logo
Did Donald Trump just give China a major advantage on AI?

Did Donald Trump just give China a major advantage on AI?

Last month, the Trump administration quietly reversed one of its own policies by lifting a ban on US tech giant Nvidia's H20 microchip exports to China.
For anyone who has followed Donald Trump's erratic record on trade, another U-turn might not sound like a notable development.
But this time, the stakes are much higher because these microchips are critical to powering the next generation of artificial intelligence.
Whichever country dominates microchip production will likely lead the global AI race, with massive implications for military strategy and economic output.
For nearly three years, the US has tried to keep these powerful chips out of China's hands.
Now, by reopening the door, has Mr Trump handed Beijing a major advantage on AI?
We spoke to three experts to explain how we got here.
Back in April, the Trump administration banned H20 microchip exports to China, toughening restrictions put in place by the Biden administration. It has since reversed that decision.
According to Jason Van Der Schyff, a fellow at Australian Strategic Policy Institute's technology and security program, this backflip may be in response to the booming black market demand for high-powered US chips in China.
"Over a billion dollars worth of restricted chips were smuggled into China in just a few months," he said.
"The reversal may be a pivot by the administration, recognising if you don't offer a legal channel for the slightly degraded chips, buyers will simply go around you."
Professor Shahriar Akter, who specialises in the study of advanced analytics and AI at the University of Wollongong said this move seems to follow "a philosophy in Silicon Valley that if you sell more" it will pour more back into "your research and development".
Associate Professor in Information Systems at Curtin University, Mohammad Hossain, suggested the Trump administration is trying to kill two birds with one stone.
The US is trying to maintain leverage in a broader geopolitical trade-off involving China's critical exports, rare earth elements, while "keeping China dependent on US technology", he said.
Nvidia is the tech giant behind these highly sought after microchips and it is led by CEO Jensen Huang who is the ninth-richest man in the world.
The H20 is a step-down from Nvidia's top-tier chips (H100 and B200) and was specifically designed to comply with US export restrictions while catering to the Chinese market.
"Basically, [H100 and B200 chips] can do things much faster than the H20," Mr Van Der Schyff said.
"If we consider how quickly AI is moving any impediment that could be brought to time more than anything is going to maintain that US strategic advantage."
While the H20 is less powerful, Mr Van Der Schyff warns that "these aren't toys … even slightly downgraded chips still enable model training at scale".
"If you're concerned about national security, letting an adversary access chips that are only one rung down the ladder still poses a strategic risk."
While the US hopes to stall China's progress in artificial intelligence, experts warn this strategy may have the opposite effect.
China's push to dominate AI is already underway and restricting exports to only H20 chips incentivises them to accelerate domestic developments.
"At present in the world, 50 per cent of AI researchers are being produced by China alone," Dr Akter said.
Chinese tech giants like Huawei and Biren Technology have been ramping up their own AI accelerators.
"Huawei's chips are already being deployed in major training clusters," Mr Van Der Schyff said.
Still, China's domestic developments trail behind industry leaders like Taiwan's TSMC and South Korea's Samsung when it comes to cutting-edge manufacturing.
"There isn't necessarily a danger that China catches up overnight but these restrictions do however give Beijing a clear incentive to sort of go all in on industrial policy for their own semiconductors to accelerate domestic progress," Mr Van Der Schyff said.
"We've seen this play out previously with 5G and also with aviation."
All three experts cautioned that it's difficult to gauge China's true AI capabilities.
"Given the closed nature of China's systems and their propensity to not always tell us the truth", it's unclear how much China's artificial intelligence has developed, Mr Van Der Schyff said.
Dr Akter used an analogy to explain the uncertainty: "There are two types of AI technologies", one is called glass box and the other is called black box.
"Glass box technology is basically explainable AI, which is open source and we can explain where data is coming from and how it is being used to develop AI models and what would be the outcome."
Whereas, black box technology is the opposite, we cannot trace back to the source of the data and we cannot tell what models have been used.
That opacity makes it difficult for the rest of the world to assess whether Beijing is playing catch-up or quietly pulling ahead.
The country that has the upper hand in microchip production will likely lead the global AI race and that has significant repercussions, experts said.
"The country that dominates compute will dominate AI, and AI will shape everything from military planning to economic productivity."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Firing people can't save Trump from the US economy's unflattering reality
Firing people can't save Trump from the US economy's unflattering reality

Sydney Morning Herald

time23 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Firing people can't save Trump from the US economy's unflattering reality

In response, a group of statistical agencies that goes by the name The Friends of the Bureau of Labour Statistics released its own, more factual, statement that read: 'This escalates the President's unprecedented attack on the independence and integrity of the federal statistical system. The President seeks to blame someone for unwelcome news,' it said. It's also worth noting that the group statement was issued by William Beach, who was McEntarfer's Trump-appointed predecessor at the bureau. It's hard to overstate what Trump has done. Imagine if Anthony Albanese decided to sack the nation's chief statistician because the latest inflation data was not what the government wanted. There would, rightly, be an outcry. Naturally, the Trump apologists have been out defending the indefensible, ignoring the fact that the bureau has always revised job numbers (up and down), no matter the occupant of the White House. Last year, while Joe Biden was still in office, the bureau revised its jobs figures between January and July down by 340,000. But the single largest downward revision came in March and April 2020, during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, when the number of jobs was cut by almost 925,000. Loading Revisions are part and parcel of what the Bureau of Labour Statistics does. Every month it updates its numbers as it receives more information. The monthly release, plus the revisions, are vital to policymakers (like the Federal Reserve) and investors so they can see how the economy is travelling in as close to real time as possible. Ever since he declared a record crowd at his 2017 inauguration, Trump and reality have been at odds. In the grand scheme of things, crowd size does not really matter. But using a Sharpie to extend the expected landfall of a hurricane, gutting agencies responsible for tracking climate change, and ignoring employment data have very real consequences. Economists and policymakers have, for years, been worried about the statistics coming out of nations where the political leaders meddle with the numbers. In Argentina during the 1990s, the government fired bureaucrats who released less-than-flattering inflation figures and began releasing their own (sound familiar?). Understandably, this made international investors wary and increase their premiums as protection. By 2001, the government was in a full-blown debt crisis and defaulted on $US93 billion of debt. Greece, Turkey, Russia and China have also tried to play fast and loose with statistics over the years. It got to such a point in the case of China that outside economists used electricity consumption or satellite pictures taken at night (to see artificial light) as a de facto measure of GDP because their trust in the official numbers was so low. As financial analyst Ned Davis told The Wall Street Journal, ' Your initial thought is, 'Are we heading toward what you see in Latin America or Turkey, where if the data doesn't look good, you fire someone, and then eventually stop reporting it?'' Just a few days before McEntarfer's sacking, Trump was saying how great the economy was travelling – and demanding the Federal Reserve cut interest rates because it was going so well. Of course, the GDP figures did not show that (growth is slowing while inflation, at 2.7 per cent, is above the Fed's 2 per cent target rate). But Trump couldn't admit that, so he told his own story. Loading Around the same time, the president claimed that his government had cut pharmaceutical prices by '1200, 1300, 1400, 1500 per cent. I don't mean 50 per cent, I mean 1400, 1500 per cent'. And he's the one who thought the Bureau of Labour Statistics was making up numbers. The problem with making up your own numbers, or installing people who will make the numbers show what you want, is that they will be at odds with the lived experience of voters. Just as Biden struggled to convince Americans that the cost of living was getting better while they could see the price of everyday essentials going up, saying the economy is great to people lining up for unemployment benefits has a short shelf life. There's an adage used by economists to describe the models they use to understand the economy: Put crap in, and you get crap out.

Before the Bell: ASX to fall, Apple leaps, oil slides
Before the Bell: ASX to fall, Apple leaps, oil slides

AU Financial Review

time23 minutes ago

  • AU Financial Review

Before the Bell: ASX to fall, Apple leaps, oil slides

Australian shares are set to rise. Wall Street advanced helped by a near 6 per cent surge in Apple on reports its eased tensions with the Trump administration. The White House said the iPhone maker will commit to investing an additional $US100 billion into its US business. In addition, there were reports iPhones will avert new tariffs on imports from India. Apple was 5.8 per cent higher near 2.55pm, lifting its market cap back above the $US3 trillion mark. President Donald Trump said he's going to increase tariffs on India to 50 per cent, from 25 per cent because India refuses to stop buying oil from Russia. India says it needs the oil for its national security. Market highlights ASX 200 futures are pointing down 32 points or 0.4 per cent to 8774. All US prices near 2.55pm New York time. Today's agenda AMP and Light & Wonder are set to report results on Thursday. The June trade balance is scheduled for 11.30am. Across the Tasman, the RBNZ's third-quarter Survey of Expectations will be most closely followed for its inflation expectations components. Overseas, the Bank of England is widely expected to cut its key rate by 25 basis points. China is set to release its July trade balance. Top stories ASX under fire after 'ridiculous' $400m TPG mix-up | A major investor has slammed the 'continuing saga' within the exchange operator after it confused the telco with a private equity firm. | A spokesperson for India's Ministry of External Affairs called the US president's announcement 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable'. | Mining unions leapt on the proposal as a reason workers should organise, but Rio Tinto says long sick leave puts pressure on those who stay on the job.

Firing people can't save Trump from the US economy's unflattering reality
Firing people can't save Trump from the US economy's unflattering reality

The Age

time23 minutes ago

  • The Age

Firing people can't save Trump from the US economy's unflattering reality

In response, a group of statistical agencies that goes by the name The Friends of the Bureau of Labour Statistics released its own, more factual, statement that read: 'This escalates the President's unprecedented attack on the independence and integrity of the federal statistical system. The President seeks to blame someone for unwelcome news,' it said. It's also worth noting that the group statement was issued by William Beach, who was McEntarfer's Trump-appointed predecessor at the bureau. It's hard to overstate what Trump has done. Imagine if Anthony Albanese decided to sack the nation's chief statistician because the latest inflation data was not what the government wanted. There would, rightly, be an outcry. Naturally, the Trump apologists have been out defending the indefensible, ignoring the fact that the bureau has always revised job numbers (up and down), no matter the occupant of the White House. Last year, while Joe Biden was still in office, the bureau revised its jobs figures between January and July down by 340,000. But the single largest downward revision came in March and April 2020, during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, when the number of jobs was cut by almost 925,000. Loading Revisions are part and parcel of what the Bureau of Labour Statistics does. Every month it updates its numbers as it receives more information. The monthly release, plus the revisions, are vital to policymakers (like the Federal Reserve) and investors so they can see how the economy is travelling in as close to real time as possible. Ever since he declared a record crowd at his 2017 inauguration, Trump and reality have been at odds. In the grand scheme of things, crowd size does not really matter. But using a Sharpie to extend the expected landfall of a hurricane, gutting agencies responsible for tracking climate change, and ignoring employment data have very real consequences. Economists and policymakers have, for years, been worried about the statistics coming out of nations where the political leaders meddle with the numbers. In Argentina during the 1990s, the government fired bureaucrats who released less-than-flattering inflation figures and began releasing their own (sound familiar?). Understandably, this made international investors wary and increase their premiums as protection. By 2001, the government was in a full-blown debt crisis and defaulted on $US93 billion of debt. Greece, Turkey, Russia and China have also tried to play fast and loose with statistics over the years. It got to such a point in the case of China that outside economists used electricity consumption or satellite pictures taken at night (to see artificial light) as a de facto measure of GDP because their trust in the official numbers was so low. As financial analyst Ned Davis told The Wall Street Journal, ' Your initial thought is, 'Are we heading toward what you see in Latin America or Turkey, where if the data doesn't look good, you fire someone, and then eventually stop reporting it?'' Just a few days before McEntarfer's sacking, Trump was saying how great the economy was travelling – and demanding the Federal Reserve cut interest rates because it was going so well. Of course, the GDP figures did not show that (growth is slowing while inflation, at 2.7 per cent, is above the Fed's 2 per cent target rate). But Trump couldn't admit that, so he told his own story. Loading Around the same time, the president claimed that his government had cut pharmaceutical prices by '1200, 1300, 1400, 1500 per cent. I don't mean 50 per cent, I mean 1400, 1500 per cent'. And he's the one who thought the Bureau of Labour Statistics was making up numbers. The problem with making up your own numbers, or installing people who will make the numbers show what you want, is that they will be at odds with the lived experience of voters. Just as Biden struggled to convince Americans that the cost of living was getting better while they could see the price of everyday essentials going up, saying the economy is great to people lining up for unemployment benefits has a short shelf life. There's an adage used by economists to describe the models they use to understand the economy: Put crap in, and you get crap out.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store