
Federal opposition flags more ‘sensitive' approach to foreign students at Australian universities
During the federal election campaign, then opposition leader Peter Dutton claimed cutting foreign student numbers would free up more housing and rental opportunities. Dutton said students were 'taking up accommodation that should be occupied by Australian citizens'.
The approach was heavily criticised by the university sector and described by tertiary bodies as 'isolationist' and akin to the 'Donald Trump anti-migration card'.
Jonathon Duniam on Sunday conceded the policy under Dutton wasn't 'as constructive as it could have otherwise been' as the Coalition continued to review its platform.
'Obviously, those numbers were part of a discussion that occurred before an election we lost,' the new education spokesperson told ABC TV.
'I don't think that any university should, as some have, use international students as a cash cow. That's not appropriate because it's not a good business model, but we need to recognise that a large part of the funding, for especially regional universities, comes from international students.
'So a more sensitive conversation needs to be had, and we will work with the sector and the government about that.'
Labor also wants to reduce international student numbers, with a plan to drive down enrolments to a maximum of 270,000 in 2025.
The shadow education minister on Sunday indicated the Coalition had softened its position on other education policies, including past opposition to the Albanese government's plan to wipe 20% off students' Hecs debts.
Duniam said the Coalition accepted Australians 'had their say' at the election.
'We've got to move on,' he said on Sunday.
The opposition's position on potential changes to the school system came under fire after Dutton pledged to 'restore' a curriculum focused on 'critical thinking, responsible citizenship and common sense' in his budget speech reply.
While a clear policy or proposal was never announced or released, Dutton suggested students were being 'indoctrinated' at school and floated that federal funding to schools could be conditional on adherence to curriculum teaching rather than 'guided into some sort of an agenda that's come out of universities'.
Duniam said his focus was on improving key metrics, such as maths, reading and science, rather than 'specific elements of the curriculum'.
'I think the rest of it will fall away if we're focusing on the priorities of getting kids out of schools with the best marks possible so they can go into university or higher education at the best standard possible and become the best graduates,' Duniam said.
Sign up to Morning Mail
Our Australian morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
'Then that will deal with all of the issues people have complaints around, including the 'woke' issues, as they're called.'
A number of Coalition MPs and senators have remained vocal supporters of a push to ban transgender women from female sports, including Duniam's Senate colleague Claire Chandler.
When asked whether it was an issue he shared with his colleagues, the senator said it deserved an 'adult debate' but that he did not believe it was up to him to decide how schools should facilitate arrangements.
'I honestly believe that girls' sports should be for girls, boys sports for boys. And if you have a mixed grouping, then that's something you can arrange by competition or in a school arrangement,' he said.
'I don't think it's for me to set down who should participate in what sport.'
In late June, the shadow immigration minister, Paul Scarr, promised a new tone when talking about migrants as the Liberal party worked to rebuild support among multicultural communities.
'One of the things I am passionate about is getting the tone of discussion right – I think that is of critical importance,' Scarr told Guardian Australia.
'And any discussion of immigration must proceed, in my view, on the basis of the contribution that's been made to this country by so many people who have come to this country as migrants.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
40 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Independent MP Nicolette Boele calls out parliament's lack of ambition in her first speech
Nicolette Boele, who sensationally beat Liberal candidate Gisele Kapterian by just 26 votes in the seat of Bradfield, gave her maiden speech to parliament on Monday, saying Australia is moving towards a decentralised and more people-centred rather than party-centred democracy. She said there was 'widespread conviction' that politicians were 'incapable of dealing with systemic longstanding issues' such as regulating online media platforms, climate change, gambling and housing affordability, adding that unlike previous reform to gun laws, or the introduction of medicare, the parliament was not ambitious enough


Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
How to sell your house privately in Australia and avoid agent commissions
Thousands of Australians are opting to sell their homes themselves in a bid to avoid paying increasingly costly agents fees and commissions. Barry Johnston, aged in his 60s, is among the thousands of Australians who have decided to do away with real estate agents and instead sell their homes privately. Mr Johnston initially engaged with a real estate agent who told him to list his four-bedroom Logan Village, Queensland home at about $1.25million. Having lived in the area for 14 years, he believed his property could fetch $1.42million and decided to privately list it at that value. Within five days, he has secured a 'firm offer' at his listing price and a further offer above asking. 'The agents that have been through here have really undervalued our place, they just wanted to make a quick turnover,' he told Daily Mail Australia. He photographed the property himself and engaged with a third-party website that allowed him to advertise his home on real estate portals for a nominal fee. In all, he estimated the process cost him no more than $2,000 - less than the fee an agent had quoted him for professional photography alone. He said it was 'a lot of work', but said much of it - including readying the property for sale - would have been necessary even with an agent. He expected selling privately will end up saving him about $30,000 in commission and adding up to $150,000 to his closing price. 'In today's economy, that's nothing to be sneezed at,' he said. For Mr Johnston, the question was as simple as: 'Can I justify paying someone so much for something I could do myself?' 'There's just nothing that the real estate agent can do that I can't do, that's basically the crux of it.' Real estate expert Neil Jenman told Daily Mail Australia most homeowners could secure as good or better results than most agents with 'a few hours research'. 'Australian home sellers are bluffed, manipulated, misinformed and terrified into believing they have to use a real estate agent to sell their home,' he said. He claimed Australia's rates of private home sales were among the lowest in the world, while the costs of advertising are the highest of anywhere in the world. 'Most agents don't do anything the sellers couldn't do themselves,' he said. For a flat fee, however, homeowners can pay to advertise on third party sites who, as registered agencies, are allowed to list the ads on property portals like and Domain. Colin Sacks, who runs one such third party site, told Daily Mail Australia said sale enquiries had grown 25 per cent in the past 18 months. 'The number of enquiries I get every day for people who are thinking about this, it's just growing more and more,' he said. 'There's no question... it's just getting busier and busier.' Michael Fotheringham, managing director at Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute agreed third party sites appeared to have increased the rate of private sales. 'It's a minority of sales overall, but there is a strong undercurrent of people who are making a choice not to go through agents and do it themselves,' he said. He said buyers could stand to gain just as much as earners from the shift towards private sales. 'There a three parties involved in a property transfer: the buyer, the seller and the middle man. When you cut out the middle man, there can be a lot of savings.' That said, selling privately won't appeal to homeowners of all kinds. Joanne White recently tried unsuccessfully to sell her commercial property in Stawell, north-west of Melbourne, before engaging a real estate agent. She told Daily Mail Australia selling privately is difficult where 'unique' properties like her own - a converted former residence - are involved. 'I think my biggest issue is, basically, I have a unique property that really, there's not anything else like it in the whole of Australia,' she said. Despite the challenges, Ms White said she would consider selling privately again with a less challenging property. President of the Real Estate Institute of Australia Leanne Pilkington said the work of agents extends well beyond arranging a sale. 'Selling a property is not just about listing it online - it involves legal compliance, understanding market conditions, negotiating with buyers and stakeholders, and managing contracts,' Ms Pilkington told Daily Mail Australia. 'Going private may seem appealing, but it can lead to costly mistakes or delays if the process isn't handled correctly according to legal requirements.'


The Guardian
41 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Minns government rejects pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge over timing and ‘chaos' fears
Organisers of a pro-Palestine rally have offered to delay their march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge by a week after the New South Wales government said it would not support a protest of that scale and nature this Sunday. On Monday, the Sydney-based Palestine Action Group announced it planned to change the course of its near-weekly rallies through the CBD and instead walk across the iconic bridge to the US consulate. The premier, Chris Minns, responded that the government could not support a protest of that size across the bridge this weekend. 'We cannot allow Sydney to descend into chaos,' Minns said in a statement. 'The NSW government cannot support a protest of this scale and nature taking place on the Sydney Harbour Bridge, especially with one week's notice. 'The bridge is one of the most critical pieces of infrastructure in our city used every day by thousands of people. Unplanned disruption risks not only significant inconvenience, but real public safety concerns.' Sign up: AU Breaking News email Minns said police were 'in discussions with organisers' about other routes they can take and 'are working to ensure community safety is upheld'. The Palestine Action Group announced the rally in a social media post, talking about the starvation of people in Gaza. 'This is a genocide. Even if, under global pressure, Israel temporarily allows some food into Gaza, it will not mean the end of Israel's goal of ethnically cleansing the [Gaza] strip.' The group said 'this extraordinary situation' has led it to call for a March for Humanity over the bridge on 3 August 'to save Gaza'. Josh Lees, a spokesperson for the group, said if the premier needed more notice in order to support the rally, then the group could organise the march a week later. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'In 2023, the Harbour Bridge was closed for several hours to shoot a scene for a Ryan Gosling film. It is regularly closed at short notice for maintenance or emergencies. It was closed for the historic 2000 march for reconciliation and the 2023 World Pride march. It can be temporarily closed to help stop a genocide,' Lees said. The group has submitted what is known as a 'form one' to police. The form is a notification to hold a public assembly that, if accepted by police, would protect those attending from being potentially charged under anti-protest laws. In 2022, the then NSW Liberal government legislated – with support from Labor – a maximum penalty of two years in prison and a $22,000 fine for protesters who obstruct facilities such as ports and transport hubs. The penalty also applies to protests on main roads. Last year, the Palestine Action Group faced a supreme court challenge by NSW police after the force knocked back its form one application to hold two pro-Palestine events in October. The group managed to come to an agreement with police that it would change the route of a rally on 6 October and an event on 7 October would be a standing vigil.