logo
I'm one of many Palestinian doctors in Israel. We're being persecuted – but we won't abandon our oath

I'm one of many Palestinian doctors in Israel. We're being persecuted – but we won't abandon our oath

The Guardian2 days ago
Medicine is a humanistic profession, grounded in ethical values of justice, beneficence and the commitment to do no harm. It is a vocation of healing, of saving lives and of easing physical and emotional suffering. Being a doctor requires inner strength – the ability to see another's pain, to feel it and to respond with empathy and compassion, alongside the knowledge and professionalism the role demands. I believe a physician also bears a critical responsibility in advocating for their patients' right to health and in upholding the principle of justice. In that sense, every doctor is, to me, a leader.
I explored these ideas in a new Guardian documentary, The Oath. I tell my story as a Palestinian doctor living in Israel and working within its healthcare system. Made over the past year, the film portrays the struggles and challenges I have faced in that time. However, since I was first filmed in March 2024, the situation in Gaza, and the position we are in as doctors, has only worsened – day by day, hour by hour.
As a Palestinian doctor living and working in Israel, in the midst of a longstanding conflict, I learned during my studies and work that injustice has been done to many populations living here. The occupation and coercion that Israel exercises over the Palestinian population in the occupied territories and the policy of discrimination against the Palestinian minority living within Israel cause serious harm to the right to health of these populations. Control over territories, expulsion, dispossession, violence, restriction of movement, establishment of settlements and apartheid cause great suffering to the population, prevent access to medical care and directly affect their health. Already as a medical student, I decided that I could not sit on the sidelines in the face of all that. I joined Physicians for Human Rights – Israel in order to fight for the health of the populations under Israeli control, together with many partners.
When we began filming the documentary, five months had already passed since Israel's assault on Gaza began. At that point, thousands had been killed and widespread destruction had taken place. Still, I could not have dreamed that for the next year and a half we would continue to witness daily bombings, mass death – including thousands of children – millions displaced, starvation and the unprecedented decimation of Gaza's health system. Hospitals, schools, mosques, churches, universities and entire neighbourhoods have been wiped off the map. The scale of devastation is unlike anything I have seen elsewhere. This is not merely a humanitarian crisis, it is what many international legal scholars and human rights organisations have begun to describe as a genocide in progress.
My personal story is inseparable from this struggle. Marwan, the brother of my sister-in-law, a paramedic, was killed in the line of duty on 7 October 2023. These past two weeks were even more tragic for his family: their tents in a camp in Gaza were bombed, killing 10 relatives, among them Abdullah, an eight-year-old boy full of life and dreams of becoming a doctor, murdered in his sleep. Little Marwan, seven years old, lay unconscious in a hospital for a week due to a severe head injury, but was denied proper treatment due to the severe shortage of medical staff and resources.
Since that tragic day, more than 1,500 Palestinian medical personnel have been killed. Many have been detained, subjected to ongoing persecution and humiliation. Some have died by torture and neglect in Israeli detention facilities. All this takes place under deafening silence from the Israeli healthcare establishment and many of my fellow physicians, who too often choose silence over basic ethics and morality. Only very few voices were heard among some in the Israeli healthcare system against targeting their colleagues in Gazan hospitals.
Amid all this, I try to speak with restraint, to choose my words carefully, out of fear and understanding that my voice might be seen as dangerous. Since 7 October, Palestinian staff in the Israeli healthcare system have faced persecution, slander and paralysis. Anti-Palestinian sentiment is surging, even among patients and colleagues. Slogans such as 'there are no innocents in Gaza' or 'burn Gaza to the ground' are neither rejected nor punished by the system. Any expression of sympathy for victims – women, children, innocent civilians – is seen as support for terror, and puts the speaker at risk of dismissal or disciplinary action.
A fellow physician, a partner in our struggle, was recently fired for delivering a brief speech in which he criticised the crimes committed in Gaza. The silencing and persecution are only intensifying.
Medicine, once assumed to be a neutral profession, has become politically and morally fraught. To treat an injured child in Gaza is no longer merely a medical duty – it is a profound moral declaration. The oath to provide equal care to all shatters against the brutal reality in which doctors and children are killed, patients are arrested, voices are suppressed and dreams – like Abdullah's – collapse.
And still, I continue to fight. Because as long as we remain silent, our oath is hollowed out, and the right to health becomes a fantasy too far to reach. Yet, as long as I have a voice, I will use it: for my patients, for justice, for the oath we all swore.
Lina Qasem Hassan is a Palestinian doctor working in the Israeli healthcare system and is chairwoman of Physicians for Human Rights - Israel. Photograph of Lina Qasem Hassan by Fadi Amun
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Furness General Hospital diagnostic centre set to open
Furness General Hospital diagnostic centre set to open

BBC News

time37 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Furness General Hospital diagnostic centre set to open

A £5.8m hospital diagnostic centre is set to open this month with an aim to provide faster patient chiefs said Croslands Community Diagnostic Centre (CDC) at Furness General Hospital in Barrow-in-Furness, Cumbria, will start seeing patients "in early August".The unit will be equipped with an MRI scanning suite, prep and recovery areas and three clinic rooms, providing access to diagnostic tests for a range of of the University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Andrew Stephenson said the new service would ensure "faster, more convenient care for everyone". "This is a huge investment at Furness General Hospital which we know will bring real benefits to the health and wellbeing of both patients and colleagues in the local area," he CDC will be run by the NHS Foundation and the Morecambe Bay Primary Care Collaborative with patients referred there by their opening of Croslands follows the launch of similar centres at Westmorland General Hospital in Kendal and Heysham Health Centre. Follow BBC Cumbria on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.

The hospital specialists visiting patients in their Sandwell homes
The hospital specialists visiting patients in their Sandwell homes

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

The hospital specialists visiting patients in their Sandwell homes

In days gone by doctors would frequently visit patients at home. In one part of the West Midlands, they are going back to old staff in Sandwell and west Birmingham liaise with GPs, paramedics, social care and district nurses, sending doctors and other health specialists to people's homes to deliver care more conventionally given in Tonks, 92, from Edgbaston, is among those being treated by acute doctors (medical specialists) and a nurse for fluid on his lungs and heart problems."I can't believe how good it's been actually. It seems as if everybody's been falling over themselves to do something or other for me," he said. Part of the NHS 10-year plan is to have more people be treated in their the new Midland Metropolitan University Hospital in Smethwick, which serves one of the most deprived areas of the country, has already been doing visit about 20 acutely unwell people every week and a range of other health professionals provide care for many Sarb Clare, an acute medical consultant, said Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust had reduced its number of beds by 100 and instead invested in treating people at home and in the said acute care had been turned on its head. "The patients absolutely love it – the fact they get to see a doctor in their own homes, we are going back full circle, aren't we?"We used to see our GPs, they used to come to our houses, they used to give us treatment. "We are coming back to that, but what's unusual is now we've got doctors who traditionally work in hospitals now going in patients' homes and delivering acute care." Dr Clare said she never thought years ago as a doctor in hospital that she would be going into people's homes, "but it just makes sense". In Mr Tonks' flat, Dr Sharjeel Kiani and his colleagues have given him daily to hospital "doesn't come without risks", Dr Kiani said."A lot of patients can have falls, develop deliriums, they can contract hospital acquired infections, so it's in his interest if we can try and keep him at home."Despite being quite unwell, Mr Tonks seemed pleased to be at home."I've been to hospital a few times in my life, which has always been ok, I've never had any complaints about hospital. But I'd much rather be at home," he said. Speaking at the Smethwick hospital's emergency department, palliative care specialist Dr Mike Blaber said the most vulnerable often arrived there, but palliative care had been delivered at home for a number of years. Other departments have embraced home care and so-called virtual wards too."We now have a paediatric, a respiratory, a cardiology, and a frailty virtual ward with specialists who can go into the patient's home, look after them there."He added it was safe, "that's really important". "Hospital is always an option that's available to people, if they need it. "It's just that a lot of the time that's not what's needed and we know that particularly for frail elderly patients or for terminally ill patients, hospitals actually are not always the safest place to be." The hospital was recently recognised at an international awards ceremony for its work in improving access to care and health inequalities. Staff received the Alliance Medical Health Inequalities Award at the Royal College of Physicians' Excellence in Patient Care Awards.A Department of Health & Social Care spokesperson said: "If we are to get patients cared for we need to shift the focus of the NHS from hospitals to the community. "We are bringing together teams of professionals closer to people's home - nurses, doctors, social care workers, pharmacists, health visitors and more – to work together to provide comprehensive care in the community." Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.

Sorry America, but it's not Australia's fault that your healthcare system is failing you
Sorry America, but it's not Australia's fault that your healthcare system is failing you

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Sorry America, but it's not Australia's fault that your healthcare system is failing you

If I were president of the United States, I would certainly be concerned about the cost and performance of the country's healthcare system. The grim statistics are well known. As of 2022, the US spent $12,555 per person on healthcare, almost twice as much as other wealthy countries, including Australia. That gap alone cancels out about half of the difference in income per person between the US and Australia, according to World Bank estimates. Higher expenditure on healthcare would not be a problem if it delivered a healthier population. But this is not the case. The US has one of the lowest life expectancies of any rich country. And even though more Americans die young, those who survive have worse health than elsewhere. Americans suffer from chronic diseases like diabetes, asthma and depression at around twice the (age-adjusted) rate of other rich countries. This gap is too large to be accounted for by specific causes like gun violence or drug overdoses, or even unequal income distribution. The US has worse health outcomes at every point on the income distribution scale than other rich countries, even though those at the upper end have much higher incomes. Sign up: AU Breaking News email And the problem is getting worse. The US saw declining life expectancy in the years after 2014 and, unlike other countries, saw a late, limited recovery from the increased death rate after the onset of the Covid pandemic. There's not much hope for rapid progress in US health outcomes. The destruction of US public health infrastructure through budget cuts, the gutting of key agencies such as the Center for Disease Control and the appointment of notorious anti-vaxxer RFK Jr as secretary of health and human services will only make matters worse. It's unsurprising then that President Donald Trump is looking at the cost side of the equation. As might be expected he has raised, again, the perennial grievances of US health policy. This is the fact that Americans pay far more for prescription medicines than do citizens of other countries where prices are controlled through mechanisms like Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). And, given his grievance-based approach to the world in general, it is no surprise that his latest statement on the topic describes Australia and other countries as 'freeloaders' on the US. The US government is, of course, entirely within its rights to set its own policy regarding the pricing of prescription drugs. The US Department of Veterans Affairs already has a program similar to the PBS, under which it pays about half as much of the typical US price. There is no reason this couldn't be extended to the entire US Medicare system, except that the result would be to close down 1,000 or more private plans, each with their own lobbyists. And with a bit more effort, the US could establish its own version of the PBS, covering all Americans. Quite possibly, faced with lower prices in the US, pharmaceutical companies might demand higher returns from other countries including Australia. But a systematic reform of this kind is beyond the capacity of the Trump administration. Instead we have seen the typical Trumpian claim that other countries are benefiting unfairly from medical research done in the US. This was arguably true in the second half of the 20th century when the US was the undoubted centre of global medical research, most notably through the National Institutes of Health. But funding for the NIH (adjusted for inflation) peaked in 2004, and has suffered from decades of financial stringency. Meanwhile, the US share of genuine innovations, measured by 'new molecular entities' has declined and is no longer notably larger (relative to GDP) than that of leading European innovators. The development of semaglutide (Ozempic and Wegovy) treatments for obesity and diabetes by Danish firm Novo Nordisk is a notable example of a drug of particular importance to the US being developed in Europe. More generally, if Trump wants to import ideas like the PBS into the US system, Australia has plenty to offer. Australia's Medicare system, combining a single-payer universal scheme for standard healthcare with private insurance and fee-for-service medicine as an upper tier, could provide a politically palatable way of delivering the US demand for 'Medicare for all' without destroying the private sector. But of course, this isn't the Trump way. What we will doubtless see, as in the recent tariff negotiations, is a series of bullying demands, resulting in triumphant announcements of magnificent deals, which turn out, on closer inspection, to be largely illusory. The bigger lesson for Australia in all of this is that, as with China, we need to treat the US not as an ally or friend but as a trading partner which will seek to push us around whenever possible. The correct response, again as with China, is to stand our ground until the other side sees the pointlessness of bullying and the mutual benefits of free exchange. John Quiggin is a professor at the University of Queensland's school of economics

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store