Investors Set to Flock to Safety as World Awaits Iran's Response
Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice
One Architect's Quest to Save Mumbai's Heritage From Disappearing
JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads
NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports
Concern that the war will intensify even further is likely to push equity prices lower, while bonds may get a boost, market watchers say. The moves will be bigger if Iran responds with steps such as blocking the Strait of Hormuz, a key passage for oil and gas shipments, or attacking US forces in the region, they say.
'The initial reaction will be a flight to safety and equities will probably be weaker,' said Neil Birrell, chief investment officer at Premier Miton Investors. 'The level that stock markets are standing at, they're definitely going to face increased risk, there's no doubt about that.'
Market reaction has been muted since Israel's initial assault this month: Even after falling for the past two weeks, the S&P 500 is only about 3% below its all-time high from February. Investors expect the conflict to be be localized, with no wider impact on the global economy, said Evgenia Molotova, a senior investment manager at Pictet Asset Management.
'But it all depends on how the conflict develops and things seem to be changing by the hour,' she said. 'The only way they take it seriously is if the Strait of Hormuz gets blocked because that will affect oil access.'
Iran has vowed to impose 'everlasting consequences' for the bombing and said it reserves all options to defend its sovereignty.
Still, downside is likely to be limited because some market participants have been preparing for a worsening conflict. The MSCI All Country World Index has pulled back 1.5% since Israel attacked Iran on June 13. Fund managers have reduced their stock holdings, shares are no longer overbought and hedging demand has increased, meaning a deep selloff is less likely at these levels.
The biggest market reaction since the start of the escalation has been in oil, with Brent futures jumping 11% to $77 a barrel. Traders are preparing for another surge in crude prices even as it's unclear where the crisis goes from here. That rise is expected to restart on Monday, after the US assault dramatically raised the stakes in a region that accounts for a third of global oil output.
Read more from the Markets Live blog: How Markets Will Trade the US Strikes on Iran
Morgan Stanley's oil analysts said a quick resolution would allow prices to fall back to the $60s a barrel, but continued tension could leave oil in the current range. 'Fundamental disruptions to the global supply of oil with a possible hit to shipments through the region would push oil prices a lot higher from here,' they said.
Meanwhile, the dollar has risen about 0.9% since the conflict started. It's a relatively small move given the US currency's traditional role as a haven in times of turmoil. The US currency has been battered in recent months by Donald Trump's trade and fiscal policies.
'The biggest trade around at the moment is short dollar,' said Birrell. 'No one likes it. But traditionally it's the safe currency people go to, and it might just be that this turns around the fortunes of the dollar.'
The reaction was less straightforward in the $29 trillion market for US Treasuries since the conflict began. Yields initially sank but the moves swiftly reversed over concern about a resurgence in inflation. US Treasuries are, overall, little changed since June 13, with the yield on 10-year notes rising since then by less than two basis points to close Friday at 4.38%.
Following are comments from strategists and analysts on how they expect investors to respond on Monday:
Emmanuel Cau, head of European equity strategy at Barclays Plc
In the very near term, markets may be worried about Iran retaliation, and whether or not it blocks the Strait of Hormuz... Recent crises in the region have shown that the impact on equities from oil shocks tend to be short lived, and usually end up as medium-term buying opportunities. In fact, if the conflict results in bringing more stability and peace to the Middle East, it could be seen as bullish for risk assets over the medium term.
Diego Fernandez, chief investment officer at A&G Banco in Madrid
'We expect some risk off, but not an aggressive one. The world may be a safer place without the Iranian nuclear threat, but we still need to see the Iranian reaction and how the conflict evolves.'
Anthony Benichou, cross-asset sales at Liquidnet Alpha trading desk
Trump couldn't afford for this to drag on. If oil stays elevated too long, especially heading into the midterms, it's a political headache. High gas prices hit Main Street, fuel inflation, and turn voters against you. So the move had to be fast, surgical, and decisive. Note how impressive the risk premium has stayed contained in oil — short-term vols have spiked, but there's been little spillover elsewhere. If Iran were to shut down (the Strait of Hormuz), they'd be cutting off their own main revenue lifeline — effectively speeding up their own collapse.
Alfonso Benito, chief investment officer at Dunas Capital
It is a very worrisome situation. Investors have some hours to digest the attack before the market opens Monday, and a lot will depend on what Iran does if it responds or not. Anyhow, it's not good.
Manish Kabra, head of US equity strategy at Societe Generale SA
Equities are likely to only see a shallow drop because central bank policies are much more accommodative than in previous oil shocks. There's also no euphoria in markets in terms of flows. It won't be like we had in 2022 when the S&P 500 and European stocks dropped 20%. Our take is that the Fed may actually ignore any potential oil shocks and that's why I still say there's a good possibility that the S&P 500 will make new highs this year.
Anthi Tsouvali, strategist at UBS Global Wealth Management
We're definitely in a higher-risk environment than we were on Friday. Markets will react, but probably still modestly in equity markets. We're for sure going to see oil going higher. Investors will also have to think about the impact of higher oil on inflation, and if that's the case, Europe is going to be hit harder than the US. Uncertainty has been very high this year and now this is another event that's added to it. So we'll see some volatility but right now, given the information we have, I don't see that it's going to be long lived. So far, we haven't seen bombings of energy facilities and the Strait of Hormuz hasn't closed. Markets will appreciate that. While there's going to be risk-off sentiment for sure, hopefully it's not going to be long lived or too deep.
Aneeka Gupta, head of macroeconomic research at Wisdom Tree UK Ltd.
Up until now, the war was very much focused on the Middle East, but with the US's involvement this looks a lot more serious in nature and the risk is really spreading out in a very big way. In terms of markets, we'll definitely see the biggest impact in commodity markets and energy prices are likely to go even higher. We're also likely to see these tensions reverberate across equities. Markets are going to be pricing in a wide variety of possibilities about how Iran is going to escalate. The worst-case scenario would be Iran trying to close the Strait of Hormuz. The first impact would be seen in oil markets and then quickly resonate across stocks and bonds. From an equity market perspective, this is very much risk off.
Charu Chanana, chief investment strategist at Saxo Markets in Singapore
This marks a turning point for markets. While oil and gold are likely to surge on geopolitical risk, the bigger question is whether US assets can still command a safe-haven premium. Rising fiscal risks, institutional strain, and policy unpredictability could accelerate the fading of US exceptionalism. Trump's decision to bypass Congress adds to institutional concerns, likely putting upward pressure on US yields and questioning the credibility premium once attached to US assets. Beyond the immediate market reaction — higher oil, gold, and volatility — investors will be watching for a potential shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz or retaliation against US naval assets. These risks could drive oil sharply higher, add inflation uncertainty, and test the US dollar's safe-haven appeal amid rising concerns over fiscal dominance and institutional erosion.
Shoki Omori, chief strategist at Mizuho Securities Co
Capital will race toward classic refuges — Japan government bonds, the yen, Swiss franc and gold. Treasury yields would feel the downdraft almost immediately. History shows that when investors dump dollars, they often scoop up Treasuries, anticipating that the Federal Reserve will lean dovish to steady the ship. A measured statement could keep the greenback steady, but any rhetoric hinting at strikes on US soil or forces would likely jolt it downward. Dollar-yen could edge down to 144.
Nick Twidale, chief analyst at AT Global Markets
We're going to see a gap higher in gold, yen, Swiss franc and likely the dollar. Gold may shoot up to $3,400 very quickly but the key theme will be volatility — the moves might not stick if, for example, Trump decides the strikes are done. Trump has the bigger stick compared with Tehran, and as such his next move — be it a further escalation or heading back to the negotiating table — will matter more for markets.
Gary Dugan, chief executive officer of The Global CIO Office
We expect equities to react in a measured way, be it with some downside risk. Markets are not technically overextended with many trading within 3-5% of their 200-day moving averages. Unless we see a significant spike in oil prices we would expect equity markets to hang in around current levels.
Nirgunan Tiruchelvam, an analyst at Aletheia Capital in Singapore
There are 3 scenarios. A dramatic escalation in Mideast tension: This could see the Strait of Hormuz being blocked and a cycle of revenge. The second is an end to the hostilities in a similar manner that India-Pakistan ended last month. The third is the continuation of the low-intensity bombing by both sides. We expect risk assets to be under pressure under scenarios 1 and 3. Oil and other commodities will also rally under these scenarios.
Jason Schenker, president of Prestige Economics
The level of fear in global financial markets will hinge on the next wave of actions in and the potential duration of this conflict, and it may take days or weeks before the fog of war clears enough for traders to take outlier positions with significant conviction. As for bonds, the impacts of this conflict could be mixed. While the Fed would have less leeway to cut interest rates due to higher crude oil prices, money leaving equity markets may flood into bonds and Treasuries as safe havens, sending bond prices higher and bond yields lower.
Viraj Patel, strategist at Vanda Research
This weekend's US strikes are another reason for hedge funds and CTAs to rush towards the exit on their bearish USD bets. We believe one of the biggest pain trades this summer could be a grind higher in the USD as the reasons for being short USD fall by the wayside. There's a perfect storm brewing for non-US equities — especially crowded cyclical European and Asian markets. Rising geopolitical risks are another headwind for global growth on top of the ongoing slowdown in cross-border trade driven by Trump tariff policies (which certain equity markets seem to be ignoring). We believe Europe and EM could underperform here as recent 'hot money' inflows unwind as global investors turn more cautious.
--With assistance from Sydney Maki, Michael Msika, Srinivasan Sivabalan, Abhishek Vishnoi and Jaehyun Eom.
Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags
Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028?
Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros
The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It
Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump?
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Matthews China Fund's Strategic Moves: A Closer Look at BYD Co Ltd
Exploring the Fund's Investment Adjustments in Q2 2025 Matthews China Fund (Trades, Portfolio) recently submitted its N-PORT filing for the second quarter of 2025, revealing strategic investment adjustments. Established in February 1998, the fund aims to achieve its investment objectives by allocating at least 80% of its net assets in Chinese companies' common and preferred stocks. The fund focuses on companies with sustainable growth potential, evaluating factors such as balance sheet strength, cash flow stability, management quality, and corporate governance. This disciplined approach aligns with the fund's long-term value investment philosophy. Summary of New Buy Matthews China Fund (Trades, Portfolio) added a total of three stocks to its portfolio during the second quarter of 2025. The most significant addition was CMOC Group Ltd (HKSE:03993), with 4,581,000 shares, accounting for 1.24% of the portfolio and valued at HK$4.68 million. The second largest addition was Hisense Home Appliances Group Co Ltd (HKSE:00921), consisting of 1,186,000 shares, representing approximately 0.86% of the portfolio, with a total value of HK$3.24 million. The third addition was Cambricon Technologies Corp Ltd (SHSE:688256), with 28,038 shares, accounting for 0.63% of the portfolio and valued at 2.36 million. Key Position Increases Matthews China Fund (Trades, Portfolio) also increased its stakes in nine stocks. The most notable increase was in BYD Co Ltd (HKSE:01211), with an additional 303,000 shares, bringing the total to 543,000 shares. This adjustment represents a significant 126.25% increase in share count, impacting the portfolio by 1.26%, with a total value of HK$8.45 million. The second largest increase was in Suzhou TFC Optical Communications Co Ltd (SZSE:300394), with an additional 165,900 shares, bringing the total to 377,916. This adjustment represents a 78.25% increase in share count, with a total value of 4.24 million. Summary of Sold Out Matthews China Fund (Trades, Portfolio) completely exited 10 holdings in the second quarter of 2025. Notable exits include Anjoy Foods Group Co Ltd (SHSE:603345), with the sale of all 295,500 shares, resulting in a -0.84% impact on the portfolio. Another significant exit was Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co Ltd (SZSE:300760), with the liquidation of all 83,814 shares, causing a -0.7% impact on the portfolio. Key Position Reduces Matthews China Fund (Trades, Portfolio) reduced its position in 13 stocks. The most significant reduction was in Guangdong Haid Group Co Ltd (SZSE:002311), with a decrease of 338,300 shares, resulting in a -69.17% decrease in shares and a -0.6% impact on the portfolio. The stock traded at an average price of 56.49 during the quarter, returning 3.14% over the past three months and 20.49% year-to-date. Another notable reduction was in PetroChina Co Ltd (HKSE:00857), with a decrease of 2,634,000 shares, resulting in a -26.56% reduction in shares and a -0.55% impact on the portfolio. The stock traded at an average price of HK$6.32 during the quarter, returning 26.27% over the past three months and 30.81% year-to-date. Portfolio Overview As of the second quarter of 2025, Matthews China Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s portfolio included 63 stocks. The top holdings were 10.31% in Tencent Holdings Ltd (HKSE:00700), 7.69% in Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (HKSE:09988), 4.51% in China Construction Bank Corp (HKSE:00939), 4.2% in Inc (HKSE:09618), and 3.79% in PDD Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PDD). The holdings are mainly concentrated in 10 of the 11 industries: Consumer Cyclical, Financial Services, Communication Services, Technology, Industrials, Real Estate, Consumer Defensive, Healthcare, Basic Materials, and Energy. This article, generated by GuruFocus, is designed to provide general insights and is not tailored financial advice. Our commentary is rooted in historical data and analyst projections, utilizing an impartial methodology, and is not intended to serve as specific investment guidance. It does not formulate a recommendation to purchase or divest any stock and does not consider individual investment objectives or financial circumstances. Our objective is to deliver long-term, fundamental data-driven analysis. Be aware that our analysis might not incorporate the most recent, price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative information. GuruFocus holds no position in the stocks mentioned herein. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.


CNN
8 minutes ago
- CNN
NBA clears Boston Celtics' $6.1 billion sale to Bill Chisholm
A group headed by Bill Chisholm is set to take control of the Boston Celtics after the NBA Board of Governors unanimously approved the sale on Wednesday. The NBA wrote in a statement, 'The transaction is expected to close shortly.' The reported $6.1 billion valuation for the club makes it the second-largest sale price for a US sports franchise, behind the $10 billion valuation for the Los Angeles Lakers when Mark Walter purchased that team in June. Chisholm and his partners are buying at least 51 percent of the Celtics. The ownership stake will increase in 2028, according to the purchase contract, when Chisholm's group is scheduled to buy out the remaining minority shareholders at a $7.3 billion valuation. According to multiple media reports, Chisholm will take over as the Celtics' governor when the sale goes through. Outgoing owner Wyc Grousbeck is expected to serve as alternate governor and remain the CEO through 2028. Grousbeck will cede his role when he no longer has the required ownership stake of at least 15 percent. Chisholm, the co-founder and managing partner of the California-based private equity firm STG Partners, is a Massachusetts native and longtime Celtics fan. Grousbeck and the outgoing ownership group Boston Basketball Partners LLC purchased the Celtics for $360 million in 2002. During that group's tenure, the club won NBA titles in 2007-08 and 2023-24 – the latter representing Boston's league-record 18th championship.


Skift
9 minutes ago
- Skift
Canadians Shun U.S., Ennismore's IPO Impact, and MSC's Carbon Cuts
Listen to the day's top travel stories in under four minutes every weekday. Good morning from Skift. It's Thursday, August 14. Here's what you need to know about the business of travel today. Canadians are continuing to shun travel to the U.S., writes Associate Editor Rashaad Jorden. The number of Canadians returning by car from the U.S. dropped 37% in July from last year, marking the seventh straight month of declines. July also saw a roughly 26% decrease in Canadians returning by air from the U.S. However, the number of Canadians returning from destinations other than the U.S. rose roughly 6%. Japan and Brazil, among other countries, have registered double-digit increases in Canadian visitors between January and June. Listen to This Podcast Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Youtube | RSS Next, Hospitality Reporter Luke Martin explains how a successful IPO for Ennismore could change how investors view lifestyle hotels. Martin writes, although Wall Street has long prioritized scale and cost efficiency, a successful IPO could elevate design, brand heat, and food-and-beverage revenue as credible sources of long-term value. If Ennismore performs well as a public company, Martin notes that would change how developers in the U.S. pick brands. However, Martin writes that if an Ennismore IPO were to stumble, that would reinforce the prevailing view that lifestyle belongs inside big hotel groups, not as a standalone business on the public markets. Finally, MSC Cruises, the third-largest cruise operator by passenger numbers, says it managed to cut greenhouse gas emissions last year. But the cruise industry still has a lot of work to reduce its massive carbon footprint, writes Climate Reporter Darin Graham. MSC Cruises highlighted in its latest climate report the tweaks and strategies that helped it cut emissions, including using AI-controlled heating and cooling systems. In addition, MSC's move to plug ships into the grid while in port enabled ships to run on electricity. However, MSC said its overall emissions will start climbing again without more transformative decarbonization solutions as its fleet grows. A report from maritime consultancy DNV warns that by 2030, the global production of carbon-neutral fuels for cruise ships won't match demand.