
'Things were not the same anymore': After one partner cheats, can a relationship truly be saved?
When she confronted her husband about it shortly after, he admitted to it.
Mrs Tan, 37, a manager at a corporate firm, said: 'The first reaction was shock ... Following that, there was resentment, anger and sadness that we have lost a part of our relationship. Things were not the same anymore."
She had never once doubted him even though he often stayed out late drinking. She had believed that her husband, who is manager at another corporate firm, just needed to relieve stress.
For Mr Tan, 35, the extramarital affair was a form of escapism. He struggled with negative feelings and couldn't bring himself to discuss them with his wife, instead resorting to alcohol. This led to him turning to another woman to satisfy his physical needs in an affair that lasted over a year.
Relationship counsellors told CNA TODAY that infidelity is rather common among married couples, be it emotional, physical or online cheating. Yet, couples can find it too painful or shameful to discuss the affairs openly, even if they want to fix their relationship.
This begs the question – can a relationship survive infidelity? When is it worth mending the relationship and when is it better to call it quits?
DISTANCE LEADS TO INFIDELITY
In truth, adultery is rarely a hasty act.
Experts said that it often starts from a gradual breakdown in a couple's relationship after trust and emotional closeness are weakened.
Associate counsellor Beverly Foo from The Lighthouse Counselling, which provides couples' therapy and marriage counselling among other services, said that Singapore couples often juggle high-pressure careers and childcare responsibilities.
With so many demands on their time and energy, couple time is usually the first thing sacrificed. As intimacy wanes, the relationship can then start to feel like a source of stress instead of support.
'As that distance grows, one or both partners may begin to invest less in the relationship," Ms Foo added. "Resentment builds, appreciation fades and attention shifts to what is lacking rather than what is present."
As one or both parties begin to feel more emotionally neglected or vulnerable, boundaries with other people may start to blur. A connection with someone outside the relationship can feel rewarding. Over time, the person may permit themselves to cross a line.
Relationship coach Winifred Ling from mental health clinic Promises Healthcare said that often, the workplace is the most convenient and accessible environment for this to happen.
"Initially, (casual) encounters might seem harmless but once a boundary is crossed, it becomes easier to deceive and lie," she added.
Ms Tammy Fontana, relationship counsellor at All in the Family Counselling Centre, stressed that infidelity is not always about an individual's moral failings and can often be a symptom of underlying issues within the relationship.
It can also stem from a lack of emotional development and maturity, or mental health challenges such as depression, unresolved trauma or addiction issues.
Additionally, the experts said that societal stigma often discourages couples from speaking openly about infidelity, a topic that's still widely considered to be taboo or shameful.
This certainly rings true for Mr and Mrs Tan, who have not disclosed their difficulties to anyone outside of their immediate families and the reason why they did not want to be identified for this interview.
Couples therapist Lieu An An from therapy provider The Psychology Atelier said that Singapore's strong emphasis on family stability and social image could play a part in pressuring couples to 'keep things together' even after such a betrayal.
Relationship coach Winny Lu Aldridge from Just2Hearts Counselling said that cultural beliefs and values can also make many couples reluctant to "air dirty laundry in public", leading them to struggle in isolation. This may also mean that they do not receive the support and guidance they need, which can in turn worsen the emotional damage.
WHEN IS THE RELATIONSHIP WORTH SAVING?
When one partner cheats, does that automatically spell the end of the relationship?
Not quite, the experts said.
Many practical concerns can affect how individuals and couples weigh this dilemma – for instance, if young children are involved or if one spouse is financially dependent on the other.
However, what often determines the outcome is not the nature of the betrayal itself, but rather how both partners respond afterwards.
Ms Foo said: "If the unfaithful partner takes full responsibility, ends the affair completely and demonstrates genuine remorse – not just in words but through consistent and trustworthy actions – there is often a foundation to rebuild upon."
Likewise, the betrayed partner needs to feel emotionally safe enough to stay open to the healing process, she added.
This was the case for Mr and Mrs Tan. She eventually decided to give him another chance on account of their two young children, but also because Mr Tan took responsibility for his misdeeds by apologising sincerely, ending the affair and seeking her forgiveness, even cutting off communication with the other woman.
'Without any of these factors, I think it would be hard for us to move on,' Mrs Tan said.
Even in the wake of an affair, the couple may still share a strong emotional connection, history or mutual respect, Mrs Aldridge from Just2Hearts Counselling said.
If the unfaithful partner takes full responsibility, ends the affair completely and demonstrates genuine remorse – not just in words but through consistent and trustworthy actions – there is often a foundation to rebuild upon.
However, some individuals may feel that staying with their partner after such a betrayal would compromise their emotional integrity or core values, Ms Foo said.
One such person is Ms Willynn Ng, 37, who divorced her husband after he cheated on her twice. The regional head of a dating application said: 'There comes a point when you've given someone chance after chance and they make it painfully clear that they love themselves more than they ever loved you.
'When they repeatedly prioritise their own desires over your mental and emotional well-being, you realise that the only person left to choose you is you.'
Ms Ng also asked herself what staying with her unfaithful spouse would signal to her four children. Would she be "normalising" the notion of betrayal in close relationships for them? "That's a legacy I refuse to leave behind."
The betrayed parties may be more inclined to separate if they are financially independent or if they already have strong social and family support outside of their partners, Mrs Aldridge said.
There is often no single deciding factor outweighing all else, but Ms Ling from Promises Healthcare believes that splitting up can be the best option when conflict between a couple is negatively affecting their children or when only one partner is still invested in making the relationship work.
THE LONG JOURNEY TO HEALING
How, then, can a broken relationship ever truly be healed?
At the outset, the immediate priority should be allowing intense emotions such as anger and hurt to settle, Ms Lieu from The Psychology Atelier said.
It could be good for couples to agree upon a short break from each other – even a few hours of space helps to prevent negative escalation.
Major decisions such as separation or retaliation should be held off until emotions have cooled.
To provide some stability during this emotional upheaval, the couple could also ask trusted family or friends to help with household duties such as childcare, Mrs Aldridge recommended.
The next step: transparent conversations between the couple, which might take place over a few sessions.
Both partners should be prepared to express feelings and needs that may have gone unattended for a long time, Ms Lieu said. In particular, the cheating partner has to be ready and willing to answer questions honestly.
Such conversations can easily become confrontational and heated, so it is important to pace this process.
In navigating this stage, couples should also consider reaching out for community support from loved ones or even professional help, as Mr and Mrs Tan did in seeking out a relationship counsellor.
'A trained couples therapist could be very helpful to add structure to talk about tricky topics,' Ms Lieu added.
Finally, both partners need to commit to re-establishing trust.
This involves negotiating clearer boundaries and reaffirming the shared values at the core of their relationship, Ms Lieu said.
For instance, the unfaithful partner could proactively provide access to their personal devices and social media accounts for transparency, Ms Ling suggested.
They should also take care to be responsive to their spouse and to avoid keeping secrets or telling lies, even small ones.
In the case of Mr Tan, upon ending his affair, he made concerted efforts to change behaviours that had previously led their relationship to harm.
Whenever he went out, he would limit himself to two drinks, update his wife on his location and return home by 10pm if she requested it of him.
He also began setting aside time to check on his wife's emotional well-being or needs every day. He said it has helped the couple to create a consistent space for open sharing, where they feel safe to "voice out any negative feelings".
Partners should not expect each other to "move on quickly", Ms Ling warned.
Instead, it is important for the cheating partner to validate the hurt they caused their partner, express remorse and sit with the discomfort.
Be careful not to lose patience, but to allow each other to grieve and process, the relationship coach advised.
The unfaithful partner could also initiate activities that allow the couple to create new memories together. Persist in these efforts even if the hurt partner initially rejects them – not to badger them, but to show sincerity.
More importantly, couples should not force or expect the relationship to revert to how it was before. 'Sustainable healing means collaborating to create a new normal marked by clearer agreements, richer communication and deeper emotional honesty," Ms Lieu said.
'Many couples might report feeling a more nuanced and enriched emotional connection ultimately – not because of the affair itself, but because of the intentional work that followed it.'
Mr and Mrs Tan certainly agreed. Now, more than a year after their mutual decision to salvage their marriage, they said that their reforged relationship is stronger than ever.
She said: 'In the past, when we spent time (together) as a family, he was always on the phone, thinking about something else. You could sense that he didn't really want to be there.
'Now, you can tell that he's truly present. His phone is aside. He's playing with the kids. He sees me differently and is more appreciative of the little things that I do."
Mr Tan said that overcoming that challenging period together means that the family now feels more confident and able to confront whatever is thrown at them in future.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
NEL, LRT disruptions: SBS Transit, LTA engineers to work overnight to restore power supply
Train operator SBS Transit says its engineers and those from the Land Transport Authority will be working overnight to restore power supply to the North East Line depot substation. This is after a power fault led to disruptions on Aug 12 across several stops along the North East Line, plus the entire Sengkang-Punggol LRT service. Earlier in the day, CNA's Rachel Teng and Muhammad Bahajjaj went out to three affected stations.


CNA
6 hours ago
- CNA
Bukit Canberra hawkers charged for using extra space permanently, not for baskets: Operator
Ms Chen Liping, who runs the stall selling noodles, also opted not to rent the space. Since she can only leave items there temporarily, she instructs delivery drivers to leave food items in her stall instead. 'Other than that, I just put this chair here so I can rest in the afternoons, then I can fold it and keep it in my stall when I don't need it,' she added. FREE MEALS In his latest post on Tuesday, Mr Seetoh reiterated that the hawkers are contractually obligated to offer 60 free, unsubsidised charity meals per month. 'It may not be enforced, but they are at the mercy and grace of the operators. It's not stated that no punishment (is) meted if they fail to do so,' he wrote. Mr Ong had earlier replied to Mr Seetoh to confirm that stallholders at Bukit Canberra Hawker Centre would not be penalised for not providing free meals to low-income residents. "There are no penalties if they do not or are unable to provide the meals," he said on Monday, adding that the initiative, which was meant to encourage hawkers to "pay it forward", has yet to commence. When asked about the free meals that Mr Seetoh claimed were part of their contracts, the hawkers confirmed that these clauses were real. Those CNA spoke to also highlighted that the free food scheme has not been implemented even though some of their three-year contracts were coming to an end. Canopy Hawkers Group's Mr Tan also confirmed that the scheme has not started. 'If you're here earning money from everyone every day, shouldn't you give back to the community a bit? Two meals a day is manageable,' said Mr Ow, adding that he already gives free meals away to those who need them. Hawkers were also aware of the clauses when they signed their leases, he stressed. 'If you want to sign the contract, then you should follow it. Don't sign the contract, then complain about it.' Ms Pang agreed that many hawkers like herself are feeling the pinch from the rising prices of essentials and may worry about providing free meals. Since the scheme has not been begun, hawkers who cannot afford to give away free meals do not need to do so, she added. 'But for me, if I can do it, I will just do it. If you can't do it, I'm sure you can talk to the management and work something out,' she said, adding that she sometimes gives away free snacks to elderly, low-income customers. The number of free meals has since been revised to 100 meals over their three-year contract, hawkers said. Mr Ong also clarified this point on Monday. While she was unaware of the previous terms of 60 meals every two months, Ms Chen said that since last year, the scheme has involved providing 100 free meals over her three-year lease. 'Everyone here who signed the contract would know about it. When they signed it, they would have asked all their questions,' she added. 'If they choose you to run the stall and offer their terms, you only sign the contract if you accept the terms … It's not like halfway through your contract, your business is not good, then you suddenly complain about the terms.' The 53-year-old hawker considered 100 meals over three years a reasonable number, which is why she accepted the terms. 'Whether business is good or bad, it's our own problem.' When asked if he had a response to hawkers who said they considered the free meal terms in their contract reasonable, Mr Seetoh reiterated to CNA: 'Charity meals, if voluntary, should not be in the contract.'


Independent Singapore
7 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Man says his mum kept 10% of his earnings and made him fund his own university fees
SINGAPORE: Parents are supposed to nurture their children and prepare them for independence, but one man says his experience growing up was very different. For more than 10 years, he claims his mother's main priority was controlling every aspect of his finances rather than supporting his well-being. In a post on the r/SGexams subreddit, he wrote that, for as long as he could remember, every dollar he spent was monitored. 'I wasn't allowed to buy anything other than food and school materials all the way until I started working. Also, I was only allowed to eat food that cost less than S$5 at the food court throughout my life until I started working full-time,' he said. He further revealed that throughout his formative years and up to polytechnic, his mother would provide him with pocket money at the beginning of each week, only to reclaim any unspent amount by the week's end. 'I had totally zero dollars with me during holidays and weekends,' he added. Even during his polytechnic internship, he had no control over his income. He claimed his mother kept all his earnings, and he later discovered that she had been transferring 'S$100 each month' from his intern pay into her personal bank account without informing him. After graduating from polytechnic, he said the restrictions continued. '[My] mother made me go out to work, and all my salary goes into a joint account between me and her. Every month, she will transfer 10% of my salary into her own bank account.' Moreover, he shared that his siblings received much better treatment than him. 'My family isn't poor, my parents paid for my older siblings' uni fees and their overseas trip with their school, and let them eat whatever they want when they were young,' he wrote. In contrast, he said he was compelled to save for his own university education. 'I had to use the joint account to save up for my own uni. My mother also told me that she won't lend me any money for my uni, and if I don't have enough money, I should just drop out.' 'You are the investment child.' In the comments, one Singaporean Redditor commented, 'Your mum is controlling you, probably bordering along the lines of financial abuse, and you should probably leave your home as soon as possible because she'll probably depend on you financially for a very long time. She views you as an investment, not as an individual who's free to make choices on their own.' Another agreed with this view, writing, 'You are the 'investment child.' Sorry, Bro, but I think you should create your own bank account, move out, and adios, amigos, from your mum, and remember to keep all the (receipts) of her controlling you in case she sues you for allowance.' A third added, 'I think maybe you can check DNA to see whether if you are really her child?' A few others also encouraged him to have an open conversation with his siblings, hoping that by making them aware of the situation, they might be willing to stand by him and help address the matter together. In other news, a local took to social media to warn others about the vendor stationed near Tampines MRT station who allegedly sells overpriced ice cream. In a post on the COMPLAINT SINGAPORE Facebook group, Facebook user Syukuri Apa Yang Telat Ad claimed he was charged S$8 for two ice creams—one served in a cone and the other as an ice cream sandwich. Read more: 'I paid $8 for these!': Man warns others about vendor selling overpriced ice cream with no price displayed