
CAP battle starts as EU plans to overhaul farmer payments
The top-line changes to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) would see ringfenced funding for farming cut by more than a fifth, with supports for agriculture merged with those for rural areas into a single fund.
In brass tax, this would mean a fall in guaranteed CAP funding from €387 billion down to €300 billion over the course of the EU budget cycle from 2028.
Around 120,000 Irish farmers receive roughly €2bn annually in CAP payments, and much of this money essentially makes a huge cohort of Irish farms viable.
Given this, it was no surprise to see farming organisations here quickly coming out of the blocks to condemn the proposals.
The Irish Farmers' Association (IFA) warned the move would put food security at risk, while the group representing dairy farmers, the ICMSA, said there would be immediate upward pressure on food prices.
A number of Irish MEPs also came out against the plans, which the Commission argues would allow for "stronger synergies between policies", and create a more flexible, crisis-responsive budget.
Now the horse-trading really gets going as member states, through the Council of Ministers, start the long process of agreeing on an approach to the proposals, before painstaking talks with the parliament in Brussels and the Commission begin.
Ultimately, it could take over two years before any agreement is in place for the start of the next EU budgetary cycle in 2028.
Ireland will likely play a key role in this process, as we will hold the rolling six-month EU presidency for the second half of next year.
This means that what the EU Commission is proposing and what eventually ends up happening might well be very different.
Based on what I've written so far, it might seem the changes suggested are largely negative, but are there any positives in there for farmers across the bloc?
Well, from what the Commission has outlined, it wants to make a strong play to encourage more young farmers into the profession.
And this is in response to one of the major issues threatening the future of family farms both here in Ireland and across the EU.
The average age of a farmer in Ireland is pushing 60, and with high income volatility and increased regulation farming isn't seen as an attractive career path in the way it would have to previous generations.
A recent Teagasc report showed farm incomes were up across the board last year, but it also highlighted severe differences in farmer earnings from one year to the next.
Paired with that, the level of environmental regulations farmers have to adhere to, and biodiversity and other targets that need to be met is only rising.
These are welcome moves to protect our environment but they come at a price, and add layers of complexity to the job.
In an attempt to address the challenge of generational renewal, the Commission has recommended that CAP funding "should be focused on active farmers", meaning supports would be "targeted towards farmers who exercise agriculture as a principal activity".
This would mean that farmers who are of pension age would no longer receive supports under CAP.
In addition, the proposals would hugely increase supports for young farmers starting out, with funding for the costs of establishing a new farm potentially rising from €100,000 to €300,000.
The changes would also give individual member states more autonomy when it comes to doling out funds to farmers and rural areas, and can steer money in one direction of the other based on what is deemed more necessary.
This could bring a shift in the well-worn path of supports going directly to farmers in less-well-off regions, as opposed to the areas themselves getting the money.
So farmers could still benefit from rural EU funding, just not directly.
However, the Commission's proposals are just proposals at this stage and will need approval at various stages of the EU decision-making process if they are to become part of the EU budget.
The Irish Government hasn't wasted any time in putting domestic structures in place to decide on the country's stance on all this.
On Thursday, the day after the EU proposals, Minister for Agriculture Martin Heydon held the first meeting of what he calls the "CAP Consultation Committee".
He called the Commission's CAP recommendations a "starting point", adding "we have been through considerable reforms before and we've managed to negotiate through them in the past and we'll do the same again".
The minister's positive take might given some of the stakeholders at that CAP committee some reassurance.
Ireland's response to this will be pretty much an all-inclusive one.
The stakeholders gathered together by the minister include five Government departments, a host of State agencies, farmer organisations, business groups, as well as academics.
IFA President Francie Gorman was giving his reaction to the Commission's CAP proposals on Wednesday's RTÉ Six-One News, in which he summed up the complexities associated with finding the right funding model for farmers.
He welcomed the EU's renewed focus on bringing along more young farmers but pointed out: "If you want the next generation of farmers coming home, along with all the measures that we bring in to support young farmers, we still have to have viable farms for them to come into."
Essentially, however well-intentioned it is, the idea of giving newer farmers more financial support at the expense of older ones could prove to be a misguided one if it kills off the very farms its trying to protect.
Like most budget-related considerations, it will come down to finding a balance.
And with the next EU budget not kicking in until 2028, at least there is sufficient time to try and get this balance right.
But there's no doubt that between now and 2028, many battles will be fought as competing interests vie for pieces of a potentially smaller pie of EU funding.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Journal
39 minutes ago
- The Journal
Q&A: What we know (and don't know) about the EU-US tariff deal
THE EU-US tariff deal, struck yesterday , will avoid a painful trade war between the transatlantic allies. The stakes were high, with a looming 1 August deadline set by Washington and a €1.65tr trading relationship on the line. Despite that, the agreement has not satisfied everyone. Many European leaders issued lukewarm statements throughout the day today, while Taoiseach Micheál Martin welcomed the agreement as an end to uncertainty for businesses. A full deal is yet to be fleshed out . An agreed 'framework' has laid out the broad principles of a deal, but negotiators will still need to hammer out the details in coming days, with a joint statement expected by the original 1 August deadline. The final agreement will need to be approved by all European leaders. US President Donald Trump will expectedly carry out the changes through executive orders, which bypasses a vote by the American parliament. So what was agreed? Both sides confirmed there will be a blanket 15% tariff rate on a majority of Irish goods exported to the US, the same level secured by Japan this month. While this means the European car sector actually sees a reduction in tariffs – from 27.% to 15% – the agreed rate is three-times higher than the tariffs before. Many European ministers pointed to this as their prime gripe with the deal . The European Commission described the deal as a step towards stabilising EU-US trade, with EU trade commissioner Maroš Šefčovič telling journalists that it was 'the best deal we could get under very difficult circumstances'. An opportunity presented itself to the EU during the deal, however. Many European governments are seeking to distance themselves from a long-term reliance on Russian energy . The EU has agreed to purchase €647m worth of liquefied natural gas, oil and nuclear fuels from the US over three years. It also said it would pour €517bn in additional investments in America, through the private sector. Advertisement Negotiating teams agreed to deals around energy products and fuel. Alamy Alamy As is the case with many of these agreements, the EU has also agreed to purchase 'significant amounts of US military equipment', according to the White House . This is a significant policy change from the European Commission, which as been promoting cross-member state trade of arms in recent months . One EU official was quick to pour cold water on this assessment, claiming it was not 'agreed or discussed'. That may suggest that the US expects EU member states to turn towards the American arms market for procurement in the near future. Blanket tariffs, you say. Are any goods tariff-free? So, we're still finding this out. The exact list of goods which will be exempt from tariffs will soon be finalised, Brussels said today. One EU official said the member states would also consider lowering levies on US cars, which are traditionally unpopular in Europe, to 0%. Machinery products and different types of fertilisers may also see zero-tariff rates, as an alternative to Russian sources. In exchange, the official said, Washington was expected to reduce tariffs on European aircraft, certain medical devices and some pharmaceuticals – for which the US largely depends on Irish imports. Discussions are ongoing about European alcohol exports becoming tariff-free – including wine and Irish whiskey. Discussions are ongoing about European alcohol exports becoming tariff-free - including wine and Irish whiskey. Alamy, file Alamy, file Irish Farmers Association President Francie Gorman said today that the agriculture industry were the 'fall guys' for EU trade policy. He questioned why the European negotiators could not achieve a lower rate of baseline tariffs, as the UK did previously. Workers' Union Siptu has demanded clarity for its members and is seeking immediate action from Ireland to protect jobs in specific sectors, such as pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and the drinks' industry, which may be impacted by tariffs. Related Reads 'Resorted to submission': Last-minute US tariff deal earns stinging criticism from EU leaders Are pharmaceuticals part of the EU-US tariff deal? And what's Section 232 got to do with it? 'A good deal for everybody': US and EU reach 15% tariff deal after Trump-von der Leyen meeting What about pharma? Any sector-specific tariffs? The White House is currently targeting pharmaceuticals and semiconductors – microchips which power mobile devices and digital machines. The US could potentially impose massive levies to attract American companies home. Ireland, home to thousands of multinational pharmaceutical manufacturers, hoped that there would be particular exemptions for medicines – a key industry here. Protecting pharmaceuticals was a priority in the EU's negotiations. An internal review by the US trade department is still ongoing over the legality of placing a levy on medical imports. Under American trade law, essential items, such as medicine and aircraft components, cannot be unfairly taxed. The US is reviewing the legality of placing a levy on medical imports. Alamy, file Alamy, file Tech firms with European bases in Dublin will not be directly impacted by tariffs on physical goods, but could be affected if the US changes tax laws to make it less attractive to set up in low-tax countries, said Andrew Kenningham from Capital Economics. Under the deal struck yesterday, the EU says the US has agreed that tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors will be capped at 15%. The White House said medicines and semiconductors would indeed be taxed at that rate. European steel, copper and aluminium are currently facing a 50% US tariff. The White House said those sectoral tariffs 'will remain unchanged' but that it would seek to ensure that the supply chains are not impacted. With reporting by AFP Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


Irish Examiner
43 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Main defendant charged with murder of private Seán Rooney sentenced to death
The main defendant at the military tribunal in Beirut indicted for the murder of Irish Defence Forces private Seán Rooney has been sentenced to death, it is understood. In a statement, Tánaiste and defence minister Simon Harris said that he noted the sentence handed down, along with those handed to a number of the other defendants who had previously not been in court. 'I am disappointed and share the disappointment of Pte Rooney's family at the lighter sentences imposed on a number of those convicted today,' he said. 'Seán Rooney made the ultimate sacrifice in the noble pursuit of peace. This is a difficult time for his family and his colleagues, especially those who were injured that night. All our thoughts are with them at this time.' Pte Rooney, who was 24 and from Newtowncunningham, Co Donegal, was killed while on UN duty when the armoured vehicle he was driving from south Lebanon to Beirut came under fire in December 2022. Several others were injured in the attack. Previously, the Irish Government expressed its concerns about the lack of progress in the case against those charged with his killing. Mr Harris said that raising these issues was a 'central focus' of his visit to Beirut last March. 'I appreciate, therefore, the efforts of the court to bring forward the hearing date forward from September to today,' he said. During my visit to Beirut, I left the Lebanese ministers in no doubt as to the absolute determination of the Irish Government to ensure that those responsible for Pte Rooney's death are brought to justice. 'I want to express my appreciation to my officials, members of the Defence Forces, Ireland's Ambassador to Lebanon, members of the Defence Forces, Ireland's Honorary Consul to Lebanon, and the Department's Lebanese lawyer, all of whom attended today's hearing along with a member of Seán's family. 'Finally, I appreciate that this is an incredibly difficult day for the family of Pte Rooney. None of us can fathom their unimaginable pain and grief and all my thoughts remain with them at this time.' While capital punishment is a legal sanction in Lebanon, reports suggest there has been a moratorium on executions since 2004. Read More Mother of slain Irish soldier Sean Rooney permitted to sue United Nations

The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Scrutiny of laws to facilitate Ireland's trade deal with Canada scrapped after US tariffs
LAWS TO FACILITATE a trade deal between Ireland, Canada and other EU member states will not be scrutinised following the announcement that a 15% tariff will be placed on Irish goods exported to the US . The contentious EU-Canada trade agreement, known as CETA, is to be ratified after politicians on the Oireachtas foreign affairs committee have waived their right to investigate the potential outcomes and consequences of the bill. Amendments to the Arbitration Act, which dictates the legality of, and set petametres around, civil lawsuits that can be taken in Ireland, were due to be examined in order to facilitate the creation of a free-trade zone between Europe and Canada. Ten member states previously rejected the deal and declined to ratify it , and the Irish Supreme Court previously said that CETA would be unconstitutional over clauses that could allow foreign investors to sue the state over any potential breaches. Trade minister and Tánaiste Simon Harris announced today that he intends to bring forward and accelerate the updates to the Arbitration Act, which will allow for CETA to be ratified without any constitutional breaches. Advertisement Government previously earmarked the expedited implementation of the deal in May , following crunch talks over Ireland's challenges with economic competitiveness and the threat of harsh US tariffs. The decision to scrap pre-legislative scrutiny, when politicians invite experts to discuss the potential consequences and outcomes of new laws, was welcomed by Harris. He said that the deal will 'open the door to one of the world's largest economies' and allow Irish firms, farmers and exports to have new opportunities. He claimed that Irish exports to Canada have increased 'fourfold' since its framework was agreed. 'This is about more trade, more jobs, and more stability for Ireland,' Harris added. Two members of the foreign affairs committee, Senators Patricia Stephenson and Alice Mary Higgins, have said they are alarmed by the decision. Stephenson said it was shameful that the government would ignore the Supreme Court decision. 'This is a disgraceful decision given the fraught legal background of this issue and the hugely controversial investor court system that ratification of CETA will usher in,' the Social Democrats senator said. Independent Senator Higgins, who has been a long-time critic of the trade deal, said the untested bill could have 'significant implications for our sovereignty', which could expose Ireland to millions 'or even billions' in potential claims. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal