Taoiseach ‘hopeful' of EU-US deal as tariff deadline pushed back
Micheal Martin said both sides continue to negotiate the 'fine detail' of future arrangements.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt announced on Monday that US President Donald Trump would be delaying an increase to the baseline 10% tariff rate to August 1.
Countries had been working to a Wednesday deadline to make a new deal with the Trump administration.
Speaking to the media after a phone call with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Monday, Mr Martin said: 'We remain hopeful that the US and the European Union can agree an outline agreement or framework principle agreement this week.
'There's still a number of issues to negotiated, nothing has been rejected, definitively.
'But what it does illustrate, though, that even if a framework agreement is arrived at, there would be a lot of negotiations subsequently.
'So therefore, whilst it would create some degree of clarity in terms of where we are in the short term, there would still be a number of issues outstanding in respect of that trade issue between the European Union and the United States and indeed between other countries.'
Mr Martin said he supported the Commission's position that an agreement should be reached to provide certainty to consumers, businesses and industry.
Asked if he expected a 10% baseline tariff to remain in place, the Taoiseach said: 'There are certain realities that probably will emerge from this that will have impact – and are having impact – on a number of sectors.
'But at least it gives us some sense of the landscape that we have to deal with.'
After the tariff deadline was pushed back, Tanaiste Simon Harris said this would give further time for the EU and US to reach an agreement in principle on a 'mutually beneficial agreement that works for both sides'.
In a statement, he said: 'However, it remains the position of the EU and the Irish Government that we would like to conclude discussions on a trade agreement before August 1.'
Mr Harris added: 'I remain cautiously optimistic about reaching agreement in principle on a Framework Agreement.
'I want to be clear that while it is likely there will be some form of tariffs going forward, their imposition even at a lower rate is bad for consumers, jobs, economic growth and investment.'
Ireland has consistently called for zero-for-zero tariffs in as many areas as possible.
The remaining uncertainty around pharmaceuticals remains a significant cause of concern.
Mr Harris said: 'My hope is that in the coming days and weeks both sides can work intensively and constructively to bring about an agreement.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
MTG urges Donald Trump to commute George Santos' prison sentence
Georgia Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene is calling on the Trump administration to commute the sentence of former Congressman George Santos, who was sentenced to seven years in prison earlier this year after pleading guilty to wire fraud and identity theft. ' George Santos has taken responsibility,' Greene wrote on X, sharing a letter she sent to the Justice Department's Office of the Pardon Attorney. 'He's shown remorse. It's time to correct this injustice.' 'I wholeheartedly believe in justice and the rule of the law, and I understand the gravity of such actions,' the letter reads. 'However, I believe a seven-year sentence for such campaign-related matters for an individual with no prior criminal record extends far beyond what is warranted.' Greene claimed Santos, who has sold Cameo videos speaking to fans and hosted a podcast playing on his reputation called Pants on Fire, was 'sincerely remorseful and has accepted full responsibility for his actions.' In April, Santos was sentenced to 87 months in prison for wire fraud and identity theft after pleading guilty last year and agreeing to nearly $374,000 in restitution payments. The following month, the former New York representative, who prosecutors accused of pocketing thousands of dollars in donor funds, appealed to the president for a full pardon. 'Previously, I was not entertaining a pardon because I didn't know what my judgment would be. Now, I am in the process of filling an application to a pardon for the president. I'll take a commutation, a clemency, whatever the president is willing to give me,' Santos said in an interview with Piers Morgan. 'I do believe this is an unfair judgment handed down to me,' he added. 'There was a lot of politicization over the process.' Santos, 37, is now in custody at a federal prison in Fairton, New Jersey. He was expelled from Congress in December 2023, following the release of a damning ethics report. He shared a goodbye post on X before entering prison thanking his allies and critics alike. 'Well, darlings…The curtain falls, the spotlight dims, and the rhinestones are packed,' he wrote. 'From the halls of Congress to the chaos of cable news what a ride it's been! Was it messy? Always. Glamorous? Occasionally. Honest? I tried… most days.' Santos was charged with 23 felony counts for three alleged schemes to use donor money and government assistance funds to enrich himself while running for Congress. He initially pleaded not guilty to the charges. The Republican, who was elected in 2022, also grabbed headlines for exaggerating details about his education and work experience, as well as his mother's whereabouts during 9/11 and his Jewish heritage. Greene has sought presidential intervention for controversial figures before. In May, she asked the president to pardon Derek Chauvin, the then-Minneapolis police officer who murdered George Floyd in a widely seen 2020 incident that set off national protests.
BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
US Attorney General orders grand jury hearings on Trump-Russia probe
US Attorney General Pam Bondi has ordered prosecutors to open legal proceedings into allegations of a so-called Russiagate conspiracy that Donald Trump has long claimed was concocted by political foes to smear has ordered a federal prosecutor to seek a potential indictment, according to the BBC's US partner CBS is unclear, however, what the possible charges might be and who could be month, US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard accused former President Barack Obama and his national security team of a "years-long coup" against Trump as she released a declassified report that Democrats branded false. Gabbard alleged that intelligence about alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 White House election had been politicised by the Obama White House to falsely tie Trump to Russia. Trump reacted by accusing Obama of "treason". An Obama spokesman later called that accusation "bizarre".Democrats said nothing in Gabbard's finding invalidated a US intelligence assessment in January 2017 concluding that Russia had sought to damage Clinton's campaign and boost Trump in the vote three months earlier.A 2020 bipartisan report by the Senate intelligence committee also found that Russia had tried to help Trump's 2016 last month the director of national intelligence referred the matter to the justice department to consider possible Monday, Bondi acted on that referral by directing an unnamed federal prosecutor to present evidence to a grand jury, according to CBS.A grand jury is a group of members of the public who determine whether there is enough evidence to file an indictment in a was not clear which former officials might be the target of any grand jury Fox News reported last month that ex-CIA Director John Brennan and ex-FBI Director James Comey were under criminal investigation relating to the Trump–Russia probe. Both have long denied any wrongdoing and accuse Trump of subverting the justice of Trump's first presidency was overshadowed by an investigation from his own justice department into whether he had conspired with Russia to sway the 2016 resulting Mueller report found no proof that Trump or his campaign had co-ordinated with the Kremlin, and no-one was charged with such crimes. The debate over Russiagate was reinvigorated last week when an appendix to another justice department investigation into the affair was 29 pages from Special Counsel John Durham's inquiry cites a March 2016 memo from a US intelligence source stating that Hillary Clinton, the Democratic White House candidate that year, had approved a plan to smear Trump as a Russian asset. Durham cites "what appear or purport to be original" emails that hackers affiliated with Russian intelligence might have obtained from an employee with a non-profit run by liberal donor George of the messages appeared to have been sent by Leonard Benardo, senior vice-president at Open Society Foundations, Soros' philanthropic arm. It apparently refers to a Clinton foreign policy adviser, Julianna email, dated 26 July 2016, reads: "Julie says it will be a long-term affair to demonize Putin and Trump. Now it is good for a post-convention bounce. Later the FBI will put more oil into the fire."There is nothing illegal about a political smear, but Trump allies suggested the email, if genuine, showed that federal investigators could have been part of the scheme. Durham, however, found no proof of such an FBI to the appendix, Benardo told Durham that "to the best of his recollection" he did not draft the email, although he noted that some of the verbiage further down sounded like something he would have special counsel also interviewed Smith, who said she did not recall receiving such an email from made no determination in his appendix whether the emails were authentic, or if they had been doctored by Russian main 306-page report, published in 2023, found the original FBI probe into Trump's campaign had lacked "analytical rigor" and relied on "raw, unanalysed and uncorroborated intelligence".US officials found the Russian meddling in 2016 included bot farms on social media and hacking of Democratic emails, but they ultimately concluded the impact was probably limited and did not actually change the election result.
The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
How the Trump administration made a sewage crisis ‘woke'
Like hundreds of families across Lowndes County, Alabama, the McPhersons do not have access to proper sanitation – just a pipe carrying raw sewage a short distance from their home. For a country that is one of the richest in the world, it is a public health scandal. 'There's a chance if you don't watch yourself, everything will shoot down with force and get all over you,' says Christopher McPherson. Nina Lakhani, a senior reporter for Guardian US, explains to Nosheen Iqbal that Lowndes County is one of the poorest districts in the country and has a history of brutal cotton plantation enslavement and also the civil rights and Black power movements. They discuss the way the soil has affected access to sanitation in the county, the significant health and psychological problems that have followed, and the long struggle for justice in which a landmark civil rights ruling under the Biden administration has been overturned by the actions of Donald Trump. Support the Guardian today:
