'Everyone's time is respected': ComfortDelGro to introduce new taxi cancellation, waiting fee policy, Singapore News
In a Facebook post on Wednesday (July 16), ComfortDelGro said that the new policy will kick in on July 31, but that there will be a risk-free "waiver period" so that both passengers and drivers have time to familiarise themselves with the changes before they are fully enforced.
During the waiver period, customers will not be charged even if fee conditions are met. Cancellation fees will only apply from Sept 1 and waiting fees will apply from Oct 15.
Customers will have four free cancellations per month according to the new cancellation policy, which are only applicable to situations when the taxi has not arrived at their pickup point. Beyond the four allowances, each subsequent cancellation will cost $4.
Drivers who cancel rides will also face penalties "to ensure that both parties are treated fairly", according to ComfortDelGro on their website. They didn't specify the exact penalties.
If a taxi has already arrived at their pickup point — as determined by their GPS data — customers will immediately incur a $4 fee for cancelling the ride.
Customers who do not arrive at their pickup point more than five minutes after their driver arrives will be considered a "no-show" and will be charged a $5 fee.
A waiting fee will also be charged if customers arrive more than four minutes late. Customers will be charged in $3 in five minute intervals, up to a maximum of $9.
According to ComfortDelGro, the cancellation and waiting fees are mutually exclusive. This means that waiting fees will be charged only when customers complete their trip, while cancellation fees are charged only when customers fail to complete their trip.
For customers using cashless payment methods, the additional fees will be deducted immediately upon cancellation. On the other hand, customers paying with cash will have the cancellation fee added to their next ride's fare. Enhancing reliability and fairness: ComfortDelGro
ComfortDelGro said that it is implementing the new policy "to enhance reliability and fairness for all users", and to ensure that "everyone's time is respected".
Cancellation fees also help ensure fair compensation for drivers, said the taxi operator.
"Our policy is designed to be transparent, equitable, and to improve the overall experience by encouraging responsible booking and cancellation practices," adding that fees are being "kept kept as low and fair as possible".
ComfortDelGro also encouraged customers to reach out via their customer service hotline at 6552 4525 or their in-app help centre if they need assistance or are charged wrongly.
[[nid:720275]]
dana.leong@asiaone.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Money banked, promises broken: unsavoury side of Vietnam's PE and VC dealmaking
[HO CHI MINH CITY] A planned stake sale by shareholders of EQuest Education, one of Vietnam's biggest private education groups, is facing setbacks after a school acquisition in Hanoi collapsed, in a case highlighting the broader risks of doing business in the country's fast-growing, but often unpredictable, business sector. KKR, the largest shareholder with a 54.8 per cent stake in EQuest, held through its Singapore-based vehicle Equinox II, invested more than US$200 million into the Vietnamese group in two funding rounds in 2021 and 2023. The PE juggernaut and other shareholders of EQuest were eyeing a stake sale this year, in hopes of raising funds and paving the way for KKR's exit four to five years since its investment in EQuest, sources familiar with the matter told The Business Times. That plan now hangs in limbo. The dispute has delayed negotiations and the due diligence process, causing uncertainties, particularly over valuation-related matters, a source noted. KKR did not respond to BT's queries. In 2021, a member company of EQuest signed deals worth one trillion dong (S$49 million) to acquire 80 per cent stakes in two schools in Hanoi. At the time, EQuest had already consolidated some 20 education institutions in Vietnam. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up The schools were part of the Ngoi Sao school system, a prominent private education network co-founded by Pham Bich Nga, a 66-year-old educator. The transaction for the second school, which was established in 2023, hit a deadlock. In a statement issued on Wednesday (Jul 16), EQuest alleged that Nga and her team withdrew funds from the first school and declined to transfer the agreed stake and management control of the second school. EQuest said it has lodged a police report on the matter, alleging embezzlement, misappropriation and fraud. In a Facebook post on Jul 16, Nguyen Quoc Toan, co-founder, chairman and chief executive of EQuest Education, alleged that the former partners claimed they 'did not understand' or had a 'different interpretation' of the contract, while retaining all the investor's funds over the past few years to develop the schools. A day earlier on Jul 15, Nga wrote on Facebook that she had proactively ended the partnership, citing major differences in educational direction and operational culture during their 2022 collaboration. 'Trying to forcibly maintain a partnership when the other party no longer wishes to continue – or attempting to claim what doesn't belong to them – cannot lead to a positive outcome for either side,' she wrote. Familiar red flags The case underscores the travails of doing business in Vietnam, which experts warn could weigh on investor confidence and undermine dealmaking in the long term. In fact, observers say disputes after deal closure between investors and Vietnamese target firms are fairly common, especially in private equity (PE) and venture capital (VC) circles; legal experts cite mismatched expectations and poor mutual understanding as key sources of friction. David Harrison, a partner for global law firm Hogan Lovells in Ho Chi Minh City, said: 'We do a lot of transactions with Vietnamese targets – family businesses in many cases – where there's no law firm on the other side to help them understand what they're signing.' They may be eager to close the deal and secure cash for their business by taking a pragmatic view, which, in the long run, may not serve their best interests, he added. Tran Duy Canh, managing partner at Dentons LuatViet in Ho Chi Minh City, said post-deal disputes often arise when critical conditions in sale agreements are not met. These do not always arise out of bad faith; more often, it comes from 'overconfidence' or misunderstanding, he said, adding that some local firms assume they can sort things out later or renegotiate if the deal veers off course. One notable case involved Vietnamese plastics firm Rang Dong and Japanese investor Sojitz Pla-Net, over a 2017 deal in which Sojitz bought five million shares in Rang Dong's Long An Plastic unit for more than 174 billion dong. Sojitz later alleged that Rang Dong failed to meet post-closing obligations. On its part, the Vietnamese firm claimed that there were 'unreasonable' terms in the contract, such as requiring it to sign employment contracts with 700 people that Sojitz appointed. Their conflict lasted about three years, from 2020 to 2023, including arbitration at the Singapore International Arbitration Centre in 2022 and subsequent onshore court proceedings in Vietnam. The ruling ultimately went Sojitz's way. However, it remains uncertain whether Rang Dong can fulfil its financial obligations to Sojitz, because the Vietnamese company is now facing bankruptcy proceedings. Lessons from soured deals Such cases worry investors, who often bear the bulk of financial losses and face lengthy investigations and legal battles. Legal counsel typically recommend mediation over taking the matter to court, especially when both sides genuinely want to resolve the misunderstanding. Another high-profile case was VinaCapital's Vietnam Opportunity Fund (VOF) investing US$32.5 million for a 34 per cent stake in Vietnamese egg and poultry giant Ba Huan in early 2018. The deal quickly unravelled after founder Pham Thi Huan publicly sought to cancel it, claiming the investor's terms risked eroding family control. She claimed VinaCapital imposed a 22 per cent annual return rate without consent, and that the Vietnamese contract included clauses missing from the English version, such as penalties for missed targets and a possible transfer of at least 51 per cent of the company's shares. VinaCapital maintained that all terms were lawful and in line with market norms, but later agreed to an amicable exit from the deal. Vu Nguyen Khanh, managing director and lead portfolio manager at VinaCapital's VOF, told BT: 'We may have a very clear view of what those terms mean, but at the same time, we want to make sure that the person on the other side of the table also understands that.' Founded in 2003 and managed by VinaCapital, VOF is a closed-ended investment trust listed on the London Stock Exchange with net assets exceeding US$970 million as at the end of June; it invests in listed equities and private companies in Vietnam. Khanh said the fund has invested in more than 200 companies in Vietnam over the past two decades. Harrison from Hogan Lovells stressed the importance of robust financial, legal and technical due diligence and forging direct ties with local partners, rather than relying on 30- to 40-page term sheets drafted for deals in other markets. He also highlighted the value of including downside protection mechanisms for investors – in the form of put rights, redemption rights, pull-back clauses, or earn-outs, for example – in case deals do not go as expected. 'The diligence, monitoring and the engagement process throughout the investment should pick up a lot of the flags,' VOF's Khanh added. He said if a situation calls for renegotiation, the first step should be to revisit the original agreements, which ought to include an avenue to resolve the issues before turning to the court. 'At the end of the day, our objective as investors is to create value and exit at a return. Disputes rarely create that kind of return,' he noted. Cultural gaps Hoang Minh Duc, special counsel at Duane Morris Vietnam, said investors are usually open to dialogue if founders stay transparent and actively work towards the best solutions for the businesses when obligations become difficult to meet. Drawing on his experience advising deals between foreign VCs and Vietnamese startups, he said many disputes stem from cultural gaps between Vietnamese business norms and those in more developed markets. He noted that Vietnamese startup founders often sign agreements without fully grasping the terms, sometimes without legal counsel or under guidance by inexperienced advisers. And when problems arise, some try to sidestep the investors. 'Vietnamese founders often value flexibility, while most VC investors, many of whom are from Singapore, prioritise transparency and an agreed structure,' he said, adding: 'This cultural gap can lead to painful partings, which may ultimately undermine dealmaking in Vietnam over the long term.'
Straits Times
9 hours ago
- Straits Times
2 workers stranded on gondola dangling outside Raffles City Tower rescued by SCDF
Find out what's new on ST website and app. A gondola was seen supported by a cable only on one side and hanging from the exterior of the building. SINGAPORE - Two workers were rescued after the gondola they were on tipped over and was suspended almost vertically outside Raffles City Tower on July 21. The Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) said that they responded to the height rescue incident, between the 28th and 29th floor of the building, at about 11.20am. 'Upon arrival, firefighters immediately checked on the gondola's stability, as well as the condition of the workers on the gondola,' SCDF said in a Facebook post at about 2pm. Rescuers from the Disaster Assistance and Rescue Team (Dart) had set up rescue equipment at the 29th and 30th floor. The gondola was then secured with safety lines, before a Dart rescuer descended onto the gondola. The workers, who were wearing body harnesses at the time, were then brought into the building through the windows on levels 29 and 30, SCDF said. Both workers were assessed by a paramedic and taken to Raffles Hospital in a stable condition, SCDF added. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia Japan PM Ishiba apologises to his party for election loss, vows to stay in office to deal with US tariff talks Business $1.1 billion allocated to three fund managers to boost Singapore stock market: MAS Singapore Spirits distribution company Proof & Company Spirits closes Singapore business Singapore Malaysia-bound motorists urged to avoid Tuas Second Link on July 23 due to chemical spill exercise Singapore Trial of new dengue vaccine begins recruitment for child participants in Singapore Singapore Mandai Wildlife Group group CEO Mike Barclay to retire; Bennett Neo named as successor Singapore Fresh charge for woman who harassed nurse during pandemic, created ruckus at lion dance competition Singapore Witness stand not arena for humiliation in sex offence cases, judge reminds lawyers When The Straits Times arrived at about 12.30pm, the gondola was seen supported by a cable only on one side and dangling from the exterior of the building. Raffles City Tower is a 42-storey office tower that is part of Raffles City. A police car, an ambulance and an SCDF truck were seen at the scene. Another two SCDF vehicles were parked at the entrance. An eyewitness, who only wanted to be known as Sam, told ST that he was leaving the building at about 11.30am when he heard a loud bang. The 30-year-old, who works on the 24th floor, said: 'I saw the gondola hanging and I heard a man screaming and asking for help. My (colleague) then called the SCDF.' Tourist Jimmy Lin, 30, said that he was at Raffles City when he saw a group of people gathered outside the building taking photos. He said: 'I was wondering what was going on, so I came out to take a look and I saw a man hanging from (the gondola).' A police car, an ambulance and an SCDF truck were seen at Raffles City. Another two SCDF vehicles were parked at the entrance. PHOTO: SCREENGRABS FROM XILEDIXIANGNAIER118118/XIAOHONGSHU The entrance to the building was cordoned off by security guards. Between February and April 2025, 13 stop-work orders and fines totalling more than $375,000 were issued to firms found to have flouted rules that protect workers carrying out tasks at high places. Four workers died after falling from a height in 2024, out of a total of 43 workplace deaths, with the Workplace Safety and Health Council saying in March 2025 that the figures marked a 10-year low. ST has contacted the Ministry of Manpower and CapitaLand for more information.
Asia News Network
14 hours ago
- Asia News Network
Unregistered online sellers now illegal in Nepal under new e-commerce law
July 21, 2025 KATHMANDU – Starting Sunday, all unregistered online sellers in Nepal—those using platforms like Facebook, TikTok, or Instagram to sell products or services—are now considered illegal. This also applies to international e-commerce companies such as Amazon, which have not registered or set up a local office or representative in Nepal, officials said. The Department of Commerce, Supplies, and Consumer Protection said the rule does not affect newly established online businesses. New sellers created after July 18 can still register with the department. As of Friday—the final deadline under the new E-commerce Act, 2025—only 950 e-commerce businesses across the country had registered, despite the department expecting hundreds more based on the volume of ongoing digital transactions. The E-commerce Act, which came into effect on April 15, gave online businesses three months to comply with the mandatory registration requirement. 'According to the new law, all online sellers must register with us. If we find any company selling goods or services online through social media or other platforms without registration, they will face fines,' said Achyut Raj Regmi, director at the department. Unregistered operators can be fined up to Rs200,000. The law covers all types of online sales, including those made through Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, WhatsApp, and similar platforms. On July 2, the department issued a public notice urging all digital sellers to register by July 18. Notably, the law also applies to foreign e-commerce platforms. Any international company selling goods to Nepali consumers must establish a local office or appoint an official representative. However, the department confirmed that no international e-commerce platform had registered by the deadline. This technically renders purchases from Amazon and similar platforms illegal under the new law. 'The law has been introduced to ensure all e-commerce businesses, domestic and international, operate under regulatory oversight,' said Bharat Prasad Acharya, another department director. 'Any platform found conducting business without registration will face action.' If a Nepali consumer places an order from a foreign site that has not registered, authorities say they will investigate if a complaint is filed. 'These companies are also subject to Nepali tax laws,' said Acharya. Nepal's e-commerce market has seen exponential growth, with transactions estimated in the billions of rupees. Much of this surge is driven by informal sellers using social media platforms. Yet, many continue to operate without registration, beyond the scope of taxation and consumer protection laws. The new law marks Nepal's first serious attempt to regulate its digital marketplace, which has been plagued by increasing cases of fraud and unethical conduct due to the lack of formal oversight. Under the new rules, even individual sellers on social media must register by submitting their business details online. This includes platform name, business registration number, office address, and the name of the registered business entity. Sellers must also clarify whether their model is platform-based or listing-based and designate a contact person to handle consumer complaints. To operate legally, each e-commerce platform must set up a proper mechanism to receive and resolve customer grievances. The law defines e-commerce as the buying and selling of goods and services via digital platforms, but it excludes sites that advertise or promote products without conducting transactions. Intermediary platforms—those that connect buyers and sellers without directly selling—must also sign formal contracts with their vendors. These agreements must be in both written and digital forms. The act further encourages small-scale and cottage industries to engage in online selling, aiming to broaden digital participation across sectors. To improve transparency, online businesses are required to update product details such as pricing, availability, or specifications within 24 to 48 hours of any changes. The law also strengthens consumer refund rights. If the product or service delivered differs from what was advertised—in design, image, weight, warranty terms, or country of origin—the buyer is entitled to a full refund. Sellers cannot deny refunds for defective, delayed, or misrepresented goods or services.
