underscores the importance of transparency and ethical practices in the tech industry. The Illusion of Revolutionary AI led by founder Sachin Dev Duggal, captivated investors with the promise of making app creation as easy as ordering a pizza. The centerpiece of this promise was a virtual assistant named 'Natasha,' heralded as a groundbreaking AI capable of developing custom applications with minimal coding. However, beneath this innovative veneer, the reality was starkly different. Reports revealed that the so-called AI relied on the relentless work of 700 developers in India, who manually coded applications based on client requests. This labor-intensive process was cleverly hidden behind the guise of sophisticated AI technology, misleading investors and clients alike. With financial backing from notable entities like Microsoft and the Qatar Investment Authority, successfully raised over $480 million. Yet, the company's house of cards began to tumble when the truth emerged. The reliance on human coders instead of advanced AI technologies exposed the firm to scrutiny and led to an investigation into its operational practices. This revelation not only shocked the tech community but also raised questions about the legitimacy of AI claims in the industry. 'Nasa Confirms the Unthinkable': China's Giant Water Diversion Project Will Slow Earth's Rotation and Disrupt Global Timekeeping Financial Fallout and Investigations The unraveling of operations had severe financial repercussions. Viola Credit, an investor, withdrew $37 million from the company after discovering that projected revenues had been inflated by 300%. The startup's forecasted revenue of $220 million was a gross exaggeration, with audits revealing actual figures closer to $50 million. This misrepresentation led to a liquidity crisis, leaving the company with only $5 million in accessible funds, which were subsequently frozen due to legal restrictions. The financial turmoil prompted Manpreet Ratia, appointed as president after the resignation of his predecessor, to file for bankruptcy. As the company navigates insolvency proceedings in the UK, US prosecutors have launched a federal investigation, demanding the company's financial records and client lists. Additionally, founder Sachin Dev Duggal faces allegations of money laundering in India, further complicating the legal landscape surrounding Earth Is Slowing Down as China's Gigantic Water Project Forces a Planetary Shift Confirmed by NASA's Latest Alarming Report A Widespread Phenomenon The scandal is not an isolated incident. The practice of 'AI washing,' where companies attribute human work to AI, is becoming alarmingly common. Amazon faced a similar controversy with its 'Just Walk Out' technology, which involved over 1,000 human operators in India. Additionally, several accounting services, advertised as automated, were found to employ Filipino workers for manual tasks. This deceptive practice raises ethical concerns about the transparency and integrity of AI claims in the tech industry. The repercussions of such practices extend beyond financial deceit. They affect the livelihoods of workers, particularly in regions where labor is outsourced. In case, nearly 1,000 employees were laid off, and the platform 'Natasha' was discontinued. These events highlight the need for stringent regulations and accountability in AI development and deployment, ensuring that innovation does not come at the cost of ethical integrity. 'China Finally Sells Record-Breaking Plane': This 130-Foot Giant Can Dump 26,000 Pounds of Water in One Jaw-Dropping Drop The Broader Impact on the Tech Industry The collapse of serves as a wake-up call for the tech industry. It underscores the importance of due diligence and transparency in technological advancements. Investors and consumers must be vigilant and skeptical of grandiose AI claims, demanding evidence of authenticity and ethical practices. The tech community must foster an environment where innovation is not only celebrated but also accountable. As AI continues to evolve, the industry must prioritize ethical guidelines and transparency to maintain trust and credibility. The incident is a stark reminder that behind every technological innovation, there must be a commitment to honesty and integrity. As we navigate the future of AI, how can the industry ensure that advancements are both groundbreaking and ethical? Our author used artificial intelligence to enhance this article. Did you like it? 4.5/5 (30)


Fashion Network
3 hours ago
- Fashion Network
French Senate approves ‘anti-fast-fashion' bill chiefly targeting Shein, Temu
Louwagie said that the government will notify the European Commission of this bill even before the end of the joint parliamentary committee work that will start soon, and that the government will also work on the decrees regulating the bill's application, and notably define the thresholds that will formally identify an operator as 'ultra-express' or 'ultra-fast-fashion'. Before the vote, the representatives of the various Senate groups spoke to explain their positions on the vote. An opportunity to underline for some the positive amendments made to the bill, and its weaknesses for others. Many senators welcomed the removal of a provision of the 2022 anti-waste law on unsold goods, which allowed ultra-fast-fashion operators to benefit from tax allowances when donating unsold goods to charitable associations. The re-introduction of a blanket ban on advertising for ultra-express fashion operators was also appreciated. 'This law does not prohibit, it protects by defining what is abnormal. It protects our environment and that of our children. It protects the economy and our textile industry. We can be happy we are giving ourselves the means to achieve our goals,' said Nicole Bonnefoy, representing the Socialist, Ecologist and Republican group, adding that 'we welcome the re-introduction of article three, which will form a negotiation basis for requesting an amendment to the European e-commerce directive, so that these restrictive measures can be made to apply to companies based for example in Ireland.' Although the amendments have been approved by the groups, several points still prompted strong reservations. The introduction of the term 'ultra-express fashion' has led to much teeth-gnashing among environmental associations and sustainable fashion brands, which believe that the aim of fencing in all types of fast-fashion practices is no longer being pursued. Jacques Fernique of Ecologist group Solidarité et territoires insisted on this aspect, emphasising that the various laws will not enter into force for many months yet, since they have to be examined again by the European Commission and the joint parliamentary committee, something which won't happen before the autumn. 'Today's vote is a relatively positive step. Shein, Temu and Amazon are pushing to the extreme a business model that destroys local jobs and our city centres' appeal. But both ultra-express fast fashion and fast fashion adopt the same approach, selling transient, low-cost disposable products. This bill is targeting the ultra-fast fashion explosion, but we can't see why the penalties shouldn't potentially apply to everyone.' Fernique is campaigning for provisions that would 'push back against the kind of disposable fashion sold by foreign platforms but also by French and European companies. It's sustainable fashion that we ought to promote, regardless of the nationality of who sells it.' An issue which the majority of senators did not endorse. 'This bill has set a course. It doesn't pretend to solve everything, but it intends to draw boundaries,' said Valente Le Hir, who is affiliated with the Republican group and is the bill's rapporteur in the Senate. She has advocated for the middle ground in various issues, asserting that the Senate wants to draw up a 'stronger bill, not a travesty of it. We have said it's time to limit the excesses of express fashion without penalising those who are working towards greater sustainability in the industry. [The bill] has distinguished, within a poorly understood sector, what constitutes planned overconsumption and what constitutes sustainable innovation. We've clarified the target. We've drawn a clear line between what we want to regulate, ultra-express fast fashion as embodied by platforms like Shein and Temu, and what we want to preserve, in other words affordable, locally rooted fashion that generates jobs in France, that anchors our communities, creates connections and boosts local industry.' After the government will have sent the text over to the European Commission, the latter will have three to four months to comment. And while French MPs and senators will be working within the joint parliamentary committee, the Commission's analysis and observations will play a key role in the bill's final wording and provisions. In the meantime, the lobbying efforts that have been ongoing for months are set to continue.


Fashion Network
3 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Khloé Kardashian's Good American brand launches on ASOS
ASOS continues to bulk up in its third-party brands with the high-profile arrival of Good American to its expansive fashion platform. The 'trailblazing" global womenswear brand, co-founded by Khloé Kardashian and British entrepreneur Emma Grede, arrives with a clear vision, 'to redefine fashion with styles that empower women'. Founded in 2016, Good American focused on fully inclusive sizing in every collection from the start. The just-launched summer collection on ASOS will feature a curated edit of its denim and elevated everyday essentials. Grede said: 'As a London native myself, it's especially meaningful to be able to share our brand with customers here and around the world. This partnership is an exciting step forward in our mission to make confident, impactful style and high-quality denim available to more women everywhere.' Shazmeen Malik, Brands director at ASOS, added: 'We believe that great style should be for everyone, and Good American's commitment to inclusive design and diverse representation makes it a natural fit for our premium brand offering.'