Winnipeg: not the city it was
I grew up in rural Manitoba and moved to Winnipeg in 1978. I was in my early teens. Coming from a village with a population of 500, Winnipeg was my New York City: bright lights and excitement, non-stop places to go and things to do. Spending time downtown on Saturdays, meeting friends for breakfast, going shopping, seeing movies, that was the life. Downtown Winnipeg was the place to be. For many years I felt safe, and I loved this city.
I never had a driver's licence. Just because we can doesn't mean we should, and I know I would have been a terrible driver. So instead I took the bus for 42 years and was quite familiar with the city routes. I got around well on my own most of the time, but then things started to change. A lot.
In the mid 2000s I stopped facilitating the Finding Your Voice writing program for newcomers at the Millennium Library because taking the bus home alone at night had become terrifying. From the Graham Avenue bus stop I experienced different levels of fear, for myself and for others, on an all-too-frequent basis. Assaults were commonplace. I had to seek assistance from various groups, organizations, and authorities more times than I wish to remember.
JOHN WOODS / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS
A 71 bus passes a bus shack on Portage Avenue at Burnell.
'Is this normal?' I'd ask myself. The same way I did growing up in a household where alcoholism and violence were normalized, I couldn't help but wonder why so many of us humans find ways to justify and explain it away.
Desperate people do desperate things. Hurt people hurt people. Everyone has a story. It's a lot of the content I'd include in my programs for refugees and immigrants new to the city. But after a while I couldn't answer the questions from those I was mentoring and teaching.
Why are so many struggling and suffering?
Why aren't the people able to get help?
Why do we have to live in fear?
Why is it that when we begin to ask questions we are labelled in all kinds of ways?
On a winter's day in 2020, I decided I'd had enough and would never get on a bus again.
By that point I'd witnessed everything from yelling and screaming to violent pushing and shoving. I'd experienced sexual advances, having someone fall over me in a seat, and someone behind me pass out on my shoulder. I'd seen bodily excretions that included vomit, blood and excrement. (The excrement was significant in quantity and the bus driver had to get to the bus station so passengers could get on a different bus.)
Those are just a few of the highlights, but on that day after my shift as a writing tutor at the Red River College downtown campus, I got on the packed bus. It was late morning. A man forcefully shoved me to where he wanted to go and began verbally abusing a woman and child beside us.
At that moment I said never again.
I got off the bus and walked home. It was a 45-minute walk in the cold. But I couldn't take it anymore. I still think of that woman and child years later, and all the others I helplessly watched over the years.
Since then, I haven't taken another bus. I walk or rely on friends for rides. I'm in my early 60s now. I'm lucky because I can still walk to get around.
It's not really socially or politically acceptable to talk about these things anymore, so I've refrained from writing about the topic the way I used to. But at my age, I'm not as worried about what people say. I'm much more concerned about trying to help bring change to where change is screaming to happen.
I've been told it's like this in every city and in every neighbourhood.
I've been advised to volunteer more.
It's been suggested that maybe I'm too sensitive or I attract these incidents.
Perhaps my trauma-informed life brings them to me.
I have tons of empathy for people, and more than an awareness of the complexities of mental health issues and addictions. My own anxiety levels have skyrocketed as a result of what I've experienced on the streets of downtown Winnipeg and in my former home in Lord Roberts, but that's another story, for another time.
Tuesdays
A weekly look at politics close to home and around the world.
I feel awful for those who struggle and suffer, including those who don't feel safe anymore. I don't know what I'd do if I didn't have a partner with a vehicle. My world would be really small.
Winnipeg has changed dramatically. People need resources desperately.
We don't need expensive studies and conferences in fancy hotels. We don't need reviews or updates or statements from politicians. We need action.
Winnipeg is in pain. The people need help and they need it now.
Janine LeGal is a local freelance writer, community activist, life-long member of Amnesty International and volunteer who has dedicated her life to ensuring that everyone has a voice.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
5 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Winnipeg libraries take huge hit from lost, unreturned items
Perched on the stone ledge outside the Millennium Library, a lifelong reader settles into his next book. John, 71, has loved the library as long as he can remember, having popped in once a week for years. On Friday, he checked out a backpack's worth of hardcover sci-fi and fantasy novels. Even he has, at least once, been fined for losing a library book. 'I tried to replace it, and they wouldn't take it, they wanted the one that I took out,' he joked. MALAK ABAS / FREE PRESS John, 71, loves a good book. He's taken out hundreds from the library, and admits he's lost at least one. He's not the only one. Records released under FIPPA show the cost of Winnipeg Public Library material marked 'lost' or 'not returned' increased exponentially from 2020 to 2024. The lowest-cost loss in those years was in 2021, when the library lost $77,519 worth of material. In 2024, the most recent data available, city libraries had their highest yearly loss, $212,832. The amount doesn't include material that has been removed due to wear and tear. When told about the dollar amounts, John shrugs. The library could do more to prevent losses, he said, but he guesses that the numbers reflect more and more people enjoying the library, as the cost to buy books gets higher. 'I make sure I return books in good condition. I mean, I like books, and I think the library's a great place,' said John, who didn't want to give his surname. 'If there wasn't the library, a lot of people wouldn't be reading. It's so expensive to buy a book at the drug store or something.' Provincial data show Winnipeg Public Library branches have nearly 900,000 print items, 43,337 audio items, and 43,606 video items, along with a number of digital, serial and miscellaneous material. The operating expenditures for physical material was $1.66 million in 2024. Pam McKenzie, a communications officer with the City of Winnipeg, said a number of changes in the past five years that could be responsible for the increase in lost and not returned items: closures due to COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021, the post-pandemic spike in borrowed material, the removal of fines for late returns as of Jan. 1, 2021 (although charges are imposed for lost or damaged items). Some libraries have expanded hours over the past five years and inflation has resulted in library items being more costly. While most Winnipeg library items are returned on time, the items most often not returned are adult non-fiction book, DVDs, and video games. 'Providing access to material and information are core library services,' McKenzie said in a statement. 'We encourage all customers to return their items so they can be enjoyed by others.' If an item is overdue by 21 days, its cost is charged to the cardholder, and the charge is removed once they return it. If a reader owes $50 or more, or if they have 10 or more overdue items, their card is suspended. Depending on the situation, the account could be sent to a collections agency. At the South Central Regional Library, which includes rural branches in Altona, Manitou, Miami, Morden, and Winkler, fines for late materials still exist. They send out automatic billing notices when a book is late, but will refund the cost if it's returned within three months. It's relatively rare for a book not to make it back after that, said SCRL director Cathy Ching. 'It has definitely dropped the amount of payments we have received on lost books, because people want their money back,' she said. 'When you have to pay full price for a hardcover book, it makes you look a little harder.' Fines total $20,000 a year for the seven libraries, Ching said, which is spent on programs. The SCRL faced threats of defunding over books about sex and gender education in their libraries in 2023. Ching said some cardholders would take out controversial books and refuse to return them during that time, choosing to pay the fine instead in hopes of permanently removing it from their collection, but library staff would use the funds to purchase the book again. One book for young adults, Sex is a Funny Word by Cory Silverburg, was taken and re-purchased multiple times. Another recent rash of missing library books had a common theme — they were all paperbacks with relatively steamy front covers. Wednesdays What's next in arts, life and pop culture. 'It really is a matter of trust to go to the counter with whatever you want to read and put it there,' Ching said with a laugh. The SCRL has one of the highest ratio of population to active users in Manitoba. Just over 70 per cent of their collective population of 46,665 people uses the library. Ching said all libraries, in Winnipeg or otherwise, share a sense of pride in maintaining their collections. 'It doesn't matter the size of your library, you're proud of what you offer people, and you want to be able to offer the best services you can with the budget you have,' she said. '(It) doesn't matter if your budget's large or small, it's ownership. You look after your collection like your children, sometimes.' Malak AbasReporter Malak Abas is a city reporter at the Free Press. Born and raised in Winnipeg's North End, she led the campus paper at the University of Manitoba before joining the Free Press in 2020. Read more about Malak. Every piece of reporting Malak produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Winnipeg Free Press
17-07-2025
- Winnipeg Free Press
Winnipeg Transit redesign leaves the North End behind
Opinion I have fond memories of my first bus pass. The sense of freedom was unparalleled, and I'm sure my mother appreciated not having to drive me to work anymore. Here in Winnipeg, we pride ourselves on raising hardy kids. It's the kind of grit you need to survive. But even the hardiest among us shouldn't have to walk six blocks to a bus stop in the pitch dark while the wind cuts through like a knife. If the people who designed the new Winnipeg Transit system had ever waited for a bus at Redwood and Main in January, they might have thought twice. The new Primary Transit Network has been framed as an efficiency upgrade. For those of us living in the North End, it feels like something else entirely, something more akin to abandonment. JOHN WOODS / FREE PRESS Transit changes that were put in place on June 29 seem to have left some neighbourhoods behind. Transit service has been cut or reduced in many of the areas where it is most needed. The 17, 38, and 71 routes, among others, were either eliminated or significantly rerouted. Dozens of stops were removed from Main Street alone, with the FX2 and FX3 replacing frequent local service with limited-stop express buses that often bypass residential pockets entirely. Transfers are now unavoidable. For those with options, this might be inconvenient. For many of us, it's disruptive. For some, it's disabling. In some North End neighbourhoods, over 30 per cent of households don't own a vehicle. Walking long distances to transfer points, especially in winter, isn't just difficult, it can be dangerous. The city removed approximately 1,700 bus stops during the redesign, and while officials have not released a public breakdown by neighbourhood, riders in the North End have reported a disproportionate loss of coverage. Main Street alone lost numerous stops, and key transfer points like Redwood and Main were eliminated without alternatives nearby. Riders have noted having to walk multiple blocks further, often in areas without sidewalks or shelters. Meanwhile, the new network prioritizes high-frequency routes along major corridors, many of which run through the south and southwest. The Blue Line, Winnipeg's flagship rapid transit spine, cuts through Fort Garry and south Pembina, areas with stronger economic growth and higher rates of car ownership. The network now extends all the way to St. Norbert. The expansion of service into new suburban areas raises a serious and uncomfortable question: how many stops were eliminated in the inner city and North End to make that possible? What did we sacrifice to serve sprawl? City officials point out that the network redesign was service-hour neutral, meaning the total hours of service citywide remain roughly the same. But equity isn't measured in aggregate hours. It's not about giving everyone the same thing. It's about giving people what they need. Equality would give every neighbourhood a bus. Equity recognizes that some neighbourhoods need more buses because they have fewer cars, fewer alternatives, and more people depending on public transit to survive. Winnipeg Transit's weekday ridership reached an average of 225,400 in early 2025, and the system recorded 47.8 million rides in 2024, nearly back to pre-pandemic levels. But that 'recovery' hides real disparity. While Rapid Transit routes in the south grow and thrive, riders in the North End are watching their service evaporate. And when ridership drops in these communities, as it inevitably does when stops vanish and routes are broken, they'll be blamed for it. We also need to talk about the role of political leadership in all this. Mayor Scott Gillingham, during his time as chair of the finance committee under then-mayor Brian Bowman, supported multi-year budgets that effectively froze or reduced transit funding when adjusted for inflation. These budget decisions constrained Winnipeg Transit's ability to hire operators, replace aging buses, or expand service. Fast forward a few years, and Gillingham now expresses concern over declining ridership and system gaps, as if he hadn't played a central role in underfunding the system in the first place. You can't gut a service and then act surprised when it fails to meet public need. I keep coming back to the question, why did our city councillors allow this to move forward? Especially those representing wards like Point Douglas, Mynarski, and Elmwood-East Kildonan. Did they not see what this would do to their constituents? The Winnipeg Transit Master Plan was approved in 2021, and revised in early 2025 after feedback. Yet many residents say they were never informed or consulted meaningfully. Public meetings were held, but largely online, and mostly attended by more affluent users. Those most affected had the least opportunity to shape the outcome. There is currently no publicly available data showing how stop removals were distributed across neighbourhoods. If the city is confident this plan serves all of Winnipeg fairly, they should release stop-level data and let the public see for themselves. Wednesdays Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture. Until then, it falls to community members and advocates to track what was lost. A simple overlay of the old and new network maps, if allowed through GIS data, would quickly reveal where access was cut, and ultimately, who paid the price. This isn't about nostalgia for an older system. It's about whether a public service still serves the public. The Transit Master Plan talks about building a 'resilient and equitable' system. But in execution, the city has privileged efficiency over access, and growth corridors over existing communities. If equity was ever on the table, it didn't survive implementation. Transit can be modern. It can be fast and efficient. But if it isn't fair, it isn't working. And right now, it's not working for the North End. MJ Jonasson is a Winnipeg-based thinker and advocate for community-driven change. With a background in advocacy, Indigenous social innovation, and social entrepreneurship, she collaborates with communities to develop meaningful solutions that challenge systemic inequities.
Winnipeg Free Press
27-06-2025
- Winnipeg Free Press
Route-and-branch transit overhaul maps city's devolution
Opinion 10 Wolseley. 11 Portage. 12 William. 14 Ellice. 15 Mountain. 16 Osborne. 17 MacGregor. 18 Corydon. 19 Notre Dame. 20 Academy… Until this week, I hadn't realized I could recite just about the full set of Winnipeg Transit routes and numbers by memory. Alas, this newly discovered party trick is destined to go unused as we bury these routes with the streetcar tracks they were originally designed to follow, the veins through a city that are remnants of a time when a much more closely-packed citizenry all needed the same things, and all of which were available in the heart of the city. JOHN WOODS / FREE PRESS FILES The revamped routes seek to deliver better commute times and less waiting to transfer in an effort to draw more users, but the Transit overhaul fails to give dedicated car users reason to get out of their vehicles. I have mixed feelings about this evolution. Obviously, changes are needed to transit. Declining ridership and rising safety issues are clear indicators that it's not fulfilling its role of getting us where we need to go. But the days of jumping on the bus for all of our needs are behind us. Even if we wanted to go shopping downtown, we largely couldn't, as there's nowhere left to shop. A short walk down Portage or Graham will yield empty shopfront after empty shopfront. The mammoth department stores of two generations ago are gone, and many of the destinations that would have drawn us are now parking lots haunted by the ghosts of Winnipeggers past and the cars of Winnipeg present. I'm worried our transit overhaul reflects our devolution, instead of our evolution, as a city. It seems to be a reflection and acceptance of our problematic sprawl. With nothing to bump into on the outside margins of our town, we have nothing stopping us from expanding ever outward, trenching new sewer lines and paving new roads while the older ones rot and crumble, building new houses while addresses in older neighbourhoods are left as burnt skeletons or piles of rubble for months on end. Transit has been slow to extend service into newer areas, and inhabitants have been slow to adopt transit as a way to get around. While in some ways this redesign feels like an admission of defeat, a commitment to a future of further sprawl, it does give hope that somewhere in Winnipeg, someone involved in planning is acknowledging we cannot go on just waiting for our boomtown days to come back while more and more of our citizenry are making homes along river banks. Transit has been slow to extend service into newer areas, and inhabitants have been slow to adopt transit as a way to get around. In a rare example of cross-sector co-ordination, there are a few examples of this novel forward-thinking mindset. The city is looking at adding housing along the new 'spine' routes, even incorporating residential units into transit infrastructure. The lofty plans for Graham Avenue — a pedestrian mall and shopping district — promise to bring people downtown to socialize, shop and dine. The new routes promise quicker commutes, better coverage and short waits for transfers — all good reasons to pull someone onto the bus who hasn't considered it in some time. All in all, it's a noble effort to make a rare and radical change to Winnipeg's public services in an effort to actually serve the needs of the citizenry. But it's not going to work. These noble 'pull' reasons to take the bus will fail if there aren't balanced and co-ordinated 'push' incentives to get people out of their cars. Wednesdays Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture. We cannot simply emphasize the perks of taking the bus without also making driving more unattractive, and we are a woefully car-committed city. We cannot simply emphasize the perks of taking the bus without also making driving more unattractive, and we are a woefully car-committed city. The fact we're still entertaining the thought of widening Kenaston Boulevard is clear communication from the city itself that we don't believe in public transit to move people. No, we must make way for more cars instead. It's cars that move people in Winnipeg. And it's cars that occupy the ever-expanding network of surface parking lots in our downtown: cheap, plentiful spaces have made driving to work easy and comfortable. Why would anyone take the bus where there is very little advantage? Transit is not just failing because the product itself isn't working well. It's failing because our city has planned for it to fail. There is no outcome for transit, in the current design of this city, that will strengthen its utility and usage, because we haven't considered factors beyond the service itself. It's clear the reliability and safety of transit must be improved, and some of that will be addressed by the changes that go into effect tomorrow, but until the infrastructure surrounding car use makes it preferable, I can't imagine I'll be memorizing many new route numbers. Rebecca Chambers Rebecca explores what it means to be a Winnipegger by layering experiences and reactions to current events upon our unique and sometimes contentious history and culture. Her column appears alternating Saturdays. Read full biography Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
