&w=3840&q=100)
From piety to proxy war: How General Munir embodies Pakistan's military-jihadi complex
Few days back there were rumours circulating on social media about General Asim Munir 's possible arrest or ouster within Pakistan's military establishment, reflecting internal dissent or power struggles. As circumstances have unfolded of late in Pakistan, the country definitely needs a coup against General Munir. The puppet Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif can be dealt with later.
General Munir's religious profile
General Munir , the Chief of the Pakistan Army and a devout Muslim , is an Islamic scholar. His mastery over The Koran is perhaps enviable to many a Muslim who perhaps aspire such depth of knowledge of the holy scripture. But the problem is in what way is he using his vast knowledge on The Koran.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
What virtue will he achieve when he leaves his legacy as one of the jihadi generals of Pakistan? Pakistan has no dearth of such figures. Several senior Pakistani military figures have been notably associated with allegations of supporting or enabling jihadist groups as part of broader strategic objectives.
Precedents of military-jihadi symbiosis
General Zia ul Haq: 'Maulvi' who put faith in arms
General Zia ul Haq, who ruled Pakistan as the head of the government, from 1977 to 1988 is considered as the original proponent of the policy of using faith to feed terrorism. A devout Muslim who saw Islam as the panacea for Pakistan's ills as well as the glue to hold the nation together, he was also referred to as 'Maulvi Zia-ul-Haq' by some in Pakistani military circles.
What he did was to create multiple terror outfits on brigade lines, a policy that came to be known as Islamisation or Shariaisation of the Pakistan state, which had maintained somewhat secular credentials until that point of time.
Zia changed the Pakistan Army's motto from MA Jinnah's 'Unity, Faith, and Discipline' to 'Faith, Piety, and Jihad for the sake of Allah'. He made Islamic prayers and studies mandatory and presided over the proliferation of religious seminaries with fundamentalism as the core driving force. He encouraged the Jamaat-e-Islami and Islamic revivalist group Tablighi Jamaat to spread their ideas among the soldiers.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
This is where began Pakistan's proxy war of terrorism against India, a policy Zia saw as a means to 'bleed India by a thousand cuts' because his country could not match India's might in the battlefield.
General Hamid Gul: 'Godfather of the Taliban'
General Hamid Gul, who served as Pakistan military's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) chief from 1987 to 1989, is perhaps the most emblematic of this trend. Often referred to by critics as the 'Godfather of the Taliban,' Gul openly supported jihadist elements in both Afghanistan and Jammu and Kashmir. He did not shy away from praising jihad as a strategic tool to achieve Pakistan's regional goals, particularly against India.
General Pervez Musharraf: Double game
General Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan's Army chief and the country's president from 1999 to 2008, outwardly allied with the United States following the 9/11 attacks. However, he has been accused of duplicity—allowing safe havens for groups like the Taliban while simultaneously receiving Western support. The Kargil war and ongoing support for the Kashmir insurgency unfolded during his tenure, adding to suspicions of state-sponsored militancy.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
General Kayani and the 'dual track' policy
General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, who led the army from 2007 to 2013 and previously headed the ISI, was seen as a key figure in maintaining Pakistan's 'dual-track' policy: targeting some militants while shielding others.
His tenure saw increasing criticism from the United States, particularly over Pakistan's failure to act against the Haqqani Network, which was blamed for deadly attacks on US and the Nato forces in Afghanistan.
Lt General Shuja Pasha and the bin Laden debacle
Lt Gen Ahmad Shuja Pasha, the ISI chief from 2008 to 2012, came under intense scrutiny following the U.S. raid in Abbottabad that killed Osama bin Laden. Under his leadership, the ISI was accused of harbouring high-profile militants, leading to deteriorating trust between Washington and Islamabad during a critical period of the 'War on Terror'.
General Bajwa: Moderate image, questionable actions
General Qamar Javed Bajwa, who served as Army chief from 2016 to 2022, was often portrayed as more moderate compared to his predecessors. Yet, during his leadership, extremist political groups such as Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP) were allowed to operate and expand influence. He was also accused of political engineering, including manipulating elections and tolerating extremist rhetoric to maintain the military's grip over civilian politics.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
These generals represent different shades of a long-standing pattern within segments of the Pakistani military establishment—balancing international alliances with internal strategies that have, at times, involved leveraging Islamist militancy for strategic depth.
General Munir vs Hafiz Saeed: Where's the difference?
Apart from his uniform, in what way is General Munir different from say someone like Hafiz Saeed, the founder of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), in any capacity? Both are killing machines of innocents although operating in a different manner but the ultimate goal is the same – the end of India.
India is no longer fighting a secessionist war in Kashmir, it is fighting Islamic fanatics in the garb of separatists who ultimately want to establish a Caliphate. Hafiz Saeed is 74 years old and although it might sound very outrageous General Munir by dint of his inclination and nature of his conduct could well replace him after retirement.
Piety or politicisation of faith?
Leading Pakistan's military since November 2022, General Munir is known for his conservative religious views and has held significant positions, including Director-General of Military Intelligence and the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). It is under his watch that Pakistani military officials attended funerals of individuals linked to terrorist activities.
The charge of politicisation of piety as prescribed in faith stems from his repeated affirmations of the two-nation theory, which is often viewed as a justification for religious differences and division, and his alleged suppression of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party led by Imran Khan.
Munir has publicly reiterated his belief in the two-nation theory, which posits that Muslims and Hindus are separate nations. This was the original premise on which Jinnah unleashed communal violence in an undivided India, giving the British an opportunity to divide India. Since then this theory, though rejected by scholars and historians, has been used to justify the creation of Pakistan and has been a source of tension and persecution of Hindus and other minorities in Pakistan.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Violence in Pahalgam
A deadly incident in the town of Pahalgam on April 22, which resulted in 26 fatalities — 25 tourists including one from Nepal and a local pony-ride operator who tried to snatch the assault from one of the terrorists — sparked widespread outrage and renewed scrutiny of a senior Pakistani military figure, General Asim Munir.
Just days before the attack, Munir delivered a contentious address emphasising Pakistan's claim over Kashmir by invoking emotionally charged historical rhetoric. Observers have drawn a connection between his inflammatory remarks and the subsequent eruption of violence. Munir, who previously led Pakistan's intelligence agency during the 2019 Pulwama tragedy, has also been accused by ex-military officer Adil Raja of orchestrating the Pahalgam assault to advance his own political agenda.
General Munir, however, might have underestimated India's retaliation, prompting his DGMO to beg India for de-escalation. This came after India's serious military response in the form of Operation Sindoor, and a clear message that 'Asim Munir will not be given a face-saver exit'.
Criticism at home
Within Pakistan, General Munir faces growing dissatisfaction over his alleged interference in civilian affairs. He has come under fire for targeting political rivals, particularly the PTI party led by former prime minister Imran Khan.
The military, under his watch, is accused of detaining civilians connected to the May 9 unrest and subjecting them to trials in military courts—a controversial move that has intensified accusations of authoritarianism.
Khan has openly claimed that Munir not only violated previously agreed-upon boundaries between the military and civilian leadership but also engaged in plotting acts of political sabotage, including attempts on his life.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Cracks within the ranks
General Munir's leadership has faced dissent within the Pakistan Army, including forced retirements of senior officers and calls from junior officers for his resignation, partly due to failures in security and handling of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).
International condemnation
A US lawmaker, Ro Khanna, urged punitive measures against Munir, accusing him of harassing relatives of individuals advocating for democratic reforms. Experts such as Michael Kugelman have expressed concern that Munir's prolonged leadership is deepening the military's dominance while weakening democratic institutions. Commentator Michael Rubin went so far as to liken Munir to a terrorist figure, drawing parallels to Osama bin Laden in the wake of the Pahalgam incident.
Munir and the militarisation of Islam
General Munir is another example in Pakistan's long history of army leaders who are linked to extremist ideas and interfering too much in politics. Even though he appears to be a religious man and an Islamic scholar, his proximity to terror chiefs operating from Pakistan is well known.
From generals like Zia-ul-Haq to Hamid Gul, the pattern has been clear: using religious extremism as a tool to stay in power and go after political goals, especially against India. Munir's time as army chief has made things worse—with reports of repression inside Pakistan, support for terrorist activities and rising unrest within the army itself.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
a minute ago
- First Post
What is Pakistan's nuclear weapons capability? Who is in-charge of its nukes?
Pakistan army chief Asim Munir's threat from the US has put a spotlight on the country's nuclear weapons. It is estimated that Islamabad has an estimated 170 warheads and is quickly developing more with the help of China read more Pakistan's nuclear-capable missile, Shaheen 1, is driven in Islamabad. The country boasts of several nuclear weapons and spends billions to develop them. File image/Reuters 'We are a nuclear nation, if we think we are going down, we'll take half the world down with us.' That's what Pakistan army's Field Marshal Asim Munir said on Sunday while speaking at a private dinner being held on American soil. But the army chief didn't stop there; on India's decision to pause the Indus Waters Treaty after the Pahalgam attack, he said, 'We will wait for India to build a dam, and when it does so, phir 10 missile sey faarigh kar dengey [we will destroy it with 10 missiles].' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While Pakistan has made nuclear threats in the past, what makes these remarks notable is that this is the first time such ultimatums have been issued from US soil against a third country. Munir issues nuclear threats from US Visiting the US a second time within a month, Field Marshal Munir at a dinner being hosted by businessman Adnan Asad, who serves as honorary consul for Pakistan in Florida's Tampa, said that Pakistan would respond with nuclear weapons if it faced an existential threat in a future war with India. He told attendees as per a report in The Print, 'We are a nuclear nation, if we think we are going down, we'll take half the world down with us.' At a dinner in the US, Pakistan army chief raised the spectre of a nuclear war, stating that Pakistan would respond with nuclear weapons if it faced an existential threat in a future war with India. File image/Reuters He further threatened to destroy any infrastructure that India builds, which has the potential to disrupt the flow of the Indus river. Munir claimed that New Delhi's decision to place the Indus Waters Treaty into abeyance after the Pahalgam terror attack in April could put 250 million people at risk of starvation. 'We will wait for India to build a dam, and when it does so, phir das missile sey faarigh kar dengey [we will destroy it with 10 missiles]…The Indus River is not the Indians' family property. Humein missilon ki kami nahin hai, al-hamdulillah [we have no shortage of missiles, Praise be to God],' Munir reportedly said. Munir was in the US to attend the retirement ceremony of outgoing US Central Command (CENTCOM) Commander General Michael Kurilla and the Change of Command Ceremony for Admiral Brad Cooper, who took over as CENTCOM head. Munir praised Kurilla's leadership and contribution to US-Pakistan military ties, while wishing Cooper success in tackling shared security issues. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This visit follows Munir's rare five-day US trip in June, when he attended a private luncheon with President Donald Trump. That meeting led to announcements of increased US-Pakistan cooperation, including an oil deal. Pakistan's nuclear power With Munir issuing a nuclear threat, the question on everyone's mind is: how many nukes does Pakistan possess? According to Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Sipri), a leading defence and armaments think tank, Pakistan is a strong nuclear power, having an estimated 170 warheads as per its latest assessment. In comparison, India has 180 nuclear stored warheads as of January 2025. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, however, noted in 2023 that Islamabad has the potential to increase its nuclear arsenal quickly as it has several new delivery systems in development, four plutonium production reactors, and an expanding uranium enrichment infrastructure. Pakistan's nuclear-capable air-launched 'Ra'ad' cruise missile seen in Islamabad. Pakistan is a strong nuclear power, having an estimated 170 warheads. File image/Reuters Christopher Clary, a security affairs expert at the University at Albany in the US, has noted that a bulk of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal lies in its land-based missile forces, though it is developing nuclear triads capable of delivering warheads by land, air and sea STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Moreover, the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons wrote in 2023 that Pakistan had spent a whopping $1 billion to develop its nuclear weapons programme. According to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Pakistan's arsenal consists primarily of mobile short- and medium-range ballistic missiles, which have enough of a range to target India. China's significant technical assistance on its nuclear and missile programmes has helped Pakistan in recent years. For years, Pakistan's possession of nuclear weapons has been a concern for the world over. This is because Islamabad has never formally declared an official nuclear doctrine. Pakistan's nuclear button Munir's threat to use nuclear weapons has also raised questions about control of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal. In Pakistan, nuclear weapon control lies with the top leadership, including the president and the prime minister, with oversight provided by the Nuclear Command and Control System (NCCS). The president and the prime minister make the final decision to use nuclear weapons jointly. The military, responsible for the security and launching of these weapons, has significant involvement in this process. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Reports state that Pakistan's arsenal is controlled by the National Command Authority (NCA), which is officially chaired by the prime minister. Formed in 2000, it is the nation's highest decision-making authority on nuclear and missile policy issues, and oversees all nuclear and missile programmes. However, the International Institute for Strategic Studies notes that although the makeup of the committee grants substantial authority to the civilian government, 'in practice, the military would probably prevail on nuclear decision-making during wartime or a military crisis.' However, there have been rumours that the United States has a contingency plan in place. In 2011, NBC News reported that the US has a plan of 'snatch and grab' when it comes to Pakistan's nuclear weapons. According to the news outlet, this would come into effect if and when the US president believed that Pakistan's weapons were a threat to either the country or its interests. Moreover, According to NBC, such plans were drawn up even before the 9/11 terror attacks in the US. Washington became even more concerned of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal in the aftermath of the Osama bin Laden raid in 2011. US military officials had testified before Congress about the security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons and the threat posed by 'loose nukes' or materials outside the government's control. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Reacting to the report, former Pakistan military ruler Pervez Musharraf had warned that a snatch-and-grab operation would lead to all-out war between the countries, calling it 'total confrontation by the whole nation against whoever comes in'. With inputs from agencies
Scroll.in
a minute ago
- Scroll.in
Rahul Gandhi, Kharge among Opposition leaders detained during Bihar voter roll revision protest
Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge and party leader Rahul Gandhi were among the Opposition members detained by the Delhi Police on Monday while they were marching to the Election Commission's office to protest against the contentious revision of voter rolls in Bihar. Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray)'s Sanjay Raut and Trinamool Congress' Sagarika Ghose were also among the leaders who were detained, ANI reported. After the police action, Rahul Gandhi told reporters that the 'truth is in front of the country'. 'This fight is not political,' he said. 'This fight is to save the Constitution. This fight is for One Man, One Vote. We want a clean, pure voters list.' The special intensive revision of the electoral rolls in Bihar was announced by the Election Commission in June. As part of the exercise, persons whose names were not on the 2003 voter list needed to submit proof of eligibility to vote. The draft roll was published on August 1, ahead of the Bihar polls expected to take place in October or November. It showed that more than 65 lakh names had been deleted from the list. The list will be revised by September after the Election Commission assesses objections and claims about the exclusion and inclusion of voters in the draft roll. The Opposition parties have been arguing that the exercise risked disenfranchising voters as they may not be able to produce the necessary documents. On Saturday, the Election Commission told the Supreme Court that it is not required under the rules to publish a list of persons excluded from Bihar's draft electoral roll. In an affidavit, the poll panel said that the rules do not require it to explain why a person's name is missing from the draft roll. The submission was made in response to a petition by the non-profit organisation Association for Democratic Reforms, which had sought a court directive for the poll panel to explain the reasons for deleting 65 lakh names from the draft electoral roll. A Scroll analysis of the data published by the Election Commission on August 1 showed that women made up 55% of voters who were excluded from Bihar's draft voter list after the revision. It also showed that five of the state's 10 districts with the largest share of Muslim population had the highest number of excluded voters. At 15.1%, Gopalganj district in western Bihar saw the highest rate of exclusion in the state. The voter list in the district's Gopalganj Assembly constituency shrunk by 18.2% – also the highest in the state.
Time of India
a minute ago
- Time of India
'Jugular Vein': Pak Army Chief Asim Munir Repeats Old 'Kashmir' Rhetoric Amid U.S. Visit
Pakistani Army Chief Asim Munir repeats his 'jugular vein' remark on Kashmir during a speech to the Pakistani diaspora in Tampa, Florida. He says Pakistan will not forget Kashmir and calls it an incomplete international agenda. Munir warns any Indian aggression will receive a befitting reply. He had made similar comments weeks before the Pahalgam attack. India had dismissed Munir's remarks, calling Kashmir a union territory of India and rejecting Pakistan's claims. Munir is on an official US visit with key meetings. He also thanked former US President Trump for his role in preventing wars, including the Indo-Pak conflict. India maintains that military actions stopped after direct talks without US mediation.#asimmunir #kashmir #jugularvein #pojk #pakistanusrelations #indopakrelations #defencenews #pakistanarmy #indianarmy #geopolitics #usvisit #toi #toibharat Read More
