B.C. Conservative Leader John Rustad faces criticism from several sides amid review
"There were only four of us," Sharkey said. "Two of us were holding the banner, and the other two were handing out candy canes. But the reception was actually surprisingly positive, and it was a kind of experience that led me to believe that in terms of our political ambitions, we were on the right track."
Sharkey, a party member since 2017 and a former provincial candidate for the Libertarian Party, now thinks the Conservatives are on the wrong track.
His conclusion comes despite the B.C. Conservatives coming within a whisker of forming government in October 2024 when 912,000 residents voted for the party that had just under 36,000 votes in the 2020 election.
Sharkey said he blames the same man others credit for reviving a party that once polled at two per cent: Opposition Leader John Rustad.
The party's direction and identity are at the heart of a dispute that set off the departure of three members of the legislature and arguments among riding associations. Should it be populist or moderate? Big tent or small?
It also comes as party members review Rustad's leadership in accordance with the party's constitution.
Rustad became the leader a month after joining the party in March 2023. He had been with the B.C. Liberals since 2005, but was kicked out in 2022 by then-leader Kevin Falcon.
WATCH | Rustad faces scheduled leadership review:
B.C. Conservative leader to face scheduled leadership review amid infighting
13 days ago
Duration 3:05
Relations between the rivals then reversed in August 2024, when Falcon suspended the election campaign of his party, rebranded as B.C. United, following the defections of members to the Conservatives.
Now, Sharkey said, the Conservatives have become a rebranded version of Rustad's old party.
There was no appetite from the members to be that big-tent party, he said.
"There is an appetite from the members to remain a grassroots party, and if Mr. Rustad wants to be a big tent, start a big-tent party."
Sharkey, who considers himself the riding association president in Abbotsford-Mission, said he believes Rustad's changes cost the Conservatives the election win.
The party's executive director, Angelo Isidorou, said in a statement Monday that Sharkey is neither a member nor a riding association president.
Domenic Cinalli describes himself as an early supporter and one-time close confidant of Rustad, but said he doesn't like the direction Rustad has taken the party.
"He has abandoned what we all stood for," Cinalli said. "He's abandoned the strong stances that we had, and it wasn't just John who brought us there. It was all the volunteers and the people who were out there fighting tooth and nail."
Cinalli said he's disappointed that the party changed directions on reconciliation with First Nations and Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity programming.
"They have gone more mediocre, more to the middle," said Cinalli, who is no longer a party member.
But for others, the Conservative tent isn't big enough. Ryan Beedie, a prominent Vancouver businessman, said in a social media post last month that the Conservatives will need to "rebrand to something more inclusive" if they wish to appeal to "centrist voters" just as the Social Credit Party or the B.C. Liberals did in the past.
A months-long leadership review is underway amid allegations from Rustad that three former Conservative MLAs — Tara Armstrong, Dallas Brodie and Jordan Kealy — "blackmailed" Conservative staff.
Rustad first made the allegation in a letter to his caucus without naming the MLAs directly. All three have denied the claims and have instead accused Rustad of using the allegations to distract from questions about his leadership.
While Rustad has since expressed regret for using the term blackmail, his critics have seized on it.
Beedie said Rustad's allegations raise questions about his leadership, and the party should use the review to move toward the middle.
WATCH | B.C. Conservative leader's letter alleges blackmail:
B.C. Conservative leader's letter alleges blackmail by ex-members
20 days ago
Duration 10:04
In a letter leaked to media on Monday, B.C. Conservative Leader John Rustad alleges that a group of legislators who left his party are threatening to release texts and messages to intimidate members of his caucus. It comes after two Conservative defectors formed the OneBC party. Tim Thielmann, the chief of staff for the OneBC leader, called the allegations a desperate attempt by Rustad to cling to power.
"Hopefully, this [review] is a positive step toward the B.C. Conservatives getting their house in order and shifting their political strategy to a more centrist approach. They will need to do so, or the B.C. NDP will be staying in power for the foreseeable future."
UBC political science lecturer Stewart Prest said the Conservatives consist of a "populist" wing and a moderate wing, and the current riding-by-riding leadership vote could make for a "messy summer" with Rustad facing pressure from both sides.
"We are already hearing rumblings of challenges from both camps, so I don't know if it is an either-or situation," Prest said, when asked which faction was more likely to challenge Rustad for leadership.
A central source of criticism concerns the handling of the party's last annual general meeting held in March.
The "Team Rustad" slate swept elections for the party's board of directors. Delegates also approved amendments to the party's constitution as proposed by Rustad.
But not everybody has accepted the results, including Armstrong, Brodie and Kealy.
In May, they alleged Rustad and his team "rigged" the meeting that endorsed the board, claiming it was stacked with South Asian supporters paid "to vote the way Mr. Rustad wanted."
Brodie and Armstrong have since gone on to form their own party, One B.C. Its chief of staff is Tim Thielmann, a former Conservative candidate in Victoria-Beacon Hill.
The allegations surrounding the AGM received another airing last month when 50-plus signatories describing themselves as "executive members or former executive members" of riding associations called on Estey to launch an external audit of the AGM.
Rustad has denied any wrongdoing at the meeting.
"I have been advised by our legal counsel and experts, who were present to scrutinize the voting process, that our AGM was 100 per cent in line with this party's 2024-2025 constitution," he said in the letter containing the blackmail allegations against the three former Conservative MLAs.
Rustad said in an interview last month that critics like Sharkey and others "want this party to be something that it is not."
"I have said this all the way through the campaign, and I don't know why people haven't heard it — it's not about being Conservative or Liberal, or NDP, or Green. It's just standing for what's right and fighting for the average everyday people. That is the party that we have built," Rustad said.
Gavin Dew, B.C. Conservative MLA for Kelowna-Mission, said the current party "has had incredible success in building a new voter coalition" that includes many more young voters and more voters from different cultural communities.
"We have made incredible strides with blue-collar voters," Dew added. "We do incredibly well with suburban voters. So, we have made all this progress, but it is clear that we still need to win over those incremental voters, which I would say is that middle-of-the-road voter."
If the party holds its current coalition together and adds more "economically oriented voters" from the middle of the spectrum to this coalition, Conservatives can hold government for "multiple terms," Dew said in an interview.
Prest is more skeptical. While strong poll numbers now and victory down the line might entice both wings of the Conservatives to put aside their differences, "there isn't really a stable policy compromise that would make both of those sides happy" in the long term, he said.
"In some really important ways, the divides between populist and more middle-of-the-road Conservatives are deeper than the divides between middle-of-the-road Conservatives and NDP, " Prest said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
36 minutes ago
- National Post
'We never technically said we would elbow anybody': The imagined thoughts of Mark Carney's elbow
Article content Prime Minister Mark Carney's slogan during the April federal election was 'elbows up.' The hockey reference was intended as a pledge of defiance against tariffs and annexation threats from the United States. Article content Instead, Carney's U.S. strategy has consisted almost entirely of concessions and even deference. And on Thursday night, all it yielded was a new threat by U.S. President Donald Trump to slap blanket 35 per cent tariffs on Canadian imports. Article content Article content Article content Article content Monday Article content The slogan was 'elbows up.' Not 'we're going to hit you with our elbows.' Or, 'I'm intending to use my elbows defensively.' The promise was only that we would proverbially elevate our elbows for an unspecified period of time, and for no declared purpose. We never technically said we would elbow anybody. Article content Keeping all this in mind, I think you'll agree there has been no inconsistency in the strategy. The Government of Canada has pursued a course with the Trump administration that, at times, has involved the raising of elbows above their usual relaxed state, which would indeed be an 'elbows up' approach. Article content Tuesday Article content I would remind everyone that the National Hockey League officially considers elbowing a penalty, with the act warranting punishments as severe as game misconducts, fines and suspensions. Article content Article content As a government committed to the rules-based international order, we obviously would never condone a violent and inherently menacing act such as the bellicose use of an elbow. Article content Article content And, as stated, that was never the intention. If you check Mr. Carney's rhetoric on this account, I think you'll agree he was mentioning elbows mainly as a means to demonstrate the articulative quality of the human arm. Article content Elbows up, to my read, was only ever a friendly gesture of greeting in which the speaker is demonstrating the functionality of their joints as a symbol of their own flexibility. 'See how my arms bend, foreign state, they are the arms of someone who will peacefully bend to your own appeals.' Article content Wednesday Article content I feel uniquely qualified to assure the Canadian people that Mr. Carney has certainly made full use of his elbows in attempting to resolve the current impasse with the United States. Article content At the G7 summit in Kananaskis, I was employed to deliver a friendly nudge to U.S. President Donald Trump, along with the comment, 'Hey Donald, you like Mount Bogart over there? What if it was Mount Trump?' Article content After phone calls between Mr. Carney and the U.S. leader, he will often lay his elbows on a table to cradle his head for hours at a time — I assume to ponder a new genius tactic. Yes, this truly has been an elbows-heavy response to one of our greatest national crises. Article content Thursday Article content Despite everything, I think we can all agree that Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre would have completely and utterly folded in the face of aggressive U.S. trade policy. Had he won in April, my least pessimistic estimate is that by now he would have surrendered at least two provinces and one great lake, and he would have appointed Rudy Giuliani as Governor General. Article content I need only point you to his public statements: No mention whatsoever of elbows, knees, digits or any other body part. Mr. Trump is a man who deals best in the tactile world. Any failure to open negotiations with at least one reference to the corporeal form is, frankly, akin to immediate surrender. Article content Friday Article content Last night's developments are certainly not what we'd hoped for, but it's all part of the process. We fully planned for this: We would unilaterally cede to perceived U.S. demands, the Americans would respond with another round of ruinous tariffs and vague grievances, and then we'd cede some more. This is called bilateral diplomacy; it's a messy process but it ultimately arrives at a place of mutual benefit. Article content
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
What we know about Canadians in ICE detention
Families of Canadians detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) say they're furious at the treatment of their loved ones and are fighting for their release. Dozens of Canadians are currently in detention centres, according to Global Affairs Canada.
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
National Defence considering purchase of fighter drones that could fly with F-35
An F-35A Lightning II fighter jet practises for an air show appearance in Ottawa, Friday, Sept. 6, 2019. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld OTTAWA — The Department of National Defence is looking at the possibility of complementing its incoming F-35 fleet with uncrewed combat aircraft. Unclassified documents obtained by The Canadian Press show the department is researching various options for acquiring the emerging technology. The documents suggest that purchasing a fleet of aerial combat drones that could fly alongside fighter jets could cost as much as $16 billion and would require hundreds of staff. That cost estimate is in the upper range. The price tag and other aspects of the emerging technology remain uncertain, and the fact that the government is researching combat drones doesn't guarantee that Canada will buy any. David Perry, president of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, said Canada's allies are already headed in this direction, so at a minimum Ottawa will want to better understand how its closest military partners will use similar technology. He said combat drones could give the air force more flexibility to contribute to allied operations and could act as a force-multiplier that would beef up the 'mass' of the air force. They're also cheaper than fighter jets. 'There's been a trade-off, particularly in the West, with investing in expensive things. It can have super high levels of precision and survivability ... and we've been moving towards having increasingly expensive fighter aircraft that can do phenomenal things, but they're so expensive that you can't build all that many of them,' Perry said. 'The broad thrust of the idea of having an unpiloted vehicle that would be able to operate with a piloted vehicle is that you provide additional numbers in a way that could potentially help provide enough quantity to overwhelm opposition forces.' Perry pointed to the war in Ukraine, where Russia has been launching massive volleys of drones and missiles. 'If you have a whole bunch of targets to track, it makes it much more difficult for any kind of defensive system to be able to deal, at the same time, with all the incoming,' he said. Canada and its allies have never deployed unmanned aerial combat drones that operate in tandem with fighter jets. Daniel Norton is a senior management systems analyst with the RAND Corporation who has done modernization studies for the U.S. air force for more than three decades. He said drones of the type Canada is looking at tend to be smaller than crewed fighters, cost a fraction of a conventional jet if bought in bulk — and can be used in situations where the military wouldn't want to put a pilot at risk. Known as 'collaborative combat aircraft,' the vehicles are designed to act autonomously in some ways — such as targeting and flying — but with humans managing their actions. Future versions of the technology could engage in fully autonomous operations. The drones could be used to carry sensors, jammers or weapons to support normal fighter jets. They could even be used as decoys. Norton said new platforms like these probably won't be deployed in battle by any country before 2030 at the earliest. 'I'd be surprised if it happened sooner,' he said. National Defence vaguely alluded to such platforms in the most recent defence policy update as something the government would 'explore.' The 2024 policy update, titled 'Our North, Strong and Free,' committed to exploring 'options for acquiring a suite of surveillance and strike drones and counter-drone capabilities.' An internal preliminary analysis of the various options for the 'autonomous collaborative platform' ruled out buying completely Canadian-made fighter drones. The analysis said one possible path would have Canada work with partner nations on developing new systems like this, and pointed to several such craft being developed for Australia, the U.S. and European nations. The analysis said such a procurement project 'could provide Canadian aerospace firms with an entry point into development and production of advanced weapons systems.' There are no current off-the-shelf versions but several are being developed, such as Boeing's MQ-28A 'Ghost Bat' for Australia, General Atomics' YFQ-42 in the U.S. and the Anduril YFQ-44A. Boeing's aircraft is undergoing flight testing, while Anduril's is expected to start testing this year. Both the U.S. and Australian air forces use F-35s. There are also several initiatives underway in Europe for autonomous collaborative aircraft. When The Canadian Press asked Lt.-Gen. Jamie Speiser-Blanchet, the new commander of the Royal Canadian Air Force, how the RCAF might change in response to the rapid developments in drone warfare, she said the military is 'already looking at those kinds of future capabilities.' 'It is absolutely something that is on our radar and something that we need to be prepared for in the future,' she said. In March, in response to the trade war with the U.S., Prime Minister Carney ordered a review of Canada's plan to purchase a fleet of F-35 fighter jets. The federal government is expected to render a decision on the procurement project by the end of summer. Canada's planned purchase of 88 of the U.S.-made stealth jets is expected to cost $27.7 billion, according to the auditor general. At this point, Canada has only financially committed to purchasing the first 16 jets. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 12, 2025. Kyle Duggan, The Canadian Press
