
Paranormal Ireland: a rich country reliant on ghostly apparitions of magic money
Ireland
is not some haunted castle or spooky seance. It is the Government coffers. We have a fiscal policy and a parafiscal one – a ghostly exchequer parallel to the known reality of the Irish economy.
By the end of this year, the
State will have taken in roughly €186 billion
in corporation taxes over the last decade. In many ways, the story of contemporary Ireland is encapsulated in the astonishing growth in the share of overall tax revenue contributed by corporation tax. In 1984, it was just 4 per cent. By 2014, it had almost tripled to 11 per cent. It has by now almost tripled again to 29 per cent.
Most of this dizzying increase is what official bodies call 'excess'. 'In other words,' as the
Irish Fiscal Advisory Council
puts it, 'it cannot be explained by underlying domestic activity.' Or, in the
Central Bank
's formulation, it is 'disconnected from actual economic activity in Ireland'. It is paranormal and, I think, unprecedented. Has any government in the history of the world ever been so dependent on the excessive and the inexplicable? Has any state ever driven such a great distance on the fumes of airy superfluity?
To get a sense of the scale of this ectoplasmic largesse, we can ask: how much money would the State have taken in last year if the share of its revenues accounted for by corporation tax were the same as 2014? The answer would be €11.9 billion. And what did the State actually take in corporation tax in 2024? That answer is
€28 billion
.
READ MORE
So we're looking at €16 billion of last year's revenue that was accounted for simply by the magical growth in the proportional contribution of corporation tax paid by a tiny number of American multinationals. To put that in context, €16 billion is the
combined budget
of the departments of Education and Transport this year.
Little Ireland received more tax revenue from American corporations than any other country outside the US
At one level, of course, this windfall is not mysterious. The 'excess' of magic money is a byproduct of the machinations of around 10 gigantic US-based corporations. They have transferred their intangible assets – patents, trademarks, brands and software licences – from overly obvious offshore tax havens to the more respectable but still very generous environs of Ireland.
The Irishness of this intellectual property (IP) is a legal fiction. We might call it IPP: Intellectual Plastic Paddy. But IPP allows the corporations to massively inflate the profits they declare here and the State to claim 12.5 per cent (now rising to 15 per cent) of those profits.
It might be reassuring to imagine that all this is the result of a cunning plan of Irish governments. But it isn't. The State was red in tooth and claw in its fight to stop the modest reforms to global tax regimes that resulted in the decisions of the multinationals to onshore their IP out of the tax havens and into Ireland. It went along with those reforms grudgingly and with bad grace when it had no real choice. This is the irony: the State has been enriched against its will, dragged kicking and screaming into Aladdin's cave.
Nonetheless, in 2022-2023, the latest year for which we have figures from the US, little Ireland received more tax revenue from American corporations than any other country outside the US. We got twice as much as China, three times as much as Germany, as much as India and Canada put together.
It is this magic fountain that waters our parafiscal exchequer. The State essentially runs two budgets. One, based on actual economic activity in Ireland, is consistently in deficit. But the other, inflated by the IPP bonanza, is in flamboyantly extravagant surplus. The first is masked by the second. The paranormal occludes the normal.
So what? If we leave aside the morality – and by God do we ever leave aside the morality – it's free money. The luck of the Irish has turned from a sick joke into a daily reality. Why not just enjoy it?
The problem, though, is that paranormal activity is bewildering. It makes it hard to decide what is and is not real. And this is the paralysing condition that besets the State. It cannot make up its collective mind whether the 'excess' is a conjuring trick or hard fact. Is it just the way Ireland is and will be for the foreseeable future? Or is it a little Eden from which, any day now, we will be expelled and thenceforth have to earn our bread by the sweat of our brows?
Unearned wealth – and let's be clear that this is what most of this 'excess' corporation tax is – leads to laziness
These dual possibilities are the headlights in which the State is caught and frozen. It can neither believe its luck nor discount it. This is the underlying reason for the almost inexplicable inability of a very rich country to reach European standards of infrastructure and social services.
Because we don't think the bonanza is real and sustainable, we can't plan to spend it sustainably. Yet because we have this embarrassment of riches, we don't have to think about how we raise and spend money in the normal, tangible Irish economy. Hence, successive governments adamantly refuse to broaden the tax base – why bother taking the risk of upsetting any powerful lobby when you can just watch the billions roll into the parafiscal treasury?
Why, indeed, make any real choices at all? Unearned wealth – and let's be clear that this is what most of this 'excess' corporation tax is – leads to laziness. The hard work of reform, of innovation, of articulating priorities and then delivering them, can be shirked.
The State needs to pick a side: either decide that the crock of gold will keep renewing itself and invest accordingly, or conclude that leprechaun economics has had its day. Either trust in the paranormal or make the normal fit for purpose.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Cash not the issue for Government but how to spend it wisely, Ifac boss briefed ahead of committee
The Apple tax windfall, the budgetary impact of migration and value for money in the health service were likely questions flagged to Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (Ifac) chairman Seamus Coffey in briefings by his officials in advance of an Oireachtas appearance. Two Q&A documents were prepared for Mr Coffey in advance of the meeting of the committee on budgetary oversight in early July – one highlighting issues likely to be 'pertinent now' while the other looked at questions that arose 'consistently. 'On what to do with the €13.8 billion Apple tax windfall, a suggested answer for Mr Coffey said to remember the Government 'is not stuck for cash.' It said: '[The State] is stuck for its capacity to spend it on things we all want. There are three broad options – spend it, save it, [or] cut debt.' READ MORE The Q&A said spending it on housing was easier said than done as the biggest issues were 'construction sector capacity and planning bottlenecks' not the availability of cash. If asked about the budgetary implications of migration, the briefing noted there had been 'large increases' in numbers coming to Ireland in recent years. 'This has meant the labour force and employment has been able to grow as rapidly as it has in recent years,' it said, before noting that around €2.1 billion 'has been set aside for humanitarian assistance to refugees this year (€800 million of this is for Ukrainian refugees). 'In terms of future costs, these are uncertain,' the briefing note added. The Q&A said that getting migrants integrated into employment and their own homes would reduce costs for the Government. 'An increased supply of housing would mean some of the more expensive means of accommodation [hotels] may be replaced,' it said. On cost-of-living supports, which have been a big feature of recent budgets, the Ifac briefings said these were now 'likely permanent'. 'There is probably less of a case for once-off measures this winter,' the briefing document said. 'Permanent increases in social welfare could be targeted at specific groups. However, the measures have seldom been targeted.' Mr Coffey was also briefed on employment in construction and whether we needed more people working in that sector. 'Just over 6 per cent of all employment is in the construction sector,' his Q&A document noted, adding that between 2005 and 2007, this had reached over 10 per cent. 'This may have been unsustainable, however,' the briefing added, advising Mr Coffey to 'mention productivity, can we get more output from the same workforce?'. A Q&A on broader questions highlighted the challenges in creating a wealth tax that would be fair, not become an administrative burden, and collect enough money to make it worthwhile. On how to fix repeated overruns in health spending, the briefing said that 'poor budgeting' was a problem but that there was also evidence of 'reduced productivity'. It also explained how Ireland's failure to meet its climate targets carried a very real 'fiscal risk'. The Q&A said the State had already forgone €500 million from carbon credits it was entitled to sell and that costs of noncompliance were in the range of €8 billion and €26 billion. 'While several [EU] member states are projected to fall short, the potential costs are significantly higher for Ireland relative to the size of its economy,' the briefing noted. Asked about the records, Ifac said they had no further comment to make.


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Mairead McGuinness to drop out of presidential race
Former European Commissioner and MEP Mairead McGuinness is dropping out of the presidential election race for health reasons. In a statement she said: 'I have made the very difficult decision to withdraw my name as the Fine Gael nominee for the Presidential election. 'This decision is not lightly taken and follows a stay in hospital last week. 'My priority now is my health. Given that the election is in a short couple of months, I do not believe that I have the strength to give the campaign my all.' READ MORE 'I am taking this decision on medical advice and while it is extremely difficult, it is the right decision for me and my family.' Ms McGuinness was one of just two official candidates in the race and she led recent opinion polls . Her surprise departure from the race throws the election wide open. The other candidate who has enough confirmed support to secure a place on the ballot paper is Independent TD Catherine Connolly who has the backing of The Social Democrats, Labour and People Before Profit. Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin are still deliberating on their approach to the presidential election and whether or not they will run candidates. In recent days businessman Gareth Sheridan has announced his intention to run saying he will seek nominations from local authorities . People who wish to enter the race must have nominations from 20 Oireachtas members or four county or city councils. In her statement Ms McGuinness said: 'I appreciate that this will come as a shock and disappointment to party members and colleagues in Fine Gael, but our political family is strong. 'I have spoken with the Tánaiste and Party leader, Simon Harris, and thank him for his support and understanding. 'I also want to thank all of those people who have done so much to support me, now and in the past. 'My focus now is my health and my family, and I ask for privacy in the time ahead.' Mr Harris said: 'Mairead McGuinness has made an incredible contribution to public life in Ireland and in Europe. 'It was our clear view in Fine Gael and the view of many people across Ireland that Mairead would make an excellent President of Ireland. 'Mairead's health will not now allow this. 'This has come as an awful shock to us all. Mairead is a valued member of our Fine Gael family. It is absolutely essential that she now prioritises her health and I know I speak for everyone when I wish her all the very best on that journey. 'In the coming days, Fine Gael, like others, will consider further the presidential election. Our Executive Council will convene to do this. 'But that's for the time ahead, not for today. Today I want to pay tribute to Mairead. I want to thank her for all she has done. I want to wish her and Tom and their family all the best at this time and she knows we are all sending her our very best.'


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Johnny Ronan company loses planning appeal for ‘overly dominant' office scheme on Dublin's North Quay
Planning authorities have rejected an appeal by property developer Johnny Ronan for a big development on Dublin's North Wall quay that would include a 17-storey building. An Coimisiún Pleanála (ACP) found the building was 'overly dominant and isolated'. that would be at odds with the surrounding context' noting it would 'seriously injure' the visual amenity of the area. ACP said the development would be 'overbearing' on nearby residential properties and would lead to an 'unacceptable and unjustified' loss of sunlight and overshadowing of amenity spaces. READ MORE It further noted that the demolition of the existing buildings on the site would 'be both premature and unjustified' and would set an 'unwelcome precedent' for demolition on similar sites in the area. [ Johnny Ronan company and Fortress confirm sale of Spencer Place residential development to Ardstone for €177m Opens in new window ] The appeal was submitted after Dublin City Council (DCC) refused to grant permission to NWQ Devco Limited, a company that is part of Mr Ronan's Ronan Group Real Estate (RGRE), which had sought a 10-year planning permission for a four building development. Ranging from nine to 17 storeys, the development was set to be located on the site of global banking firm Citigroup's European headquarters on North Wall Quay on the banks of the river Liffey. The 73.4 metre tall development was set to contain more than 87,200 sqm of floor space, of which some 69,200 sqm would be office space, alongside parking, arts and cultural areas, and a cafe. In the appeal, Mr Ronan's firm requested an oral hearing and argued that the development would aide in the consolidation of development and promotion of building upwards in line with national planning guidelines and would be a 'key economic driver'. It said an interactive gallery housed on the 16th floor of the development 'is believed to become one of the city's most important visitor centre and popular tourist destination'. Dublin City Council (DCC) had refused permission for the 73.4 metre tall redevelopment in April 2024, giving three reasons. It said the 'height and excessive bulk and scale' of the development would impact on a nearby existing residential development and the surrounding area and that the development would be injurious to the 'key views and vistas' along the river. The council further stated that granting the demolition of the existing building, instead of retrofitting, would 'set an undesirable precedent'. Mr Ronan's firm appealed the decision to ACP, with the application being subject to a third party appeal seeking to uphold the council decision. The Clarion Quay Management Company called for ACP to reject the appeal after the publication of an Irish Times article in which the developer indicated it's theintention to appeal the decision. The group, which self-described as an 'owners volunteer management company' for an adjacent mixed-use residential and commercial property, cited a series of concerns including of solar glare into residential properties, overlooking issues, and loss of sunlight.