
US wine sellers and bars nervously wait for tariff decision: ‘It's a sad situation'
Under normal circumstances, Randall Bush, the founder of Loci Wine in Chicago, would have already arranged with his European partners to gather these wines in Le Havre, the last stop before they are loaded into containers and shipped across the Atlantic. But these wines won't be arriving stateside anytime soon.
After the Trump administration threatened on 13 March to impose 200% tariffs on alcoholic products from Europe, many US importers like Bush have halted all outgoing shipments from Europe.
The 1,100 cases of his wine, from family-owned producers in his company's modest European portfolio, have already been paid for. But due to the tariff threat, they will remain stranded at their respective domaines at least until 2 April when the Trump administration is expected to reveal a 'reciprocal tariff number' for each of its global trading partners.
The newfound uncertainty around tariffs has many restaurant owners, beverage directors, liquor distributors and wine importers on edge in recent weeks. The only certainty among the trade professionals interviewed is that a 200% tariff would be catastrophic for the wine and spirits industry globally. And while most believe the actual number will end up much lower, everyone agrees that even modest tariffs would send shock waves throughout the entire food and beverage ecosystem, weakening distribution channels and further driving up already astronomical prices.
'What scares me is how these hypothetical tariffs would affect [the many] European-themed restaurants like French bistros, Italian trattorias and German beer halls,' said Richard Hanauer, wine director and partner with Lettuce Entertain You. The Chicago-based group owns, manages and licenses more than 130 restaurants and 60 brands in a dozen different states and Washington DC. Hanauer predicts that concept-driven eateries that rely on European products would have to source wine and spirits from other regions because 'the consumer is not going to accept the markup'.
Even though Trump has been known to walk back dubious claims about tariffs before, the wine and spirits industry is taking this recent threat very seriously. Most American importers, such as Loci's Bush, are adhering to the US Wine Trade Alliance's (USWTA) guidance issued in mid-March warning its members to cease wine shipments from Europe. Without guarantees that any potential tariffs would come with a notice period or exemptions for wines shipped prior to their announcement, the organization had no choice but to advise its constituents to halt all EU wine shipments.
'Once the wine is on the water, we have no power,' said Bush. 'We're billed by our shippers as soon as the wine arrives.'
Tariffs are import taxes incurred by the importer and paid as a percentage of the value of the freight at the point of entry upon delivery. Since shipments from Europe can often take up to six to eight weeks to arrive, firms like Loci face the predicament of not knowing how much they will owe to take delivery of their products when they reach US ports.
'We've had many US importers tell us that even a 50% unplanned tariff could bankrupt their businesses, so we felt we had no choice,' said Benjamin Aneff, president of the USWTA, of the organization's injunction. 'It's a sad situation. These are mostly small, family-owned businesses.'
Europe's wineries can also ill afford to be dragged into a trade war with the United States. According to the International Trade Center, the US comprises almost 20% of the EU's total wine exports, accounting for a total of $14.1bn (€13.1bn) of exported beverage, spirit and vinegar products from the EU in 2024.
Many independent importers still recall Trump levying $7.5bn of tariffs on exports from the EU during his first presidency, which included 25% duties on Scotch whiskey, Italian cheeses, certain French wines and other goods. These retaliatory measures, which took effect in October 2019, resulted from a years-long trade dispute between the US and the EU over airline subsidies.
'We were hit with duties in late 2019. But we negotiated with a lot of our suppliers, so we were able to stave off any significant price increases,' said André Tamers, the founder of De Maison Selections, a fine-wine importer with a large portfolio of French and Spanish wines and spirits. But because the Covid-19 pandemic hit shortly thereafter, Tamers admitted, it was difficult to gauge the impact of the first round of Trump tariffs. The Biden administration eventually rescinded the measures in June 2021.
To pre-empt any potentially disastrous news on the tariff front, many restaurants and bars are ramping up inventory purchases to the extent that their budgets allow. 'We made some large commitments for rosé season,' said Grant Reynolds, co-founder of Parcelle, which has an online wine shop as well as two bars and a bricks-and-mortar retail outlet in Manhattan. 'To whatever we can reasonably afford, we've decided to secure those commitments sooner than later so that we can better weather the storm.'
The same is true for many cocktail-focused bars around the country, which are looking to shore up supplies of popular spirits that could end up a victim of tariffs, including allocated scotches and rare cognacs.
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
'If it becomes very apparent that these tariffs are going to go live, we could be looking at dropping close to $100,000 on inventory just to insulate ourselves because it will save us so much money over the next six months,' said Deke Dunne, beverage director of Washington DC's award-winning cocktail bar Allegory. 'It will have to be a game-time decision, though, because the last thing I want to do is to buy up a lot of inventory I don't need.' Hanauer said that he's seen some vendors offering wine buyers heavy discounts and incentives to stockpile cases of European products to prepare for the possibility of onerous tariffs.
One bar owner feeling a little less panic compared with his industry counterparts is Fred Beebe, co-owner of Post Haste, a sustainability-minded cocktail bar in Philadelphia. Since it opened in 2023, Post Haste eschews imported spirits of any kind; the bar is stocked exclusively with US products from east of the Mississippi River. 'We always thought it would be advantageous to have our producers close to us for environmental reasons and to support the local economy,' said Beebe, 'but we didn't necessarily think that it would also benefit from fluctuations in distribution or global economic policy.'
Instead of serving popular European liquor brands such as Grey Goose vodka or Hendrick's gin, the bar highlights local craft distillers such as Maggie's Farm in Pittsburgh, which produces a domestic rum made from Louisiana sugar cane. After the recent tariff threats, Beebe says, the decision to rely on local products has turned out to be fortuitous. 'I feel really bad for anyone who is running an agave-based program, a tequila or mezcal bar,' said Beebe. 'They must be worried constantly about whether the price of all of their products are going to go up by 25% to 50%.'
On the importing side, there is agreement that this is an inopportune moment for the wine industry to face new headwinds. Wine consumption has steadily declined in the United States in recent years as gen Z and millennial consumers are turning to cannabis, hard seltzers and spirits such as tequila, or simply embracing sobriety in greater numbers.
'Unfortunately, the reality is that wine consumption was already down before this compared to what it was five years ago,' said Reynolds. 'This obviously doesn't help that. So, with more tariffs, you would start to see a greater shift of behaviors away from drinking wine.'
But despite slumping sales and the impending tariff threats, niche importers like Tamers say they have little choice but to stay the course. 'You leave yourself vulnerable, but if you don't buy wine, then you don't have any wine to sell. So, it's a double-edged sword,' he said. 'Our customers are still asking for these products, so there's not much else we can do.'
Aneff hopes that commonsense negotiations will lead to both parties divorcing alcohol tariffs from other trade disputes over aluminum, steel and digital services.
'I do have some hope for a potential sectoral agreement on wine, and perhaps spirits, which would benefit domestic producers and huge numbers of small businesses on both sides of the Atlantic,' he said. 'I can't think of anything that would bring more joy to people's glasses than ensuring free trade on wine.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
11 minutes ago
- Metro
Trump ally running for office representing Georgia spells it wrong in ad campaig
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video A pro-Trump lawmaker running for the Senate embarrassingly misspelled the name of his own state in his ad campaign. Congressman Mike Collins of Georgia unveiled a 38-second video that starts with him saying that 'this place is broken, out of touch Democrats like our two US senators who fight harder for MS-13 gang members than they will nursing students at UGA (University of Georgia)'. His voiceover on the clip continues that 'we've got to be absolutely unrelenting, we've got to be unafraid to fight', with footage of a 'truckers for Trump' MAGA hat. It then has audio of President Donald Trump saying, 'Mike Collins, great job you're doing'. The ad posted on X (formerly Twitter) on Sunday wraps up with Collins saying he is going to 'put the hammer down' and 'we're going to get it done'. It ends with an American flag-inspired truck logo and the slogan: 'Georiga, Let's Ride'. That glaring misspelling of Georgia was quickly ridiculed by social media users, but it was still on Collins' campaign X account @TeamOverhaulGA as of Wednesday. 'Take it down! Quick,' wrote an X user who shared a screengrab of the 'Georiga' gaffe. Another wrote: 'Where is Georiga?' 'GEORIGA needs you!' quipped another user. Collins' campaign shared a video on Monday on YouTube, but without the botched slogan. More Trending Currently representing Georgia's 10th congressional district, Collins, 58, is challenging Democratic Senator Jon Ossoff in next year's race. Collins has branded himself as an avid supporter of Trump. Collins co-owns a family trucking firm. It is not the first time that a Republican running for office has had a fumble around the Peach State. In September 2024, Trump's campaign ran ads on Facebook and Instagram targeting the swing state, that featured lush rolling hills that were actually from the Eastern European country of Georgia. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: How 8.8-magnitude earthquake and tsunamis are causing major flight disruption worldwide MORE: Boeing 787 Dreamliner narrowly avoided crash after engine failure MORE: Donald Trump 'seriously considering' a presidential pardon for Sean 'Diddy' Combs


New Statesman
11 minutes ago
- New Statesman
The conflicts that shape us
One of the pleasures of editing this magazine is the chance to read the letters. The wit, wisdom and – how should I put this? – advice I receive each week is mighty, and appreciated. It is genuinely helpful to know what New Statesman readers are thinking: what they like in each issue and what they are less keen on. It is, for example, particularly revealing that Jonathan Sumption's essay on Gaza continues to provoke impassioned debate on both sides. The ongoing crisis in Gaza – and the British government's response – is clearly something we must continue to focus on. This week, our international editor, Megan Gibson, digs into the authoritarian instincts of the government's decision to classify the campaign group Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation. It is a disconcerting read. There is plenty of humour in the letters inbox, too. This week, I especially enjoyed Michael Henderson's note hailing the delights of Italian culture following Finn McRedmond's dispatch from Chianti last week. 'It is indeed a magnificent culture,' Michael wrote, before adding a delightfully controversial 'but' – there is always a but. When it comes to 'ale vs Sangiovese', as Michael put it, 'the English win every time'. By publishing these words, I fear I may have sparked a diplomatic incident. A letter of protest from the Italian ambassador is no doubt already winging its way to us. If so, perhaps I should provoke further – can we agree Cheddar is superior to Parmesan, and nicer on pasta? That cheese with fish is fine? And Marmite, of course, is king of all European condiments? I shall now assume the brace position under my desk. Beyond such culinary disputes, readers have also urged a greater focus on class as the driving force of British politics. I agree, and hope in the coming weeks we will be able to do more on this subject. The very question of what constitutes the 'working class' today is a fascinating topic. I remember visiting Ohio in an attempt to understand why working-class auto workers were abandoning the Democratic Party for Donald Trump. Yet, when I visited their homes, I found many had often already retired with good pensions and no mortgage. Some even spent winters in their second homes in Florida. The very poor in the cities I visited were often African American, did not own their homes and were still voting Democrat. The story, as ever, was complicated. I wonder whether it is fair to assume the university-educated children of middle England inherit their parents' class, even if they do not own assets, cannot conceive of ever doing so and, as Marx might have put it, sell their labour for increasingly poor wages. Are they middle class or part of a new working class? One thing is clear: the lure of a new left-wing party under Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana is strong for this cohort, who should not be ignored – a point made by Jason Cowley in his Diary. The main subject of this week's magazine, however, is the growing sense of unease in the country as we head into the depths of summer. As George Eaton writes, there is now real concern in Westminster at the continuing strike action over NHS pay, mounting fiscal pressure on the government and the spreading protests over so-called asylum hotels. I said when I became editor that I wanted the New Statesman to cover difficult topics like these with old-fashioned reportage – doing the hard work of travelling the country and talking to people. That is exactly what Anoosh Chakelian has done this week, visiting Diss in Norfolk and Epping in Essex to understand what is happening and why. As ever, her reporting is first-rate: thoughtful, compassionate and illuminating. I urge you to read it. Sitting alongside this is another piece of excellent writing from our new culture editor, Tanjil Rashid, who argues that the government must be prepared to have difficult conversations if resolution and integration are to be reached. Elsewhere, Will Lloyd meets a man still searching for justice after the Battle of Orgreave, Freddie Hayward details the continuing radicalisation of the Maga movement in Washington and Will Dunn offers a painfully funny – and at times just plain painful – account of King-Emperor Donald Trump's bizarre visit to Scotland. I hope you enjoy it. If you don't, the Correspondence page is all yours. Oh, and here's one for Finn: a pint of Theakston's beats a pint of Guinness. And now I'm back under my desk. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Related This article appears in the 30 Jul 2025 issue of the New Statesman, Summer of Discontent


Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
Republican US Senator Grassley clashes with Trump over nominations
July 30 (Reuters) - U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley said on Wednesday he was "offended" and "disappointed" by President Donald Trump's social media posts targeting him for refusing to end a custom that allows Democratic senators to effectively veto new nominees to serve as judges and prosecutors in their states. At the start of a Senate Judiciary hearing on four of Trump's judicial nominees, Grassley, an Iowa Republican, took issue with the president's call late Tuesday on his social media platform Truth Social for an end to the so-called "blue slip" process in the Republican-led Senate. Senators by custom must return blue slips, named for the color of the form, in order for any district court or U.S. attorney nominees from their states to advance and receive a hearing before the committee. Trump in a post on Tuesday called on Grassley to have the "COURAGE" to end "hoax" and "scam" blue slips, which he said are allowing Senate Democrats to "have an ironclad stoppage of Great Republican Candidates" to serve as judges and U.S. attorneys. Trump then early Wednesday reposted messages from Truth Social users focused on the 91-year-old senator's age and encouraging him to comply with Trump's wishes. "I was offended by what the president said, and I'm disappointed that it would result in personal insults," Grassley said. The custom has allowed senators in both parties to block nominees they opposed in their home states and ensure the White House consults with them to find acceptable picks. Senator Dick Durbin, the committee's top Democrat, during Democratic President Joe Biden's tenure resisted calls by progressive advocates to do away with blue slips when he chaired the panel. He thanked Grassley for likewise standing by the custom. "I hope it continues to be the case," he said. Grassley responded: "Yes." Trump's tirade came after New Jersey U.S. Senators Cory Booker and Andy Kim, both Democrats, effectively blocked the nomination of Alina Habba, the president's former personal lawyer, to serve as their state's top federal prosecutor by refusing to return blue slips. After judges in New Jersey also declined to appoint her to the position of U.S. attorney, the Trump administration withdrew her nomination and pursued a new maneuver to keep her in the job in an acting capacity that included firing the prosecutor whom a federal court had tapped to replace her.