Shifting to Asia, Rubio meets Quad and talks minerals
Since then, much of Rubio's attention has been on the Middle East, with the United States bombing Iranian nuclear sites in support of Israel; on Ukraine, as Trump unsuccessfully seeks a ceasefire in Russia's invasion, and on boosting Trump's domestic priorities such as mass deportations of migrants.
Welcoming the three foreign ministers, Rubio did not directly mention military concerns over China but said he sought cooperation among business and on raw materials -- also key goals for the Trump administration.
Rubio told them he was focused on "diversifying the global supply chain of critical minerals -- not just access to the raw material, but also access to the ability to process and refine it to usable materials."
"It's critical for all technologies and for all industries across the board," Rubio said, voicing hope for "real progress" on the issue within the Quad.
China holds major reserves of several key minerals including the vast majority of the world's graphite, which is crucial for electric vehicles.
Beijing has sought to impose restrictions as leverage, as the United States in turn curbs its access to semiconductors and as Trump wields the threat of punishing tariffs on both friends and foes.
'Free and open'
Trump is expected to travel to India later this year for a summit of the Quad.
The four-way partnership was first conceived by late Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe, who saw an alliance of democracies around China -- which has repeatedly alleged that the Quad is a way to contain it.
Trump has long branded China as the top US adversary, but since returning to office has also saluted his relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping.
Both the Indian and Japanese foreign ministers said that they wanted the Quad to focus on a "free and open Indo-Pacific" -- a phrasing that is a veiled allusion to opposing Chinese dominance in Asia.
"We're all committed to ensure a free and open Indo-Pacific," Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said.
"It is essential that nations of the Indo-Pacific have the freedom of choice, so essential to make right decisions on development and security," he said.
Jaishankar also made clear that India would raise its strikes last month against Pakistan in response to a major attack on mostly Hindu civilians in Indian-administered Kashmir.
"India has every right to defend its people against terrorism, and we will exercise that right. We expect our Quad partners to understand and appreciate that," he said.
Despite shared concerns on China, the Quad members have differed on other hotspots. India has maintained a historic relationship with Russia despite the invasion of Ukraine.
Both India and Japan also have historically warm relationships with Iran, whose nuclear sites the United States bombed in June in support of an Israeli campaign.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
33 minutes ago
- LeMonde
US Senator Elizabeth Warren urges bribery probe over Trump-Paramount settlement
US Senator Elizabeth Warren renewed calls Wednesday, July 2, for a bribery investigation into Paramount following its $16 million settlement with President Donald Trump over a lawsuit the entertainment giant initially described as meritless. The president had sued the CBS News parent company for $20 billion, claiming the "60 Minutes" program had deceptively edited an interview with his 2024 election rival Kamala Harris in her favor. The suit is described by Trump's critics as part of a broader assault on press freedom that has seen him bar The Associated Press from the Oval Office and sue other media organizations over their coverage. Paramount nevertheless entered into mediation in a bid to placate Trump, as it seeks to close its $8 billion merger with the entertainment company Skydance, which needs federal government approval. "With Paramount folding to Donald Trump at the same time the company needs his administration's approval for its billion-dollar merger, this could be bribery in plain sight," said Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat. "Paramount has refused to provide answers to a congressional inquiry, so I'm calling for a full investigation into whether or not any anti-bribery laws were broken." Warren was among three senators who wrote to Paramount Global Chair Shari Redstone in May with bribery concerns over the company's efforts to settle the suit, calling for a congressional probe. Republicans control both chambers of Congress, limiting the power of Democrats to investigate or compel answers from witnesses. The senators' letter came after CBS News head Wendy McMahon and "60 Minutes" executive producer Bill Owens quit over Paramount's handling of the showdown with Trump. 'Paramount's surrender' The company initially called the suit "completely without merit" and sought to have it dismissed. It said in a statement to AFP the $16 million would go toward Trump's future presidential library rather than to him personally, and added that the settlement did not include an apology. In Wednesday's shareholders meeting, Paramount co-CEO George Cheeks said companies often settle litigation to avoid high legal costs and the unpredictability of a trial. Settlement allows a company to focus on its objectives "rather than being mired in uncertainty and distraction," Cheeks said. But it was received by Trump's legal team with excitement. With the settlement, a spokesman said, Trump "delivers another win for the American people." Warren said the company should be "ashamed of putting its profits over independent journalism" in the face of the Trump administration's "sheer corruption." Trump accused CBS of airing two different snippets from the same answer that Harris, then vice president, gave about Israel, to help her in her election campaign. Legal experts have argued that the lawsuit would have been an easy victory in court for CBS, which made public an unedited transcript of the Harris interview. And media watchers have pointed out that Trump routinely takes part in interviews that are edited for all manner of reasons, often in his favor. 'First Amendment undermined' "This settlement is a cowardly capitulation by the corporate leaders of Paramount, and a fundamental betrayal of '60 Minutes' and CBS News," said Rome Hartman, who helped produce the Harris interview for the show. "The story that was the subject of this lawsuit was edited by the book and in accordance with CBS News standards." CBS journalists stood united against the deal, seemingly in the works for months. In a letter to Paramount's leadership in early May, the "60 Minutes" correspondents said they were troubled by reports that Paramount might settle the case "in a way that acknowledges some sort of wrongdoing on our part." The correspondents, in the letter obtained by The Associated Press, said that "if our parent company caves in to his pressure and lies, it will leave a shameful stain and undermine the First Amendment." It was signed by Whitaker, Lesley Stahl, Scott Pelley, Anderson Cooper, Sharyn Alfonsi, Jon Wertheim and Cecilia Vega. "Paramount's decision to capitulate to Trump threatens journalists' ability to do their job reporting on powerful public figures," the Writers Guild of America East, which represents "60 Minutes" journalists, said in a statement. ABC News, owned by Disney, agreed to donate a similar amount to the Trump presidential library in its own settlement with the president late last year. Trump had contended that star ABC anchor George Stephanopoulos had defamed him by asserting that Trump had been found liable for rape in a civil lawsuit brought by writer E. Jean Carroll, when he was found liable for sexual abuse.
Fashion Network
42 minutes ago
- Fashion Network
India exporters cautiously optimistic as US tariff deadline looms
Indian exporters are anxiously eyeing the possible reintroduction of Donald Trump 's punishing tariffs next week, though many hold out hope for a last-minute reprieve. The US president's April 2 "Liberation Day" announcement of swingeing levies on dozens of key trading partners sent shockwaves through capitals before he announced a pause for negotiations, which ends next Wednesday. New Delhi and Washington have been locked in multiple rounds of talks, with hopes for an interim pact to avert the 26 percent "reciprocal" tolls meted out to India. The tariffs, which came on top of 10 percent levies across the board for every country, were imposed for what the White House says are unfair US trade deficits. While India -- the world's most populous country -- is not a manufacturing powerhouse, it still ran up a $45.7 billion trade surplus with the United States last year. And now some of its most labour-intensive exports, including electronics, gems and jewellery and shrimp, are under threat. Exporters are "optimistic" that India may be able to carve out a bilateral agreement on the "trade side at least", Ajay Sahai, Director General of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations, told AFP. But he added that it was "quite a fluid situation", suggesting one outcome could see the deadline extended, given that India is "constructively engaged" with Washington. "The feedback which I am getting suggests positive developments either way -- and we are hopeful," he added. India's seafood industry is seeing "some amount of anxiety", but also "more reason for hope", said KN Raghavan, Secretary General, Seafood Exporters Association of India. He did not give details, but said a "solution appears to be in the anvil". US officials have been upbeat about the prospect of an agreement. Trump on Tuesday raised the possibility of an agreement, saying it is "going to be a different kind of a deal". "It's going to be a deal where we're able to go in and compete," he added. "Right now, India doesn't accept anybody in. I think India is going to do that, and if they do that, we're going to have a deal for much less tariffs." His Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said last month that a pact could be expected in the "not too distant future". However, Indian media reports on Tuesday, quoting unnamed sources, struck a more neutral tone, saying negotiators were still working to resolve key differences that had cropped up during talks. An Indian commerce ministry official told AFP that New Delhi's unmet demands included relief from separate sectoral tariffs on steel and aluminium as well a greater access for labour-intensive exports including textiles and footwear. They have also spoken of disagreements over Washington's push to have India open up its agriculture sector and allow freer trade of American farm produce. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has said she was eager for a deal. "I'd love to have an agreement, a big, good, beautiful one; why not?" she told India's Financial Express newspaper, in an interview printed on Monday. Sitharaman, however, added that "agriculture and dairy" are the "very big red lines". Experts believe a smaller agreement is still possible ahead of the deadline. "The more likely outcome is a limited trade pact," said Ajay Srivastava of Global Trade Research Initiative, a New Delhi-based think-tank in a recent note. Srivastava said that under such a deal, India could cut tariffs on a range of industrial goods and offer limited access for US agricultural produce --- in return for Trump dropping the 26 percent levies. But he also warned that talks "may collapse" if Washington "continues to insist on opening India's core agriculture sectors or allowing entry of GMO (genetically modified organism) products". And seafood exporters remain on edge as talks go down to the wire. "Currently, exporters believe they can manage with a 10 percent tariff, as it can be absorbed. But if it goes back up to 25 percent to 30 percent levels, we could see American buyers finding alternative sources," Raghavan said. "They will find some other cheaper source," he added.
Fashion Network
42 minutes ago
- Fashion Network
After Prada 'sandal scandal', Indian brands tap heritage pride to boost sales
"Prada 0: Kolhapur 1," said an Instagram post by e-commerce website Shopkop, whose founder Rahul Parasu Kamble's open letter to Prada pointing out the footwear is "soaked in tradition" was reshared 36,000 times on social media. "I saw the controversy as a way to promote Kolhapuri," said Kamble, 33, who has seen sales of sandals he sources from local artisans touch 50,000 rupees ($584) in three days, five times the average. Social media has been abuzz in recent days with criticism and sarcastic memes, with politicians, artisans and a trade body demanding due credit to Indian heritage. Prada has said it will arrange follow-up meetings with artisans. In a statement to Reuters on Tuesday, it added the Italian group intends to make the sandals in India in collaboration with local manufacturers, if it commercialises them. India's luxury market is small but growing, with the rich splurging on Lamborghini cars and pricey watches. Prada does not have a single retail store in India and its products are usually reserved for the super rich - its men's leather sandals start retailing at $844, while Kolhapuris can be priced as low as $12. But linking of the Prada name to the Kolhapuri sandals, which are made by around 7,000 artisans, is providing a business opportunity for some. Mumbai-based Ira Soles is running new Facebook and Instagram advertisements which proclaim its $32 "Tan Handcrafted Kolhapuris just walked the ramp at Prada ... Limited stock. Global spotlight. Own a piece of what the world is applauding.". E-commerce website Niira is offering up to 50% discounts on its Kolhapuri slippers it says are "rooted in tradition". Its sales of $18 sandals, that looked like the one Prada showcased in Milan, have tripled, founder Nishant Raut said. "Why can't an Indian Kolhapuri brand become as big as a Birkenstock," he said. Handmade in small factories, Kolhapuri sandals, or chappals as they are called in Hindi, are often paired with Indian attire. Similar designs are sold in big outlets of Bata India and Metro Brands, and also on Amazon and Walmart's Flipkart. In 2021, India's government said the sandals could achieve $1 billion a year in exports. Though latest estimates are not available, artisans say the business has struggled as consumers increasingly opt for more fashionable, upmarket footwear. Still, the Prada controversy is breathing new life into a craft that Lalit Gandhi, president of Maharashtra's main industry lobby group, says is "a dying art". Gandhi said he is in talks with Prada to develop a co-branded, limited-edition sandal. Kolhapur craftsmen Ashok Doiphode, 50, is pinning hopes on a Prada boost. He hand-stitches sandals for nine hours daily but can sell a pair for just 400 rupees ($5). "If big companies like Prada come, craftsman like me can get a good price."
