ICHRA adoption grows as Congress mulls codifying the coverage into law
A nascent form of health coverage that creates an alternative gateway for employers to offer Affordable Care Act coverage to their workers is seeing rising uptake, especially among midsize to large employers.
Adoption of individual coverage health reimbursement arrangements, or ICHRA plans, rose 34% from 2024 to 2025 among employers with 50 or more full-time employees, according to a new report from trade association the HRA Council.
Still, the vast majority of ICHRA users remain companies with fewer than 20 employees, most of which are providing health coverage for the first time through the arrangements, the HRA Council said.
ICHRA allows employees to shop and choose between plans on the ACA exchanges and have some or all of the cost offset by their employer through a stipend. Unlike in traditional group health plans, businesses can set a fixed amount to help their workers cover healthcare costs, defraying some financial risk from offering insurance.
ICHRAs were first available as a coverage option in 2020, and have grown rapidly since, according to research. However, the lack of industry-wide data collection makes it difficult to get a clear picture of adoption nationwide — market experts estimate about 500,000 to one million Americans are covered in ICHRA arrangements.
About 450,000 U.S. employees and their dependents were offered ICHRA or a qualified small employer HRA for the 2025 plan year, according to the new report. However, that estimate should be taken as a floor for the larger overall market, which could encompass one million people or more, the HRA Council said.
Proponents of ICHRAs argue they create an avenue for employers to offer benefits that they may not be able to otherwise afford.
The share of small businesses offering health insurance has dropped significantly over the past two decades, from upwards of 47% in 2000 to about 30% in 2023, according to an analysis by health software company TakeCommand. That decline has coincided with an increase in the cost of providing employer-sponsored insurance.
As for employees, ICHRAs give them freedom to choose from a variety of plans based on their needs, instead of from a smaller range of choices set up by their employer. People who enroll in ACA plans via ICHRA tend to be younger as well, a population that's usually healthier — so, their enrollment helps stabilize the risk pools and keep marketplace plans affordable, ICHRA advocates say.
The coverage arrangements were expanded by President Donald Trump during his first term in rulemaking in 2019, as the president promoted policy alternatives to traditional ACA coverage.
However, unlike many of the Trump administration's healthcare priorities, ICHRAs enjoy relatively bipartisan support. Democrats generally approve of ICHRAs because they add new members to the ACA marketplaces, while Republicans support the expanded choices they provide employees.
Though ICHRAs are backed by regulation, the plans have never been backed by law. However, that could soon change.
Republicans in Congress are currently considering codifying ICHRAs as 'Custom Health Option and Individual Care Expense' or 'CHOICE' plans. Massive reconciliation legislation passed by the House in June would also provide small employers offering ICHRAs with a tax credit.
However, the Senate Finance Committee stripped the ICHRA provisions from the upper house's version of the bill released on Monday.
To date, Indiana is the only state that's established a tax credit for ICHRA adoption, though a handful of others — including Ohio, Texas and Georgia — are considering the legislation that would create incentives for small employers to offer the arrangements, according to the HRA Council.
The legislative uncertainty hasn't stopped private equity, venture capital and some major insurance companies from investing heavily into ICHRAs, betting that the market for the products will continue to grow.
Investors have funneled millions of dollars into companies providing ICHRA administration and health benefits technology. Funding rounds this year alone include upwards of $100 million for Remodel Health, $40 million for Thatch and $20 million for Venteur, for example.
Meanwhile Centene, the largest marketplace carrier in the U.S., is embarking on a full-court press to introduce more employees to its ICHRA plans. The insurer recently created a division wholly dedicated to promoting ICHRA and launched the arrangements in six states during open enrollment for 2025.
'Large-scale ICHRA adoption will be a journey of several years ... but considering the small group health insurance market covers 62 million Americans and the full commercial group market covers 170 million, we see a healthy addressable market over the long term,' Centene CEO Sarah London said during the payer's investor day in December.
'Aggressively pursuing this line of business is an easy choice,' London added.
Similarly, Oscar Health has worked to expand its ICHRA membership, viewing it as a valuable alternative for smaller businesses to provide insurance as medical costs continue to rise, CEO Mark Bertolini said during an Axios event in Washington, D.C. in May.
Recommended Reading
Centene appoints first head of ICHRA products
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Avel eCare Hosts National Emergency Airway Course to Sharpen Life-Saving Intubation Skills
90+ medical professionals gather in Sioux Falls for hands-on training, real-time telemedicine support, and continuing education through AVELearn SIOUX FALLS, SD / / August 6, 2025 / Over 90 medical professionals from across the country gathered in Sioux Falls for the 2025 Avel eCare Emergency Airway Training Program, powered by The Difficult Airway Course™. This immersive, two-day program combined classroom instruction with high-impact, hands-on practice to help clinicians build confidence and precision in one of the most critical emergency procedures-intubation. A standout feature of the course was the use of over 100 porcine tracheas, allowing participants to practice surgical and video-guided airway techniques on a wide variety of anatomies. These real tracheas replicate the diverse challenges clinicians face in real-world airway emergencies, helping providers build muscle memory and quick-response capability. "Every airway is different, and every second matters," said Dr. Kelly Rhone, Chief Medical Officer at Avel eCare. "This course gives physicians the repetition and exposure they need to act decisively and safely when it counts." The training also highlighted Avel's real-time telemedicine support, including the use of video laryngoscopes-specialized tools with mounted cameras. These allow remote Avel physicians to see exactly what on-site providers see during a live intubation and verbally guide them step-by-step. "It's not just about teaching intubation," added Dr. Rhone. "It's about being there-virtually-during the most critical seconds, helping physicians feel confident, supported, and prepared." For some, the impact of the course has already been felt in the field. "I had to perform a surgical cricothyrotomy for the first time in the ER. I definitely would not have felt comfortable even attempting it before I had taken this course," said Bryon Bellinger, ARNP, of Guttenberg Municipal Hospital. "I was also fortunate to have an Avel physician on camera helping me with it as well. I recommend [the course] to everyone." Course highlights included: Pediatric Airway Case Discussions Surgical Airway Techniques Bag-Valve Mask and Laryngoscopy Workshops Code Airway Simulations Video Laryngoscopy Skill Stations But training doesn't stop at the end of the workshop. Avel eCare is committed to continuing education through its AVELearn platform, which provides ongoing access to clinical webinars, simulated learning, and accredited courses. "Beyond airway training, Avel eCare's AVELearn platform provides a wide range of education opportunities tailored to the unique needs of our partners. Whether it's accessing credit hours online, participating in live webinars, or engaging in simulated education, Avel eCare ensures that continuing education is accessible, practical, and integrated into our partnership" said Dr. Luke Van Oeveren, Avel eEmergency Physician. For Avel, this event reflects a broader mission: to empower clinicians with the tools, training, and telemedicine technology they need-whether they're in a metro trauma center or a rural ER. About Avel eCareAvel eCare is one of the nation's leading telemedicine providers, delivering 24/7 virtual clinical support across emergency care, ICU, behavioral health, pharmacy, hospitalist, and specialty services. Through innovative programs like AVELearn, Avel supports continuous education and skill development for healthcare teams, helping them deliver consistent, high-quality care-anytime, anywhere. Learn more at Media Contact:Jessica GaikowskiAvel eCaremedia@ SOURCE: Avel eCare View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The best states to have a baby in 2025 (and the 10 that need to do better)
If you're expecting a baby, where you live can make a big difference in everything from how much you'll pay for delivery to the quality of care your newborn receives. According to WalletHub's just-released 2025 Best & Worst States to Have a Baby report, the average cost of a conventional birth is more than $2,600 for mothers with insurance and nearly $15,000 for those without. For many parents, the financial and logistical realities of birth are prompting a bigger question: What does 'baby-friendly' actually look like when you're the one giving birth? WalletHub analyzed all 50 states and the District of Columbia across 31 factors, including hospital delivery costs, infant care expenses, healthcare access, and the number of pediatricians per capita. The results highlight how different the experience of welcoming a child can be depending on your zip code. The 10 best states to have a baby in 2025 Massachusetts North Dakota Minnesota New Hampshire Maine Rhode Island Vermont Washington Iowa District of Columbia Why Massachusetts leads the list Massachusetts has the third-lowest infant mortality rate, the eighth-lowest maternal mortality rate, and strong parental leave policies. It also ranks high in childhood vaccination rates and food security. For new parents, that translates to better infrastructure, more accessible care, and policy-level support during one of life's most demanding transitions. Related: Where to give birth: Here are your labor and delivery options The 10 hardest states to give birth in While some states are building strong foundations for new parents, others leave families facing significant hurdles from the very start. According to WalletHub's analysis, these are the 10 lowest-ranked states when it comes to birth-related cost, healthcare access, and family support: 42. West Virginia 43. Oklahoma 44. Florida 45. Arkansas 46. New Mexico 47. Georgia 48. South Carolina 49. Nevada 50. Alabama 51. Mississippi Parents in these states often face higher rates of low birth weight, fewer OB-GYNs per capita, and little to no paid leave, all of which can increase stress during pregnancy and postpartum. Why Mississippi leads the list In Mississippi, for example, families navigate some of the highest risks and fewest resources in the country. Consistently limited access to care and support leaves many new parents without the tools they need to feel safe and prepared. Your state can shape your experience—long before and long after delivery The report revealed dramatic differences across the country: South Dakota has the lowest average annual cost for early child care—3.5 times lower than in D.C., which has the highest. That kind of gap can determine whether a parent returns to work out of choice or financial necessity, and whether care is chosen based on quality or affordability. District of Columbia has the most midwives and OB-GYNs per capita. More access means less time on waitlists, more flexibility in choosing providers, and a higher chance of being seen when it matters most. Massachusetts leads the nation in parental leave policies. These gaps reflect what many parents already know firsthand: the support you need to raise a child depends heavily on where you live. Related: The United States is the most expensive country to give birth in What parents can do—no matter where they live If you're in a state that ranks lower on WalletHub's list, it doesn't mean you're out of options. Experts recommend: Tapping into community resources: Local nonprofits and parent networks can help bridge the gap in childcare and healthcare access. Advocating for policy change: From zoning laws to parental leave policies, many of the solutions start at the local level. Leaning on support systems: Building your own 'village,' whether through friends, family, or community groups, is critical for both parents and babies. Because whether you live in Massachusetts or Mississippi, one thing is clear: parents shouldn't have to navigate this alone. Solve the daily Crossword
CNN
22 minutes ago
- CNN
3 myths about metabolism could be holding you back
EDITOR'S NOTE: The podcast Chasing Life With Dr. Sanjay Gupta explores the medical science behind some of life's mysteries big and small. You can listen to episodes here. (CNN)— Think speeding up your metabolism is key to losing weight? Metabolism has grown into one of the biggest buzzwords in the wellness industry — a tricky code that, if deciphered, is believed to unlock the secrets of weight loss and overall health. Despite the term's ubiquity, one scientist says many people don't understand much of how this basic bodily process works. 'They think it has something to do with how much food we can eat without gaining weight or something like that,' Dr. Kevin Hall told CNN Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta recently on his podcast, Chasing Life. Hall wants to elevate metabolism for different reasons. 'Metabolism is just this incredible biochemical process that basically turns the food that we eat and the oxygen that we breathe into essentially … everything we are and everything we do,' he said. A leading nutrition and metabolism scientist, Hall is well-known for his research on contestants from the reality show 'The Biggest Loser' that helped explain what set participants who kept the weight off apart from those who gained it back. He spent more than two decades at the National Institutes of Health. His later work on ultraprocessed foods investigated its link to obesity, including one study that demonstrated it actively caused participants to overeat. Hall announced his early retirement and exit from NIH in April, citing censorship of how his research findings were communicated. He's now coauthor of the new book 'Food Intelligence: The Science of How Food Both Nourishes and Harms Us' alongside journalist Julia Belluz. Metabolism and weight loss enter conversations arm in arm, but this, according to Hall, can be reductive. 'I just find it incredibly frustrating sometimes that this idea of metabolism, this really beautiful physiological process that is so fundamental to life, is kind of talked about as, 'Oh well, if you take this supplement, you can boost your metabolism and lose weight,'' he explained to Gupta. You can listen to the full episode here. Is a faster or higher metabolism really the highway to weight loss? Hall is here to set the record straight, highlighting three misconceptions about metabolism that show there is more to it than meets the eye. One common belief is that a slower metabolism results in a higher body weight. But mostly, Hall said, the opposite is true. 'Generally, larger people have faster metabolisms than smaller people,' he told Gupta. Hall attributed the pervasiveness of this myth to the way researchers designed early metabolism studies. Scientists initially tried to match up participants' caloric intake to their weight, but they didn't account for the fact that these calorie counts were self-reported. It turned out that those with obesity often underreported the number of calories they ate to a larger degree than their leaner counterparts. This, Hall said, 'led people to a conclusion that, well, if they're eating less calories and they're maintaining their weight, then they must be burning less calories. And maybe the reason why they have obesity is because they have slow metabolisms.' Modern technology now allows researchers to rely on data, not participants' own reports. 'When we actually directly measure people's metabolisms, people with obesity have higher metabolic rates on average than people who are lean,' Hall noted. But the myth that we should be boosting metabolism to treat obesity has stubbornly persisted — and has at times led to deadly consequences. When Stanford University researchers discovered that the chemical compound 2,4-dinitrophenol, or DNP, increased metabolism levels in the 1930s, they enthusiastically promoted it as a safe and effective tool for treating obesity. While DNP did boost metabolism, it also led to side effects that included blindness and death, causing federal drug regulators to quickly withdraw it from the market. 'Maybe,' Hall suggested, 'it shouldn't be too much of a surprise later to realize that with something so fundamentally important to life as metabolism, you can't just turn it up and turn it down with a pharmaceutical drug and not expect some pretty severe side effects, including death.' Like weight, age might not affect metabolism as much as you may assume. 'It turns out that until you get to very advanced ages, we're talking 70s and 80s, it looks like our metabolic rate is roughly constant,' Hall said. There are, of course, changes in the aging body that can impact metabolic rates. People 'past the age of 30 or so,' Hall said, are 'tending to lose muscle mass or tending to lose lean mass, and they're tending to gain fat mass. And that alone is anticipated to result in a lower metabolism.' That's because lean muscle burns more calories than fat. But it's these age-related changes — that are not inevitable — and not age itself, that influence one's metabolism. 'Once you get rid of that effect … it doesn't seem like there's a fundamental aging effect to slow metabolism as, as we get older,' Hall concluded. A couple ways to combat the loss of lean muscle mass as you age is by engaging in twice-a-week strength training and getting enough protein in your diet (but no need to go overboard). Another pillar of metabolism mythology is the idea that a slow metabolism is the enemy of continued weight loss. Interventions such as dieting are believed to slow metabolism to the point that you can't lose any additional weight. But keeping your metabolism from slowing down isn't the key to sustained weight loss, Hall said. In fact, it's just the opposite. 'The people who are most successful at losing weight and keeping it off are the ones who sport the slowest metabolisms or the greatest reductions in metabolism,' he said. 'It's kind of like stretching a spring, right?' The more intensely someone diets or exercises, the more weight they'll lose and the more their metabolism will slow down, he explained in his book. Hall's research showed that a slower metabolism 'didn't seem to determine anyone's ability to lose weight or keep it off in the short or long run.' By uncoupling metabolism from the weight loss conversation, Hall said he hopes everyone can appreciate the phenomenon for what it really is. Misinformation about metabolism 'has really distracted people, I think, from the real beauty of what this is,' he told Gupta. 'It's harnessing the continuous flow of matter and energy in our food and in our breath and powering every cell in our body, as well as the bodies and cells of practically every organism that we have ever encountered,' Hall said. 'It's a fundamental component of life, and it's just incredibly fascinating.' We hope these three insights help you understand your metabolism better. Listen to the full episode here. And join us next week for a new episode of Chasing Life.
