Stormont MLA Remuneration Board Bill passes despite opposition
It will replace the previous Independent Financial Review Panel which has been defunct for a number of years.
TUV MLA Timothy Gaston claimed the Bill is 'nothing more than a vehicle to enable MLAs to award themselves' with a pay rise (Liam McBurney/PA)
Currently, the basic salary for an MLA is £51,500, but this can rise with position including chairing some committees or serving as a minister, with the First and deputy First Ministers receiving a salary of £123,500.
A report alongside the Bill showed MLA salaries are lower than those received by Members of the Scottish Parliament (£72,196), Assembly Members at the Welsh Assembly (£72,057) and Members of the Irish Parliament (113,679 euros/£94,537).
The Bill, put forward by the Assembly Commission, was passed by an oral vote by MLAs on Monday, with the sole MLAs representing the TUV and People Before Profit both opposing the Bill.
TUV MLA Timothy Gaston claimed it is 'nothing more than a vehicle to enable MLAs to award themselves a substantial pay rise', and objected to former MLAs being entitled to sit on the new board.
People Before Profit MLA Gerry Carroll also criticised that former MLAs could sit on the board, and said that a pay rise for MLAs amid 'rising rates of poverty' would be 'completely tone deaf'.
However UUP MLA Andy Allen, who sits on the Assembly Commission, described a 'technical Bill' to deal with the process of how salaries and pensions are set.
Closing the debate Sinn Fein MLA Sinead Ennis slammed what she termed 'inaccuracies and misunderstandings' over the Bill.
She also warned that if the Bill did not pass the Assembly 'will have failed' to ensure legal clarity and leave no structure in place to determine the salaries and pensions of MLAs.
'In passing this Bill today, future discussions and decisions around the salaries and pensions of members will shift to the independent remuneration board,' she told MLAs.
'That board has independence in deciding what factors it wants to consider before determining its view on the appropriate level of salaries and pensions for members.
'That is the appropriate way of dealing with these matters.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
12 hours ago
- Scotsman
Help close the pay gap for disabled and ethnic staff
Employers back ethnicity and disability pay gap reporting, but more preparation is needed ahead of the entry into force of mandatory reporting requirements Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Pinsent Masons asked clients for their say on the introduction of reporting requirements to aid our response to the UK government's consultation on the Equality (Race and Disability) Bill, which will introduce mandatory ethnicity and disability pay gap reporting. While many employers across different business sectors voiced strong support for reporting, the findings reveal that meeting the mandatory requirements will take preparation. Our survey showed fewer than half currently calculate disability or ethnicity pay gaps, suggesting that despite positive sentiment, significant groundwork will be required before the new measures can be implemented effectively. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Perhaps to minimise such groundwork, some clients suggested aligning any new frameworks with the existing gender pay gap reporting model and the use of established legal definitions for ethnicity and disability. Experience gained from gender pay gap reporting will be valuable to employers when implementing disability and ethnicity pay gap reporting. The Employment Rights Bill will make gender pay gap actions plans mandatory, says Susannah Donaldson However, ethnicity and disability data also present unique challenges, including sensitivities around self-identification, data protection concerns, and the need for tailored strategies to address disparities. Just over half of the employers surveyed already produce action plans in relation to gender pay gaps, despite there currently being no legal requirement to do so. However, the Employment Rights Bill will make gender pay gap actions plans mandatory. In contrast, very few employers asked, currently produce action plans for ethnicity or disability gaps. Action plans should be purposeful and aim to deliver objective benefits by identifying specific actions required to close pay gaps. Linking reporting with follow-up action is essential to avoid stagnation and ensure year-on-year progress. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad One of the most significant barriers identified was the challenge of collecting accurate and comprehensive data. Only 28% of clients we asked reported that at least 80% of their workforce had disclosed disability status, while 43% said the same for ethnicity. Additionally, employees who meet the legal definition of disability under the Equality Act may not identify as disabled, particularly among neurodivergent individuals. Know the backgrounds and needs of staff, but be sensitive with personal information (Picture: Adobe) Another concern raised by employers was the frequency of data updates. If disability status is only recorded at the point of hiring, it may not reflect changes in an employee's health status over time. This could result in underreporting or outdated information being used in pay gap calculations. Collecting data for pay gap reporting involves data management and a cultural exercise. Employers need to build trust and communicate clearly with employees about how their sensitive personal data will be used. Better cultural outcomes, as well as better figures to publicly report, are likely to be achieved if the exercise is based on reliable data. Organisations that already collect ethnicity and disability data will be better positioned to comply with future requirements. Those that do not, should begin assessing how to introduce data collection processes and engage with their workforce to build trust and encourage disclosure. Although the new legal obligations are unlikely to come into force before 2027, employers should be encouraged to start preparations now.
Daily Record
18 hours ago
- Daily Record
Tory MSP charges taxpayer £14,400 a year for living in former colleague's Edinburgh flat
EXCLUSIVE: Douglas Lumsden is living in ex MSP Peter Chapman's property. A former Tory MSP has made over £40,000 from the Holyrood expenses system by renting his Edinburgh flat to a Conservative colleague. Peter Chapman is receiving £1,200 a month from the taxpayer so that serving Tory MSP Douglas Lumsden can live in his property. MSPs who live far from Edinburgh are able to rent accommodation in the Capital to help carry out their parliamentary duties. But the system has been tightened over the last twenty years to protect Holyrood 's reputation. MSPs cannot rent from a close relative or a fellow member of the Parliament, but there is no bar on former MSPs being landlords. According to the online expenses system, which is available online, Lumsden 's rent costs were £12,100 in 2021/22, £13,900 twelve months later and £14,400 in 2023/24. The 'payee' for the £40,400 of claims in this period is 'Peter and Edith Chapman'. Peter Chapman, who owns a flat around fifteen minutes from the parliament, receives the rent, not Lumsden. Chapman was a Tory MSP for the North East between 2016 and 2021 before he stood down. He is now a councillor in Aberdeenshire and declares rent from an Edinburgh flat on his register of interest. Lumsden, a former councillor, has been a Tory MSP on the North East list since 2021. Former Labour MSP Neil Findlay said of renting from ex MSPs: "This practice should be reviewed. The allowances that are paid to allow MSPs whose home is far from Holyrood to live in Edinburgh during the week are funded by taxpayers' money." Lumsden was criticised earlier this year after he tabled nearly 1,000 written questions to the parliament in a single month. The question blitz was estimated to have cost the taxpayer £100,000 and he was urged to pay back the money. Some of the questions were about flagpoles, bees and jars of honey in the Holyrood shop. He denied using AI for the bombardment. When he was an MSP, Chapman quit his front bench role after lobbying councillors over a planning application he had a financial interest in. He admitted at the time he had been 'foolish' but he was cleared of breaching Holyrood 's code of conduct. A Scottish Conservative spokesperson said: 'These claims were declared properly and within the rules.' A Scottish Parliament spokesperson said: 'The Scottish Parliament's rules on Edinburgh accommodation for MSPs are already robust and take account of an independent review to ensure public confidence. 'At the end of each five-year session, the SPCB conducts its own review of the Members' expenses scheme to ensure it remains fit for purpose. That review provides an opportunity to reflect on whether any further changes are appropriate.'
STV News
a day ago
- STV News
Aberdeen to make final decision on proposed 7% tourist tax
Councillors in Aberdeen are set to make a final decision over a proposed 7% tourist tax next week. It is hoped the introduction of a visitor levy would generate up to £7.5m per year, adding around £5 on top of the cost of an average hotel room in the city per night. In February, councillors agreed to press ahead with plans to introduce the levy and launch a public consultation on the scheme, giving residents and local businesses the chance to have their say on it. Now, those consultations have come back to the council for consideration, and the local authority's finance and resources committee is due to make a final decision on Wednesday, August 6. Councillors say that the additional income could help bring events like the World Rally Championship and Tall Ships Races back to Aberdeen. The cash could also be spent on improvements across the city, such as upgrades to the Winter Gardens and replacement Christmas lights. If the levy is approved, it is estimated that it could be in place by April 2027 at the earliest. 'I think this visitor levy, if we did choose to implement it, would offer a real opportunity in terms of boosting the Aberdeen and local economy,' said Alex McLellan, convener of the finance and resource committee at Aberdeen City Council. 'To contextualise, you're talking about the price of a coffee. You're talking about a few pounds on top of your cost per night, which could really boost the local economy in Aberdeen. 'The visitor levy offers a real opportunity for the council to generate additional revenue, which can be used to boost the visitor economy, bring people here, bring major events here, and really put Aberdeen on the map as a destination in Scotland.' The rate would apply to all overnight accommodation in the city, including hotels, hostels, guest houses, B&Bs and self-catering lets. Camping sites and caravan parks would also charge the fee. Exemptions would be made for homeless people, asylum seekers and refugees, and those who receive benefits, payments or allowances for disabilities. Those who are travelling to the city for medical appointments would also be excluded from paying the levy. Stephen Gow, general manager of the Chester Hotel in Aberdeen, said a visitor levy is 'not an unusual thing to have'. 'You go to most European cities and you'll find that there's a levy on the visitors coming in,' he said. 'We have to be careful that the percentage is not misinterpreted. The rates in Aberdeen are perhaps lower than they are in the Central Belt, who have suggested that they're going to have a lower percentage, but the actual amount of money paid will be higher.' The Visitor Levy (Scotland) Bill was passed in May last year, allowing councils across the country to charge a fee or tax on overnight stays. Glasgow's new tourist tax has already been given the go-ahead, with visitors to be charged on average £4.83 per night from January 25, 2027. Edinburgh councillors approved a similar 5% visitor levy in January, which will take effect from July 24, 2026. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
