HCSTSI slams FBR arrest powers in budget
Hyderabad Chamber of Small Traders & Small Industry (HCSTSI) Acting President Ahmed Idrees Chohan has strongly condemned the inclusion of a new Section 37AA in the Sales Tax Act under the Federal Budget 2025-26.
He called the amendment draconian and unconstitutional, saying it allows Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) officers to arrest any businessman, industrialist, CEO, or director merely on suspicion, without a warrant. He termed it the most dangerous legal provision in Pakistan's history.
Chohan said the section empowers FBR officers to arrest and detain individuals for up to 14 days without court approval or a judicial warrant.
"This violates justice and assaults constitutional rights and damages business freedom. What kind of financial reform instills fear among investors by allowing tax officials to arrest people?" he asked. "Is being an industrialist now a crime in Pakistan?"
He questioned whether the government wants to promote business or drive investors abroad to business-friendly countries like Bangladesh, Vietnam, Malaysia, or the United Arab Emirates (UAE), where no such arrest clauses exist.
While the world promotes ease of doing business, Pakistan appears to treat entrepreneurs like criminals, he said. The HCSTSI leader said such arbitrary arrest powers don't exist in any developed or developing country.
"If someone is evading taxes, a judicial system already exists. The FBR isn't a judicial body or law enforcement agency. It has no authority to arrest," he added.
Chohan labelled Section 37AA as "economic terrorism" and a deliberate act of "capital destruction". He warned that if the clause remains, Pakistan's business community will feel unsafe and foreign investment will stay away.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
18 hours ago
- Business Recorder
PCJCCI hails FBR's move to withdraw ‘excessive' tax measures
LAHORE: Pakistan-China Joint Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PCJCCI) strongly welcomes the Federal Board of Revenue's (FBR) recent decision to withdraw the excessive and impractical tax measures proposed in the Federal Budget 2025–26. This reversal marks a critical step towards restoring business confidence and stabilizing Pakistan's fragile economic landscape. This decision, made possible through the direct support and intervention of Field Marshal General Asim Munir, reflects a deep understanding of the economic challenges facing the private sector and a genuine commitment to inclusive, sustainable growth. Zafar Iqbal, Acting President of PCJCCI, stated that the proposed tax measures would have directly impacted over 3.5 million small and medium enterprises (SMEs), threatened over 1.2 million jobs, and discouraged both local and foreign investment. Field Marshal Asim Munir's timely action has not only prevented this fallout but also sent a strong message of solidarity with the business community. He further added that Pakistan's GDP growth for FY 2024–25 was recorded at 2.4%, already below the projected 3.5% due to inflationary pressures and high interest rates. The industrial sector, contributing 19.1% to GDP, had shown a decline of 1.3% in the last quarter, mainly due to reduced business activity and investment uncertainty. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) from China declined by 18% in FY 2024 compared to the previous year, largely attributed to tax unpredictability and regulatory instability. Salahuddin Hanif, Secretary General PCJCCI said that the reversal of these policies paves the way for enhanced bilateral cooperation under CPEC Phase II and renewed investor confidence from China. We are confident that this business-friendly shift will lead to increased joint ventures, job creation, and SME development. He also added that we reaffirm our commitment to contributing towards a resilient and globally competitive economy through strengthened Pakistan-China business collaboration. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
19 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Rs300bn ‘windfall': NA panel seeks sugar mill directors' names
ISLAMABAD: A National Assembly panel headed by PTI stalwart Atif Khan on Monday sought the names of sugar mill directors holding at least 20 percent shares from the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP), amid reports of Rs 300 billion windfall profits made through price manipulation in connivance with dealers. Officials from the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) informed the panel that at least 14 FBR officials, allegedly involved in the illegal release of sugar, have been suspended and are currently under investigation. The Additional Secretary of the Ministry of Industries and Production told the committee that millers and dealers manipulated prices following the expiry of the sugar export deadline, earning approximately $440 million from these exports. NA panel to probe Rs300bn sugar windfall He briefed the panel that in the 2024-25 crop year, sugarcane cultivation increased by 1.11% compared to 2023-24. However, due to climate change factors such as heat wave and crop disease, sugarcane yield and sucrose recovery declined. Consequently, sugar production fell to 5.862 million metric tons (MMT), around 1 MMT less than the previous year. Adding carryover stocks of 0.5 MMT, total sugar availability for 2024-25 was estimated at 6.362 MMT, roughly equal to domestic consumption in 2023-24. 'This tight balance between supply and demand led to price increases by the industry from January 2024 onward, following the exports,' he added. The committee, led by the Deputy Prime Minister, held several meetings with key stakeholders including the Pakistan Sugar Mills Association (PSMA), emphasizing price stability. They agreed to cap the ex-mill price at Rs 159/kg and the retail price at Rs 164/kg for one month, until April 19, 2025. 'In May 2025, the committee extended the status quo until June 15, 2025. However, PSMA did not comply and continued to raise prices,' he added. The Ministry of Industries summoned sugar millers, warning them that their actions were unacceptable, but the mills disregarded the ministry's warnings. A track-and-trace system was installed on sugar stocks in November 2021, whereby every sugar sack is stamped with a scanable mark revealing its details, according to FBR officials. However, some sugar bags were released without stamps, allegedly involving officials deputed at the mills. So far, the FBR has seized several trucks carrying unstamped sacks. Sales tax on sugar is deducted at 18% GST rate, amounting to Rs 1,485 per 50 kg sugar bag. Fourteen FBR officials have been suspended, and the Prime Minister has formed a special team including intelligence officials to monitor FBR operations. Sales tax collection from sugar has increased to Rs 100 billion from Rs 65 billion last year, despite a reduction of 1 MMT in sugar production. 'We might not even need to import sugar. The current stock is sufficient until November 15, 2025,' said the Additional Secretary of the Ministry of Industries and Production. It is estimated that only 200,000 tons of sugar may be imported, if any. Notably, 70% of sugar consumption is by industries, not the common man. Officials from the Ministry of National Food Security and Research stated that sugar imports are planned to prevent price hikes and avoid artificial shortages amid concerns about price could rise further in November 2025. After detailed discussions, the panel decided to summon SECP officials to obtain a list of sugar mill directors holding at least 20% shares, which will be shared with the media to reveal any political affiliations. The committee also resolved to review the Public Accounts Committee minutes where the Auditor General of Pakistan claimed sugar millers earned Rs 300 billion in profits within three weeks. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
19 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Budgetary outcome in 2024-25
The detailed statistics on the fiscal operations by the federal and the provincial governments have recently been released by the Federal Ministry of Finance. The outcome of the operations has sometimes been referred to as inadequate because of a big shortfall in federal tax revenues collected by the FBR. The agreed target for these revenues was of Rs 12,970 billion in 2024-25, requiring a growth rate of as high as 40 percent. The actual collection was Rs 11,744 billion, implying thereby a big shortfall of Rs 1,226 billion, equivalent to 9.5 percent of the target and 1.1 percent of the GDP. Such a large shortfall has seldom been seen before. However, the distinctly positive side of the outcome is that the budget deficit target of the consolidated operations was more than achieved. It had been set at 5.7 percent of the GDP in the targets of the IMF Programme for 2024-25. The actual outcome is a lower deficit of 5.4 percent of the GDP. Also, the primary surplus at 2.4 percent of the GDP is higher than the targeted level. The contraction in the budget deficit is also sizeable. It was 6.8 percent of the GDP in 2023-24. This implies a big reduction of 1.4 percent of the GDP in only one year. Consequently, along with relatively stability in the value of the rupee, the central government's debt to GDP ratio has remained, more or less, unchanged at close to 66 percent of the GDP in 2024-25. The fundamental question is how, despite a big fall in the FBR revenues, the budget deficit target was more than achieved? The achievement of the targets could only have been possible with higher non-tax revenues and/or lower expenditures. In fact, this has been the outcome in both budgetary heads. The non-tax-to-GDP ratio is higher than the original target by 0.3 percent of the GDP. The overall public expenditure to GDP ratio is lower by 0.5 percent of the GDP. The higher non-tax to GDP ratio is because of somewhat larger revenues than budgeted from the SBP profits and the petroleum levy. The big success is the large containment in debt servicing in relation to the budget estimate for 2024-25. This was set at Rs 9,775 billion. The actual cost of interest payments on debt has been restricted to Rs 8,887 billion, implying thereby a large saving of Rs 888 billion. This alone has covered up 72 percent of the shortfall in FBR revenues. The primary reason is the precipitate decline in interest rates, with the policy rate plummeting from 22 percent to 11 percent during the year. Also, despite the shortfall, FBR revenues have shown an extraordinary increase in the tax-to-GDP ratio from 8.9 percent of the GDP to 10.1 percent of the GDP in one year. The other good news is that faster growth has taken place in direct taxes versus indirect tax revenues. Income tax revenues have risen by almost 28 percent, while the increase in indirect tax revenues was closer to 24 percent. Consequently, the federal tax system is moving in a progressive direction. The focus must now be on further broadening of the direct tax base. There is need, however, to highlight the severe contraction of development spending at the federal level. It has been restricted to Rs 768 billion in 2024-25, equivalent to only 0.7 percent of the GDP. A decade ago, it stood at 1.6 percent of the GDP, and earlier at above at 2.5 percent of the GDP. There are three key sectors of development spending by the federal government. These are water resources, highways, and electricity generation and distribution. They are critical components of infrastructure from the viewpoint of the future growth of the economy. The throw-forward of costs of ongoing projects in these sectors was to Rs 3163 billion in 2024-25, with the actual level of spending of Rs 344 billion. Implementation fully of these projects will take more than nine years at the current rate. Meanwhile, there will be a large escalation in costs. The expenditure on projects in the water resources sector has acquired much greater priority after India's unilateral withdrawal from the Indus Waters Treaty and the risk thereof of diversion of water. The throw-forward cost of ongoing water resources projects in 2024-25 was Rs 1,448 billion, and the allocation to the sector for the year was only 9 percent of this cost. It is worrying that there has been no significant increase in the development allocation to this sector even in the current fiscal year. There is also a need to focus on the performance of provincial governments. There has overall been a shortfall in the generation of a cash surplus by the four provincial governments combined. The target was Rs 1,217 billion in the budget estimates for 2024-25. The actual surplus was Rs 921 billion, implying a shortfall of Rs 296 billion. The basic reason for failure to achieve the target is the big shortfall in federal transfers of over Rs 650 billion and the runaway growth in provincial current expenditure and development expenditure of over 26 percent and 54 percent respectively. Clearly, there is need for stronger expenditure management by the provincial governments to ensure that the cash surplus target is achieved. Also, these governments must adopt a more aggressive stance on resource mobilization. An appropriate indicator of the performance of a provincial government is the growth rate in the cash surplus. It is the highest in Sindh at 106 percent, followed by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa at 71 percent, Punjab at 64 percent and Baluchistan at 1 percent. Turning to the outlook for 2025-26, based on the budgetary outcome and performance in 2024-25, the first critical task is for the federal and provincial governments to target for continued big reduction in the budget deficit. It was reduced by 1.4 percent of the GDP in 2024-25. The target in 2025-26 is to reduce it further by 1.5 percent of the GDP, from 5.4 percent to 3.9 percent of the GDP. This is likely to be a difficult task. FBR revenues will have to increase by over 20 percent in 2025-26, when the nominal GDP is expected to rise by 12 percent. Already, there are indications of a shortfall in FBR revenues in the first month of July 2025. The expectation is also that the growth rate of current expenditure will be only 4 percent in relation to the level in 2024-25. In particular, debt servicing is projected to be actually lower than the level in 2024-25 by almost 8 percent. However, interest rates have remained unchanged by the SBP in the first meeting of the Monetary Policy Committee in 2025-26 and the outlook for interest rates in 2025-26 is unclear at this stage. Overall, there is a need to recognize the achievements in the realm of public finances in 2024-25, while highlighting some of the shortfalls. 2025-26 also promises to be a challenging year. The requirements are for continued high growth in FBR revenues and substantial containment of the increase in current expenditure. Otherwise, the very low budget deficit target of 3.9 percent of the GDP will remain elusive and continue to be the focus of the IMF Programme in 2025-26. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
